Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Use of 2.0-mm endotracheal tubes for periviable infants

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Rysavy MA, Mehler K, Oberthür A, Ågren J, Kusuda S, McNamara PJ, et al. An immature science: intensive care for infants born at ≤23 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr. 2021;233:16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arbour K, Lindsay E, Laventhal N, Myers P, Andrews B, Klar A, et al. Shifting provider attitudes and institutional resources surrounding resuscitation at the limit of gestational viability. Am J Perinatol. 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33111279/.

  3. Berger JN, Elgin TG, Dagle JM, Klein JM, Colaizy TT. Survival and short-term respiratory outcomes of <750 g infants initially intubated with 2.0 mm vs. 2.5 mm endotracheal tubes. J Perinatol. 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34675371/.

  4. Wallström L, Sjöberg A, Sindelar R. Early volume targeted ventilation in preterm infants born at 22–25 weeks of gestational age. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021;56:1000–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehler K, Oberthuer A, Keller T, Becker I, Valter M, Roth B, et al. Survival among infants born at 22 or 23 weeks’ gestation following active prenatal and postnatal care. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:671–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhatt D, Lee H, Ramanathan R. Need for 2.0 mm endotrachael tube for extremely low birth weight infants and need for special suction catheters and stylet [abstract]. CAN: Cool Topics in Neonatology. Coronado, CA. March 2017. Available from: https://www.choc.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Bhatt2-Needfor2.0.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2021.

  7. Ginsberg HG, Goldsmith JP. Controversies in neonatal resuscitation. Clin Perinatol. 1998;25:1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kattwinkel J, Niermeyer S, Nadkarny V, Tibbals J, Phillips B, Zideman D, et al. ILCOR Advisory Statement: resuscitation of the newly born infant. An advisory statement from the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation. 1999;99:1927–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiner GM, Zaichkin J, editors. Textbook of neonatal resuscitation. 8th ed. American Academy of Pediatrics and American Heart Association; 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MR drafted the initial manuscript and subsequent revisions. Data were collected by members of the Tiny Baby Collaborative, including TN, KM, and JA. PM and CB reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Rysavy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rysavy, M., Nakamura, T., Mehler, K. et al. Use of 2.0-mm endotracheal tubes for periviable infants. J Perinatol 42, 1275–1276 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01323-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01323-7

Search

Quick links