Interventions for blood pressure (BP) control have positive effects on outcomes for patients with hypertension. Research on these effects in small- and medium-sized practices is limited. Our retrospective analysis used data from Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3), a research program conducted in 2016–2018 as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s EvidenceNOW initiative, to examine the impact of implementing more interventions for BP control in these settings. Thirty-eight H3 practices met inclusion criteria and were assigned to an implementer group (high or low) based on the number of interventions implemented with the support of a practice facilitator during the study. Practices in the high-implementer group implemented a mean of 2.2 additional interventions relative to the low-implementer group. Groups were compared on two measures of BP control: (1) mean percentage of hypertensive patients with a most recent BP below 140/90, and (2) mean systolic and diastolic BP of hypertensive patients. In the first measure, practices in the high-implementer group had greater improvement between baseline and the end of the study. Among the 10,150 patients included in the second measure, reductions in mean SBP and DBP were greater for the high-implementer group. These outcomes show that implementing additional interventions had a positive association with measures of BP control, though clinical significance was unknown or limited. Future research is needed to understand the impact of interventions for BP control in small- and medium-sized practices, including the interactions among intervention implementation, practice facilitation, and practice and patient characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The datasets generated and/or analyzed for this study are not publicly available. A limited dataset is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Hypertension cascade: hypertension prevalence, treatment and control estimates among US adults aged 18 years and older applying the criteria from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association’s 2017 Hypertension Guideline—NHANES 2013–2016. Atlanta, GA. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2021.
Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Himmelfarb CD, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71:1269–324.
Fuchs FD, Whelton PK. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2020;75:285–92.
Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e254–743.
Wang G, Grosse SD, Schooley MW. Conducting research on the economics of hypertension to improve cardiovascular health. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53:S115–17.
Glynn LG, Murphy AW, Smith SM, Schroeder K, Fahey T. Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;17:13.
Niiranen TJ, Leino K, Puukka P, Kantola I, Karanko H, Jula AM. Lack of impact of a comprehensive intervention on hypertension in the primary care setting. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27:489–96.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Advancing Heart Health. 2021. https://www.ahrq.gov/evidencenow/projects/heart-health/index.html.
Ciolino JD, Jackson KL, Liss DT, Brown T, Walunas TL, Murakami L, et al. Design of healthy hearts in the heartland (H3): a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;71:47–54.
Controlling High Blood Pressure. eCQI Resource Center; 2021. https://ecqi.healthit.gov/ecqm/ep/2021/cms165v9.
Rancourt J. ONC’s Open Source popHealth Tool Receives 2014 Certification. Health IT Buzz; 2014. https://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/health-innovation/oncs-open-source-pophealth-tool-receives-2014-certification.
Persell SD, Kho AN, Thompson JA, Baker DW. Improving hypertension quality measurement using electronic health records. Med Care. 2009;47:388–94.
Gasparini A. comorbidity: an R package for computing comorbidity scores. J Open Source Softw. 2018;3:648.
Makelarski JA, DePumpo M, Boyd K, Brown T, Kho AL, Navalkha C, et al. Implementation of systematic community resource referrals at small primary care practices to promote cardiovascular disease self-management. J Health Qual. 2020;42:278–86.
Persell SD, Liss DT, Walunas TL, Ciolino JD, Ahmad FS, Brown T, et al. Effects of 2 forms of practice facilitation on cardiovascular prevention in primary care: a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness trial. Med Care. 2020;58:344–51.
Jaffe MG, Lee GA, Young JD, Sidney S, Go AS. Improved blood pressure control associated with a large-scale hypertension program. JAMA. 2013;310:699–705.
Bolen SD, Love TE, Einstadter D, Lever J, Lewis S, Persaud H, et al. Improving regional blood pressure control: a positive deviance tiered intensity approach. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36:1591–7.
CMS 165 Version 8. 2022. https://ecqi.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/ecqm/measures/CMS165v8.html.
Squires JE, Sullivan K, Eccles MP, Worswick J, Grimshaw JM. Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals’ behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews. Implement Sci. 2014;9:152.
Landon BE, Normand SL. Performance measurement in the small office practice: challenges and potential solutions. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:353–7.
Holmboe E, Kim N, Cohen S, Curry M, Elwell A, Petrillo MK, et al. Primary care physicians, office-based practice, and the meaning of quality improvement. Am J Med. 2005;118:917–22.
Wang A, Pollack T, Kadziel LA, Ross SM, McHugh M, Jordan N, et al. Impact of practice facilitation in primary care on chronic disease care processes and outcomes: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33:1968–77.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Program; CY 2021 payment policies under the physician fee schedule and other changes to part B payment policies. In: Services HaH, edITOR. Washington DC: Federal Register; 2020. p. 84472–85377.
Aggarwal R, Chiu N, Wadhera RK, Moran AE, Raber I, Shen C, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control in the United States, 2013 to 2018. Hypertension. 2021;78:1719–26.
Paulsen MS, Andersen M, Thomsen JL, Schroll H, Larsen PV, Lykkegaard J, et al. Multimorbidity and blood pressure control in 37 651 hypertensive patients from Danish general practice. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;2:e004531.
Yu J, Wang AA, Zimmerman LP, Deng Y, Vu TH, Tedla YG, et al. A cohort analysis of statin treatment patterns among small-sized primary care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37:1845–52.
Ye J, Zhang R, Bannon JE, Wang AA, Walunas T, Kho AN, et al. Identifying practice facilitation delays and barriers in primary care quality improvement. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33:655–64.
Walunas TL, Ye J, Bannon J, Wang A, Kho AN, Smith JD, et al. Does coaching matter? Examining the impact of specific practice facilitation strategies on implementation of quality improvement interventions in the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland study. Implement Sci. 2021;16:33.
Banerjee D, Chung S, Wong EC, Wang EJ, Stafford RS, Palaniappan LP. Underdiagnosis of hypertension using electronic health records. Am J Hypertens. 2012;25:97–102.
We would like to thank the staff of the clinical practices that participated. We also acknowledge all the contributes made by study staff of the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University for their support during the project.
This work was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Grant R18HS023921 and T32-HS000078/T32-HS00008.
The authors declare no competing interests. SDP receives unrelated research support from Omron Healthcare Co. Ltd.
All data collected during the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland Study was governed by the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board Study #STU00201720. All practice participants consented to study participation.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, S.M., Wang, A., Anthony, L. et al. Is more better? The impact of implementing more interventions for hypertension control in a practice facilitation study for small- and medium-sized practices. J Hum Hypertens (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-023-00813-1