Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Verifying locations of sources of historical environmental releases of dioxin-like compounds in the U.S.: implications for exposure assessment and epidemiologic inference

Abstract

Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran (PCDD/F) emissions from industrial sources contaminate the surrounding environment. Proximity-based exposure surrogates assume accuracy in the location of PCDD/F sources, but locations are not often verified. We manually reviewed locations (i.e., smokestack geo-coordinates) in a historical database of 4478 PCDD/F-emitting facilities in 2009 and 2016. Given potential changes in imagery and other resources over this period, we re-reviewed a random sample of 5% of facilities (n = 240) in 2016. Comparing the original and re-review of this sample, we evaluated agreement in verification (location confirmed or not) and distances between verified locations (verification error), overall and by facility type. Using the verified location from re-review as a gold standard, we estimated the accuracy of proximity-based exposure metrics and epidemiologic bias. Overall agreement in verification was high (>84%), and verification errors were small (median = 84 m) but varied by facility type. Accuracy of exposure classification (≥1 facility within 5 km) for a hypothetical study population also varied by facility type (sensitivity: 69–96%; specificity: 95–98%). Odds ratios were attenuated 11–69%, with the largest bias for rare facility types. We found good agreement between reviews of PCDD/F source locations, and that exposure prevalence and facility type may influence associations with exposures derived from this database. Our findings highlight the need to consider location error and other contextual factors when using proximity-based exposure metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans; 1997.

  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodiobenzo-para-dioxin, 2,3,4,7,8=ppentachlorodibenzofuran, and 3,3’,4,4’,5-pentachlorobiphenyl; 2012.

  3. Viel JF, Arveux P, Baverel J, Cahn JY. Soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma clusters around a municipal solid waste incinerator with high dioxin emission levels. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:13–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Floret N, Mauny F, Challier B, Arveux P, Cahn JY, Viel JF. Dioxin emissions from a solid waste incinerator and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Epidemiology. 2003;14:392–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Viel JF, Daniau C, Goria S, Fabre P, de Crouy-Chanel P, Sauleau EA, et al. Risk for non Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the vicinity of French municipal solid waste incinerators. Environ Health. 2008;7:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charnley G, Doull J. Human exposure to dioxins from food, 1999—2002. Food Chem Toxicol. 2005;43:671–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Domingo JL, Schuhmacher M, Muller L, Rivera J, Granero S, Llobet JM. Evaluating the environmental impact of an old municipal waste incinerator: PCDD/F levels in soil and vegetation samples. J Hazard Mater. 2000;76:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Floret N, Viel JF, Lucot E, Dudermel PM, Cahn JY, Badot PM, et al. Dispersion modeling as a dioxin exposure indicator in the vicinity of a municipal solid waste incinerator: a validation study. Environ Sci Tech. 2006;40:2149–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorber M, Pinsky P, Gehring P, Braverman C, Winters D, Sovocool W. Relationships between dioxins in soil, air, ash, and emissions from a municipal solid waste incinerator emitting large amounts of dioxins. Chemosphere. 1998;37:2173–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deziel NC, Nuckols JR, Colt JS, De Roos AJ, Pronk A, Gourley C, et al. Determinants of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in house dust samples from four areas of the United States. Sci Tot Evnrion. 2012;433:516–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Deziel NC, Nuckols JR, Jones RR, Graubard BI, De Roos AJ, Pronk A, et al. Comparison of industrial emissions and carpet dust concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in a multi-center U.S. study. Sci Tot Evnrion. 2017;580:1276–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Malisch R, Kotz A. Dioxins and PCBs in feed and food—review from European perspective. Sci Tot Evnrion. 2014;491-492:2–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pesatori AC, Consonni D, Rubagotti M, Grillo P, Bertazzi PA. Cancer incidence in the population exposed to dioxin after the “Seveso accident”: twenty years of follow-up. Environ Health. 2009;8:39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elliott P, Shaddick G, Kleinschmidt I, Jolley D, Walls P, Beresford J, et al. Cancer incidence near municipal solid waste incinerators in Great Britain. Br J Cancer. 1996;73:702–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. De Roos AJ, Hartge P, Lubin JH, Colt JS, Davis S, Cerhan JR, et al. Persistent organochlorine chemicals in plasma and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11214–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Roos AJ, Davis S, Colt JS, Blair A, Airola M, Severson RK, et al. Residential proximity to industrial facilities and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Environ Res. 2010;110:70–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pronk A, Nuckols JR, De Roos AJ, Airola M, Colt JS, Cerhan JR, et al. Residential proximity to industrial combustion facilities and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a case-control study. Environ Health. 2013;12:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Franzblau A, Zwica L, Knutson K, Chen Q, Lee SY, Hong B, et al. An investigation of homes with high concentrations of PCDDs, PCDFs, and/or dioxin-like PCBs in house dust. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009;6:188–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hinwood AL, Callan AC, Heyworth J, Rogic D, de Araujo J, Crough R, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) and dioxin concentrations in residential dust of pregnant women. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2014;16:2758–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Richards G, Agranovski IE. Dioxin-like pcb emissions from cement kilns during the use of alternative fuels. J Hazard Mater. 2017;323(Pt B):698–709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tue NM, Suzuki G, Takahashi S, Kannan K, Takigami H, Tanabe S. Dioxin-related compounds in house dust from New York State: occurrence, in vitro toxic evaluation and implications for indoor exposure. Environ Poll. 2013;181:75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). An inventory of sources and environmental releases of dioxin-like compounds in the United States for the years 1987, 1995, and 2000. [Internet]. National Center for Environmental Assessment. Office of Research and Development. 2006. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=159286 Accessed 3 June 2018.

  23. Thomas VM, Spiro TG. Peer reviewed: the U.S. Dioxin inventory: are there missing sources? Environ Sci Technol. 1996;30:82a–5a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pollution prevention and compliance assistance information for the healthcare industry: incinerators: Healthcare Environmental Resource Center; 2015. http://www.hercenter.org/facilitiesandgrounds/incinerators.cfm.

  25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). www.epa.gov.

  26. Energy Justice Network. www.energyjustice.net

  27. Bao Y, Bertoia ML, Lenart EB, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Speizer FE, et al. Origin, methods, and evolution of the three nurses’ health studies. Am J Pub Health. 2016;106:1573–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blair A, Thomas K, Coble J, Sandler DP, Hines CJ, Lynch CF, et al. Impact of pesticide exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risks in the agricultural health study. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:537–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cuellar AE, Gerler PJ. Trends in hospital consolidation: the formation of local systems. Health Aff. 2003;22:77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dosemeci M, Stewart PA. Recommendations for reducing the effects of exposure misclassification on relative risk estimates. Occup Hyg. 1996;3:169–76..

  31. Healy MA, Gilliland JA. Quantifying the magnitude of environmental exposure misclassification when using imprecise address proxies in public health research. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2012;3:55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirby RS, Delmelle E, Eberth JM. Advances in spatial epidemiology and geographic information systems. Ann Epidemiol. 2017;27:1–9.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Faure E, Danjou AM, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Dossus L, Fervers B. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies. Environ Health. 2017;16:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), NCI Training Program in Cancer Epidemiology (T32 CA009001), and Susan G. Komen for the Cure® (IIR13264020). Dr. Deziel was supported in part by the American Cancer Society (grant MRSG-15-147-01-CNE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rena R. Jones.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, R.R., VoPham, T., Sevilla, B. et al. Verifying locations of sources of historical environmental releases of dioxin-like compounds in the U.S.: implications for exposure assessment and epidemiologic inference. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 29, 842–851 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0079-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0079-0

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links