Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Pathophysiology and pregnancy outcomes of ascites in preeclampsia—a scoping review

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a multisystem disorder associated with defective trophoblast invasion, maternal syndrome, and capillary endothelial leak. The presence of ascites/third space fluid accumulation increases the risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. The current criteria/guidelines of preeclampsia do not establish the presence of ascites as a marker of severity or recognize the timing and need for early delivery despite associated complications. Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant literature, reported up to December 2023, regarding the pathophysiology, pregnancy outcome, and management of preeclampsia complicated with ascites. A total of 5 studies on pathophysiology and eight on pregnancy outcomes met the inclusion criteria, with 41 case reports on ascites in preeclampsia. The etiopathogenesis for the development of ascites in preeclampsia includes endothelial damage, capillary hyperpermeability, release of vasoconstrictive agents, reduced intravascular oncotic pressure, and raised intraabdominal pressure. The presence of ascites represents the extreme form of microvascular damage, which also correlates with the raised sFlt-1 levels in this condition. The adverse pregnancy outcomes include increased risk of congestive heart failure, eclampsia, renal failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and maternal death. The presence of ascites in preeclampsia is associated with the deterioration of the maternal condition. Hence, it is indicative of preeclampsia with severe features and requires vigilant monitoring, and prompt delivery may be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Methods for diagnosing ascites in pregnancy.
Fig. 3: Pathophysiology of ascites in preeclampsia.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Protocol Registration: the protocol as registered in the PROSPERO registry (registration number CRD42023484316 and is accessible at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023484316).

References

  1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tuncalp O, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cong KJ, Wang TT. [Complication of ascites in pregnancy-induced hypertension]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1994;29:7–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Suriya JY, Keepanasseril A, Manikandan K, Maurya DK, Veena P, Soundara Raghavan S. Maternal ascites an independent prognostic factor in severe preeclampsia: a matched cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296:63–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Woods JB, Blake PG, Perry KG Jr., Magann EF, Martin RW, Martin JN Jr. Ascites: a portent of cardiopulmonary complications in the preeclamptic patient with the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:87–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yavana SJ, Raju V, Keepanasseril A, Pal K. Ascites in preeclampsia-pathophysiology and pregnancy outcomes—a systematic review. PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023484316. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php??accessedID=CRD42023484316. (accessed on 30 Jan 2024)

  6. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73. Oct 2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rumack, CM, Wilson, SR, Charboneau, JW, Levine, D. Diagnostic ultrasound. 4th ed. Maryland Heights: Mosby; 2011.

  9. Calvin S, Silva M, Weinstein L, Finley P, Witte M. Characterization of ascites present at cesarean section. Am J Perinatol. 1991;8:99–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koseoglu SB, Deveer R, Camuzcuoglu A, Kasap B, Camuzcuoglu H. Massive ascites and pleural effusion in preeclampsia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:QD08–QD9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Redman CW. Current topic: preeclampsia and the placenta. Placenta 1991;12:301–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, Rodgers GM, Hubel CA, McLaughlin MK. Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1200–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, Lim KH, Li J, Mondal S, et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Investig. 2003;111:649–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Higami S, Kondo E, Shibata E, Fujimoto S, Hagimoto M, Urakawa R, et al. A case of preeclampsia developing massive ascites after delivery. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10:e05830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofmann-Kiefer KF, Knabl J, Martinoff N, Schiessl B, Conzen P, Rehm M, et al. Increased serum concentrations of circulating glycocalyx components in HELLP syndrome compared to healthy pregnancy: an observational study. Reprod Sci. 2013;20:318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Briones GJC, Díaz de León-Ponce M, Gómez BTE, Ávila EF, Ochoa REC, Briones VCG, et al. Medición de la fuga capilar en la preeclampsia-eclampsia. Cir Cir. 2000;68:194–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bhatia RK, Bottoms SF, Saleh AA, Norman GS, Mammen EF, Sokol RJ. Mechanisms for reduced colloid osmotic pressure in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:106–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vázquez Rodríguez JG. Plasma colloid osmotic pressure, Briones index and ascites in preeclampsia-eclampsia. Cir Cir. 2010;78:133–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ives CW, Sinkey R, Rajapreyar I, Tita ATN, Oparil S. Preeclampsia-pathophysiology and clinical presentations: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1690–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vázquez-Rodríguez JG, Veloz-Martínez MG. Pleural effusion and ascites in severe preeclampsia: frequency and correlation with plasma colloid osmotic pressure and renal filtration function. Cir Cir. 2011;79:324–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deruelle P, Coudoux E, Ego A, Houfflin-Debarge V, Codaccioni X, Subtil D. Risk factors for postpartum complications occurring after preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. A study in 453 consecutive pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;125:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Suonio S, Saaranen M, Saarikoski S. Left-sided hydrothorax in connection with severe preeclampsia. Case reports. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1984;22:357–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gyselaers W, Lozada MJ, Pacheco LD, Tayebi S, Malbrain M. Intra-abdominal pressure as an ignored parameter in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:963–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Richter CE, Saber S, Thung SF. Eclampsia complicated by abdominal compartment syndrome. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26:751–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Unsal MA, Ince U, Cengiz S, Karahan CS, Aran T. The relationship between intraabdominal hypertension and preeclampsia. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med. 2017;23:1–5.

  26. Foreman CS Jr. Massive ascites as a complication of severe preeclampsia. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1989;34:307–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woo JS, Liang ST, Wong VT. Ultrasonic detection of maternal ascites in patients with severe preeclampsia. Aust N. Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;22:237–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lilford RJ, Lubbe WF. Multiple serous effusions complicating preeclampsia. A case report. S Afr Med J. 1978;54:619–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ni J, Huang Y, Wu M, Liu X, Zhou J, Huang Y. Clinical characteristics and timing of delivery in women with severe preeclampsia complicated with ascites. Chin J Perinat Med. 2009;(12):10–4.

  30. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:e237–60.

  31. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, Karumanchi SA, McCarthy FP, Saito S, et al. The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;13:291–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morton A. Possible additional criteria for the diagnosis of preeclampsia with severe features. Obstet Med. 2023;16:9–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ko ML, Chen SC, Huang LW, Chang JZ, Huang LW, Hwang JL, et al. Massive ascites complicating preeclampsia. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;44:267–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tan A, Ma J, Deng X, Tang G. Severe ascites as the primary symptom of fulminant postpartum HELLP syndrome: a case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42:685–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ipadeola A, Nkwocha GC, Adeleye JO. Subclinical hypothyroidism unmasked by preeclampsia and ascites. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17:S173–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Chawla S, Kumar P, Bhalla M. Case of ascites in preeclampsia. Med J Armed Forces India. 2012;68:257–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Vaijyanath AM, Nayar B, Malhotra N, Deka D. Massive ascites in severe preeclampsia: a rare complication. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2002;28:199–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gyamlani G, Molnar MZ, Lu JL, Sumida K, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kovesdy CP. Association of serum albumin level and venous thromboembolic events in a large cohort of patients with nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2017;32:157–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vazquez-Arredondo JG, Vazquez-Rodriguez JG. Plasma colloid osmotic pressure in preeclampsia. Review of the Mexican literature 1997-2018. Cir Cir. 2021;89:547–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yamamoto T, Murase T, Kuno S, Ichikawa G, Chisima F. Leukocyte subpopulation in ascites of women with preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2008;60:318–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Preethi Y, Leelambika C, Kumar S, Shankar P. Magnitude of edema and proteinuria and its impact on pregnancy outcome in preeclampsia. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2022;9:2774–9.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Okamoto T, Watanabe K, Banno T, Saitou T, Sugiura K, Iwasaki A, et al. Amount of proteinuria as associated with severity classification of pregnant women with preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022;29:30–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Haddad B, Barton JR, Livingston JC, Chahine R, Sibai BM. HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome versus severe preeclampsia: onset at < or =28.0 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1475–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Haddad B, Barton JR, Livingston JC, Chahine R, Sibai BM. Risk factors for adverse maternal outcomes among women with HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:444–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Suarez B, Alves K, Senat MV, Fromageot J, Fischer C, Rosenberg P, et al. Abdominal pain and preeclampsia: sonographic findings in the maternal liver. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:1077–83. quiz 85-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hall DR, Grove D, Carstens E. Early preeclampsia: what proportion of women qualify for expectant management and if not, why not? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;128:169–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Osmanagaoglu MA, Osmanagaoglu S, Ulusoy H, Bozkaya H. Maternal outcome in HELLP syndrome requiring intensive care management in a Turkish hospital. Sao Paulo Med J 2006;124:85–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sobande AA, Eskandar M, Bahar A, Abusham A. Severe preeclampsia and eclampsia in Abha, the south west region of Saudi Arabia. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. İmir G, Kol Ö, Kaygusuz K, Çetin A, Çetin M, Güvenal T, et al. Perinatal outcomes in HELLP syndrome. J Turkish-Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2008;9:89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chawla S, Marwaha A, Agarwal R. HELLP or help: a real challenge. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015;65:172–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Thakur A, Joshi R, Poudel P, Uprety DK. Maternal and fetal outcome of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy at BPKIHS. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;ume 131:E445–E446. pp

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chen H, Tao F, Fang X, Wang X. Association of hypoproteinemia in preeclampsia with maternal and perinatal outcomes: a retrospective analysis of high-risk women. J Res Med Sci. 2016;21:98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Erkilinc S, Eyi EGY. Factors contributing to adverse maternal outcomes in patients with HELLP syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31:2870–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Shoopala HM, Hall DR. Re-evaluation of abruptio placentae and other maternal complications during expectant management of early onset preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;16:38–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kanaki A, Patil S, Goura A, Sangamkunti A. Maternal complications and foetal outcome in eclampsia. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2023;15:329–39. 2023

    Google Scholar 

  56. Turgut A, Demirci O, Demirci E, Uludogan M. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with HELLP syndrome and women with severe preeclampsia without HELLP syndrome. J Prenat Med. 2010;4:51–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Guan F, Ye J, Lin J. Risk factors for cardiopulmonary dysfunction in early-onset severe preeclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;135:192–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mbonyizina C, Ntirushwa D, Bazzett-Matabele L, Ntasumbumuyange D, Rulisa S, Magriples U. Point of care ultrasound: does the presence of ascites in severe preeclampsia correlate with poor maternal and neonatal outcome? Trop Med Int Health. 2019;24:1018–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Le Y, Ye J, Lin J. Expectant management of early-onset severe preeclampsia: a principal component analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:519.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Golden A. Ascites in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1949;57:385–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Reinberger JR, Mackey WF. Eclampsia without convulsions complicated by ascites with recovery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1951;61:449–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jacobs WM, White L. Ascites in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1965;25:872–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sivasuriya M, Jayaweera BA. Ascites in a case of severe preeclampsia-a rare clinical manifestation. Ceylon Med J. 1971;16:51–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Semchyshyn S. Ascites in toxemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;129:925–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mccormick J, Criss P. Ultrasound detection of massive maternal abdominal ascites in the preeclamptic patient. J Diagn Med Sonogr. 1985;1:268–71. Nov

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Ashmore J, Attapattu JA. Massive ascites and bilateral hydrothorax complicating severe preeclampsia. Ceylon Med J. 1998;43:235–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Mana F, Laubach M, Reynaert H, Urbain D. “Transient HELLP syndrome” followed by massive ascites. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;20:193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Morton A. Severe preeclampsia complicated by multiple serous effusions. Aust N. Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:360–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Raffaelli R, Bergamini V, Raspaolo V, Musola M, Papadopoulos N, Cromi A, et al. Massive ascites complicating preeclampsia: an indication for preterm birth? In1st SGI International Summit “Preterm Birth” 2005 (pp. 1-3).

  70. Ding DC, Hsu S, Su HY, Chu TW. Massive Ascites in Severe Preeclampsia. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;44:384–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Daponte A, Skentou H, Dimopoulos KD, Kallitsaris A, Messinis IE. Massive vulvar edema in a woman with preeclampsia: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2007;52:1067–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Wirawan JP. The unique presentation of massive ascites complicating severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Indones J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;35:67–9.

  73. Pradhan P, Sherpa K, Joshi A, Pathak S. Massive ascites in severe preeclampsia: a rare complication. Nepal Med Coll J. 2012;14:342–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kumar R, Dey M. Massive ascites and bilateral pleural effusion causing respiratory embarrassment in a postnatal case of severe preeclampsia. Med J Armed Forces India. 2014;70:290–2. 1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Stanic Z, Vulic M, Tadin I. Massive ascites in a patient with preeclampsia. Case Rep Perinat Med. 2015;4:109–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. El-Agwany AS, Abdelsadek AA. A rare case of normotensive HELLP syndrome complicated with massive ascites: spontaneous resolution. Egypt J Anaesth. 2016;32:155–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Bharathi K, Vijayalakshmi S, Mahendra G. Massive ascites complicating severe preeclampsia: a case report. Glob J Med Res E Gynecol Obstet. 2017;17:26–8.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Alabrah PW, Agbo J, Agoro ES. Preeclampsia complicated by antenatal & postnatal ascites. Eur J Med Health Sci. 2019;1:5.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Liu EL, Li YG, Zhou YX, Zhao JH. A case of pregnancy complicated with severe systemic lupus erythematosus, severe preeclampsia and lupus nephritis. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;125:21–21. Dec 1pp

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kotzageorgiou P, Moros M, Lykoudi A, Pitouli E, Fournaraki I, Metritidis D. A case of ascites complicating preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;234:e221. Mar 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Ghazali S, Al-Domyati M. Severe hyponatremia and ascites associated with preeclampsia. Crescent J Med Biol Sci. 2019;6:132–5. Jan 1

    Google Scholar 

  82. Konar L, Kalpahar S, Konar C, Mukherjee GG, Chakravorty B. Atypical Preeclampsia Complicated with HELLP Syndrome and Huge Ascites—A Rare Case Report and Review. IJOPARB. 2020;10:122–5

  83. Murata T, Yoshimoto Y, Shibano Y, Nakamura S, Yamauchi R. Gallbladder wall thickening in a woman with postpartum preeclampsia: a case report. Case Rep. Women’s Health. 2022;33:e00370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Sugai S, Suda K, Tamegai K, Haino K, Nakatsue T, Narita I, et al. Massive ascites due to lupus peritonitis in a patient with preeclampsia and systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Vazifdar S, Gavali U. Ascites in preeclampsia: a case report. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2022;9:296–8. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2022.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Khan SS, Roalkvam SN, Harmse ADR, Saddouk Y. A series of unfortunate events: Eclampsia with massive postpartum ascites. Int J Case Rep Images. 2023;14:18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Chakravarty S. Preeclampsia and ascites: a case report. J Adv Zool. 2023;44:448–9. Oct 10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YSV and AK conceived the study. All authors contributed to the design. KP searched the databases. AK and YSV performed the screening. YSV and VR extracted the details from each study. and guarantees data integrity. VR, YSV, and AK wrote the first draft. All authors contributed to the revising and finalization of the manuscript. AK (corresponding author) guarantees all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anish Keepanasseril.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venkatesh, Y.S., Raju, V., Pal, K. et al. Pathophysiology and pregnancy outcomes of ascites in preeclampsia—a scoping review. J Hum Hypertens 38, 631–641 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-024-00927-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-024-00927-0

Search

Quick links