Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Health-care spending and utilization for children discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit

Abstract

Objectives

To describe health-care spending and utilization for infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Study design

Retrospective cohort analysis of 4973 NICU graduates in the Truven MarketScan Medicaid database, with follow-up to the third birthday. Health-care spending and utilization after NICU discharge were assessed. Using logistic regression, we assessed clinical characteristics associated with hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits.

Results

Most (69.5%) post-NICU spending occurred within the first year [$33,276 per member per year]. Inpatient care accounted for most (71.6%) of the 3-year spending. The percentages of infants with a 1-year readmission or ED visit were 36.8% and 63.7%, respectively. Medical technology was associated with the highest likelihoods of hospital [aOR 17.8 (95%CI 12.2–26.0)] and ED use [aOR 2.3 (95%CI 1.8–3.0)].

Conclusions

Hospital care accounts for the majority of spending for NICU graduates. Infants with medical technology have the highest risk of hospital and ED use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harrison W, Goodman D. Epidemiologic trends in neonatal intensive care, 2007-12. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:855–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jarjour IT. Neurodevelopmental outcome after extreme prematurity: a review of the literature. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;52:143–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Serenius F, Kallen K, Blennow M, Ewald U, Fellman V, Holmstrom G, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA. 2013;309:1810–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormick MC, Litt JS, Smith VC, Zupancic JA. Prematurity: an overview and public health implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:367–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Msall ME, Tremont MR. Measuring functional outcomes after prematurity: developmental impact of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight status on childhood disability. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:258–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hack M, Taylor HG, Drotar D, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Andreias L, et al. Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged children born with extremely low-birth-weight in the 1990s. JAMA. 2005;294:318–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Behrman RE, Butler AS, editors. Preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington (DC): The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petrou S, Davidson LL. Economic issues in the follow-up of neonates. Semin Neonatol. 2000;5:159–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston KM, Gooch K, Korol E, Vo P, Eyawo O, Bradt P, et al. The economic burden of prematurity in Canada. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lamarche-Vadel A, Blondel B, Truffer P, Burguet A, Cambonie G, Selton D, et al. Re-hospitalization in infants younger than 29 weeks’ gestation in the EPIPAGE cohort. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93:1340–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Russell RB, Green NS, Steiner CA, Meikle S, Howse JL, Poschman K, et al. Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lorch SA, Passarella M, Zeigler A. Challenges to measuring variation in readmission rates of neonatal intensive care patients. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14(5 Suppl):S47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wade KC, Lorch SA, Bakewell-Sachs S, Medoff-Cooper B, Silber JH, Escobar GJ. Pediatric care for preterm infants after NICU discharge: high number of office visits and prescription medications. J Perinatol. 2008;28:696–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards ST, Abrams MK, Baron RJ, Berenson RA, Rich EC, Rosenthal GE, et al. Structuring payment to medical homes after the Affordable Care Act. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:1410–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bockli K, Andrews B, Pellerite M, Meadow W. Trends and challenges in United States neonatal intensive care units follow-up clinics. J Perinatol. 2014;34:71–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Chronic Condition Indicator [Available from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/chronic/chronic.jsp.] Accessed December 31, 2017.

  17. Chi MJ, Lee CY, Wu SC. The prevalence of chronic conditions and medical expenditures of the elderly by chronic condition indicator (CCI). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;52:284–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedman B, Jiang HJ, Elixhauser A, Segal A. Hospital inpatient costs for adults with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63:327–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Feudtner C, Hays RM, Haynes G, Geyer JR, Neff JM, Koepsell TD. Deaths attributed to pediatric complex chronic conditions: national trends and implications for supportive care services. Pediatrics. 2001;107:E99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Feudtner C, Feinstein JA, Zhong W, Hall M, Dai D. Pediatric complex chronic conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and complex medical technology dependence and transplantation. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen E, Berry JG, Camacho X, Anderson G, Wodchis W, Guttmann A. Patterns and costs of health care use of children with medical complexity. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1463–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Palfrey JS, Haynie M, Porter S, Fenton T, Cooperman-Vincent P, Shaw D, et al. Prevalence of medical technology assistance among children in Massachusetts in 1987 and 1990. Public Health Rep. 1994;109:226–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Berry JG, Hall DE, Kuo DZ, Cohen E, Agrawal R, Feudtner C, et al. Hospital utilization and characteristics of patients experiencing recurrent readmissions within children’s hospitals. JAMA. 2011;305:682–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Agrawal R, Hall M, Cohen E, Goodman DM, Kuo DZ, Neff JM, et al. Trends in health care spending for children in Medicaid with high resource use. Pediatrics. 2016;138. pii: e20160682. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

  25. Kuo DZ, Hall M, Agrawal R, Cohen E, Feudtner C, Goodman DM, et al. Comparison of health care spending and utilization among children with Medicaid insurance. Pediatrics. 2015;136:1521–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. McAllister JW, Cooley WC, Van Cleave J, Boudreau AA, Kuhlthau K. Medical home transformation in pediatric primary care--what drives change? Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(Suppl 1):S90–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Clemans-Cope L, Holahan J, Garfield R. Medicaid spending growth compared to other payers: a look at the evidence. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

DZK and CJS were supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number R40MC23626. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS, or the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Z. Kuo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuo, D.Z., Berry, J.G., Hall, M. et al. Health-care spending and utilization for children discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 38, 734–741 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0055-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0055-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links