Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Suitability of gridded climate datasets for use in environmental epidemiology

Abstract

Epidemiologic analyses of the health effects of meteorological exposures typically rely on observations from the nearest weather station to assess exposure for geographically diverse populations. Gridded climate datasets (GCD) provide spatially resolved weather data that may offer improved exposure estimates, but have not been systematically validated for use in epidemiologic evaluations. As a validation, we linearly regressed daily weather estimates from two GCDs, PRISM and Daymet, to observations from a sample of weather stations across the conterminous United States and compared spatially resolved, population-weighted county average temperatures and heat indices from PRISM to single-pixel PRISM values at the weather stations to identify differences. We found that both Daymet and PRISM accurately estimate ambient temperature and mean heat index at sampled weather stations, but PRISM outperforms Daymet for assessments of humidity and maximum daily heat index. Moreover, spatially-resolved exposure estimates differ from point-based assessments, but with substantial inter-county heterogeneity. We conclude that GCDs offer a potentially useful approach to exposure assessment of meteorological variables that may, in some locations, reduce exposure measurement error, as well as permit assessment of populations distributed far from weather stations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson GB, Bell ML. Heat waves in the United States: mortality risk during heat waves and effect modification by heat wave characteristics in 43 U.S. communities. Environ Health Persp. 2011;119:210–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bobb JF, Peng RD, Bell ML, Dominici F. Heat-related mortality and adaptation to heat in the United States. Environ Health Persp. 2014;122:811–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gasparrini A, Guo YM, Hashizume M, Kinney PL, Petkova EP, Lavigne E, et al. Temporal variation in heat-mortality associations: a multicountry study. Environ Health Persp. 2015;123:1200–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Knowlton K, Rotkin-Ellman M, King G, Margolis HG, Smith D, Solomon G, et al. The 2006 California heat wave: impacts on hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Environ Health Persp. 2009;117:61–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Medina-Ramon M, Schwartz J. Temperature, temperature extremes, and mortality: a study of acclimatisation and effect modification in 50 US cities. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64:827–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bobb JF, Obermeyer Z, Wang Y, Dominici F. Cause-specific risk of hospital admission related to extreme heat in older adults. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;312:2659–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckley JP, Richardson DB. Seasonal modification of the association between temperature and adult emergency department visits for asthma: a case-crossover study. Environ Health. 2012;11:55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansel NN, McCormack MC, Kim V. The effects of air pollution and temperature on COPD. COPD. 2016;13:372–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kingsley SL, Eliot MN, Gold J, Vanderslice RR, Wellenius GA. Current and projected heat-related morbidity and mortality in Rhode Island. Environ Health Persp. 2016;124:460–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson GB, Bell ML, Peng RD. Methods to calculate the heat index as an exposure metric in environmental health research. Environ Health Persp. 2013;121:1111–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Metzger KB, Ito K, Matte TD. Summer heat and mortality in New York City: how hot is too hot? Environ Health Persp. 2010;118:80–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wellenius GA, Eliot MN, Bush KF, Holt D, Lincoln RA, Smith AE, et al. Heat-related morbidity and mortality in New England: Evidence for local policy. Environ Res. 2017;156:845–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barreca AI, Shimshack JP. Absolute humidity, temperature, and influenza mortality: 30 years of county-level evidence from the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:S114–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jaakkola K, Saukkoriipi A, Jokelainen J, Juvonen R, Kauppila J, Vainio O, et al. Decline in temperature and humidity increases the occurrence of influenza in cold climate. Environ Health 2014;13:22.

  15. Menne MJ, Durre I, Vose RS, Gleason BE, Houston TG. An overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network-Daily database. J Atmos Ocean Tech. 2012;29:897–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee M, Shi L, Zanobetti A, Schwartz JD. Study on the association between ambient temperature and mortality using spatially resolved exposure data. Environ Res. 2016;151:610–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bornstein R. Observations of the urban heat island effect in New York City. J Appl Meteorol Clim. 1968;7:575–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laaidi K, Zeghnoun A, Dousset B, Bretin P, Vandentorren S, Giraudet E, et al. The impact of heat islands on mortality in Paris during the August 2003 heat wave. Environ Health Persp. 2012;120:254–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keane RE, Holsinger LM, Parsons RA, Gray K. Climate change effects on historical range and variability of two large landscapes in western Montana, USA. For Ecol Manag. 2008;254:375–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neupane RP, Kumar S. Estimating the effects of potential climate and land use changes on hydrologic processes of a large agriculture dominated watershed. J Hydrol. 2015;529:418–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao L, Lee X, Smith RB, Oleson K. Strong contributions of local background climate to urban heat islands. Nature. 2014;511:216–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA. Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol. 1997;190:214–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI, Gibson WP, Doggett MK, Taylor GH, et al. Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int J Climatol. 2008;28:2031–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Daly C, Smith JI, Olson KV. Mapping atmospheric moisture climatologies across the conterminous United States. Plos ONE 2015;10:e0141140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141140.

  25. PRISM Climate Group. Parameter-elevation Relationships on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM). Corvallis, Oregon: Northwest Alliance for Computational Science and Engineering at Oregon State University; 2017.

  26. Thornton PE, Thornton MM, Mayer BW, Wei Y, Devarakonda R, Vose RS, et al. Daymet: daily surface weather data on a 1-km grid for North America, version 3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center; 2017.

  27. Smith A, Lott N, Vose R. The integrated surface database recent developments and partnerships. B Am Meteorol Soc. 2011;92:704–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. NOAA. Historical Observing Metadata Repository. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; n.d. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/homr/. Access 28 February 2018.

  29. Diamond HJ, Karl TR, Palecki MA, Baker CB, Bell JE, Leeper RD, et al. U.S. Climate Reference Network after one decade of operations status and assessment. B Am Meteorol Soc. 2013;94:485–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bell JE, Palecki MA, Baker CB, Collins WG, Lawrimore JH, Leeper RD, et al. U.S. Climate Reference Network soil moisture and temperature observations. J Hydrometeorol. 2013;14:977–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F. World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z. 2006;15:259–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. ORNL. Spatial Data Access Tool (SDAT). Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center; 2017. https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1388. Access 10 July 2017.

  33. ORNL. World map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center; 2017. https://webmap.ornl.gov/ogcdown/dataset.jsp?dg_id=10012_1. Access 10 July 2017.

  34. Højsgaard S, Halekoh U. doBy: Groupwise Statistics, LSmeans, Linear Contrasts, Utilities; 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=doBy.

  35. U.S. Census Bureau. Centers of population for Census 2000; 2015. https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/centersofpop2000.html. Access 1 December 2017.

  36. Davis RE, McGregor GR, Enfield KB. Humidity: a review and primer on atmospheric moisture and human health. Environ Res. 2016;144:106–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lumley T, Diehr S, Emerson S, Chen L. The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:151–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gasparrini A, Armstrong B, Kenward MG. Distributed lag non-linear models. Stat Med. 2010;29:2224–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gasparrini A, Guo YM, Hashizume M, Lavigne E, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, et al. Mortality risk attributable to high and low ambient temperature: a multicountry observational study. Lancet. 2015;386:369–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Core Team R. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  41. McEvoy DJ, Mejia JF, Huntington JL. Use of an observation network in the Great Basin to evaluate gridded climate data. J Hydrometeorol. 2014;15:1913–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fischer EM, Knutti R. Robust projections of combined humidity and temperature extremes. Nat Clim Change. 2013;3:126–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Guo Y, Barnett AG, Tong S. Spatiotemporal model or time series model for assessing city-wide temperature effects on mortality? Environ Res. 2013;120:55–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Daly C. Guidelines for assessing the suitability of spatial climate data sets. Int J Climatol. 2006;26:707–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of this research was conducted using computational resources and services at the Center for Computation and Visualization, Brown University. This work was financially supported in part by the Open Graduate Education and Brown-MBL Programs from the Graduate School of Brown University, and by the Institute at Brown for Environment and Society. Dr. KW was supported by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant F32 ES027742. The content of this report is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsoring institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith R. Spangler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spangler, K.R., Weinberger, K.R. & Wellenius, G.A. Suitability of gridded climate datasets for use in environmental epidemiology. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 29, 777–789 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0105-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0105-2

Keywords:

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links