Abstract
Objective
To analyze a cohort of clinically unexplained stillbirths (CUS) referred for postmortem.
Study Design
In total, 258 CUS were referred for full postmortem between 2009 and 2015. Relevant Condition at Death (ReCoDe) classification was applied. Statistical analysis included chi-square test and multiple logistic regression.
Results
In all, 386 ReCoDe categories identified corresponded to: fetus (99); umbilical cord (48); placenta (165); amniotic fluid (55), and mother (1). No condition was identified in 18 cases. Prevalent conditions were placental insufficiency (101 cases, 39%) and fetal growth restriction (96 cases, 37%), frequently presenting together (41 cases, 15.9%). Significant associations were found between fetal growth restriction and gestational age, asymmetrical fetal growth and placental insufficiency.
Conclusions
In total, 60.5% of CUS were diagnosed at postmortem to have fetal growth restriction and/or placental insufficiency. The mean gestational age of death in which these conditions presented was 32.7 weeks and 35.5 weeks, respectively, suggesting a critical time-frame to monitor to potentially reduce stillbirth occurrence.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Births in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics. 19 July 2017 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthsummarytablesenglandandwales/2016
Gardosi J, Kady SM, McGeown P, Francis A, Tonks A. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331:1113–7.
Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ. 2013;346:f108.
Vergani P, Cozzolino S, Pozzi E, Cuttin MS, Greco M, Ornaghi S, et al. Identifying the causes of stillbirth: a comparison of four classification systems. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:319.e1–319.e4.
Gardosi J Commentary: Clinical implications of “unexplained” stillbirths. Excerpt from the 8th Annual Report of the Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirth and Death in Infancy. [cited 2018 Apr. 2]. http://www.pi.nhs.uk/pnm/CESDI SB commentary.pdf.
MBRRACE-UK. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report UK Perinatal Deaths for Births in 2016. UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2014. 2016. 184 p. Available from: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/mbrrace-uk/reports/MBRRACE-UK-PMS-Report-2014.pdf.
Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth. 2010. (Green-top Guide). Report No. 55.
National Health Service. Overview Stillbirth. 2018. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/stillbirth/ (accessed 20 April 2019).
Knong T, Mooney E, Ariel I, Balmus N, Boyd T, Brundler MA, et al. Sampling and definitions of placental lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140:698–713.
Auger N, Bilodeau-Bertrand M, Poissant J, Shah P. Decreasing use of autopsy for stillbirths and infant deaths: missed opportunity. J Perinatol. 2018;38:1414–9.
Flenady V, Frøen JF, Pinar H, Torabi R, Saastad E, Guyon G, et al. An evaluation of classification systems for stillbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:24.
Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Spencer JA. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:1030–8.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The investigation and manangement of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. RCOG Green-top Guide No. 2013;31:1–34.
Gardosi J, Giddings S, Buller S, Southam M, Williams M. Preventing stillbirths through improved antenatal recognition of pregnancies at risk due to fetal growth restriction. Public Health. 2014;128:698–702.
Boyle EM, Poulsen G, Field DJ, Kurinczuk JJ, Wolke D, Alfirevic Z, et al. Effects of gestational age at birth on health outcomes at 3 and 5 years of age: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e896.
O’Connor H, Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary M, Kennelly M, McAuliffe F, et al. Comparison of asymmetric versus symmetric IUGR e results from a national prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;1:S173–4.
Cox P, Marton T. Pathological assessment of intrauterine growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23:751–64.
Mandruzzato G, Antsaklis A, Botet F, Chervenak FA, Figueras F, Grunebaum A, et al. Intrauterine restriction (IUGR). J Perinat Med. 2008;36:277–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blythe, C., Vazquez, R.E.Z., Cabrera, M.S. et al. Results of full postmortem examination in a cohort of clinically unexplained stillbirths: undetected fetal growth restriction and placental insufficiency are prevalent findings. J Perinatol 39, 1196–1203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0412-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0412-z
This article is cited by
-
Improved estimation of the relationship between fetal growth and late stillbirth in the United States, 2014–15
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Placental Pathology Findings in Unexplained Pregnancy Losses
Reproductive Sciences (2024)