Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Neonatology’s race to the bottom: RVUs, cFTEs, and physician time

Abstract

The clinical productivity of neonatology divisions is often defined as relative value units (RVUs) produced per clinical full-time equivalent physicians (cFTEs). Based on the realities of neonatology clinical billing, commonly daily bundled charges, and one cFTE defined as a fixed number of clinical hours per year, the RVU:cFTE ratio will inevitably be proportional to the number of NICU patients per physician clinical hour. As a result, increasing productivity defined as the RVU:cFTE ratio, a commonly incentivized goal in neonatology, requires decreasing physician time per patient. As neonatology groups seek to surpass RVU:cFTE benchmarks based upon productivity of peer institutions, they end up in a “race to the bottom,” each striving to spend less time per patient than their peers. This definition of physician productivity fails to consider the importance of time itself as an essential “product” provided by physicians, and can undermine the clinical mission and quality of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Funding

There was no funding aside from salary as Neonatology Division Chief and Director of the Program for Biomedical Ethics at Yale School of Medicine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All contributions to this manuscript were from the single author MRM.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Mercurio.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mercurio, M.R. Neonatology’s race to the bottom: RVUs, cFTEs, and physician time. J Perinatol 41, 2561–2563 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01192-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01192-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links