Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Assessing gestational exposure to trace elements in an area of unconventional oil and gas activity: comparison with reference populations and evaluation of variability



Located in Northeastern British Columbia, the Montney formation is an important area of unconventional oil and gas exploitation, which can release contaminants like trace elements. Gestational exposure to these contaminants may lead to deleterious developmental effects.


Our study aimed to (1) assess gestational exposure to trace elements in women living in this region through repeated urinary measurements; (2) compare urinary concentrations to those from North American reference populations; (3) compare urinary concentrations between Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants; and (4) evaluate inter- and intra-individual variability in urinary levels.


Eighty-five pregnant women participating in the Exposures in the Peace River Valley (EXPERIVA) study provided daily spot urine samples over 7 consecutive days. Samples were analyzed for 20 trace elements using inductively-coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Descriptive statistics were calculated, and inter- and intra-individual variability in urinary levels was evaluated through intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) calculation for each trace element.


When compared with those from North American reference populations, median urinary levels were higher in our population for barium (~2 times), cobalt (~3 times) and strontium (~2 times). The 95th percentile of reference populations was exceeded at least 1 time by a substantial percentage of participants during the sampling week for barium (58%), cobalt (73%), copper (29%), manganese (28%), selenium (38%), strontium (60%) and vanadium (100%). We observed higher urinary manganese concentrations in self-identified Indigenous participants (median: 0.19 µg/g creatinine) compared to non-Indigenous participants (median: 0.15 µg/g of creatinine). ICCs varied from 0.288 to 0.722, indicating poor to moderate reliability depending on the trace element.


Our results suggest that pregnant women living in this region may be more exposed to certain trace elements (barium, cobalt, copper, manganese, selenium, strontium, and vanadium), and that one urine spot sample could be insufficient to adequately characterize participants’ exposure to certain trace elements.

Impact statement

Unconventional oil and gas (UOG) is an important industry in the Peace River Valley region (Northeastern British Columbia, Canada). Information on the impacts of this industry is limited, but recent literature emphasizes the risk of environmental contamination. The results presented in this paper highlight that pregnant women living near UOG wells in Northeastern British Columbia may be more exposed to some trace elements known to be related to this industry compared to reference populations. Furthermore, our results based on repeated urinary measurements show that one urine sample may be insufficient to adequately reflect long-term exposure to certain trace elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. We will not be able to make additional exposure data in EXPERIVA participants available to external investigators given restrictions in our research agreements and ethics approval.


  1. BC Oil and Gas Commission. British Columbia’s Oil and Gas Reserves and Production Report 2019. 2020.

  2. National Energy Board, BC Oil and Gas Commission, Alberta Energy Regulator, Ministry of Natural Gas Development. Energy briefing note - The ultimate potential for unconventional petroleum from the Montney Formation of British Columbia and Alberta. 2013 Nov. Report No.: ISSN 1917-506X.

  3. BC Oil and Gas Commission. British Columbia’s Oil and Gas Reserves and Production Report 2018. 2020.

  4. Adams C, Janicki E, Balogun A. (2016): Summary of shale gas activity in Northeast British Columbia 2013; in Oil and Gas Reports 2016, British Columbia Ministry of Natural Gas Development, 1-39.

  5. Chittick EA, Srebotnjak T. An analysis of chemicals and other constituents found in produced water from hydraulically fractured wells in California and the challenges for wastewater management. J Environ Manage. 2017;2041:502–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lester Y, Ferrer I, Thurman EM, Sitterley KA, Korak JA, Aiken G, et al. Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: implications for water treatment. Sci Total Environ. 2015;512–513:637–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun Y, Wang D, Tsang DCW, Wang L, Ok YS, Feng Y. A critical review of risks, characteristics, and treatment strategies for potentially toxic elements in wastewater from shale gas extraction. Environment International. 2019;125:452–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pichtel J. Oil and Gas Production Wastewater: Soil Contamination and Pollution Prevention. Applied and Environmental Soil Science [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Jun 8];2016(Article ID 2707989). Available from:

  9. Vengosh A, Kondash A, Harkness J, Lauer N, Warner N, Darrah TH. The geochemistry of hydraulic fracturing fluids. Procedia Earth Planet Sci. 2017;17:21–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrer I, Thurman EM. Chemical constituents and analytical approaches for hydraulic fracturing waters. Trends Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2015;5(Feb):18–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. EPA. Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas: Impacts from the Hydraulic Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water Resources in the United States (Final Report). Washington, DC; 2016. Report No.: EPA/600/R-16/236F.

  12. Council of Canadian Academies. Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas Extraction in Canada. Ottawa (ON): The Expert Panel on Harnessing Science ans Technology to Understand the Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas Extraction; 2014.

  13. Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Darrah TH, Kondash A. A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:8334–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wisen J, Chesnaux R, Werring J, Wendling G, Baudron P, Barbecot F. A portrait of wellbore leakage in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:913–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cozzarelli IM, Kent DB, Briggs M, Engle MA, Benthem A, Skalak KJ, et al. Geochemical and geophysical indicators of oil and gas wastewater can trace potential exposure pathways following releases to surface waters. Sci Total Environ. 2021;755(Feb):142909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. GWSolutions. Peace river regional district water quality database and analysis. Nanaimo, BC: Coming Clean; 2016.

  17. Bamber AM, Hasanali SH, Nair AS, Watkins SM, Vigil DI, Van Dyke M, et al. A systematic review of the epidemiologic literature assessing health outcomes in populations living near oil and natural gas operations: study quality and future recommendations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:2123.

  18. Caron-Beaudoin É, Whitworth KW, Bosson-Rieutort D, Wendling G, Liu S, Verner MA. Density and proximity to hydraulic fracturing wells and birth outcomes in Northeastern British Columbia, Canada. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021;31:53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deziel NC, Brokovich E, Grotto I, Clark CJ, Barnett-Itzhaki Z, Broday D, et al. Unconventional oil and gas development and health outcomes: A scoping review of the epidemiological research. Environ Res. 2020;182:109124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hill EL. Shale gas development and infant health: Evidence from Pennsylvania. J Health Econ. 2018;61:134–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Currie J, Greenstone M, Meckel K. Hydraulic fracturing and infant health: New evidence from Pennsylvania. Sci Adv. 2017;3:e1603021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stacy SL, Brink LL, Larkin JC, Sadovsky Y, Goldstein BD, Pitt BR, et al. Perinatal outcomes and unconventional natural gas operations in southwest Pennsylvania. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(Jun):e0126425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Casey JA, Savitz DA, Rasmussen SG, Ogburn EL, Pollak J, Mercer DG, et al. Unconventional natural gas development and birth outcomes in Pennsylvania, USA. Epidemiology. 2016;27:163–72.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Whitworth KW, Marshall AK, Symanski E. Maternal residential proximity to unconventional gas development and perinatal outcomes among a diverse urban population in Texas. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0180966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McKenzie LM, Guo R, Witter RZ, Savitz DA, Newman LS, Adgate JL. Birth outcomes and maternal residential proximity to natural gas development in rural Colorado. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:412–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McKenzie LM, Allshouse W, Daniels S. Congenital heart defects and intensity of oil and gas well site activities in early pregnancy. Environ Int. 2019;132:104949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Janitz AE, Dao HD, Campbell JE, Stoner JA, Peck JD. The association between natural gas well activity and specific congenital anomalies in Oklahoma, 1997-2009. Environ Int. 2019;122:381–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Caserta D, Graziano A, Lo Monte G, Bordi G, Moscarini M. Heavy metals and placental fetal-maternal barrier: a mini-review on the major concerns. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17:2198–206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Skogheim TS, Weyde KVF, Engel SM, Aase H, Surén P, Øie MG, et al. Metal and essential element concentrations during pregnancy and associations with autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Environ Int. 2021;152:106468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu J, Xia W, Pan X, Zheng T, Zhang B, Zhou A, et al. Association of adverse birth outcomes with prenatal exposure to vanadium: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1:e230–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao H, Tang J, Zhu Q, He H, Li S, Jin L, et al. Associations of prenatal heavy metals exposure with placental characteristics and birth weight in Hangzhou Birth Cohort: Multi-pollutant models based on elastic net regression. Sci Total Environ. 2020;742:140613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Caron-Beaudoin É, Bouchard M, Wendling G, Barroso A, Bouchard MF, Ayotte P, et al. Urinary and hair concentrations of trace metals in pregnant women from Northeastern British Columbia, Canada: a pilot study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019;29:613–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Caron-Beaudoin É, Valter N, Chevrier J, Ayotte P, Frohlich K, Verner MA. Gestational exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Northeastern British Columbia, Canada: A pilot study. Environ Int. 2018;110:131–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Health Canada. Second report on human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals in Canada: results of the Canadian Health Measures Survey Cycle 2 (2009-2011). Ottawa, Canada; 2012. Report No.: ISBN 978-1-100-22140-3.

  35. Centers for disease control and prevention. Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Updated Tables, January 2019, Volume One. 2019.

  36. Calafat AM. Contemporary Issues in Exposure Assessment Using Biomonitoring. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2016;3:145–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Perrier F, Giorgis-Allemand L, Slama R, Philippat C. Within-subject pooling of biological samples to reduce exposure misclassification in biomarker-based studies. Epidemiology. 2016;27:378–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Smolders R, Koch HM, Moos RK, Cocker J, Jones K, Warren N, et al. Inter- and intra-individual variation in urinary biomarker concentrations over a 6-day sampling period Part 1: metals. Toxicol Lett. 2014;231:249–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang YX, Feng W, Zeng Q, Sun Y, Wang P, You L, et al. Variability of metal levels in spot, first morning, and 24-hour urine samples over a 3-month period in healthy adult Chinese men. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(Apr):468–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gunier RB, Horn-Ross PL, Canchola AJ, Duffy CN, Reynolds P, Hertz A, et al. Determinants and within-person variability of urinary cadmium concentrations among women in northern California. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:643–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang YX, Pan A, Feng W, Liu C, Huang LL, Ai SH, et al. Variability and exposure classification of urinary levels of non-essential metals aluminum, antimony, barium, thallium, tungsten and uranium in healthy adult men. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019;29:424–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen HG, Chen YJ, Chen C, Tu ZZ, Lu Q, Wu P, et al. Reproducibility of essential elements chromium, manganese, iron, zinc and selenium in spot samples, first-morning voids and 24-h collections from healthy adult men. Br J Nutr. 2019;122(Aug):343–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Liljequist D, Elfving B, Skavberg Roaldsen K. Intraclass correlation—A discussion and demonstration of basic features. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0219854.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Matthias G, Lemon J, Ian Fellows Puspendra Singh. irr: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement [Internet]. 2019. Available from:

  45. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zota AR, Ettinger AS, Bouchard M, Amarasiriwardena CJ, Schwartz J, Hu H, et al. Maternal blood manganese levels and infant birth weight. Epidemiology. 2009;20:367–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu XD, Zhang J, Yan CH, Shen XM. Prenatal exposure to manganese at environment relevant level and neonatal neurobehavioral development. Environ Res. 2014;133:232–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bouchard MF, Sauvé S, Barbeau B, Legrand M, Brodeur MÈ, Bouffard T, et al. Intellectual impairment in school-age children exposed to manganese from drinking water. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:138–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wright RO, Amarasiriwardena C, Woolf AD, Jim R, Bellinger DC. Neuropsychological correlates of hair arsenic, manganese, and cadmium levels in school-age children residing near a hazardous waste site. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27:210–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sanders AP, Claus Henn B, Wright RO. Perinatal and childhood exposure to cadmium, manganese, and metal mixtures and effects on cognition and behavior: a review of recent literature. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015;2:284–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Egbobawaye EI. Whole-Rock Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Triassic Montney Formation, Northeastern British Columbia, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Int J Geosci. 2016;07:91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wisen J, Chesnaux R, Wendling G, Werring J, Barbecot F, Baudron P. Assessing the potential of cross-contamination from oil and gas hydraulic fracturing: A case study in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. J Environ Manage. 2019;246:275–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. DiGiulio DC, Jackson RB. Impact to underground sources of drinking water and domestic wells from production well stimulation and completion practices in the Pavillion, Wyoming, Field. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:4524–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Shrestha N, Chilkoor G, Wilder J, Gadhamshetty V, Stone JJ. Potential water resource impacts of hydraulic fracturing from unconventional oil production in the Bakken shale. Water Res. 2017;108:1–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Fontenot BE, Hunt LR, Hildenbrand ZL, Carlton DD Jr., Oka H, Walton JL, et al. An evaluation of water quality in private drinking water wells near natural gas extraction sites in the Barnett Shale Formation. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:10032–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Alawattegama SK, Kondratyuk T, Krynock R, Bricker M, Rutter JK, Bain DJ, et al. Well water contamination in a rural community in southwestern Pennsylvania near unconventional shale gas extraction. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2015;50:516–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. DiGiulio DC, Wilkin RT, Miller C, Oberley G. Draft investigation of ground water contamination near Pavillion, Wyoming. Ada, Oklahoma: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2011. Report No.: EPA 600/R-00/000.

  58. Rozell DJ, Reaven SJ. Water pollution risk associated with natural gas extraction from the marcellus shale. Risk Analysis. 2012;32:1382–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Vidic RD, Brantley SL, Vandenbossche JM, Yoxtheimer D, Abad JD. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science. 2013;340:1235009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was conducted in Treaty 8, the traditional territory of the Cree, Saulteau and Dunne-Za people. This research project was funded through a Project Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Application ID 390320) awarded to Marc-André Verner and Élyse Caron-Beaudoin. At the time of the EXPERIVA study recruitment, Élyse Caron-Beaudoin was supported through a CIHR postdoctoral fellowship (Funding Reference Number 159262). Marc-André Verner is the recipient of a Research Scholar J2 Award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS). We want to thank the participants, as well as the Treaty 8 Tribal Association, the Saulteau First Nations and the West Moberly First Nations for their support and welcoming. The research team would also like to thank the staff from the medical and midwifery clinics for their assistance during the recruitment. We also thank Denis Dieme for analytical measurements of trace elements.


Project Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (156206) awarded to MAV and ECB. In 2019, ECB was supported through a CIHR postdoctoral fellowship (Funding Reference Number 159262). MAV is the recipient of a Research Scholar J2 Award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé (FRQS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




LC contributed to data analysis, interpretation of the results and drafted the initial manuscript. MB developed the analytical methods, provided scientific support and reviewed the manuscript. LG reviewed the manuscript. DBR provided scientific support for the statistical analysis and reviewed the manuscript. NOB and WMFNCC contributed to the conceptualization of EXPERIA and reviewed the manuscript. ECB managed the recruitment and sampling. ECB and MAV were responsible for the conceptualization of EXPERIVA, developing the methodologies, funding, supervising the project, data interpretation and manuscript writing and editing. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc-André Verner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study received ethical approval from the Northern Health Research Review Committee and the Université de Montréal Institutional Review Board (#CERC-18-003-P).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Claustre, L., Bouchard, M., Gasparyan, L. et al. Assessing gestational exposure to trace elements in an area of unconventional oil and gas activity: comparison with reference populations and evaluation of variability. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 33, 94–101 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Trace elements
  • Exposure assessment
  • Pregnant women
  • Biomonitoring
  • Inter- and intra-individual variability
  • Unconventional oil and gas


Quick links