Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Historical redlining and park use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from big mobility data



Despite the health benefits of urban green space, disparities in its access and use have long existed. Emerging evidence suggests an adverse impact of redlining, a discriminatory practice decades ago, on multiple health outcomes. However, whether and to what degree redlining contributes to these disparities remains unknown particularly during a pandemic. With newly available mobility data tracking the locations of large numbers of mobile devices, this study links historical redlining with changes in green space use during the COVID-19 pandemic.


This study examines how changes in park visits during the lockdown period (3/23/2020–8/2/2020) are associated with redlining across census tracts in three large U.S. cities.


HOLC neighborhood redlining grade data were merged with SafeGraph mobility data at census tract level for New York City, Chicago, and Philadelphia. Ordinary Least Square regressions were conducted to assess the association between dominant redlining grade and relative change in park visits in census tracts by comparing the lockdown period to the reference period. Spatial error and lag models were also used to account for potential spatial autocorrelation.


Park visits during the lockdown period in 2020 decreased by at least one-third in the three cities. The influence of redlining varied across neighborhoods and cities. In New York City, neighborhoods with more redlined areas experienced the largest drop, sharper decreases concentrated in neighborhoods previously graded as “best” or “still desirable” in Philadelphia, but the effect was barely present in Chicago. In addition, changes in park visits are positively correlated between neighborhoods in New York City and Chicago, but it’s not observed in Philadelphia.

Impact Statement

  • Using emerging big mobility data, our study revealed large drops in park visits, a better measure than commonly-used access measures in capturing green space exposure, during the lockdown period. We found that historical redlining has a lasting impact on current green space use. More decreases in park visits were observed in the redlined areas in New York City, but patterns vary by neighborhood and city due to local-specific neighborhood dynamics. And changes in park visits were spatially, positively correlated across places.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Spatial distribution of neighborhood redlining grade and dominant redlining category in census tracts.
Fig. 2: Park visits per 10,000 people by dominant redlining category at census tract level before and during the pandemic lockdown period.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Pinto LV, Inácio M, Ferreira CSS, Ferreira AD, Pereira P. Ecosystem services and well-being dimensions related to urban green spaces – A systematic review. Sustain Cities Soc. 2022;85:104072.

  2. Fong KC, Hart JE, James P. A review of epidemiologic studies on greenness and health: updated literature through 2017. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018;5:77–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. James P, Banay RF, Hart JE, Laden F. A review of the health benefits of greenness. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015;2:131–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Twohig-Bennett C, Jones A. The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environ Res 2018;166:628–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu H, Li F, Li J, Zhang Y. The relationships between urban parks, residents’ physical activity, and mental health benefits: A case study from Beijing, China. J Environ Manag. 2017;190:223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Banay RF, Bezold CP, James P, Hart JE, Laden F. Residential greenness: Current perspectives on its impact on maternal health and pregnancy outcomes. Int J Women’s Health. 2017;9:133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crouse DL, Pinault L, Balram A, Hystad P, Peters PA, Chen H, et al. Urban greenness and mortality in Canada’s largest cities: A national cohort study. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1:e289–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. James P, Hart JE, Banay RF, Laden F. Exposure to greenness and mortality in a nationwide prospective cohort study of women. Environ Health Perspect, 2016;124:1344–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vienneau D, de Hoogh K, Faeh D, Kaufmann M, Wunderli JM, Röösli M, et al. More than clean air and tranquillity: residential green is independently associated with decreasing mortality. Environ Int. 2017;108:176–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Camargo DM, Ramírez PC, Fermino RC. Individual and environmental correlates to quality of life in park users in Colombia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:1250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharifi F, Nygaard A, Stone WM. Heterogeneity in the subjective well-being impact of access to urban green space. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021;74:103244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ambrey CL, Shahni TJ. Greenspace and wellbeing in Tehran: A relationship conditional on a neighbourhood’s crime rate? Urban For. Urban Green 2017;27:155–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scopelliti M, Carrus G, Adinolfi C, Suarez G, Colangelo G, Lafortezza R, et al. Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: The experience of urban parks in Bogotá. Landsc Urban Plan 2016;148:139–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boone CG, Buckley GL, Grove JM, Sister C. Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2009;99:767–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rigolon A. A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landsc Urban Plan 2016;153:160–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolch J, Wilson JP, Fehrenbach J. Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geogr. 2005;26:4–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Casey JA, James P, Cushing L, Jesdale BM, Morello-Frosch R. Race, ethnicity, income concentration and 10-year change in urban greenness in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:1546.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayen Huerta C, Cafagna G. Snapshot of the Use of Urban Green Spaces in Mexico City during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:4304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jay J, Heykoop F, Hwang L, de Jong J, Kondo M. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Park Use in U.S. Cities. medRxiv. 2021.

  20. Ugolini F, Massetti L, Pearlmutter D, Sanesi G. Usage of urban green space and related feelings of deprivation during the COVID-19 lockdown: Lessons learned from an Italian case study. Land Use Policy. 2021;105:105437.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Venter ZS, Barton DN, Gundersen V, Figari H, Nowell MS. Back to nature: Norwegians sustain increased recreational use of urban green space months after the COVID-19 outbreak. Landsc Urban Plan 2021;214:104175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Geng DC, Innes J, Wu W, Wang G. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: a global analysis. J Res 2021;32:553–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Larson LR, Zhang Z, Oh JI, Beam W, Ogletree SS, Bocarro JN, et al. Urban Park Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Are Socially Vulnerable Communities Disproportionately Impacted? Front. Sustain. Cities. 2021;3:710243.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taff BD, Rice WL, Lawhon B, Newman P. Who Started, Stopped, and Continued Participating in Outdoor Recreation during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States? Results from a National Panel Study. Land. 2021;10:1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nardone A, Chiang J, Corburn J. Historic Redlining and Urban Health Today in U.S. Cities. Environ. Justice. 2020;13:109–19.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hillier AE. Redlining and the home owners’ loan corporation. J Urban Hist. 2003;29:394–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Greer J. The Home Owners’ Loan Corporation and the Development of the Residential Security Maps. J Urban Hist 2013;39:275–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitchell B, Franco J. HOLC “redlining” maps: the persistent structure of segregation and economic inequality. 2018. Available online at: Accessed 21 Oct 2021.

  29. Lee EK, Donley G, Ciesielski TH, Gill I, Yamoah O, Roche A, et al. Health outcomes in redlined versus non-redlined neighborhoods: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2022;294:114696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertocchi G, Dimico A. COVID-19, race, and redlining. medRxiv. 2020.

  31. Li M, Yuan F. Historical redlining and food environments: A study of 102 urban areas in the United States. Health Place. 2022;75:102775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang S, Pierson E, Koh PW, Gerardin J, Redbird B, Grusky D, et al. Mobility network models of COVID-19 explain inequities and inform reopening. Nature. 2021;589:82–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nardone A, Rudolph KE, Morello-Frosch R, Casey JA. Redlines and Greenspace: The Relationship between Historical Redlining and 2010 Greenspace across the United States. Environ Health Perspect 2021;129:017006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. SafeGraph. What about bias in the Safegraph dataset? 2022. Available online at: Accessed 3 Jan 2022.

  35. SafeGraph. Guide to Points-of-Interest Data: POI Data FAQ. 2022. Available online at: Accessed 3 Jan 2022.

Download references


This research is supported by the University at Albany President’s COVID-19 and Minority Health Disparities Seed Funding Program [88826-1-1162929, 2021] and the American Heart Association (grant 19TPA34830085).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



YL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft; YH: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology; RL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources; KZ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Huang, Y., Li, R. et al. Historical redlining and park use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from big mobility data. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:



Quick links