Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Lack of social support as measured by the Family Resource Scale screening tool is associated with early adverse cognitive outcome in extremely low birth weight children

Abstract

Objective

Extremely low birth weight children are at high risk for cognitive impairment.

Study design

Cognitive outcome of extremely low birth weight children participating in a Neonatal Research Network, randomized trial was evaluated at 18 and 30 months corrected age using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd ed. Family resources and social support were assessed using a Family Resource Scale parent questionnaire. Regression analysis was used to determine independent demographic, medical, and family resource factors influencing longitudinal cognitive outcome.

Result

Higher Family Resource Scale scores at 18 months were associated with greater improvement in cognitive scores between 18 and 30 months. Cognitive outcome was most adversely affected in children whose families had the least resources and social support. The adverse effect of poor social support was independent of family income.

Conclusion

Poor interpersonal social support has an independent, adverse impact on cognitive outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Badr L, Bookheimer S, Purdy I, Deeb M. Predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome for preterm infants with brain injury: MRI, medical and environmental factors. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85:279–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miceli PJ, Goeke-Morey MC, Whitman TL, Kolberg KS, Miller-Loncar C, White RD. Brief report: birth status, medical complications, and social environment: individual differences in development of preterm, very low birth weight infants. J Pedia Psychol. 2000;25:353–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong H, Edwards P. Nature or nurture: a systematic review of the effect of socio-economic status on the developmental and cognitive differences of children born preterm. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17:1689–1700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bendersky M, Lewis M. Environmental risk, biological risk, and developmental outcome. Dev Psychol. 1994;30:484–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McManus B, Poehlmann J. Maternal depression and perceived social support as predictors of cognitive function trajectories during the first 3 years of life for preterm infants in Wisconsin. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;38:425–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunst C, Leet H. Measuring the adequacy of resources in households with young children. Child Care Health Dev. 1987;13:111–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brannan AM, Manteuffel B, Holdent EW, Heflinger CA. Use of the family resource scale in children’s mental health: reliability and validity among economically diverse samples. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006;33:182–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1993.

  9. Van Horn M, Synder S. Family Resource Scale-Revised: psychometrics and validation of a measure of family resources in a sample of low-income families. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2001;19:54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor J, Crowley S, White K. Measuring family support and resources: psychometric investigation of the FSS and FRS. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359 249: Atlanta, GA; 1993 Apr.

  11. Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (1988).

  12. Moore T, Hennessy E, Myles J, Draper E, Costeloe K, Marlow N. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies. Brit Med J. 2012;345:e7961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson S, Marlow N. Early and long-term outcome of infants born extremely preterm. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hintz S, Kendrick D, Wilson-Costello D, Das A, Bell E, Vohr B, et al. Early-childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes are not improving for infants born at <25 weeks gestational age. Pediatrics. 2011;127:62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stephens BE, Bann C, Poole WK, Vohr BR. Neurodevelopmental impairment: predictors of its impact on the families of extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months. Infant Ment Health J. 2008;29:570–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duncan AF, Watterberg KL, Nolen TL, Vohr BR, Adams-Chapman I, Das A., for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Effect of ethnicity and race on cognitive and language testing at age 18-22 months in extremely premature infants. J Pedia. 2012;160:966–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lowe JR, Duncan AF, Bann C, Fuller J, Hintz SR, Das A., for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, et al. Early working memory as a racially and ethnically neutral measure of outcome in extremely preterm children at 18-22 months. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89:1055–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Voss W, Jungmann T, Wachtendorf M, Neubauer AP. Long-term cognitive outcomes of extremely low birthweight infants: the influence of the maternal educational background. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:569–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Doyle L, Davis P, Schmidt B, Anderson P. Cognitive outcome at 24 months is more predictive than at 18 months for IQ at 8-9 years in extremely low birth weight children. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88:95–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bronfenbrenner U. Making human beings human. Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications; 2005. 336 p

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keating D. Transformative role of epigenetics in child development research: commentary on the special section. Child Dev. 2016;87:135–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychol Bull. 2000;126:309–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Medina-Mirapeix F, Lillo-Navarro C, Montilla-Herrador J, Gacto-Sanchez M, Franco-Sierra M, Escolar-Reina P. Predictors of parent’s adherence to home exercise programs for children with developmental disabilities, regarding both exercise frequency and duration: a survey design. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53:545–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Noble K, McCandliss B, Farah M. Socioceconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Dev Sci. 2007;10:464–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hille ET, den Ouden AL, Stuifbergen MC, Verrips GH, Vogels AG, Brand R, et al. Is attrition bias a problem in neonatal follow-up? Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:901–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Castro L, Yolton K, Haberman B, Roberto N, Hasen NI, Ambalavanan N, et al. Bias in reported neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight survivors. Pediatrics. 2004;114:404–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, Mele L, Verter J, Steichen JJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993-4. Pediatrics. 2000;105:1216–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kurstjens S, Wolke D. Effects of maternal depression on cognitive development of children over the first 7 years of life. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001;42:623–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Huhtala M, Korja R, Lehtonen L, Haataja L, Lapinleimu H, Rautava P, for the PIPARI Study Group. Associations between parental psychological well-being and socio-emotional development in 5-year-old preterm children. Ear Hum Dev. 2014;90:119–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nolan S, Hendricks J, Ferguson S, Towell A. Social networking site (SNS) use by adolescent mothers: can social support and social capital be enhanced by online social networks?—a structured review of the literature. Midwifery. 2017;48:24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim H, Wyatt R, Li X, Gaylord M. Use of social media by fathers of premature infants. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016;30:359–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. DeHoff B, Staten L, Rodgers R, Denne S. The role of online social support in supporting and educating parent of young children with special health care needs in the United States: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Primack B, Shensa A, Sidani J, Whaite E, Lin L, Rosen D, et al. Social media use and perceived isolation among young adults in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Almasri N, Saleh M, Dunst C. Family resources for families of children with cerebral palsy in Jordan: psychometric properties of the Arabic-Family Resources Scale. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;40:354–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ompad D, Palamar J, Krause K, Kapadia F, Halkitis P. Reliability and validity of a material resources scale and its association with depression among young men who have sex with men: the P18 Cohort Study. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12:1384–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The National Institutes of Health, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), and the National Center for Research Resources provided grant support for the Neonatal Research Network’s Glutamine Study through cooperative agreements. While NICHD staff did have input into the study design, conduct, analysis, and manuscript drafting, the content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Participating NRN sites collected data and transmitted it to RTI International, the data coordinating center (DCC) for the network, which stored, managed, and analyzed the data for this study. On behalf of the NRN, Drs. Abhik Das (DCC Principal Investigator) and Carla M. Bann (DCC Statistician) had full access to all of the data in the study, and with the NRN Center Principal Investigators, take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis. We are indebted to our medical and nursing colleagues and the infants and their parents who agreed to take part in this study. The following investigators, in addition to those listed as authors, participated in this study: NRN Chair: Alan H. Jobe, M.D. Ph.D, University of Cincinnati. Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (U10 HD27904)—William Oh, M.D.; Angelita Hensman, BSN RNC; Lucy Noel, RN; Barbara Alksininis, PNP; Martha R. Leonard, BA; Rachel A. Vogt, M.D.; Teresa M. Leach, M.Ed CAES; Victoria E. Watson, M.S. CAS. Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies & Children’s Hospital (U10 HD21364, M01 RR80)—Michele C. Walsh, M.D. M.S.; Avroy A. Fanaroff, M.D.; Deanne Wilson-Costello, M.D.; Nancy S. Newman, RN; Bonnie S. Siner, RN; Harriet G. Friedman, M.A. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University Hospital, and Good Samaritan Hospital (U10 HD27853, M01 RR8084)—Edward F. Donovan, M.D.; Jean Steichen, M.D.; Barbara Alexander, RN; Cathy Grisby, BSN CCRC; Marcia Worley Mersmann, RN CCRC; Holly L. Mincey, RN BSN; Jody Hessling, RN; Teresa L. Gratton, PA. Emory University, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Grady Memorial Hospital, and Emory Crawford Long Hospital (U10 HD27851, M01 RR39)—Barbara J. Stoll, M.D.; Ira Adams- Chapman, M.D.; Ellen C. Hale, RN BS CCRC; Maureen Mulligan LaRossa, RN; Sheena Carter, Ph.D; Michelle Tidwell, BSN. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development—Linda L. Wright, M.D.; Elizabeth M. McClure, M.Ed. Indiana University, University Hospital, Methodist Hospital, Riley Hospital for Children, and Wishard Health Services (U10 HD27856, M01 RR750)—Brenda B. Poindexter, M.D. M.S.; James A. Lemons, M.D.; Diana D. Appel, RN BSN; Lon G. Bohnke, M.S.; Marilyn Bull, M.D.; Anna M. Dusick, M.D. FAAP (deceased); Greg Eaken, Ph.D; Dianne E. Herron, RN; Darlene Kardatzke, M.D.; Carolyn Lytle, M.D. MPH; Lucy C. Miller, RN BSN CCRC; Leslie Richard, RN; Leslie D. Wilson, BSN CCRC. RTI International (U10 HD36790)—W. Kenneth Poole, Ph.D (deceased); Betty K. Hastings; Elizabeth M. McClure, Med; Carolyn Petrie Huitema, M.S. Stanford University, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital (U10 HD27880, M01 RR70)—David K. Stevenson, M.D.; Barry E. Fleisher, M.D.; Susan R. Hintz, M.D. M.S. Epi; M. Bethany Ball, BS CCRC; Joan M. Baran, Ph.D; Lori E. Bond, Ph.D; Carol G. Kuelper, Ph.D; Julie C. Lee, Ph.D; Renee P. Pyle, Ph.D; Nicholas St. John, Ph.D. University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System and Children’s Hospital of Alabama (U10 HD34216, M01 RR32)—Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D.; Myriam Peralta-Carcelen, M.D.; Kirstin J. Bailey, Ph.D; Fred J. Biasini, Ph.D; Stephanie A. Chopko, Ph.D; Monica V. Collins, RN BSN MaEd; Shirley S. Cosby, RN BSN; Vivien A. Phillips, RN BSN; Richard V. Rector, Ph.D. University of California San Diego Medical Center and Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women (U10 HD40461)—Neil N. Finer, M.D.; Maynard R. Rasmussen, M.D.; Jack M. Anderson, M.D.; Kathy Arnell, RN; Donna Posin, OTR/L MPA. University of Miami Holtz Children’s Hospital (U10 HD21397, M01 RR16587)—Shahnaz Duara, M.D.; Charles R. Bauer, M.D.; Ruth Everett-Thomas, RN MSN; Maria Calejo, M.S.; Alexis N. Diaz, BA; Silvia M. Frade, BA; Yamiley Gideon, BA; Kasey Hamlin-Smith, Ph.D; Silvia Hiriart-Fajardo, M.D.; Lisa Jean-Gilles, BA; Elaine O. Mathews, RN. University of Tennessee (U10 HD21415)—Sheldon B. Korones, M.D. (deceased); Henrietta S. Bada, M.D.; Tina Hudson, RN BSN; Kimberly Yolton, Ph.D; Marilyn Williams, LCSW. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Parkland Health & Hospital System, and Children’s Medical Center Dallas (U10 HD40689, M01 RR633)—Abbot R. Laptook, M.D.; Walid A. Salhab, M.D.; R. Sue Broyles, M.D.; Roy J. Heyne, M.D.; Susie Madison, RN; Jackie F. Hickman, RN; Alicia Guzman; Sally Adams, PNP; Linda Madden, PNP; Elizabeth Heyne, PA; Cristin Dooley, MS CIMI. Wayne State University, Hutzel Women’s Hospital, and Children’s Hospital of Michigan (U10 HD21385)—Seetha Shankaran, M.D.; Yvette Johnson, M.D.; Rebecca Bara, RN BSN; Geraldine Muran, RN BSN; Deborah Kennedy, RN BSN; Laura Goldston, MA. Yale University, Yale-New Haven Children’s Hospital (U10 HD27871, M01 RR6022)—Richard A. Ehrenkranz, M.D.; Patricia Gettner, RN; Monica Konstantino, RN; Elaine Romano, RN BSN; Nancy Close, PhD; Walter Gilliam, Ph.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha G. Fuller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuller, M.G., Vaucher, Y.E., Bann, C.M. et al. Lack of social support as measured by the Family Resource Scale screening tool is associated with early adverse cognitive outcome in extremely low birth weight children. J Perinatol 39, 1546–1554 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0462-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0462-2

Search

Quick links