Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A population-based mercury exposure assessment near an artisanal and small-scale gold mining site in the Peruvian Amazon

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology volume 31, pages 126–136 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Human exposure to mercury is a leading public health problem. Artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) is a major source of global mercury emissions. Although occupational mercury exposure to miners (via mercury vapor inhalation) is known, chronic mercury exposure to nearby residents that are not miners (via mercury-contaminated fish consumption) is poorly characterized. We conducted a population-based mercury exposure assessment in 23 communities (19 rural, 4 urban) around the Amarakaeri Communal Reserve, which is bordered on the east by heavy ASGM activity. We measured total mercury in hair (N = 2083) and blood (N = 476) from March-June 2015 and performed follow-up measurements (N = 723 hair and N = 290 blood) from February-April 2016. Mercury exposure risk was highest in communities classified as indigenous, or native, regardless of proximity to mining activity. Residence in a native community (vs. non-native) was associated with mercury levels 1.9 times higher in hair (median native 3.5 ppm vs. median non-native 1.4 ppm total mercury) and 1.6 times higher in blood (median native 7.4 ng/mL vs median non-native 3.2 ng/mL total mercury). Unexpectedly, proximity to mining was not associated with exposure risk. These findings challenge common assumptions about mercury exposure patterns and emphasize the importance of population-representative studies to identify high risk sub-populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Map of the Amarakaeri Communal Reserve study site.
Fig. 2: Violin plots of total hair mercury and total blood mercury at baseline by study community.
Fig. 3: Temporal variability in total hair and total blood mercury levels by community.
Fig. 4: Intra-cluster correlations for baseline total hair mercury levels for households by community.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data on legal mining concessions leased by the Peruvian government are available from the Ministry of Energy and Mining of Peru (http://www.minem.gob.pe/). Data on recent mining activity are available on request from Matthew Finer of the Monitoring of the Andean Amazon Project (maaproject.org). Mercury exposure and epidemiological datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, due to restrictions for protection of human subjects, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Basu NN, et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet. 2018;391:462–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Steckling N, Tobollik M, Plass D, Hornberg C, Ericson B, Fuller R, et al. Global burden of disease of mercury used in artisanal small-scale gold mining. Ann Glob Health. 2017;83:234–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bank MS, Vignati DA, Vigon B. United Nations Environment Programme’s Global Mercury Partnership: science for successful implementation of the Minamata Convention. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2014;33:1199–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. National Research Council. Toxicological effects of methylmercury. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000.

  5. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological profile for mercury. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1999.

  6. Steckling N, Devleesschauwer B, Winkelnkemper J, Fischer F, Ericson B, Kramer A, et al. Disability weights for chronic mercury intoxication resulting from gold mining activities: results from an online pairwise comparisons survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:E57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ha E, Basu N, Bose-O’Reilly S, Dorea JG, McSorley E, Sakamoto M, et al. Current progress on understanding the impact of mercury on human health. Environ Res. 2017;152:419–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashe K. Elevated mercury concentrations in humans of Madre de Dios, Peru. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yard EE, Horton J, Schier JG, Caldwell K, Sanchez C, Lewis L, et al. Mercury exposure among artisanal gold miners in Madre de Dios, Peru: a cross-sectional study. J Med Toxicol. 2012;8:441–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Langeland AL, Hardin RD, Neitzel RL. Mercury levels in human hair and farmed fish near artisanal and small-scale gold mining communities in the Madre de Dios River Basin, Peru. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:E302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibb H, O’Leary KG. Mercury exposure and health impacts among individuals in the artisanal and small-scale gold mining community: a comprehensive review. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:667–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fraser B. Peruvian gold rush threatens health and the environment. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:7162–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. INEI. Peru: Encuesta Demografica de Salud Familiar (ENDES) 3014. Peru: Instituto Nacional de Estadistica e Informatica Lima; 2015.

  14. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Method 7473 (SW-846): mercury is solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry, Revision 0. 1998.

  15. Monastero RN, Karimi R, Nyland JF, Harrington J, Levine K, Meliker JR. Mercury exposure, serum antinuclear antibodies, and serum cytokine levels in the Long Island Study of Seafood Consumption: a cross-sectional study in NY, USA. Environ Res. 2017;156:334–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kolenikov SAG. Socioeconomic status measurement with discrete proxy variables: Is principal component analysis a reliable answer? Rev Income Wealth. 2009;55:128–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Finer MOT, Novoa S. Gold Mining Deforests 32,000 Acres in southern Peruvian Amazon from 2013 to 2016. MAAP:50. Monitoring the Andean Amazon Project. 2016.

  18. Asner GP, Llactayo W, Tupayachi R, Luna ER. Elevated rates of gold mining in the Amazon revealed through high-resolution monitoring. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:18454–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hansen MC, Krylov A, Tyukavina A, Potapov PV, Turubanova S, Zutta B, et al. Humid tropical forest disturbance alerts using Landsat data. Environ Res Lett. 2016;11:034008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 2013;342:850–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. JECFA. Summary and conclusions of the 67th Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety; 2004.

  22. Asner GP, Tupayachi R. Accelerated losses of protected forests from gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon. Environ Res Lett. 2016;12:094004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ingram V, TJC, Schure J, Nkamgnia E, Tadjuidje MH. Where artisanal mines and forest meet: socio-economic and environmental impacts in the Congo Basin. Nat Resour Forum. 2011;35:304–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hilson G. Small-scale mining and its socio-economic impact in developing countries. Nat Resour Forum. 2002;26:3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. The United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP Global Mercury Assessment 2013: sources, emissions, releases and environmental transport. Geneva, Switzerland: Branch UC; 2013.

  26. Diringer SE, Feingold BJ, Ortiz EJ, Gallis JA, Araujo-Flores JM, Berky A, et al. River transport of mercury from artisanal and small-scale gold mining and risks for dietary mercury exposure in Madre de Dios, Peru. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2015;17:478–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wyatt L, Ortiz EJ, Feingold B, Berky A, Diringer S, Morales AM, et al. Spatial, temporal, and dietary variables associated with elevated mercury exposure in peruvian riverine communities upstream and downstream of artisanal and small-scale gold mining. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:E1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Diringer SE, Berky AJ, Marani M, Ortiz EJ, Karatum O, Plata DL, et al. Deforestation due to artisanal and small-scale gold minng exacerbates soil and mercury mobilization in Madre de Dios, Peru. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54:286–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Klotz K, Goen T. Human biomonitoring of lead exposure. Met Ions Life Sci. 2017;17:99–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110434330-006.

  30. Afridi HI, Talpur FN, Kazi TG, Brabazon D. Assessment of toxic elements in the samples of different cigarettes and their effect on the essential elemental status in the biological samples of Irish hypertensive consumers. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29:309–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yasutake A, Hachiya N. Accumulation of inorganic mercury in hair of rats exposed to methylmercury or mercuric chloride. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006;210:301–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cernichiari E, Myers GJ, Ballatori N, Zareba G, Vyas J, Clarkson T. The biological monitoring of prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicology 2007;28:1015–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The Minamata Convention on Mercury. 2013.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge local field workers and Jean-Pierre Muro of MEDLAB-Peru for assistance in data collection, as well as support from the Madre de Dios Regional Health Directorate (DIRESA), particularly Drs Emperatriz Morales, Elvis Rojas and Fernando Mendieta. Support for this study was provided by the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (CRN 3034), Bass Connections at Duke University, and Hunt Oil Peru LLC (HOEP-QEHSS-140003).

Funding

This study was funded by the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (CRN 3034), Bass Connections at Duke University, Hunt Oil Peru LLC (HOEP-QEHSS-140003), and the Duke University Superfund Research Center (P42ES010356.) The study funders had no roles in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or manuscript preparation. The corresponding author had full access to all study data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Caren Weinhouse, William K. Pan

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA

    Caren Weinhouse, John A. Gallis, Ernesto Ortiz, Paige Bullins & William K. Pan

  2. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 1102 Hock Plaza, Durham, NC, 27710, USA

    John A. Gallis

  3. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, 9 Circuit Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA

    Axel J. Berky, Heileen Hsu-Kim & William K. Pan

  4. Centro de Estudios, Investigación y Servicios en Salud, Cusco, Peru

    Ana Maria Morales

  5. Pacific Institute, 654 13th Street, Preservation Park, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA

    Sarah E. Diringer

  6. Research Triangle Institute, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA

    James Harrington

  7. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC, 27708, USA

    Laura Rogers, John Hare-Grogg & Heileen Hsu-Kim

Authors
  1. Caren Weinhouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John A. Gallis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ernesto Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Axel J. Berky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ana Maria Morales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sarah E. Diringer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. James Harrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Paige Bullins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Laura Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. John Hare-Grogg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Heileen Hsu-Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. William K. Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CW, WKP, EO and HH-K conceived research questions. CW oversaw data analysis, created figures (except Fig. 1) and tables, and wrote the manuscript. JG analyzed data. AJB created Fig. 1. EO, AMM, and AJB coordinated data collection in the field. SD created mining proximity variables. JH oversaw total blood mercury measurements at Research Triangle Institute. PB and JH-G measured total hair mercury in the laboratory of HH-K. WKP, HH-K, EO, AJB, and AMM designed the study. WKP obtained funding and oversaw the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caren Weinhouse.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weinhouse, C., Gallis, J.A., Ortiz, E. et al. A population-based mercury exposure assessment near an artisanal and small-scale gold mining site in the Peruvian Amazon. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 31, 126–136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0234-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0234-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links