Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Predictors of urinary biomarker concentrations of phthalates and some of their replacements in children in the Project Viva cohort

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology volume 33, pages 255–263 (2023)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Some phthalates are still widely used in food packaging, toys, and personal care products, and links to adverse health have motivated substitution with replacement chemicals. Few studies have examined patterns and predictors of phthalate replacement biomarkers in children.

Objective

To examine associations of sociodemographic, dietary, and urine collection characteristics with urinary concentrations of biomarkers of select phthalates and their replacements in mid-childhood.

Methods

We studied 830 children ages 6–10 years in 2007–2010 in a Boston-area cohort. We quantified urinary metabolites and summed their concentrations to calculate biomarkers of the concentrations of ten parent phthalates/replacements. We used linear regression to examine mutually adjusted associations of each predictor with each phthalate biomarker. We used logistic regression to examine predictors of 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, diisononyl ester (DINCH) biomarker detectability.

Results

Predictor characteristics explained 25–48% of urinary biomarker variability. Di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate (DEHTP) biomarker was higher in females (18.7% [95% CI: 0.7, 39.9]), children who consumed more meat and dairy, and samples collected from later years. DINCH biomarker was more detectable in females (odds ratio [OR] 2.1 [95% CI: 1.5, 3.0]) and samples from later years.

Significance

Populations of children with increased urinary concentrations of phthalate and replacement biomarkers can be targeted for future study of sources of exposure, and identifying dietary predictors of biomarkers will directly guide future interventions.

Impact

Our study uses data from a large cohort that is one of the first to measure DINCH, DEHTP, and metabolites of di-isononyl phthalate and di-isodecyl phthalate. Additionally, we evaluate predictors during mid-childhood when biomarkers might be highest. As the use of replacement phthalates increases, our study is one of the first to examine biomarker patterns and predictors among children.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Spearman correlation coefficients of concentrations of biomarkers of parent phthalates in mid-childhood (age 6–10 years) in Project Viva (n = 830).

Data availability

Restrictions apply to the availability of some, or all data generated or analyzed during this study to preserve patient confidentiality or because they were used under license. The corresponding author will on request detail the restrictions and any conditions under which access to some data may be provided. Project Viva data sharing policies are further detailed at https://www.hms.harvard.edu/viva/protocol-policies.html.

References

  1. Zota AR, Calafat AM, Woodruff TJ. Temporal trends in phthalate exposures: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2010. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:235–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Saravanabhavan G, Guay M, Langlois É, Giroux S, Murray J, Haines D. Biomonitoring of phthalate metabolites in the Canadian population through the Canadian Health Measures Survey (2007–2009). Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013;216:652–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Braun JM, Sathyanarayana S, Hauser R. Phthalate exposure and children’s health. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2013;25:247–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jurewicz J, Hanke W. Exposure to phthalates: reproductive outcome and children health. A review of epidemiological studies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2011;24:115–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oken E, Baccarelli AA, Gold DR, Kleinman KP, Litonjua AA, De Meo D, et al. Cohort profile: project viva. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:37–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Silva MJ, Jia T, Samandar E, Preau JL Jr, Calafat AM. Environmental exposure to the plasticizer 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, diisononyl ester (DINCH) in U.S. adults (2000-2012). Environ Res. 2013;126:159–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva MJ, Wong LY, Samandar E, Preau JL Jr, Jia LT, Calafat AM. Exposure to di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate in the U.S. general population from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Environ Int. 2019;123:141–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Botelho J, Prinkle JL. Laboratory Procedures Manual: Metabolites of phthalates and phthalate alternatives. In: CDC, editor. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018.

  9. Baird DD, Saldana TM, Nepomnaschy PA, Hoppin JA, Longnecker MP, Weinberg CR, et al. Within-person variability in urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations: measurements from specimens after long-term frozen storage. J exposure Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2010;20:169–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalloo G, Wellenius GA, McCandless L, Calafat AM, Sjodin A, Karagas M, et al. Profiles and Predictors of Environmental Chemical Mixture Exposure among Pregnant Women: The Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment Study. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:10104–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rifas-Shiman SL, Willett WC, Lobb R, Kotch J, Dart C, Gillman MW. PrimeScreen, a brief dietary screening tool: reproducibility and comparability with both a longer food frequency questionnaire and biomarkers. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:249–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johns LE, Cooper GS, Galizia A, Meeker JD. Exposure assessment issues in epidemiology studies of phthalates. Environ Int. 2015;85:27–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Updated Tables, January 2017, 1. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/pdf/FourthReport_UpdatedTables_Volume1_Jan2017.pdf. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Environmental Health; Division of Laboratory Sciences. 2017.

  14. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw, PJ, Editors. Partitioning Around Medoids (Program PAM). In Finding Groups in Data. 1990. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316801.ch2.

  15. Yao X, Steven XuX, Yang Y, Zhu Z, Zhu Z, Tao F, et al. Stratification of population in NHANES 2009–2014 based on exposure pattern of lead, cadmium, mercury, and arsenic and their association with cardiovascular, renal and respiratory outcomes. Environ Int. 2021;149:106410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hauser R, Meeker JD, Park S, Silva MJ, Calafat AM. Temporal variability of urinary phthalate metabolite levels in men of reproductive age. Environ health Perspect. 2004;112:1734–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Silva MJ, Barr DB, Reidy JA, Malek NA, Hodge CC, Caudill SP, et al. Urinary levels of seven phthalate metabolites in the U.S. population from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2000. Environ health Perspect. 2004;112:331–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffman K, Hammel SC, Phillips AL, Lorenzo AM, Chen A, Calafat AM, et al. Biomarkers of exposure to SVOCs in children and their demographic associations: The TESIE Study. Environ Int. 2018;119:26–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Watkins DJ, Eliot M, Sathyanarayana S, Calafat AM, Yolton K, Lanphear BP, et al. Variability and Predictors of Urinary Concentrations of Phthalate Metabolites during Early Childhood. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:8881–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith AR, Kogut KR, Parra K, Bradman A, Holland N, Harley KG. Dietary intake and household exposures as predictors of urinary concentrations of high molecular weight phthalates and bisphenol A in a cohort of adolescents. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022;32:37–47.

  21. Zota AR, Phillips CA, Mitro SD. Recent Fast Food Consumption and Bisphenol A and Phthalates Exposures among the U.S. Population in NHANES, 2003-2010. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124:1521–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Serrano SE, Braun J, Trasande L, Dills R, Sathyanarayana S. Phthalates and diet: a review of the food monitoring and epidemiology data. Environ Health. 2014;13:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. García-Fabila MM, Chávez AA, Meza JCS, Montes LPB, García AR. Phthalates in the diet of Mexican children of school age. Risk analysis. Toxicol Rep. 2020;7:1487–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Carwile JL, Seshasayee SM, Ahrens KA, Hauser R, Chavarro JE, Fleisch AF. Dietary correlates of urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations in 6-19 Year old children and adolescents. Environ Res. 2022;204:112083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trasande L, Attina TM, Sathyanarayana S, Spanier AJ, Blustein J. Race/ethnicity-specific associations of urinary phthalates with childhood body mass in a nationally representative sample. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:501–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cirillo T, Fasano E, Castaldi E, Montuori P, Amodio, Cocchieri R. Children’s exposure to Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and dibutylphthalate plasticizers from school meals. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:10532–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garí M, Koch HM, Pälmke C, Jankowska A, Wesołowska E, Hanke W, et al. Determinants of phthalate exposure and risk assessment in children from Poland. Environ Int. 2019;127:742–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lioy PJ, Hauser R, Gennings C, Koch HM, Mirkes PE, Schwetz BA, et al. Assessment of phthalates/phthalate alternatives in children’s toys and childcare articles: Review of the report including conclusions and recommendation of the Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015;25:343–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hammel SC, Levasseur JL, Hoffman K, Phillips AL, Lorenzo AM, Calafat AM, et al. Children’s exposure to phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers in the home: The TESIE study. Environ Int. 2019;132:105061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Silva MJ, Wong L-Y, Samandar E, Preau JL, Calafat AM, Ye X. Exposure to di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate in a convenience sample of U.S. adults from 2000 to 2016. Arch Toxicol 2017;91:3287–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Silva MJ, Jia T, Samandar E, Preau JL, Calafat AM. Environmental exposure to the plasticizer 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, diisononyl ester (DINCH) in US adults (2000—2012). Environ Res. 2013;126:159–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Schwedler G, Conrad A, Rucic E, Koch HM, Leng G, Schulz C, et al. Hexamoll® DINCH and DPHP metabolites in urine of children and adolescents in Germany. Human biomonitoring results of the German Environmental Survey GerES V, 2014–2017. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;229:113397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schwedler G, Rucic E, Lange R, Conrad A, Koch HM, Pälmke C, et al. Phthalate metabolites in urine of children and adolescents in Germany. Human biomonitoring results of the German Environmental Survey GerES V, 2014-2017. Int J Hyg Environ health. 2020;225:113444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ketema RM, Ait Bamai Y, Miyashita C, Saito T, Kishi R, Ikeda-Araki A. Phthalates mixture on allergies and oxidative stress biomarkers among children: The Hokkaido study. Environ Int. 2022;160:107083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee WC, Fisher M, Davis K, Arbuckle TE, Sinha SK. Identification of chemical mixtures to which Canadian pregnant women are exposed: The MIREC Study. Environ Int. 2017;99:321–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Traoré T, Forhan A, Sirot V, Kadawathagedara M, Heude B, Hulin M, et al. To which mixtures are French pregnant women mainly exposed? A combination of the second French total diet study with the EDEN and ELFE cohort studies. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018;111:310–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Teitelbaum SL, Britton JA, Calafat AM, Ye X, Silva MJ, Reidy JA, et al. Temporal variability in urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites, phytoestrogens and phenols among minority children in the United States. Environ Res. 2008;106:257–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Braun JM, Smith KW, Williams PL, Calafat AM, Berry K, Ehrlich S, et al. Variability of urinary phthalate metabolite and bisphenol A concentrations before and during pregnancy. Environ health Perspect. 2012;120:739–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Townsend MK, Franke AA, Li X, Hu FB, Eliassen AH. Within-person reproducibility of urinary bisphenol A and phthalate metabolites over a 1 to 3 year period among women in the Nurses’ Health Studies: a prospective cohort study. Environ Health: a Glob access Sci source. 2013;12:80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wittassek M, Angerer J. Phthalates: metabolism and exposure. Int J Androl. 2008;31:131–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Koch HM, Schütze A, Pälmke C, Angerer J, Brüning T. Metabolism of the plasticizer and phthalate substitute diisononyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH(®)) in humans after single oral doses. Arch Toxicol. 2013;87:799–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Frederiksen H, Kranich SK, Jørgensen N, Taboureau O, Petersen JH, Andersson AM. Temporal variability in urinary phthalate metabolite excretion based on spot, morning, and 24-h urine samples: considerations for epidemiological studies. Environ Sci Technol 2013;47:958–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Science (R01ES030101) and the National Institutes of Health (R01HD034568, UH3OD023286).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Geetika Kalloo, Jaclyn A. Janis.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HealthCore Inc, Watertown, MA, USA

    Geetika Kalloo

  2. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, USA

    Jaclyn A. Janis, Shravanthi M. Seshasayee & Abby F. Fleisch

  3. Division of Chronic Disease Research Across the Lifecourse, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA

    Sheryl L. Rifas, Emily Oken & Abby F. Fleisch

  4. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Antonia M. Calafat & Julianne Cook Botelho

  5. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Russ Hauser & Tamarra James-Todd

  6. Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA

    Abby F. Fleisch

Authors
  1. Geetika Kalloo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaclyn A. Janis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shravanthi M. Seshasayee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sheryl L. Rifas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Antonia M. Calafat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Julianne Cook Botelho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Russ Hauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tamarra James-Todd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Emily Oken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Abby F. Fleisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GK and JAJ were responsible for interpreting the results and writing of the manuscript, SMS and SLRS were responsible for the analysis, AMC and JCB were the CDC consultants regarding the biomarkers, RH, TJT, EO served in an advisor capacity, and AFF served the primary guide and scientific lead for the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abby F. Fleisch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalloo, G., Janis, J.A., Seshasayee, S.M. et al. Predictors of urinary biomarker concentrations of phthalates and some of their replacements in children in the Project Viva cohort. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 33, 255–263 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00513-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00513-x

Keywords

  • Phthalates
  • Children’s environmental health
  • Endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links