Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

The optimal blood pressure target in diabetes mellitus: a quest coming to an end?

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 32, pages 641–650 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The presence of hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) substantially increases cardiovascular risk. Blood pressure (BP) decrease in these individuals is associated with large reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but the optimal BP levels in DM still remain a matter of important controversy. For almost 20 years, guidelines recommended an office BP target of <130/80 mmHg in diabetic individuals, following evidence from trials randomizing patients to diastolic BP levels. When the action-to-control-cardiovascular-risk-in-diabetes-blood-pressure (ACCORD-BP) study showed that systolic BP (SBP) <120 mmHg was associated with similar risk to SBP < 140 mmHg in type 2 DM, all guidelines stepped back to recommend a SBP < 140 mmHg, despite the obvious limitations of ACCORD-BP, including the surprisingly low event rate and the actual average BP of 133.5/70.5 mmHg in the “standard-target” arm. In contrast, the systolic-blood-pressure-intervention-trial (SPRINT) showed cardiovascular benefits in hypertensive patients without DM randomized to SBP<120 versus <140 mmHg and many believed that absence of between-group differences in ACCORD-BP was rather a matter of power and not of dissimilar cardiovascular profile of diabetic patients. In this regard, the American-College-of-Cardiology/American-Heart-Association 2017 BP guidelines advocated a BP target of <130/80 in all hypertensives, including those with DM. However, the 2018 American-Diabetes-Association recommendations were not in the same direction, suggesting BP goal <140/90 for most patients, with the exception of those with “high cardiovascular risk”, where a <130/80 mmHg target may apply. This review presents the evidence from old and recent trials relevant to optimal BP levels in DM, aiming to shed light in this major clinical question.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Blood Press. 2014;23:3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perkovic V, Huxley R, Wu Y, Prabhakaran D, MacMahon S. The burden of blood pressure-related disease: a neglected priority for global health. Hypertension. 2007;50:991–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/ APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension. 2017 (Epub ahead of print).

  4. World Health Organization. Global report on Diabetes. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

  5. The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, SRK Seshasai, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarafidis PA, Whaley-Connell A, Sowers JR, Bakris GL. Cardiometabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease: what is the link? J Cardiometab Syndr 2006;1:58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarafidis PA, Alexandrou ME, Ruilope LM. A review of chemical therapies for treating diabetic hypertension. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017;18:909–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:434–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:229–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adler AI, Stratton IM, Neil HA, Yudkin JS, Matthews DR, Cull CA, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:412–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. UK Prospective Diabetes. Study Group Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998; 317: 703–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet. 1998;351:1755–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarafidis PA, Georgianos P, Bakris GL. Resistant hypertension—its identification and epidemiology. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9:51–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ACCORD Study Group TAS, Cushman WC, Evans GW, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1575–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Supplement 1):S11–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults. JAMA. 2014;311:507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. SPRINT Research Group TSR, Wright JT, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK, Sink KM, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. American Diabetes Association. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Supplement 1):S86–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarafidis PA, Bakris GL. Antihypertensive therapy and the risk of new-onset diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1167–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarafidis PA, Bakris GL. Use of a single target blood pressure level in type 2 diabetes mellitus for all cardiovascular risk reduction. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarafidis PA, Lazaridis AA, Ruiz-Hurtado G, Ruilope LM. Blood pressure reduction in diabetes: lessons from ACCORD, SPRINT and EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13:365–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarafidis PA. Patient cases: 1. a patient with apparent compliance. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2015;22(S1):15–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarafidis PA, Sharpe CC, Wood E, Blacklock R, Rumjon A, Al-Yassin A, et al. Prevalence, patterns of treatment, and control of hypertension in predialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120:147–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Woodward M, ADVANCE Collaborative Group. et al. Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:829–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooper-DeHoff RM, Gong Y, Handberg EM, Bavry AA, Denardo SJ, Bakris GL, et al. Tight blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2010;304:61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Lobach I, Messerli FH. Blood pressure targets in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus/impaired fasting glucose:observations from traditional and bayesian random-effects meta-analyses of randomized trials. Circulation. 2011;123:2799–810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Reboldi G, Gentile G, Angeli F, Ambrosio G, Mancia G, Verdecchia P. Effects of intensive blood pressure reduction on myocardial infarction and stroke in diabetes: a meta-analysis in 73 913 patients. J Hypertens. 2011;29:1253–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McBrien K, Rabi DM, Campbell N, Barnieh L, Clement F, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Intensive and standard blood pressure targets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Arguedas JA, Leiva V, Wright JM. Blood pressure targets for hypertension in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; CD008277.

  31. American Diabetes Association. Executive summary: standards of medical care in diabetes-2013. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(Supplement 1): S4–10.

  32. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group, Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, Goff DC, Bigger JT, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2545–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Margolis KL, O’Connor PJ, Morgan TM, Buse JB, Cohen RM, Cushman WC, et al. Outcomes of combined cardiovascular risk factor management strategies in type 2 diabetes: the ACCORD randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1721–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sarafidis PA, Ruilope LM. Aggressive blood pressure reduction and renin-angiotensin system blochade in chronic kidney disease:time for re-evaluation? Kidney Int. 2014;85:536–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Khosla N, Sarafidis PA, Bakris GL. Microalbuminuria. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 2006;26:635–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruiz-Hurtado G, Banegas JR, Sarafidis PA, Volpe M, Williams B, Ruilope LM. Has the SPRINT trial introduced a new blood-pressure goal in hypertension? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14:560–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cushman WC, Whelton PK, Fine LJ, Wright JT, Reboussin DM, Johnson KC, et al. SPRINT trial results. latest news in hypertension management. Hypertension. 2016;67:263–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mancia G, Bertinieri G, Grassi G, Parati G, Pomidossi G, Ferrari A, et al. Effects of blood-pressure measurement by the doctor on patient’s blood pressure and heart rate. Lancet. 1983;2:695–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mancia G, Parati G, Bilo G, Gao P, Fagard R, Redon J, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure values in the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET). Hypertension. 2012;60:1400–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Esler M. SPRINT, or false start, toward a lower universal-treated blood pressure target in hypertension. Hypertension. 2016;67:266–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Perkovic V, Rodgers A. Redefining blood-pressure targets — SPRINT starts the marathon. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2175–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tonelli M, Muntner P, Lloyd A, Manns BJ, Klarenbach S, Pannu N, et al. Risk of coronary events in people with chronic kidney disease compared with those with diabetes: a population-level cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:807–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheung AK, Rahman M, Reboussin DM, Craven TE, Greene T, Kimmel PL, et al. Effects of intensive BP control in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:2812–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, von Eynatten M, Mattheus M, et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:323–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:644–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Abdul-Ghani M, Del Prato S, Chilton R, DeFronzo RA. SGLT2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: lessons learned from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:717–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ferrannini E, Mark M, Mayoux E. CV protection in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial: a “Thrifty Substrate” hypothesis. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1108–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Marx N, McGuire DK. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition for the reduction of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:3192–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sarafidis PA, Tsapas A. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1092–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Imprialos KP, Sarafidis PA, Karagiannis AI. Sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and blood pressure decrease. J Hypertens. 2015;33:2185–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, Mainou M, Liakos A, Bekiari E, et al. Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gilbert RE. Sodium–glucose linked transporter-2 inhibitors: potential for renoprotection beyond blood glucose lowering? Kidney Int. 2014;86:693–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cherney DZI, Perkins BA, Soleymanlou N, Maione M, Lai V, Lee A, et al. Renal hemodynamic effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2014;129:587–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Pandit JA, Batlle D. Snapshot hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in hypertension. precision in the measurements is key. Hypertension. 2016;67:270–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Touyz RM, Dominiczak AF. Successes of SPRINT, but still some hurdles to cross. Hypertension. 2016;67:268–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Eirini Papadopoulou & Pantelis Sarafidis

  2. Second Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Eirini Papadopoulou

  3. First Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Elena Angeloudi & Spiridon Karras

Authors
  1. Eirini Papadopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elena Angeloudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Spiridon Karras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pantelis Sarafidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pantelis Sarafidis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papadopoulou, E., Angeloudi, E., Karras, S. et al. The optimal blood pressure target in diabetes mellitus: a quest coming to an end?. J Hum Hypertens 32, 641–650 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0079-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0079-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links