Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Difference in the risk profiles of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: results from two community-based studies in China and Sweden

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 34, pages 207–213 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and its risk factors may differ between various populations. Few studies have compared the risk profiles associated with cfPWV in different ethnic populations. The study population included 4321 subjects from Shanghai, China (n = 1272, age 75.0 ± 6.5 years, female 57.3%) and Malmö, Sweden (n = 3049, age 72.5 ± 5.5 years, female 60.4%). cfPWV was measured using the SphygmoCor device in both cohorts, with some difference in the determination of pulse transmission distance. The median cfPWV was 8.9 and 10.1 m/s (P < 0.001) respectively in the Chinese and Swedish subjects. cfPWV was associated (P < 0.05) with age, body mass index (BMI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, fasting plasma glucose and serum triglycerides in both populations. The standardized effect size (m/s) associated with age (0.091 vs. 0.048, P < 0.001) and fasting plasma glucose (0.025 vs. 0.012, P = 0.046) was greater in the Swedish than Chinese subjects, whereas those with BMI (0.046 vs. 0.008, P < 0.001), MAP (0.079 vs. 0.067, P = 0.016), and heart rate (0.057 vs. 0.046, P = 0.036) were greater in Chinese. No difference was observed in those associated with serum triglycerides (P = 0.128). cfPWV was additionally associated with sex, serum total cholesterol, and on antihypertensive medication in the Swedish subjects, and with serum uric acid in the Chinese subjects (P ≤ 0.041). In conclusion, Chinese and Swedish subjects shared similar major risk factors of arterial stiffness, but with some differences in the strength of associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

References

  1. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D. et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2588–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1318–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Chowienczyk P, Cruickshank JK, De Backer T. et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2012;30:445–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, May M, Anderson SG, Benjamin EJ, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:636–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cecelja M, Chowienczyk P. Dissociation of aortic pulse wave velocity with risk factors for cardiovascular disease other than hypertension: a systematic review. Hypertension. 2009;54:1328–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Achimastos A, Benetos A, Stergiou G, Argyraki K, Karmaniolas K, Thomas F, et al. Determinants of arterial stiffness in Greek and French hypertensive men. Blood Press. 2002;11:218–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moh MC, Sum CF, Tavintharan S, Ang K, Lee SBM, Tang WE, et al. Baseline predictors of aortic stiffness progression among multi-ethnic Asians with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2017;260:102–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheng CS, Liu M, Kang YY, Wei FF, Zhang L, Li GL, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in elderly Chinese. Hypertens Res. 2013;36:824–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheng CS, Li Y, Li LH, Huang QF, Zeng WF, Kang YY, et al. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as a predictor of mortality in elderly Chinese. Hypertension. 2014;64:1124–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheng CS, Li Y, Huang QF, Kang YY, Li FK, Wang JG. Pulse waves in the lower extremities as a diagnostic tool of peripheral arterial disease and predictor of mortality in elderly Chinese. Hypertension. 2016;67:527–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hedblad B, Nilsson P, Janzon L, Berglund G. Relation between insulin resistance and carotid intima-media thickness and stenosis in non-diabetic subjects. Results from a cross-sectional study in Malmö, Sweden. Diabet Med. 2000;17:299–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gottsäter M, Östling G, Persson M, Engström G, Melander O, Nilsson PM. Non-hemodynamic predictors of arterial stiffness after 17 years of follow-up: the Malmö Diet and Cancer study. J Hypertens. 2015;33:957–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang QF, Sheng CS, Liu M, Li FH, Li Y, Wang JG. Arterial stiffness and wave reflections in relation to plasma advanced glycation end products in a Chinese population. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26:754–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension and the European Society of Cardiology. 2013 ESH/ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(Suppl 1):S5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T. et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:20–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bos WJ. How to assess mean blood pressure properly at the brachial artery level. J Hypertens. 2007;25:751–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Avolio AP, Chen SG, Wang RP, Zhang CL, Li MF, O’Rourke MF. Effects of aging on changing arterial compliance and left ventricular load in a northern Chinese urban community. Circulation. 1983;68:50–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness’ Collaboration. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and reference values’. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2338–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. AlGhatrif M, Strait JB, Morrell CH, Canepa M, Wright J, Elango P, et al. Longitudinal trajectories of arterial stiffness and the role of blood pressure: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Hypertension. 2013;62:934–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wildman RP, Mackey RH, Bostom A, Thompson T, Sutton-Tyrrell K. Measures of obesity are associated with vascular stiffness in young and older adults. Hypertension. 2003;42:468–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brunner EJ, Shipley MJ, Ahmadi-Abhari S, Tabak AG, McEniery CM, Wilkinson IB, et al. Adiposity, obesity, and arterial aging: longitudinal study of aortic stiffness in the Whitehall II cohort. Hypertension. 2015;66:294–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang X, Ye P, Cao R, Yang X, Xiao W, Zhang Y, et al. Triglycerides are a predictive factor for arterial stiffness: a community-based 4.8-year prospective study. Lipids Health Dis. 2016;15:97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan I, Spronck B, Kiat H, Barin E, Reesink KD, Delhaas T, et al. Heart rate dependency of large artery stiffness. Hypertension. 2016;68:236–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McEniery CM, Yasmin, Hall IR, Qasem A, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR. et al. Normal vascular aging: differential effects on wave reflection and aortic pulse wave velocity: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1753–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meani P, Maloberti A, Sormani P, Colombo G, Giupponi L, Stucchi M, et al. Determinants of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity progression in hypertensive patients over a 3.7 years follow-up. Blood Press. 2018;27:32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Scuteri A, Cunha PG, Rosei EA, Badariere J, Bekaert S, Cockcroft JR. et al. Arterial stiffness and influences of the metabolic syndrome: a cross-countries study. Atherosclerosis. 2014;233:654–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Webb DR, Khunti K, Silverman R, Gray LJ, Srinivasan B, Lacy PS, et al. Impact of metabolic indices on central artery stiffness: independent association of insulin resistance and glucose with aortic pulse wave velocity. Diabetologia. 2010;53:1190–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kokubo Y. Prevention of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases: a comparison of lifestyle factors in Westerners and East Asians. Hypertension. 2014;63:655–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lawes CM, Rodgers A, Bennett DA, Parag V, Suh I, Ueshima H. et al. Blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region. J Hypertens. 2003;21:707–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL, Avolio AP, Chirinos JA, Cockcroft JR, et al. Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2015;66:698–722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Yokoi T, Tanaka H. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: impact of different arterial path length measurements. Artery Res. 2010;4:27–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mozos I, Malainer C, Horbańczuk J, Gug C, Stoian D, Luca CT, et al. Inflammatory markers for arterial stiffness in cardiovascular diseases. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the voluntary participation of all subjects from both cohorts. We thank the expert assistance of the staff from the Clinical Research Unit at Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden and the physicians and nurses from the Zhaoxiang Community Health Centre (Qingpu District, Shanghai), as well as the technicians and doctoral and master students from the Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai, China.

Funding

The Chinese study was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81470533, 91639203 and 81770455), and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing, China (2015AA020105–06 and 2016YFC1300100), and from the Shanghai Commissions of Science and Technology (14ZR1436200 and 15XD1503200) and Education (Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support 20152503), the Shanghai Bureau of Health and Family Planning (20144Y0213, 15GWZK0802, 2017BR025 and a grant for leading academics) and Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (14XJ10071), Shanghai, China. The Swedish study was supported by the Medical Research Council of Sweden (grant K2011-65X-20752-04-6), the Heart- and Lung Foundation, the Region Skåne County Council, and the Ernhold Lundstrom Foundation.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Qian-Hui Guo, Iram Faqir Muhammad

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials and Centre for Vascular Evaluations, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

    Qian-Hui Guo, Chang-Sheng Sheng, Ji-Guang Wang & Yan Li

  2. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

    Iram Faqir Muhammad, Yan Borné, Margaretha Persson, Gunnar Engström & Peter M. Nilsson

Authors
  1. Qian-Hui Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iram Faqir Muhammad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan Borné
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chang-Sheng Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Margaretha Persson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ji-Guang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gunnar Engström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Peter M. Nilsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yan Li or Peter M. Nilsson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J-GW reports receiving grants and lecture and consulting fees from Omron Healthcare (Kyoto, Japan). The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, QH., Muhammad, I.F., Borné, Y. et al. Difference in the risk profiles of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: results from two community-based studies in China and Sweden. J Hum Hypertens 34, 207–213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0160-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0160-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links