Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Birth and early developmental screening outcomes associated with cannabis exposure during pregnancy

Abstract

Objective

To compare birth and early developmental screening outcomes for infants with and without in utero cannabis exposures.

Study design

Observational cohort of women receiving prenatal care within a large health system, live birth between October 1, 2015 and December 1, 2017, and at least one infant visit. Cannabis exposure was through routine urine toxicology screen. Preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, birth defects, and early developmental screening outcomes were assessed from birth and electronic health record data.

Results

Of 3435 women, 283 (8.2%) had a positive urine toxicology screen. In utero cannabis exposure was associated with SGA birth, adjusted rate ratio (aRR) 1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22–2.34). Abnormal 12-month developmental screens occurred in 9.1% of infants with in utero cannabis exposure vs. 3.6% of those with negative maternal screens, aRR 1.90 (95% CI: 0.92–3.91). Additional birth outcomes were not associated with in utero cannabis exposure.

Conclusions

Exposure to cannabis during pregnancy may adversely impact fetal growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Identification of cohort, inclusions, and exclusions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Englund J, Zerr D, Pergam S, Kuypers J, Yager J et al. Oseltamivir-resistant novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in two immunosuppressed patients—Seattle, Washington, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:893–6.

  2. Bilefsky D. Legalizing recreational marijuana, Canada begins a national experiment. New York: New York Times; 2018.

  3. Mark K, Terplan M. Cannabis and pregnancy: maternal child health implications during a period of drug policy liberalization. Prev Med. 2017;104:46–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saint Louis C. Pregnant women turn to marijuana, perhaps harming infants. New York: New York Times; 2017.

  5. Mark K, Gryczynski J, Axenfeld E, Schwartz RP, Terplan M. Pregnant women's current and intended cannabis use in relation to their views toward legalization and knowledge of potential harm. J Addict Med. 2017;11:211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Young-Wolff KC, Sarovar V, Tucker LY, Avalos LA, Conway A, Armstrong MA, et al. Association of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy with prenatal marijuana use. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:1423–4.

  7. Dickson B, Mansfield C, Guiahi M, Allshouse AA, Borgelt LM, Sheeder J, et al. Recommendations from cannabis dispensaries about first-trimester cannabis use. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:1031–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agrawal A, Rogers CE, Lessov-Schlaggar CN, Carter EB, Lenze SN, Grucza RA. Alcohol, cigarette, and cannabis use between 2002 and 2016 in pregnant women from a nationally representative sample. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;173:95–6.

  9. Brown QL, Sarvet AL, Shmulewitz D, Martins SS, Wall MM, Hasin DS. Trends in marijuana use among pregnant and nonpregnant reproductive-aged women, 2002–2014. JAMA. 2017;317:207–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shannon S, Louie J, Siniscalchi A, Rico E, Richter D et al. Surveillance for pediatric deaths associated with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection—United States, April–August 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:941–7.

  11. Ross EJ, Graham DL, Money KM, Stanwood GD. Developmental consequences of fetal exposure to drugs: what we know and what we still must learn. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:61–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grant KS, Petroff R, Isoherranen N, Stella N, Burbacher TM. Cannabis use during pregnancy: pharmacokinetics and effects on child development. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;182:133–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Conner SN, Bedell V, Lipsey K, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG. Maternal marijuana use and adverse neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:713–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ko JY, Tong VT, Bombard JM, Hayes DK, Davy J, Perham-Hester KA. Marijuana use during and after pregnancy and association of prenatal use on birth outcomes: a population-based study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;187:72–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bailey BA, Byrom AR. Factors predicting birth weight in a low-risk sample: the role of modifiable pregnancy health behaviors. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11:173–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chasnoff IJ. Medical marijuana laws and pregnancy: implications for public health policy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Volkow ND, Compton WM, Wargo EM. The risks of marijuana use during pregnancy. JAMA. 2017;317:129–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goler N, Conway A, Young-Wolff KC. Data are needed on the potential adverse effects of marijuana use in pregnancy. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:492–3.

  19. Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman MW. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Lipkind HS, Klein NP, Cheetham TC, Naleway A, et al. Evaluation of the association of maternal pertussis vaccination with obstetric events and birth outcomes. JAMA 2014;312:1897–904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nordin JD, Kharbanda EO, Vazquez Benitez G, Lipkind H, Vellozzi C, Destefano F. Maternal influenza vaccine and risks for preterm or small for gestational age birth. J Pediatr. 2014;164:1051–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Romitti PA, Naleway AL, Cheetham TC, Lipkind HS, et al. First trimester influenza vaccination and risks for major structural birth defects in offspring. J Pediatr. 2017;187:234–9.e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Romitti PA, Naleway AL, Cheetham TC, Lipkind HS, et al. Identifying birth defects in automated data sources in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:412–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bordet R, Pu Q, Puisieux F, Deplanque D, Jaboureck O, Leys D, et al. Susceptibility to provoked cerebral infarction is not increased in a rat model of pharmacologically-induced hypertension despite endothelial dysfunction. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2000;14:177–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Squires J, Bricker D, Potter L. Revision of a parent-completed development screening tool: ages and Stages Questionnaires. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;22:313–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Squires J, Twombly E, Bricker D, Potter L. Ages and stages questionnaires. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Squires J, Bricker D, Twombly E. ASQ:SE-2 technical appendix. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, MD; 2015.

  28. Rothstein A, Miskovic A, Nitsch K. Brief review of psychometric properties and clinical utility of the ages and stages questionnaires, third edition for evaluating pediatric development. Arch Phys Med Rehabilit. 2017;98:809–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schonhaut L, Armijo I, Schonstedt M, Alvarez J, Cordero M. Validity of the ages and stages questionnaires in term and preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1468–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. American College of O, Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric P. Committee opinion no. 637: marijuana use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:234–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gunn JK, Rosales CB, Center KE, Nunez A, Gibson SJ, Christ C, et al. Prenatal exposure to cannabis and maternal and child health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e009986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Massey SH, Mroczek DK, Reiss D, Miller ES, Jakubowski JA, Graham EK, et al. Additive drug-specific and sex-specific risks associated with co-use of marijuana and tobacco during pregnancy: evidence from 3 recent developmental cohorts (2003–2015). Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2018;68:97–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Luke S, Hutcheon J, Kendall T. Cannabis use in pregnancy in British Columbia and selected birth outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019.

  34. Corsi DJ, Walsh L, Weiss D, Hsu H, El-Chaar D, Hawken S, et al. Association between self-reported prenatal cannabis use and maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes. JAMA. 2019.

  35. Goldschmidt L, Richardson GA, Willford J, Day NL. Prenatal marijuana exposure and intelligence test performance at age 6. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:254–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Goldschmidt L, Day NL, Richardson GA. Effects of prenatal marijuana exposure on child behavior problems at age 10. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2000;22:325–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. O'Leary C, Zubrick SR, Taylor CL, Dixon G, Bower C. Prenatal alcohol exposure and language delay in 2-year-old children: the importance of dose and timing on risk. Pediatrics. 2009;123:547–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Folger AT, Eismann EA, Stephenson NB, Shapiro RA, Macaluso M, Brownrigg ME, et al. Parental adverse childhood experiences and offspring development at 2 years of age. Pediatrics. 2018;141:e20172826; https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-2826.

  39. Friedrich J, Khatib D, Parsa K, Santopietro A, Gallicano GI. The grass isn't always greener: The effects of cannabis on embryological development. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016;17:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moir D, Rickert WS, Levasseur G, Larose Y, Maertens R, White P, et al. A comparison of mainstream and sidestream marijuana and tobacco cigarette smoke produced under two machine smoking conditions. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008;21:494–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Leslie Kuckler, MPH for assistance with data collection. The authors also thank the HealthPartners Medical Group, under the leadership of Dr Charlie Lais and Dr Jason Maxwell, for implementing changes in prenatal care and documentation of developmental screening in our health system, making this study possible. Finally, the authors also thank the Healthy Beginnings program for promoting drug, alcohol, and tobacco free pregnancies and for providing support for women who screen positive in our health system.

Funding

All phases of this study were supported by a grant (U01DD0001035) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [to PAR]. The sponsor was not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing of the paper, or the decision to submit for publication. Findings of this study represent those of the authors and do not represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elyse Olshen Kharbanda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kharbanda, E.O., Vazquez-Benitez, G., Kunin-Batson, A. et al. Birth and early developmental screening outcomes associated with cannabis exposure during pregnancy. J Perinatol 40, 473–480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0576-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0576-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links