Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Quality Improvement Article
  • Published:

Implementation of a pilot program of Reach Out and Read® in the neonatal intensive care unit: a quality improvement initiative

Abstract

Objective:

Language exposure is important for neurodevelopment, but is sparse in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Study design:

We introduced Reach Out and Read (ROR) in the NICU as a quality improvement initiative to increase language exposure. Measures included availability of books, accessibility of parents, and enrollment of infants, percent infants read to by their parents, and data from parental surveys.

Result:

98 infants were included (40 before, 58 after). We obtained books in the mother’s language for 95% of infants, 82% eligible infants were enrolled, and 70% read to their infants (mean of 0.45 ± 0.35 times/day). Surveyed parents enjoyed reading, noted positive effect(s), and intended to read post-discharge.

Conclusion:

We launched a well-received pilot ROR program in the NICU and reached our goal of ≥50% infants being read to by their parents. Further study is needed to assess the impact of reading in the NICU on parents and infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caskey M, Stephens B, Tucker R, Vohr B. Importance of parent talk on the development of preterm infant vocalizations. Pediatrics. 2011;128:910–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huttenlocher J. Language input and language growth. Prev Med. 1998;27:195–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayberry RI, Lock E, Kazmi H. Linguistic ability and early language exposure. Nature. 2002;417:38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Briscoe J, Gathercole SE, Marlow N. Short-term memory and language outcomes after extreme prematurity at birth. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:654–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bohm B, Katz-Salamon M, Institute K, Smedler AC, Lagercrantz H, Forssberg H. Developmental risks and protective factors for influencing cognitive outcome at 5 1/2 years of age in very-low-birthweight children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:508–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, Mele L, Verter J, Steichen JJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993-4. Pediatrics. 2000;105:1216–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ortiz-Mantilla S, Choudhury N, Leevers H, Benasich AA. Understanding language and cognitive deficits in very low birth weight children. Dev Psychobiol. 2008;50:107–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caskey M, Stephens B, Tucker R, Vohr B. Adult talk in the NICU with preterm infants and developmental outcomes. Pediatrics. 2014;133:e578–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Webb AR, Heller HT, Benson CB, Lahav A. Mother’s voice and heartbeat sounds elicit auditory plasticity in the human brain before full gestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:3152–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Pineda RG, Neil J, Dierker D, Smyser CD, Wallendorf M, Kidokoro H, et al. Alterations in brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants hospitalized in different neonatal intensive care unit environments. J Pediatr. 2014;164:52–60. e52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hart B, Risley TR. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: P.H. Brookes; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bus A, Van Ijzendoorn M, Pellegrini A. Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: a meta-analysis of intergenerational transmission of literacy. Rev Educ Res. 1995;65:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Braid S, Bernstein J. Improved cognitive development in preterm infants with shared book reading. Neonatal Netw. 2015;34:10–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yarosz D, Barnett W. Who reads to young children? Identifying predictors of family reading activities. Read Psychol. 2001;22:67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lariviere J, Rennick JE. Parent picture-book reading to infants in the neonatal intensive care unit as an intervention supporting parent-infant interaction and later book reading. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011;32:146–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuckerman B, Khandekar A. Reach Out and Read: evidence based approach to promoting early child development. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010;22:539–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Council on Early C, High PC, Klass P. Literacy promotion: an essential component of primary care pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2014;134:404–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Langley GL, Moen R, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Perla RJ, Provost LP, Murray SK. The run chart: a simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:46–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Reach Out and Read of Massachusetts and the Cabot Family Charitable Trust, as well as the Boston Medical Center Elaine Ullian Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernadette M. Levesque.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors are responsible for this reported research. Dr. Levesque currently serves as a consultant to Reach Out and Read of Massachusetts to provide training for other neonatal intensive care units in Massachusetts who are interested in introducing Reach Out and Read in their units. Alison Corning-Clarke and Carole Ferguson are both employed by Reach Out and Read of Massachusetts. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levesque, B.M., Tran, A., Levesque, E. et al. Implementation of a pilot program of Reach Out and Read® in the neonatal intensive care unit: a quality improvement initiative. J Perinatol 38, 759–766 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0060-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0060-8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links