Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The immigrant birthweight paradox in an urban cohort: Role of immigrant enclaves and ambient air pollution

Abstract

Background

Foreign-born Black and Latina women on average have higher birthweight infants than their US-born counterparts, despite generally worse socioeconomic indicators and prenatal care access, i.e., “immigrant birthweight paradox” (IBP). Residence in immigrant enclaves and associated social-cultural and economic benefits may be drivers of IBP. Yet, enclaves have been found to have higher air pollution, a risk factor for lower birthweight.

Objective

We investigated the association of immigrant enclaves and children’s birthweight accounting for prenatal ambient air pollution exposure.

Methods

In the Boston-based Children’s HealthWatch cohort of mother-child dyads, we obtained birthweight-for-gestational-age z-scores (BWGAZ) for US-born births, 2006–2015. We developed an immigrant enclave score based on census-tract percentages of foreign-born, non-citizen, and linguistically-isolated households statewide. We estimated trimester-specific PM2.5 concentrations and proximity to major roads based residential address at birth. We fit multivariable linear regressions of BWGAZ and examined effect modification by maternal nativity. Analyses were restricted to nonsmoking women and term births.

Results

Foreign-born women had children with 0.176 (95% CI: 0.092, 0.261) higher BWGAZ than US-born women, demonstrating the IBP in our cohort. Immigrant enclave score was not associated with BWGAZ, even after adjusting for air pollution exposures. However, this association was significantly modified by maternal nativity (pinteraction = 0.014), in which immigrant enclave score was positively associated with BWGAZ for only foreign-born women (0.090, 95% CI: 0.007, 0.172). Proximity to major roads was negatively associated with BWGAZ (−0.018 per 10 m, 95% CI: −0.032, −0.003) and positively correlated with immigrant enclave scores. Trimester-specific PM2.5 concentrations were not associated with BWGAZ.

Significance

Residence in immigrant enclaves was associated with higher birthweight children for foreign-born women, supporting the role of immigrant enclaves in the IBP. Future research of the IBP should account for immigrant enclaves and assess their spatial correlation with potential environmental risk factors and protective resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Analytical sample selection, Boston-based Children’s HealthWatch cohort, 2006–2015.
Fig. 2: Response functions of immigrant enclave score on the change in average first, second, and third trimester PM2.5 concentrations (μg/m3) and distance to major roads (meter), Boston-based Children’s HealthWatch cohort, 2006–2015 (N = 2514).
Fig. 3: Adjusted mean differences in birthweight-for-gestational-age z-scores for US-born and foreign-born mothers, Boston-based Children’s HealthWatch cohort, 2006–2015 (N = 2514).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pew Research Center. Key findings about U.S. immigrants. 2021. www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/20/key-findings-about-u-s-immigrants/.

  2. Ferré C, Callaghan W, Olson C, Sharma A, Barfield W. Effects of maternal age and age-specific preterm birth rates on overall preterm birth rates—United States, 2007 and 2014. Morbidity Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:1181–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Womack LS, Rossen LM, Martin JA. Singleton low birthweight rates, by race and Hispanic origin: United States, 2006–2016. NCHS Data Brief, no 306. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2018. Access at: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/52611.

  4. Fuentes-Afflick E, Lurie P. Low birth weight and Latino ethnicity: examining the epidemiologic paradox. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:665–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Integration of Immigrants into American Society. Panel on the Integration of Immigrants into American Society, M.C. Waters and M.G. Pineau, Eds. Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. https://doi.org/10.17226/21746.

  6. Acevedo-Garcia D, Soobader MJ, Berkman LF. The differential effect of foreign-born status on low birth weight by race/ethnicity and education. Pediatrics 2005;115:e20–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Acevedo-Garcia D, Bates LM. Latino health paradoxes: empirical evidence, explanations, future research, and implications. In Latinas/os in the United States: Changing the face of America. Boston, MA: Springer; 2008. pp. 101–13.

  8. Flores ME, Simonsen SE, Manuck TA, Dyer JM, Turok DK. The “Latina epidemiologic paradox”: contrasting patterns of adverse birth outcomes in US-born and foreign-born Latinas. Womens Health Issues. 2012;22:e501–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Portes A, Manning RD. The immigrant enclave: theory and empirical examples. Inequality Classic Readings in Race, Class, and Gender. New York: Routledge; 2018.

  10. Finch BK, Lim N, Perez W, Do DP. Toward a population health model of segmented assimilation: The case of low birth weight in Los Angeles. Sociol Perspect. 2007;50:445–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Sayed AM, Galea S. Community context, acculturation, and low-birth-weight risk among Arab Americans: evidence from the Arab–American birth-outcomes study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:155–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams AD, Messer LC, Kanner J, Ha S, Grantz KL, Mendola P. Ethnic enclaves and pregnancy and behavior outcomes among Asian/Pacific Islanders in the USA. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020;7:224–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernandez-Kelly MP, Schauffler R. Divided fates: immigrant children in a restructured US economy. Int Migr Rev. 1994;28:662–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Portes A, Rumbaut RG. Not everyone is chosen: segmented assimilation and its determinants. Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Univ of California Press; 2001:44–69.

  15. Portes A, Kyle D, Eaton WW. Mental illness and help-seeking behavior among Mariel Cuban and Haitian refugees in South Florida. J Health Social Behav. 1992;33:283–98.

  16. McGlade MS, Saha S, Dahlstrom ME. The Latina paradox: an opportunity for restructuring prenatal care delivery. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:2062–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Page RL. Positive pregnancy outcomes in Mexican immigrants: what can we learn? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33:783–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bethel JW, Schenker MB. Acculturation and smoking patterns among Hispanics: a review. Am J Preven Med. 2005;29:143–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Britton ML, Shin H. Metropolitan residential segregation and very preterm birth among African American and Mexican-origin women. Soc Sci Med. 2013;98:37–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Osypuk TL, Bates LM, Acevedo-Garcia D. Another Mexican birthweight paradox? The role of residential enclaves and neighborhood poverty in the birthweight of Mexican-origin infants. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:550–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kane JB, Teitler JO, Reichman NE. Ethnic enclaves and birth outcomes of immigrants from India in a diverse US state. Soc Sci Med. 2018;209:67–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fong KC, Bell ML. Do fine particulate air pollution (PM2.5) exposure and its attributable premature mortality differ for immigrants compared to those born in the United States?. Environmental Research. 2021;196:110387.

  23. Brugge D, Leong A, Averbach AR, Cheung FM. An environmental health survey of residents in Boston Chinatown. J Immigr Health. 2000;2:97–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liévanos RS. Race, deprivation, and immigrant isolation: the spatial demography of air-toxic clusters in the continental United States. Soc Sci Res. 2015;54:50–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grineski SE, Collins TW, Chakraborty J. Hispanic heterogeneity and environmental injustice: Intra-ethnic patterns of exposure to cancer risks from traffic-related air pollution in Miami. Popul Environ. 2013;35:26–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hunter LM. The spatial association between US immigrant residential concentration and environmental hazards. Int Migr Rev. 2000;34:460–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ritz B, Wilhelm M. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: methodologic issues in an emerging field. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102:182–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bell ML, Ebisu K, Belanger K. Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1118–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fleisch AF, Rifas-Shiman SL, Koutrakis P, Schwartz JD, Kloog I, Melly S, et al. Prenatal exposure to traffic pollution: associations with reduced fetal growth and rapid infant weight gain. Epidemiology. 2015;26:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kloog I, Melly SJ, Ridgway WL, Coull BA, Schwartz J. Using new satellite based exposure methods to study the association between pregnancy PM 2.5 exposure, premature birth and birth weight in Massachusetts. Environ Health. 2012;11:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dadvand P, Ostro B, Figueras F, Foraster M, Basagaña X, Valentín A, et al. Residential proximity to major roads and term low birth weight: the roles of air pollution, heat, noise, and road-adjacent trees. Epidemiology. 2014;25:518–25.

  32. Yorifuji T, Naruse H, Kashima S, Murakoshi T, Tsuda T, Doi H, et al. Residential proximity to major roads and placenta/birth weight ratio. Sci Total Environ. 2012;414:98–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, Koehoorn M, Demers P, Karr C. A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:680–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Alvarez HA, Kubzansky LD, Campen MJ, Slavich GM. Early life stress, air pollution, inflammation, and disease: an integrative review and immunologic model of social-environmental adversity and lifespan health. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;92:226–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Riva D, Magalhaes CB, Lopes A, Lancas T, Mauad T, Malm O, et al. Low dose of fine particulate matter (PM2. 5) can induce acute oxidative stress, inflammation and pulmonary impairment in healthy mice. Inhalation Toxicol. 2011;23:257–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bosdriesz JR, Lichthart N, Witvliet MI, Busschers WB, Stronks K, Kunst AE. Smoking prevalence among migrants in the US compared to the US-born and the population in countries of origin. PloS ONE. 2013;8:e58654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ettinger de Cuba S, Chilton M, Bovell-Ammon A, Knowles M, Coleman SM, Black MM, et al. Loss of SNAP is associated with food insecurity and poor health in working families with young children. Health Aff. 2019;38:765–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosofsky AS, Fabian MP, Ettinger de Cuba S, Sandel M, Coleman S, Levy JI, et al. Prenatal ambient particulate matter exposure and longitudinal weight growth trajectories in early childhood. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1444.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilcox AJ. On the importance—and the unimportance—of birthweight. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:1233–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bollen KA, Bauldry S. Three Cs in measurement models: causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychol Methods. 2011;16:265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. SAS Program for the 2000 CDC Growth Charts (ages 0 to <20 years). 2019. www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/growthcharts/resources/sas.htm/.

  43. Grummer-Strawn LM, Reinold C, Krebs NF, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of the World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0-59 months in the United States. MMWR Recommendations Rep. 2010;59:1–15. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5909a1.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  44. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. How your fetus grows during pregnancy. 2021. https://www.acog.org/patient-resources/faqs/pregnancy/how-your-fetus-grows-during-pregnancy#measured.

  45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Z-score Data files. 2009. https://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/zscore.htm.

  46. Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman MW. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:1–0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lakshmanan A, Chiu YH, Coull BA, Just AC, Maxwell SL, Schwartz J, et al. Associations between prenatal traffic-related air pollution exposure and birth weight: Modification by sex and maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index. Environ Res. 2015;137:268–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Rosa MJ, Pajak A, Just AC, Sheffield PE, Kloog I, Schwartz J, et al. Prenatal exposure to PM2.5 and birth weight: a pooled analysis from three North American longitudinal pregnancy cohort studies. Environ Int. 2017;107:173–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Rhee J, Fabian MP, Ettinger de Cuba S, Coleman S, Sandel M, Lane KJ, et al. Effects of maternal homelessness, supplemental nutrition programs, and prenatal PM2.5 on birthweight. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:4154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. MassGIS (Bureau of Geographic Information). MassGIS Data: Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Roads. 2018. https://docs.digital.mass.gov/dataset/massgis-data-massachusetts-department-transportation-massdot-roads.

  51. Shiono PH, Rauh VA, Park M, Lederman SA, Zuskar D. Ethnic differences in birthweight: the role of lifestyle and other factors. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:787–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Sandel M, Sheward R, Ettinger de Cuba S, Coleman S, Heeren T, Black MM, et al. Timing and duration of pre-and postnatal homelessness and the health of young children. Pediatrics. 2018;142.

  53. Van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn KM. Multivariate imputation by chained equations. J Stat Softw. 2011;45:1–67.

  54. Wilson A, Chiu YH, Hsu HH, Wright RO, Wright RJ, Coull BA. Potential for bias when estimating critical windows for air pollution in children’s health. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186:1281–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Bell R, Pless-Mulloli T, Howel D. Particulate air pollution and fetal health: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiology. 2004;15:36–45.

  56. Laurent O, Wu J, Li L, Chung J, Bartell S. Investigating the association between birth weight and complementary air pollution metrics: a cohort study. Environ Health. 2013;12:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Laurent O, Hu J, Li L, Kleeman MJ, Bartell SM, Cockburn M, et al. Low birth weight and air pollution in California: Which sources and components drive the risk? Environ Int. 2016;92–93:471–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kannan S, Misra DP, Dvonch JT, Krishnakumar A. Exposures to airborne particulate matter and adverse perinatal outcomes: a biologically plausible mechanistic framework for exploring potential effect modification by nutrition. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1636–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Pratt GC, Vadali ML, Kvale DL, Ellickson KM. Traffic, air pollution, minority and socio-economic status: addressing inequities in exposure and risk. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:5355–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Williams AD, Ha S, Shenassa E, Messer LC, Kanner J, Mendola P. Joint effects of ethnic enclave residence and ambient volatile organic compounds exposure on risk of gestational diabetes mellitus among Asian/Pacific Islander women in the United States. Environ Health. 2021;20:56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Fischer P, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, Koppelman GH, et al. Traffic-related air pollution, preterm birth and term birth weight in the PIAMA birth cohort study. Environ Res. 2011;111:125–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mannes T, Jalaludin B, Morgan G, Lincoln D, Sheppeard V, Corbett S. Impact of ambient air pollution on birth weight in Sydney, Australia. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:524–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Matoba N, Suprenant S, Rankin K, Yu H, Collins JW. Mortgage discrimination and preterm birth among African American women: an exploratory study. Health Place. 2019;59:102193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wallace D. Discriminatory mass de-housing and low-weight births: scales of geography, time, and level. J Urban Health. 2011;88:454–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Giurgescu C, McFarlin BL, Lomax J, Craddock C, Albrecht A. Racial discrimination and the Black‐White gap in adverse birth outcomes: a review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011;56:362–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Collins JW Jr, David RJ, Handler A, Wall S, Andes S. Very low birthweight in African American infants: the role of maternal exposure to interpersonal racial discrimination. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:2132–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Earnshaw VA, Rosenthal L, Lewis JB, Stasko EC, Tobin JN, Lewis TT, et al. Maternal experiences with everyday discrimination and infant birth weight: A test of mediators and moderators among young, urban women of color. Ann Behav Med. 2013;45:13–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Mehra R, Keene DE, Kershaw TS, Ickovics JR, Warren JL. Racial and ethnic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: differences by racial residential segregation. SSM Popul Health. 2019;8:100417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Hall M, Crowder K. Native out-migration and neighborhood immigration in new destinations. Demography. 2014;51:2179–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Boustan LP. Was postwar suburbanization “white flight”? Evidence from the black migration. Q J Econ. 2010;125:417–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Crowder K, Hall M, Tolnay SE. Neighborhood immigration and native out-migration. Am Sociol Rev. 2011;76:25–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Mezuk B, Cederin K, Li X, Rice K, Kendler KS, Sundquist J, et al. Immigrant enclaves and risk of diabetes: a prospective study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Abraido-Lanza AF, Dohrenwend BP, Ng-Mak DS, Turner JB. The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the” salmon bias” and healthy migrant hypotheses. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1543–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Viruell-Fuentes EA, Miranda PY, Abdulrahim S. More than culture: structural racism, intersectionality theory, and immigrant health. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2099–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Palloni A, Arias E. Paradox lost: explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage. Demography. 2004;41:385–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID). “Pregnant Travelers”. 2020. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/page/pregnant-travelers.

  77. Li K, Wen M, Henry KA. Ethnic density, immigrant enclaves, and Latino health risks: a propensity score matching approach. Soc Sci Med. 2017;189:44–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Nobari TZ, Wang MC, Chaparro MP, Crespi CM, Koleilat M, Whaley SE. Immigrant enclaves and obesity in preschool-aged children in Los Angeles County. Soc Sci Med. 2013;92:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Allen JP, Turner E. Ethnic residential concentrations in United States metropolitan areas. Geographical Rev. 2005;95:267–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Parker JD, Heck K, Schoendorf KC, Saulnier L, Basu R, Woodruff TJ. “Comparing exposure metrics in the relationship between PM2.5 and birth weight in California,” NCEE Working Paper Series 200308, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Nov 2003.

  81. Steurer MA, Peyvandi S, Costello JM, Moon-Grady AJ, Habib RH, Hill KD, et al. Association between Z-score for birth weight and postoperative outcomes in neonates and infants with congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surge. 2021:162;1838–1847.e4.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the families and children who participated in the Boston-based Children’s HealthWatch survey, without whom these analyses would not have been possible. The authors also thank Itai Kloog, from the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, and Joel Schwartz, from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, for providing exposure data. Our work was part of the Center for Research on Environmental and Social Stressors in Housing Across the Life Course (CRESSH). CRESSH is a partnership between the Boston University School of Public Health and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health that studies environmental health disparities in low-income communities throughout MA.

Funding

This study was supported by the NIH/NIMHD grant (P50MD010428); NIH/NIEHS grants (T32ES007069, P30 ES000002, and R01 ES024332); and USEPA grants (RD83615601, RD83587201, and RD835872). The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the grantee and does not represent official views of any funding entity. Further, no parties involved endorse the purchase of any commercial products or services discussed in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MDTC: Conceptualization; Methodology; Formal analysis; Software; Visualization; Roles/Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing. SEdC: Conceptualization; Data curation; Writing—review and editing. MPF: Conceptualization; Data curation; Writing—review and editing. KJL: Data curation; Methodology; Writing—review and editing. TJT: Conceptualization; Methodology; Writing—review and editing. DRW: Conceptualization; Methodology; Writing—review and editing. BAC: Conceptualization; Methodology; Writing—review and editing; FC: Data curation. MM: Data curation. JIL: Writing—review and editing; Funding acquisition. FLade: Writing—review and editing; Funding acquisition. MS: Writing—review and editing. GA: Conceptualization; Methodology; Formal analysis; Writing—review and editing; Supervision. AZ: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Data curation; Methodology; Formal analysis; Writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to MyDzung T. Chu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, M.T., Ettinger de Cuba, S., Fabian, M.P. et al. The immigrant birthweight paradox in an urban cohort: Role of immigrant enclaves and ambient air pollution. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 32, 571–582 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00403-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00403-8

Keywords

Search

Quick links