Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Blood pressure in early and mid-pregnancy and the risk of small-for-gestational-age birth: findings of a large cohort study in China

Abstract

The influences of blood pressure in early to mid-pregnancy on the risk of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth are not clear. Our objective was to examine the associations of the blood pressure levels at 10 and 18 gestational weeks with the risk of SGA birth. Data were obtained from the Chinese Maternal and Newborn’s Health Monitoring System (MNHMS). In total, 50745 Chinese women who delivered a single live infant at a gestational age of between 28 and 42 weeks were included in this analysis. Blood pressure, birth outcome and other related information were obtained during antenatal visits by obstetricians. Logistic regression models were used to examine the associations, adjusting for potential confounders. The total incidence of SGA birth was 8.9%. High blood pressure levels at 10 gestational weeks significantly increased the risk of SGA birth (SBP: RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.11–1.56; DBP: RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05–1.14). The incidence of SGA birth was not associated with the DBP at 18 gestational weeks but showed a U-shaped relationship with SBP. A decrease in blood pressure from 10 to 18 gestational weeks was associated with an increased risk of SGA birth (SBP: RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.07; DBP: RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02–1.09). Our results provide evidence on the relationship of blood pressure in early and mid-pregnancy with SGA birth. Higher blood pressures during early pregnancy and greater decreases in blood pressure from early to mid-pregnancy increased the risk of SGA birth, indicating a continuum of risk for SGA birth based on blood pressure starting during early pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee AC, Katz J, Blencowe H, Cousens S, Kozuki N, Vogel JP, et al. National and regional estimates of term and preterm babies born small for gestational age in 138 low-income and middle-income countries in 2010. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1:e26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz J, Lee AC, Kozuki N, Lawn JE, Cousens S, Blencowe H, et al. Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:417–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ray JG, Park AL, Fell DB. Mortality in infants affected by preterm birth and severe small-for-gestational age birth weight. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20171881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang Y-T, Lin H-Y, Wang C-H, Su B-H, Lin C-C. Association of preterm birth and small for gestational age with metabolic outcomes in children and adolescents: a population-based cohort study from Taiwan. Pediatr & Neonatol. 2018;59:147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mericq V, Martinez-Aguayo A, Uauy R, Iniguez G, Van der Steen M, Hokken-Koelega A. Long-term metabolic risk among children born premature or small for gestational age. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13:50–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1–452.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allen VM, Joseph K, Murphy KE, Magee LA, Ohlsson A. The effect of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy on small for gestational age and stillbirth: a population based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2004;4:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wikstrom AK, Gunnarsdottir J, Nelander M, Simic M, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S. Prehypertension in pregnancy and risks of small for gestational age infant and stillbirth. Hypertens. 2016;67:640–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Macdonald-Wallis C, Silverwood RJ, de Stavola BL, Inskip H, Cooper C, Godfrey KM, et al. Antenatal blood pressure for prediction of pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, and small for gestational age babies: development and validation in two general population cohorts. BMJ. 2015;351:h5948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Macdonald-Wallis C, Tilling K, Fraser A, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA. Associations of blood pressure change in pregnancy with fetal growth and gestational age at delivery: findings from a prospective cohort. Hypertens. 2014;64:36–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bakker R, Steegers EA, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Blood pressure in different gestational trimesters, fetal growth, and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: the generation R study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:797–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukushima K, Morokuma S, Tsukimori K, Murata M, Wake N. Blood pressure measurements within the JNC7 pre-hypertensive range after 32 weeks of gestation are a risk factor for decreased fetal growth. Hypertens Res. 2012;35:128–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaillard R, Bakker R, Willemsen SP, Hofman A, Steegers EA, Jaddoe VW. Blood pressure tracking during pregnancy and the risk of gestational hypertensive disorders: the Generation R Study. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:3088–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Macdonald-Wallis C, Silverwood RJ, Fraser A, Nelson SM, Tilling K, Lawlor DA, et al. Gestational-age-specific reference ranges for blood pressure in pregnancy: findings from a prospective cohort. J Hypertens. 2015;33:96–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Macdonald-Wallis C, Tilling K, Fraser A, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA. Established preeclampsia risk factors are related to patterns of blood pressure change in normal term pregnancy: findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. J Hypertens. 2011;29:1703–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang A, Ji Z, Zhao W, Hu H, Yang Q, Chen D. Rate of gestational weight gain and preterm birth in relation to prepregnancy body mass indices and trimester: a follow-up study in China. Reprod Health. 2016;13:93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu LiZR, Shulian Zhang, Wenjing Shi, Weili Yan, Xiaoli Wang, et al. Chinese neonatal birth weight curve for different gestational age. Chin J Pediatr. 2015;53:97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Preg. 2001; 20:IX-XIV.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: the R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011. http://www.R-project.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shen M, Tan H, Zhou S, Smith GN, Walker MC, Wen SW. Trajectory of blood pressure change during pregnancy and the role of pre-gravid blood pressure: a functional data analysis approach. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Steer PJ, Little MP, Kold-Jensen T, Chapple J, Elliott P. Maternal blood pressure in pregnancy, birth weight, and perinatal mortality in first births: prospective study. BMJ. 2004;329:1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayer C, Joseph KS. Fetal growth: a review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:136–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. He D, Wu S, Zhao H, Zheng Z, Zhang W. High normal blood pressure in early pregnancy also contribute to early onset preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018;40:539–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376:631–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goulopoulou S, Davidge ST. Molecular mechanisms of maternal vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21:88–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mol BWJ, Roberts CT, Thangaratinam S, Magee LA, de Groot CJM, Hofmeyr GJ. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2016;387:999–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kintiraki E, Papakatsika S, Kotronis G, Goulis DG, Kotsis V. Pregnancy-Induced hypertension. Hormones. 2015;14:211–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roberts JM, Hubel CA. The two stage model of preeclampsia: variations on the theme. Placenta. 2009;30(Suppl A):S32–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Santillan MK, Santillan DA, Sigmund CD, Hunter SK. From molecules to medicine: a future cure for preeclampsia? Drug News Perspect. 2009;22:531–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang A, Wu K, Zhao W, Hu H, Yang Q, Chen D. Attendance at prenatal care and adverse birth outcomes in China: a follow-up study based on Maternal and Newborn’s Health Monitoring System. Midwifery. 2018;57:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Aiqun Huang or Dafang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Ma, Y., Wu, K. et al. Blood pressure in early and mid-pregnancy and the risk of small-for-gestational-age birth: findings of a large cohort study in China. J Hum Hypertens 33, 475–481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0150-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0150-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links