Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

A holistic approach to infant growth assessment considers clinical, social and genetic factors rather than an assessment of weight at a set timepoint

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Directed acyclic graph of relationship between factors affecting growth and development.

References

  1. Chou F, Paney V, Yeh H. Postnatal growth in extremely low birth weight newborns: nature or nurture? J Perinatol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0737-7.

  2. Fenton TR, Cormack B, Goldberg D, Nasser R, Alshaikh B, Eliasziw M, et al. “Extrauterine growth restriction” and “postnatal growth failure” are misnomers for preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2020;40:704–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Horbar JD, Edwards EM, Greenberg LT, Profit J, Draper D, Helkey D, et al. Racial Segregation and Inequality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:455–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bushnik T, Yang S, Kaufman JS, Kramer MS, Wilkins R. Socioeconomic disparities in small-for-gestational-age birth and preterm birth. Heal Rep. 2017;28:3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rochow N, AlSamnan M, So HY, Olbertz D, Pelc A, Däbritz J, et al. Maternal body height is a stronger predictor of birth weight than ethnicity: analysis of birth weight percentile charts. J Perinat Med. 2018;47:22–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cormack BE, Jiang Y, Harding JE, Crowther CA, Bloomfield FH. Relationships between neonatal nutrition and growth to 36 weeks’ corrected age in ELBW babies–secondary cohort analysis from the provide trial. Nutrients. 2020;12:760.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakano Y, Hirabayashi C, Murase M, Mizuno K, Itabashi K. Malnutrition caused by unexpectedly low protein concentration in breast milk. Pediatr Int. 2017;59:1100–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fenton TR, Anderson D, Groh-Wargo S, Hoyos A, Ehrenkranz RA, Senterre T. An attempt to standardize the calculation of growth velocity of preterm infants-evaluation of practical bedside methods. J Pediatr. 2018;196:77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanis R. Fenton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fenton, T.R., Goldberg, D., Alshaikh, B. et al. A holistic approach to infant growth assessment considers clinical, social and genetic factors rather than an assessment of weight at a set timepoint. J Perinatol 41, 650–651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00785-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00785-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links