Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Prognostic role of masked and white-coat hypertension: 10-Year mortality in treated elderly hypertensives

Abstract

White-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH) and masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) are common in the elderly. The prognostic role of these hypertension phenotypes is not completely defined in this subpopulation. Our aim is to evaluate the long-term prognostic role of WUCH and MUCH in treated elderly hypertensives. Observational study conducted on 120 consecutive treated elderly hypertensives. Patients were assessed on a first clinical visit in 2006. Subsequently, such patients or their relatives have been recalled after 10 years to evaluate the survival rates. Main inclusion criteria at baseline: age ≥ 65 years, a previous diagnosis of essential hypertension, a valid 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). All participants received anti-hypertensive drugs during the 10-year period and we considered 10-year mortality for the analysis. General characteristics at baseline: mean age was 71.2 ± 5.3 years; females were 53.3%; 15.1% of patients had sustained controlled hypertension (SCH), 35.8% had WUCH, 10.8% had MUCH and 38.3% had sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH). Thirty-two patients (26.7%) died during the 10-year period. Deceased patients were older, had lower treatment intensity, HDLc levels and eGFR than survivors. After adjusting for these covariates, MUCH (HR 12.30, p < 0.001) and SUCH (HR 4.84, p = 0.007) were associated with higher risk of death, compared to SCH, while no relationship emerged with WUCH (HR 1.58, p = 0.455). In our real-life study on treated elderly hypertensives, MUCH was associated with higher risk of death, compared to SCH and SUCH, while WUCH was not. ABPM is a key tool to improve management and therefore prognosis in this subpopulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleg JL, Aronow WS, Frishman WH. Cardiovascular drug therapy in the elderly: benefits and challenges. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:13–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cutler JA, Sorlie PD, Wolz M, Thom T, Fields LE, Roccella EJ. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates in United States adults between 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Hypertension. 2008;52:818–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tocci G, Presta V, Figliuzzi I, Attalla El Halabieh N, Battistoni A, Coluccia R, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcomes of white-coat and masked hypertension: analysis of a large ambulatory blood pressure database. J Clin Hypertens. 2018;20:297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Briasoulis A, Androulakis E, Palla M, Papageorgiou N, Tousoulis D. White-coat hypertension and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2016;34:593–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hänninen MR, Niiranen TJ, Puukka PJ, Kesäniemi YA, Kähönen M, Jula AM. Target organ damage and masked hypertension in the general population: the Finn-Home study. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1136–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008. JAMA. 2010;303:2043–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Metoki H, Asayama K, Obara T, Hashimoto J, et al. Prognosis of “masked” hypertension and “white-coat” hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:508–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Balietti P, Spannella F, Giulietti F, Rosettani G, Bernardi B, Cocci G, et al. Ten-year changes in ambulatory blood pressure: the prognostic value of ambulatory pulse pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20:1230–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G, et al. European Society of Hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1731–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G, et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2003;21:821–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banegas JR, Ruilope LM, de la Sierra A, Vinyoles E, Gorostidi M, de la Cruz JJ, et al. Relationship between clinic and ambulatory blood-pressure measurements and mortality. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1509–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mancia G. White-coat hypertension: growing evidence in favour of its adverse prognostic significance. J Hypertens. 2017;35:710–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation—United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:1227–32.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Toth PP, Kwiterovich PO, Blumenthal RS, et al. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. JAMA. 2013;310:2061–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Spannella F, Giulietti F, Fedecostante M, Ricci M, Balietti P, Cocci G, et al. Interarm blood pressure differences predict target organ damage in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Hypertens. 2017;19:472–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Omboni S, Palatini P, Parati G. Standards for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring clinical reporting in daily practice: recommendations from the Italian Society of Hypertension. Blood Pressure Monit. 2015;20:241–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;00:1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fedecostante M, Spannella F, Giulietti F, Espinosa E, Dessì-Fulgheri P, Sarzani R. Associations between body mass index, ambulatory blood pressure findings, and changes in cardiac structure: relevance of pulse and nighttime pressures. J Clin Hypertens. 2015;17:147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE. Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. BMJ. 2003;326:1427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maselli M, Giantin V, Franchin A, Zanatta F, Sarti S, Corradin ML. Detection of blood pressure increments in active elderly individuals: the role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;24:914–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tientcheu D, Ayers C, Das SR, McGuire DK, de Lemos JA, Khera A, et al. Target organ complications and cardiovascular events associated with masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension: analysis from the Dallas Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2159–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fagard RH, Cornelissen VA. Incidence of cardiovascular events in white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension versus true normotension: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2007;25:2193–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fujiwara T, Yano Y, Hoshide S, Kanegae H, Kario K. Association of cardiovascular outcomes with masked hypertension defined by home blood pressure monitoring in a Japanese general practice population. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:583–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71:1269–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kario K, Shimada K, Schwartz JE, Matsuo T, Hoshide S, Pickering TG. Silent and clinically overt stroke in older Japanese subjects with white-coat and sustained hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:238–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bobrie G, Chatellier G, Genes N, Clerson P, Vaur L, Vaisse B, et al. Cardiovascular prognosis of “masked hypertension” detected by blood pressure self-measurement in elderly treated hypertensive patients. JAMA. 2004;291:1342–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stergiou GS, Asayama K, Thijs L, Kollias A, Niiranen TJ, Hozawa A, et al. Prognosis of white-coat and masked hypertension: International Database of Home blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome. Hypertension. 2014;63:675–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang Y, Huang W, Mai W, Cai X, An D, Liu Z, et al. White-coat hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and total mortality. J Hypertens. 2017;35:677–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sega R, Trocino G, Lanzarotti A, Carugo S, Cesana G, Schiavina R, et al. Alterations of cardiac structure in patients with isolated office, ambulatory, or home hypertension: data from the general population (Pressione Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni [PAMELA] Study). Circulation. 2001;104:1385–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cuspidi C, Facchetti R, Bombelli M, Sala C, Tadic M, Grassi G. Risk of new-onset metabolic syndrome associated with white-coat and masked hypertension: data from a general population. J Hypertens. 2018;36:1833–183931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mancia G. Clinical significance of white-coat hypertension. J Hypertens. 2016;34:623–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mancia G, Bombelli M, Cuspidi C, Facchetti R, Grassi G. Cardiovascular risk associated with white-coat hypertension: pro side of the argument. Hypertension. 2017;70:668–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Franklin SS, Thijs L, Asayama K, Li Y, Hansen TW, Boggia J, et al. The cardiovascular risk of white-coat hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2033–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ben-Dov IZ, Kark JD, Mekler J, Shaked E, Bursztyn M. The white coat phenomenon is benign in referred treated patients: a 14-year ambulatory blood pressure mortality study. J Hypertens. 2008;26:699–705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Franklin SS, Thijs L, Hansen TW, Li Y, Boggia J, Kikuya M, et al. Significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: a meta-analysis using the International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes population. Hypertension. 2012;59:564–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Harrell FE,Jr, Lee KL, Matchar DB, Reichert TA. Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems, and suggested solutions. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985;69:1071–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Sarzani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spannella, F., Filipponi, A., Giulietti, F. et al. Prognostic role of masked and white-coat hypertension: 10-Year mortality in treated elderly hypertensives. J Hum Hypertens 33, 741–747 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0140-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0140-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links