Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit discharge preparedness among families with limited english proficiency

Abstract

Objective

We compared the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit discharge preparedness of families with and without Limited English Proficiency (LEP).

Study design

We performed a retrospective analysis of discharged families. Each family’s discharge preparation was self-assessed on the day of discharge, and the discharging nurse assessed the family’s overall emotional and technical discharge preparedness all on 9-point Likert scales. Families were considered not prepared for discharge if they rated themselves or the nurse rated their preparedness as <7 on the Likert scale.

Results

Among 1307 discharged families, 90 had LEP. The odds of being prepared for discharge were the same for both groups (aOR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.27–1.41; p= 0.258). In multivariable analyses, families with LEP were less likely to be prepared with technical baby care skills (aOR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13–0.81).

Conclusion

Families with LEP are at higher risk and may require special attention when preparing for NICU discharge.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Limited English Proficiency: A Federal Interagency Website 2002 April 30th. 2018. https://www.lep.gov. Accessed 9 June 2018.

  2. U.S Census Bureau American Community Survey, 2010–2013. 2013. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/. Accessed 9 June 2018.

  3. Zong J, Batalova J. The Limited English Proficient Population in the United States. 2015. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/limited-english-proficient-population-united-states. Accessed 9 June 2018.

  4. Smith VC, Hwang SS, Dukhovny D, Young S, Pursley DM. Neonatal intensive care unit discharge preparation, family readiness and infant outcomes: connecting the dots. J Perinatol. 2013;33:415–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith VC, Dukhovny D, Zupancic JA, Gates HB, Pursley DM. Neonatal intensive care unit discharge preparedness: primary care implications. Clin Pediatr. 2012;51:454–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Hospital discharge of the high-risk neonate. Pediatrics. 2008;122:1119–26.

  7. Thornton JD, Pham K, Engelberg RA, Jackson JC, Curtis JR. Families with limited English proficiency receive less information and support in interpreted intensive care unit family conferences. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Cleave AC, Roosen-Runge MU, Miller AB, Milner LC, Karkazis KA, Magnus DC. Quality of communication in interpreted versus noninterpreted PICU family meetings. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1507–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen AL, Rivara F, Marcuse EK, McPhillips H, Davis R. Are language barriers associated with serious medical events in hospitalized pediatric patients? Pediatrics. 2005;116:575–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallagher RA, Porter S, Monuteaux MC, Stack AM. Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department: the impact of language. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29:579–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldman RD, Amin P, Macpherson A. Language and length of stay in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22:640–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levas MN, Cowden JD, Dowd MD. Effects of the limited English proficiency of parents on hospital length of stay and home health care referral for their home health care-eligible children with infections. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:831–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu SM, Huang ZJ, Schwalberg RH, Nyman RM. Parental English proficiency and children’s health services access. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1449–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jimenez N, Jackson DL, Zhou C, Ayala NC, Ebel BE. Postoperative pain management in children, parental English proficiency, and access to interpretation. Hosp Pediatr. 2014;4:23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miquel-Verges F, Donohue PK, Boss RD. Discharge of infants from NICU to Latino families with limited English proficiency. J Immigr Minor Health. 2011;13:309–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zurca AD, Fisher KR, Flor RJ, Gonzalez-Marques CD, Wang J, Cheng YI, et al. Communication with limited English-proficient families in the PICU. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7:9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Flores G, Abreu M, Tomany-Korman SC. Limited english proficiency, primary language at home, and disparities in children’s health care: how language barriers are measured matters. Public Health Rep. 2005;120:418–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eneriz-Wiemer M, Sanders LM, Barr DA, Mendoza FS. Parental limited English proficiency and health outcomes for children with special health care needs: a systematic review. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14:128–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paul RI. Language barriers Increase the cost of care. AAP Grand Rounds. 2003;9:17–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kowalski WJ, Leef KH, Mackley A, Spear ML, Paul DA. Communicating with parents of premature infants: who is the informant? J Perinatol. 2006;26:44–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lyndon A, Wisner K, Holschuh C, Fagan KM, Franck LS. Parents’ perspectives on navigating the work of speaking up in the NICU. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017;46:716–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith VC, Young S, Pursley DM, McCormick MC, Zupancic JA. Are families prepared for discharge from the NICU? J Perinatol. 2009;29:623–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Enlow E, Herbert SL, Jovel IJ, Lorch SA, Anderson C, Chamberlain LJ. Neonatal intensive care unit to home: the transition from parent and pediatrician perspectives, a prospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2014;34:761–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheikh L, O’Brien M, McCluskey-Fawcett K. Parent preparation for the NICU-to-home transition: staff and parent perceptions. Child Health Care. 1993;22:227–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Purdy IB, Craig JW, Zeanah P. NICU discharge planning and beyond: recommendations for parent psychosocial support. J Perinatol. 2015;35(Suppl 1):S24–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Broedsgaard A, Wagner L. How to facilitate parents and their premature infant for the transition home. Int Nurs Rev. 2005;52:196–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernstein HH, Spino C, Baker A, Slora EJ, Touloukian CL, McCormick MC. Postpartum discharge: do varying perceptions of readiness impact health outcomes? Ambul Pediatr. 2002;2:388–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss ME, Ryan P, Lokken L. Validity and reliability of the perceived readiness for discharge after birth scale. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35:34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Robinson A, Miller M. Making information accessible: developing plain English discharge instructions. J Adv Nurs. 1996;24:528–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Galinato J, Montie M, Shuman C, Patak L, Titler M. Perspectives of nurses on patients with limited English proficiency and their call light use. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2016;3:1–9.

  31. Gany F, Leng J, Shapiro E, Abramson D, Motola I, Shield DC, et al. Patient satisfaction with different interpreting methods: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(Suppl 2):312–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rivera ET, West-Olatunji C, Conwill W, Garrett MT, Phan LT. Language as a form of subtle oppression among linguistically different people in the United States of America. Perspect Soc/Social Perspect. 2008;10:11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lang KR, Dupree CY, Kon AA, Dudzinski DM. Calling out implicit racial bias as a harm in pediatric care. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2016;25:540–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rivadeneyra R, Elderkin-Thompson V, Silver RC, Waitzkin H. Patient centeredness in medical encounters requiring an interpreter. Am J Med. 2000;108:470–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hall WJ, Chapman MV, Lee KM, Merino YM, Thomas TW, Payne BK, et al. Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:e60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hopwood CJ, Flato CG, Ambwani S, Garland BH, Morey LC. A comparison of Latino and Anglo socially desirable responding. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65:769–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Marin G, Gamba RJ, Marin BV. Extreme response style and acquiescence among Hispanics. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2016;23:498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyn Obregon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Obregon, E., Martin, C., Frantz III, I. et al. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit discharge preparedness among families with limited english proficiency. J Perinatol 39, 135–142 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0255-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0255-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links