Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Skyrocketing pollution: assessing the environmental fate of July 4th fireworks in New York City

Abstract

Background

Pyrotechnic displays often lead to significant increases in poor air quality. The widespread environmental fate—involving air, water, and spatial-temporal analyses—of fireworks-produced pollutants has seldom been investigated.

Objective

This study examined the environmental fate of pollutants from the largest fireworks event in the U.S.: Macy’s Fourth of July Fireworks show in New York City (NYC).

Methods

Real-time PM2.5 and gravimetric PM2.5 and PM10 were collected at locations along the East River of NYC. Airborne particles were assayed for trace elements (X-ray fluorescence) and organic and elemental carbon (OC/EC). River water samples were evaluated by ICP-MS for heavy-metal water contamination. Spatial-temporal analyses were created using PM2.5 concentrations reported by both EPA and PurpleAir monitoring networks for NYC and 5 other major metropolitan areas.

Results

The fireworks event resulted in large increases in PM2.5 mass concentrations at the river-adjacent sampling locations. While background control PM2.5 was 10–15 µg/m3, peak real-time PM2.5 levels exceeded 3000 µg/m3 at one site and 1000 µg/m3 at two other locations. The integrated gravimetric PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations during the fireworks event ranged from 162 to 240 µg/m3 and 252 to 589 µg/m3, respectively. Zn, Pb, Sb, and Cu more than doubled in river water samples taken after the event, while S, K, Ba, Cu, Mg, Fe, Sr, Ti, and Zn increased in airborne PM2.5 from the fireworks. Data from hyperlocal monitoring networks for NYC and other metropolitan areas yielded similar, but generally smaller, increases in PM2.5 levels.

Impact

Fireworks shows have been associated with environmental contamination. This comprehensive analysis considers the fate of pollutants from the largest annual U.S. pyrotechnic show through air, water, and hyperlocal temporal characterization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Map of the locations of PM monitors with respect to the Macy’s Fourth of July Fireworks show launch site.
Fig. 2: Real-time concentrations of PM and BC pre- and post-fireworks show.
Fig. 3: Hourly concentration data from EPA equivalent monitors across multiple cities.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Vaziri, A Taylor Swift Eras Tour: Santa Clara fines fireworks company after curfew-breaking shows. San Francisco Chronicle. 2023. https://www.sfchronicle.com/entertainment/article/taylor-swift-santa-clara-curfew-18277831.php.

  2. American Pyrotechnics Association. U.S. Fireworks Industry Revenue Figures Breakdown by Industry Segment 2000–2022. Southport. 2023.

  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Fireworks Annual Report. 2022. Retrieved from https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/2022-Fireworks-Annual-Report.pdf.

  4. Attri AK, Kumar U, Jain VK. Formation of ozone by fireworks. Nature. 2001;411:1015–1015. https://doi.org/10.1038/35082634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Licudine JA, Yee H, Chang WL, Whelen AC. Hazardous metals in ambient air due to new year fireworks during 2004–2011 celebrations in Pearl City, Hawaii. Public Health Rep. 2012;127:440–50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3366381/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jia C, Xue Z, Fu X, Sultana F, Smith LJ, Zhang Y, et al. Impacts of Independence Day fireworks on pollution levels of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the U.S. Sci Total Environ. 2020;743:140774 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140774.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Y, Ma W, Yin S, Li C, Xu K, Zhang C, et al. Quantification of enhanced VOC emissions from fireworks. Environ Pollut. 2022;315:120389 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu W, Xu R, Ye T, Abramson MJ, Morawska L, Jalaludin B, et al. Estimates of global mortality burden associated with short-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2·5). Lancet Planet Health. 2024;8:e146–e155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00003-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajagopalan S, Al-Kindi SG, Brook RD. Air pollution and cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2054–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.099.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gouder C, Montefort S. Potential impact of fireworks on respiratory health. Lung India. 2014;31:375–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lall R, Ito K, Thurston GD. Distributed lag analyses of daily hospital admissions and source-apportioned fine particle air pollution. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:455–60. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. What’s in fireworks, and what produces those colorful explosions? Chemical & Engineering News. 2017. Retrieved 19 Dec 2023, from https://cendevqa.acs.org/articles/95/i27/s-fireworks-produces-those-colorful.html.

  13. Antimony trisulfide. American Chemical Society. 2006. Retrieved September 14, 2023, from https://www.acs.org/molecule-of-the-week/archive/a/antimony-trisulfide.html.

  14. Juan CA, Pérez De La Lastra JM, Plou FJ, Pérez-Lebeña E. The chemistry of reactive oxygen species (ROS) revisited: outlining their role in biological macromolecules (DNA, lipids and proteins) and induced pathologies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:4642 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094642.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Z, Weichenthal S, Kwong JC, Burnett RT, Hatzopoulou M, Jerrett M, et al. A population-based cohort study of respiratory disease and long-term exposure to iron and copper in fine particulate air pollution and their combined impact on reactive oxygen species generation in human lungs. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55:3807–18. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05931.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lakey PSJ, Berkemeier T, Tong H, Arangio AM, Lucas K, Pöschl U, et al. Chemical exposure-response relationship between air pollutants and reactive oxygen species in the human respiratory tract. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32916 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32916.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun J, Yu J, Shen Z, Niu X, Wang D, Wang X, et al. Oxidative stress-inducing effects of various urban PM2.5 road dust on human lung epithelial cells among 10 Chinese megacities. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;224:112680 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112680.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hickey C, Gordon C, Galdanes K, Blaustein M, Horton L, Chillrud S, et al. Toxicity of particles emitted by fireworks. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2020;17:28 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00360-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Skalny AV, Lima TRR, Ke T, Zhou J-C, Bornhorst J, Alekseenko SI, et al. Toxic metal exposure as a possible risk factor for COVID-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases. Food Chem Toxicol. 2020;146:111809 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Potter NA, Meltzer GY, Avenbuan ON, Raja A, Zelikoff JT. Particulate matter and associated metals: a link with neurotoxicity and mental health. Atmosphere. 2021;12:425 https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12040425.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng K, Zeng Z, Tian Q, Huang J, Zhong Q, Huo X. Epidemiological evidence for the effect of environmental heavy metal exposure on the immune system in children. Sci Total Environ. 2023;868:161691 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161691.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arinola G, Dutta A, Oluwole O, Olopade C. Household air pollution, levels of micronutrients and heavy metals in cord and maternal blood, and pregnancy outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:2891 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122891.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. United States. 2011. Federal Hazardous Substances Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1261–1278.

  24. Yerramsetti VS, Sharma AR, Gauravarapu Navlur N, Rapolu V, Dhulipala NSKC, Sinha PR. The impact assessment of Diwali fireworks emissions on the air quality of a tropical urban site, Hyderabad, India, during three consecutive years. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185:7309–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3102-x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Han G, Gong W, Quan JH, Li J, Zhang M. Spatial and temporal distributions of contaminants emitted because of Chinese New Year’s Eve celebrations in Wuhan. Environ Sci: Process Impacts. 2014;16:916–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00588G.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Camilleri R, Vella AJ. Effect of fireworks on ambient air quality in Malta. Atmos Environ. 2010;44:4521–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.07.057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sijimol MR, Mohan M. Environmental impacts of perchlorate with special reference to fireworks—a review. Environ Monit Assess. 2014;186:7203–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3921-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. https://www.macys.com/s/fireworks/by-the-numbers/?lid=fireworks_cta-bythenumbers Macy’s Fourth of July fireworks 2023 - by the numbers. Macy’s Fourth of July Fireworks 2023—by the numbers. (n.d.)

  29. Luglio DG, Katsigeorgis M, Hess J, Kim R, Adragna J, Raja A, et al. PM2.5 concentration and composition in subway systems in the Northeastern United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2021;129:027001 https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. EPA. Compendium Method IO-3.3, Determination of metals in ambient particulate matter using x-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy. 1999. EPA/625/R-96/010a.

  31. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/5040.pdf National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (2003). Method 5040: Benzene. In NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition (pp. 1–9).

  32. https://docs.airnowapi.org/ AirNow. (n.d.). AirNow API Documentation.

  33. https://a816-dohbesp.nyc.gov/IndicatorPublic/beta/key-topics/airquality/realtime/ Real-Time Air Quality in NYC. (n.d.). Environment & Health Data Portal. Retrieved September 15, 2023.

  34. U.S. EPA, O. (n.d.). PM 2.5 Policy and Guidance|Ambient Monitoring Technology Information Center|US EPA. Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/pmpolgud.html.

  35. https://www.R-project.org/ R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  36. Personal Weather Station Dashboard | Weather Underground. (n.d.). Retrieved September 14, 2023, from https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KNYNEWYO1130/table/2023-07-4/2023-07-4/daily.

  37. Anastasiou E, Vilcassim MJR, Adragna J, Gill E, Tovar A, Thorpe LE, et al. Feasibility of low-cost particle sensor types in long-term indoor air pollution health studies after repeated calibration, 2019–2021. Sci Rep. 2022;12:14571 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18200-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Barkjohn KK, Holder AL, Frederick SG, Clements AL. Correction and accuracy of PurpleAir PM2.5 measurements for extreme wildfire smoke. Sensors. 2022;22:9669 https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Delp WW, Singer BC. Wildfire smoke adjustment factors for low-cost and professional PM2.5 monitors with optical sensors. Sensors. 2020;20:3683 https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133683.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Mehadi A, Moosmüller H, Campbell DE, Ham W, Schweizer D, Tarnay L, et al. Laboratory and field evaluation of real-time and near real-time PM 2.5 smoke monitors. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2020;70:158–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1654036.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Darack E. weatherscapes: San Francisco Bay Area. Weatherwise. 2009;62:10–11. https://doi.org/10.3200/WEWI.62.1.10-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/KSFO/date/2023-7-4 Personal Weather Station Dashboard | Weather Underground. (n.d.). Retrieved May 19, 2024

  43. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Guidance for Inhalation Exposures to Particulate Matter. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 30 Sep 2020.

  44. U.S. EPA. Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter. Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC, 2019.

  45. World Health Organization. WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. World Health Organization. 2021. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/345329.

  46. Wang Y, Zhuang G, Xu C, An Z. The air pollution caused by the burning of fireworks during the lantern festival in Beijing. Atmos Environ. 2007;41:417–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.043.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Vecchi R, Bernardoni V, Cricchio D, D’Alessandro A, Fermo P, Lucarelli F, et al. The impact of fireworks on airborne particles. Atmos Environ. 2008;42:1121–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wu G, Tian W, Zhang L, Yang H. The Chinese Spring Festival impact on air quality in china: a critical review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:9074 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159074. PMID: 35897443; PMCID: PMC9330068

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Khan AA, Garsa K, Jindal P, Devara PCS. Effects of stubble burning and firecrackers on the air quality of Delhi. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195:1170 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11635-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mukherjee T, Asutosh A, Pandey SK, Yang L, Gogoi PP, Panwar A, et al. Increasing potential for air pollution over megacity new delhi: a study based on 2016 Diwali episode. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2018;18:2510–8. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.11.0440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rai P, Furger M, El Haddad I, Kumar V, Wang L, Singh A, et al. Real-time measurement and source apportionment of elements in Delhi’s atmosphere. Sci Total Environ. 2020;742:140332 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Shamsipur M, Pourmortazavi SM, Hajimirsadeghi SS. An investigation on decomposition kinetics and thermal properties of copper-fueled pyrotechnic compositions. Combust Sci Technol. 2011;183:575–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2010.523032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pourmortazavi SM, Hajimirsadeghi SS, Kohsari I, Fathollahi M, Hosseini SG. Thermal decomposition of pyrotechnic mixtures containing either aluminum or magnesium powder as fuel. Fuel. 2008;87:244–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.04.022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ. Heavy metals toxicity and the environment. EXS. 2012;101:133–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sengul AB, Asmatulu E. Toxicity of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2020;18:1659–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01033-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Stafoggia M, Oftedal B, Chen J, Rodopoulou S, Renzi M, Atkinson RW, et al. Long-term exposure to low ambient air pollution concentrations and mortality among 28 million people: results from seven large European cohorts within the ELAPSE project. Lancet Planet Health. 2022;6:e9–e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00277-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Brunekreef B, Strak M, Chen J, Andersen ZJ, Atkinson R, Bauwelinck M, et al. Mortality and morbidity effects of long-term exposure to low-level PM2.5, BC, NO2, and O3: an analysis of European cohorts in the ELAPSE Project. Res Rep. (Health Eff Inst). 2021;2021:1–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Caplow T, Schlosser P, Ho DT, Enriquez RC. Effect of tides on solute flushing from a strait: imaging flow and transport in the east river with SF 6. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:4562–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/es035248d.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wilkin RT, Fine DD, Burnett NG. Perchlorate behavior in a municipal lake following fireworks displays. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:3966–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0700698.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Pyrotechnics For The Planet. (n.d.). Chemical & Engineering News. Retrieved January 10, 2024, from https://cen.acs.org/articles/86/i26/Pyrotechnics-Planet.html.

  61. Steinhauser G, Klapötke TM. Green” pyrotechnics: a chemists’ challenge. Angew Chem (Int Ed Engl). 2008;47:3330–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200704510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-66116286 Drone show displays light up the sky on Fourth of July. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 Jan. 2024

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to note the support of NYU’s NIEHS Training Grant T32E007324. We thank friends of the authors for providing rooftops on which to conduct the Fourth of July exposure assessment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AFS and DL assisted in conceiving and designing the analysis, collecting the data, performing the analysis, and were primary in writing the paper. TG conceived and designed the analysis, contributed data or analysis tools, and assisted in performing the analysis and writing the paper. BK, TH, and RK assisted in designing the analysis, collecting the data, performing the analysis, and in writing the paper. AR, KT, NCR, RG, and JG assisted in conceiving and designing the analysis, collecting the data, and performing the analysis. MK and RG assisted in conceiving and designing the analysis and collecting the data. TK and MC assisted in collecting the data and contributing data or analysis tools.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Luglio.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Ethical approval from IRB or IACUC was not required as this study did not involve human or other animal experiments.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saporito, A.F., Gordon, T., Kim, B. et al. Skyrocketing pollution: assessing the environmental fate of July 4th fireworks in New York City. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00701-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00701-x

Keywords

Search

Quick links