Article | Published:

Who’s counting? Assessing the effects of a simulation-based training intervention on the accuracy of neonatal heart rate auscultation

Journal of Perinatology (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract

Objective

To determine if simulation-based medical education could improve pediatric residents’ ability to accurately assess neonatal heart rate via auscultation.

Study design

Primary outcomes included heart rate accuracy and Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) group accuracy, defined as whether a heart rate estimation fell in the appropriate NRP algorithm group. Pediatric residents completed a pre-assessment and then participated in a simulation training intervention on high-fidelity manikins. Residents completed a post-assessment 1 month later.

Results

Heart rate estimates from 21 pediatric residents showed improved overall heart rate accuracy and NRP group accuracy from 53.6 to 78.7% (p < 0.0001) and 68.3 to 80% (p = 0.0002), respectively. Residents were more likely to overestimate low heart rates and underestimate high heart rates.

Conclusion

Heart rate simulation-based training significantly improved residents’ ability to assess heart rate on high-fidelity neonatal manikins. Providers participating in NRP may benefit by receiving heart rate skills assessment-focused training during an NRP provider course.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Weiner, GM et al. Textbook of neonatal resuscitation (NRP). American Academy of Pediatrics. Elk Grove Village, IL. 7th ed. 2016.

  2. 2.

    Boon W, McAllister J, Attar MA, Chapman RL, Mullan PB, Haftel HM. Evaluation of heart rate assessment timing, communication, accuracy, and clinical decision-making during high fidelity simulation of neonatal resuscitation. Int J Pediatr. 2014;2014:927430.

  3. 3.

    Chitkara R, Rajani AK, Oehlert JW, Lee HC, Epi MS, Halamek LP. The accuracy of human senses in the detection of neonatal heart rate during standardized simulated resuscitation: implications for delivery of care, training and technology design. Resuscitation. 2013;84:369–72.

  4. 4.

    Hawkes GA, Hawkes CP, Kenosi M, Demeulemeester J, Livingstone V, Ryan CA, et al. Auscultate, palpate and tap: time to re-evaluate. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105:178–82.

  5. 5.

    Kamlin CO, O’Donnell CP, Everest NJ, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Accuracy of clinical assessment of infant heart rate in the delivery room. Resuscitation. 2006;71:319–21.

  6. 6.

    Voogdt KG, Morrison AC, Wood FE, van Elburg RM, Wyllie JP. A randomised, simulated study assessing auscultation of heart rate at birth. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1000–3.

  7. 7.

    Phillipos E, Solevåg AL, Pichler G, Aziz K, van Os S, O’Reilly M, et al. Heart rate assessment immediately after birth. Neonatology. 2016;109:130–8.

  8. 8.

    Kamlin CO, Dawson JA, O’Donnell CP, Morley CJ, Donath SM, Sekhon J, et al. Accuracy of pulse oximetry measurement of heart rate of newborn infants in the delivery room. J Pediatr. 2008;152:756–60.

  9. 9.

    Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K, Colby C, Fairchild K, Gallagher J, et al. Part 15: neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S909–919.

  10. 10.

    Singh JK, Kamlin CO, Morley CJ, O’Donnell CP, Donath SM, Davis PG. Accuracy of pulse oximetry in assessing heart rate of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Paediatr Child Health. 2008;44:273–5.

  11. 11.

    Mizumoto H, Tomotaki S, Shibata H, Ueda K, Akashi R, Uchio H, et al. Electrocardiogram shows reliable heart rates much earlier than pulse oximetry during neonatal resuscitation. Pediatr Int. 2012;54:205–7.

  12. 12.

    Katheria A, Rich W, Finer N. Electrocardiogram provides a continuous heart rate faster than oximetry during neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1177–1181.

  13. 13.

    van Vonderen JJ, Hooper SB, Kroese JK, Roest AA, Narayen IC, van Zwet EW, et al. Pulse oximetry measures a lower heart rate at birth compared with electrocardiography. J Pediatr. 2015;166:49–53.

  14. 14.

    Katheria A, Arnell K, Brown M, Hassen K, Maldonado M, Rich W, et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial of EKG for neonatal resuscitation. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0187730.

  15. 15.

    Saugstad OD, Soll RF. Assessing heart rate at birth: auscultation is still the gold standard. Neonatology. 2016;110:238–40.

  16. 16.

    Kessler DO, Auerbach M, Pusic M, Tunik MG, Foltin JC. A randomized trial of simulation-based deliberate practice for infant lumbar puncture skills. Simul Healthc. 2011;6:197–203.

  17. 17.

    Kessler DO, Arteaga G, Ching K, Haubner L, Kamdar G, Krantz A, et al. Interns’ success with clinical procedures in infants after simulation training. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e811–820.

  18. 18.

    Taras J, Everett T. Rapid Cycle deliberate practice in medical education—a systematic review. Cureus. 2017;9:e1180.

  19. 19.

    McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86:706–11.

  20. 20.

    Cordero L, Hart BJ, Hardin R, Mahan JD, Giannone PJ, Nankervis CA. Pediatrics residents’ preparedness for neonatal resuscitation assessed using high-fidelity simulation. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:399–404.

  21. 21.

    Gulati R, Zayek M, Eyal F. Presetting ECG electrodes for earlier heart rate detection in the delivery room. Resuscitation. 2018;128:83–7.

  22. 22.

    Shimabukuro R, Takase K, Ohde S, Kusakawa I. Handheld fetal Doppler device for assessing heart rate in neonatal resuscitation. Pediatr Int. 2017;59:1069–73.

  23. 23.

    Dyson A, Jeffrey M, Kluckow M. Measurement of neonatal heart rate using handheld Doppler ultrasound. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102:F116–F119.

  24. 24.

    Lemke R, Farrah M, Byrne PJ. Use of a new Doppler umbilical cord clamp to measure heart rate in newborn infants in the delivery room. EJ Neonat Res. 2011;1:83–8.

  25. 25.

    Kevat AC, Bullen DV, Davis PG, Kamlin CO. A systematic review of novel technology for monitoring infant and newborn heart rate. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106:710–20.

  26. 26.

    Curran VR, Aziz K, O’Young S, Bessell C. Evaluation of the effect of a computerized training simulator (ANAKIN) on the retention of neonatal resuscitation skills. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16:157–64.

  27. 27.

    Patel J, Posencheg M, Ades A. Proficiency and retention of neonatal resuscitation skills by pediatric residents. Pediatrics. 2012;130:515–21.

  28. 28.

    Matterson HH, Szyld D, Green BR, Howell HB, Pusic MV, Mally PV, et al. Neonatal resuscitation experience curves: simulation based mastery learning booster sessions and skill decay patterns among pediatric residents. J Perinat Med. 2018;46:934-41.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was presented in part at the 2018 Pediatric Academic Society Meeting in Toronto, Canada and the 2018 Pediatric Hospital Medicine Meeting in Atlanta, GA.

Author contributions

NM—Study conception, design, data analysis, manuscript drafting and editing, approved final manuscript. NK—Study conception, design, simulation center liason, manuscript editing, approved final manuscript. SR—Study conception, design, manuscript editing, approved final manuscript. SD—Study design, significant data analysis, approved final manuscript. JB—Study conception, design, manuscript editing, approved final manuscript. VS—Study conception, design, manuscript editing, approved final manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, USA

    • Nathan Money
    • , Natalya Kusheleva
    • , Susana Ruano
    • , Jonathan Blau
    •  & Vinisha Singhi
  2. Biostatistics Unit, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA

    • Seleshi Demissie
  3. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, USA

    • Jonathan Blau
    •  & Vinisha Singhi

Authors

  1. Search for Nathan Money in:

  2. Search for Natalya Kusheleva in:

  3. Search for Susana Ruano in:

  4. Search for Seleshi Demissie in:

  5. Search for Jonathan Blau in:

  6. Search for Vinisha Singhi in:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Money.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0339-4