Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Journal Club
  • Published:

Does prenatal surgical repair of myelomeningoceles lead to better school-age outcomes?

A Correction to this article was published on 20 May 2021

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history

References

  1. Moldenhauer JS, Adzick NS. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: After the management of myelomeningocele study (MOMS). Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22:360–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Danzer E, Flake AW. In utero repair of myelomeningocele: rationale, initial clinical experience and a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial. Neuroembryology Aging. 2006;4:165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW, Burrows PK, Johnson MP, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 201; 364: 993–1004.

  4. Tulipan N, Wellons JC, Thom EA, Gupta N, Sutton LN, Burrows PK, et al. Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele and the need for cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;16:613–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farmer DL, Thom EA, Brock JW, Burrows PK, Johnson MP, Howell LJ, et al. The management of myelomeningocele study: full cohort 30-month pediatric outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:256.e1-e13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Houtrow AJ, Thom EA, Fletcher JM, Burrows PK, Adzick NS, Thomas NH, et al. Prenatal repair of myelomeningocele and school-age functional outcomes. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20191544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis M, Barnes MA. The cognitive phenotype of spina bifida meningomyelocele. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010;16:31–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang C, Scharfstein DO, Colantuoni E, Girard TD, Yan Y. Inference in randomized trials with death and missingness. Biometrics. 2017;73:431–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lachin JM. Worst-rank score analysis with informatively missing observations in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1999;20:408–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thabane L, Mbuagbaw L, Zhang S, Samaan Z, Marcucci M, Ye C, et al. A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Journal club is a collaboration between the American Academy of Pediatrics- Section of Neonatal Perinatal medicine and the International Society of Evidence- based neonatology (EBNEO.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faith Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: the citation to the original article was omitted. The citation is now.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, F., Bateman, D.A. & Garey, D.M. Does prenatal surgical repair of myelomeningoceles lead to better school-age outcomes?. J Perinatol 41, 2104–2107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00903-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00903-9

Search

Quick links