Abstract
The clinical productivity of neonatology divisions is often defined as relative value units (RVUs) produced per clinical full-time equivalent physicians (cFTEs). Based on the realities of neonatology clinical billing, commonly daily bundled charges, and one cFTE defined as a fixed number of clinical hours per year, the RVU:cFTE ratio will inevitably be proportional to the number of NICU patients per physician clinical hour. As a result, increasing productivity defined as the RVU:cFTE ratio, a commonly incentivized goal in neonatology, requires decreasing physician time per patient. As neonatology groups seek to surpass RVU:cFTE benchmarks based upon productivity of peer institutions, they end up in a “race to the bottom,” each striving to spend less time per patient than their peers. This definition of physician productivity fails to consider the importance of time itself as an essential “product” provided by physicians, and can undermine the clinical mission and quality of care.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Funding
There was no funding aside from salary as Neonatology Division Chief and Director of the Program for Biomedical Ethics at Yale School of Medicine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All contributions to this manuscript were from the single author MRM.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mercurio, M.R. Neonatology’s race to the bottom: RVUs, cFTEs, and physician time. J Perinatol 41, 2561–2563 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01192-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01192-6
This article is cited by
-
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine recommendations on Medicaid parity and future of pediatric subspecialty workforce
Journal of Perinatology (2024)
-
Fatigue and fallibility: the perils of prolonged shifts for neonatologists
Journal of Perinatology (2023)
-
Fundamentals in neonatologist staffing: transparency, autonomy, and partnership
Journal of Perinatology (2023)
-
“On duty, not on call: time to rethink Neonatal Intensive Care Unit attending hours”
Journal of Perinatology (2023)
-
Academic neonatologist—a species at the brink of extinction?
Journal of Perinatology (2023)