Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Oral microbiota in human systematic diseases

Abstract

Oral bacteria directly affect the disease status of dental caries and periodontal diseases. The dynamic oral microbiota cooperates with the host to reflect the information and status of immunity and metabolism through two-way communication along the oral cavity and the systemic organs. The oral cavity is one of the most important interaction windows between the human body and the environment. The microenvironment at different sites in the oral cavity has different microbial compositions and is regulated by complex signaling, hosts, and external environmental factors. These processes may affect or reflect human health because certain health states seem to be related to the composition of oral bacteria, and the destruction of the microbial community is related to systemic diseases. In this review, we discussed emerging and exciting evidence of complex and important connections between the oral microbes and multiple human systemic diseases, and the possible contribution of the oral microorganisms to systemic diseases. This review aims to enhance the interest to oral microbes on the whole human body, and also improve clinician’s understanding of the role of oral microbes in systemic diseases. Microbial research in dentistry potentially enhances our knowledge of the pathogenic mechanisms of oral diseases, and at the same time, continuous advances in this frontier field may lead to a tangible impact on human health.

Introduction

In 1891, the first oral microbiologist Willoughby D. Miller put forward the theory of oral focal infections, suggesting that oral microbial infection can affect other parts of the body, related to a variety of systemic diseases.1 Frank Billings speculated that the infection of teeth may be the cause of rheumatoid arthritis, nephritis, endocarditis, and other diseases.2 Proponents of this theory believe that dental plaque and its metabolites can enter the blood circulatory system and cause a variety of systemic or degenerative changes. Therefore, the treatment of systemic diseases by extracting the affected tooth is not only popular in dentistry, but also entire medical field. However, the theory of oral focal infection has not received enough attention and theoretical support. With the advances of microbiome research, the association between oral microbes and a variety of human chronic diseases has been studied, including inflammatory bowel disease,3 cancers,4 cardiovascular diseases,5 Alzheimer’s disease,6 diabetes,7 rheumatoid arthritis,8 and preterm birth9 (Fig. 1). In addition, the changes of oral microbiota in the state of systemic diseases are gradual and repeatable. Therefore, oral microbes can reflect human health and disease status in real-time and have important value in disease risk early warning and curative effect prediction.

Over 700 kinds of microorganisms are colonized in the human oral cavity.10 The oral microbiome is one of the most important and complex microbial communities in the human body and is also one of the five research priorities (oral cavity, nasal cavity, vagina, intestine, skin) of the human microbiome project (HMP).11 With the consummation of the human microbiome project, the understanding of oral microbes has become more in-depth, and it is not limited to further understanding the role of oral microorganisms in caries, periodontal diseases, and other oral diseases. Evidence is increasingly inclined to believe in the oral lesion theory proposed by Miller. The inflammation of periodontitis leads to the loss of connective tissues and bones.12 Extensive inflammatory cell infiltration appears in the connective tissue near the periodontal pocket epithelium.13 It is generally believed that this low-grade inflammation will disturb the health of the whole body or worsen other systemic diseases.14 Therefore, in the general population, chronic periodontitis may be an important source of invisible peripheral inflammation. Thus, periodontitis is also called “low-grade systemic disease”, affecting a variety of systemic diseases.

Particularly, a large amount of evidence has proved that bacteria are closely related to tumor development in the past two decades.15 For example, the role of human papillomavirus in oral cancer,16 Helicobacter pylori in gastric cancer,17 Chlamydia pneumoniae in lung cancer,18 Salmonella typhi in gallbladder cancer,19 Streptococcus bovis,20 Bacteroides fragilis21, and especially the periodontal pathogen Fusobacterium nucleatum in colon cancer.22 These studies have led to the possible role of bacteria in the occurrence of tumors, and the subsequent research results do provide some evidence to support it. There is a lot of evidence that oral microorganisms can induce cancer through direct or indirect factors.23 For example, oral microorganisms can secrete polysaccharides or use their flagella to accumulate on the surface of tumor cells in large numbers, induce chronic inflammation, and the secretion of cytokines directly promotes the growth of tumor cells.

Increasing evidence supports the association between the oral microbiome and human systemic diseases.24 This association may be attributed to the ability of many oral microbes to influence the inflammatory microenvironment. Excluding unfavorable factors such as physical activity, poor oral condition is closely related to unhealthy body index. Clinical and basic research on oral health and systemic diseases has become a frontier hotspot. Herein, we reviewed advances in the relationship between oral microbes and digestive diseases, cancers, cardiovascular diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and preterm birth (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic of the oral microbiota in human systematic diseases. Oral microbes affect the process of systemic diseases through the inflammatory response caused by oral infection or the ectopic colonization of oral microorganisms in other organs or tissues of the human body, such as tumor, gut, heart, blood, brain, joint, placenta.

Oral microbes and digestive system diseases

The possible pathways for oral microbes to act on the intestinal tract include that the oral microbes invade the intestines, causing imbalances in the intestinal microecology and affecting organs of the digestive system.25 For example, the colonization of oral microbes affects the metabolism of butyrate of intestinal microbes26; oral microbes, especially periodontitis pathogens, can enter the bloodstream through periodontal inflammation tissues and enter the systemic circulation, thereby acting on the whole body.27 As mentioned in the study of colorectal cancer, F. nucleatum colonizes the intestine and acts through the blood pathway.28 In addition, the metabolites of oral microorganisms enter the systemic circulation through the blood, which makes a low-grade inflammation in the human body, and promotes the occurrence and development of chronic inflammatory diseases in the digestive system.29 This approach is gradually supported by the evidence of oral microbiome research, and it is widely recognized in the research of systemic diseases caused by the imbalance of the intestinal flora. Therefore, this approach may also be the main role of oral microbes in the digestive tract and an important way to affect systemic diseases.

Oral microbes and inflammatory bowel disease

Adults produce more than 1000 mL of saliva every day, almost all of which enter the gastrointestinal tract.30 Therefore, oral microbes, as an important reservoir of intestinal microbes, play an important role in maintaining the internal stability of the intestinal microecosystem. The virulent strains in the oral cavity migrate to the intestine through the digestive tract or blood, which affects the process of many intestinal inflammatory diseases.31 Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a global disease, especially in developed countries, the prevalence in developing countries is also increasing year by year, the prevalence in China is about 3.44 per 100,000 persons.32 Chronic non-specific intestinal inflammatory diseases, whose etiology is not well understood, are believed to be determined by genetic and environmental factors.33 The intestinal microbiome also plays an important role during IBD.34 At the same time, recent studies found a correlation between oral microbes and IBD.3

Periodontal disease is considered to be a risk factor for a variety of systemic diseases.35 Porphyromonas gingivalis and F. nucleatum are the main pathogens of periodontal disease.36 The inflammation caused by P. gingivalis in the oral cavity can lead to the disorder of the intestinal microbial community structure, the destruction of the intestinal barrier, the induction of endotoxemia, and the systemic inflammatory response.37 Under normal circumstances, F. nucleatum is almost impossible to detect in the intestine, but the bacteria can migrate to the intestine, inhibit the immune response mediated by T cells, thus promoting the progress of IBD.38 In addition, Streptococcus salivarius is an early colonizer in the oral cavity, which also can colonize the intestinal tract, down-regulate the nuclear transcription factor NF-кB of small intestinal epithelial cells and participate in the process of intestinal inflammation and homeostasis.39 Through population surveys, it is found that poor oral care behaviors related to alteration of the oral flora, cause an imbalance of intestinal microbes, and lead to the occurrence of IBD.40 Cariogenic bacteria can also participate in intestinal inflammation. Streptococcus mutans TW295 is a serologically κ type (distributed in less than 5% of the population). The bacteria can express the collagen-binding protein (CBP), which is more common in patients with bacteremia after tooth extraction and infective endocarditis.41 Animal experiments have found that jugular vein injection of Streptococcus mutans TW295 can aggravate the degree of inflammation in a mouse model of colitis.42 According to clinical research, the detection rate of this strain in patients with colitis is also higher than that of healthy people.

Oral microbiome studies have found that the oral flora of IBD patients is significantly different from that of healthy people.43,44 The number of oral dominant bacteria in patients with IBD has changed, including Streptococcus, Prevotella, Neisseria, Haemophilus, and Veillonella.45 Oral bacteria, such as Campylobacter and F. nucleatum,46 were detected in tissue samples from IBD patients. The intestinal invasive Campylobacter was detected in 50% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, but it was not detected in healthy people.47 Moreover, the F. nucleatum isolated from the inflammatory intestinal epithelium of patients with IBD is more invasive than the strain isolated from healthy people or healthy intestinal epithelium of patients with IBD.48,49,50 In addition, Klebsiella pneumoniae from the oral cavity can enter the intestinal tract ectopically, causing an increase in Th1 cells in the intestinal mucosa, thereby inducing IBD.51,52 Clinical studies have also found that more oral-derived microorganisms can be detected in the intestinal mucosa and feces of patients with IBD.42,53,54 Based on these results, we have deepened our view that the microorganisms in the oral cavity can be ectopic to the intestine to trigger intestinal inflammation.

Oral microbes and liver diseases

There is a significant difference between the tongue flora of patients with liver cancer and healthy people.55 The oral flora of patients with liver cancer is more diverse, and the composition of the flora is significantly different from that of healthy people, and Bacillus, Leptotrichia, Actinomyces, and Campylobacter have higher abundances, while Haemophilus, Streptococcus, and Pseudomonas have lower abundances.56 Many clinical studies have demonstrated that periodontitis is a risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver, and P. gingivalis plays a significant role in the course of non-alcoholic fatty liver.57,58,59 Lanjuan et al. analyzed the intestinal microbiome of patients with liver cirrhosis and found a large number of oral microorganisms, including Veillonella, Streptococcus, Prevotella, Haemophilus, Lactobacillus, and Clostridium.60 Therefore, it can also be considered that the invasion of oral microorganisms has been found in the intestines of patients with liver cirrhosis. The invasion of P. gingivalis into the intestine can change the composition of the intestinal microbiome,37 increase the permeability of the intestinal mucosa and insulin resistance,61 lead to the spread of intestinal bacteria to the liver, and increase the content of triglycerides in liver tissue.58

Oral bacteria and cancers

A large amount of research evidence shows that oral microbes play a great role in tumor proliferation, invasion, and metastasis.3,50,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70 Oral microorganisms can directly act on the occurrence and development of tumors through some cytokines and pathways or promote the formation, deterioration, and metastasis of tumors by regulating the immune response between tumors and the body.71,72,73 The oral microbes that play a role in this can be used as potential biomarkers for the study of oral cancers and used to detect the development of oral cancer.74,75 An in-depth understanding of the interaction mechanism between oral microbes and tumors will facilitate the design of subsequent new targeted drugs. This will play a great role in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with oral cancer in the future.

Oral microbes and oral squamous cell carcinoma

Oral cancer and oropharyngeal cancer rank sixth among systemic malignant tumors.76 Early detection and treatment are the best strategies to prevent and control oral cancer. Common risk factors for oral tumors include smoking, alcohol abuse, HPV, ultraviolet rays, etc.77,78 In recent years, studies have found much important evidence that oral microbes are closely related to OSCC, including P. gingivalis,79 F. nucleatum,80 Treponema denticola81,82 and Candida,83 etc.

Analysis of P. gingivalis in cancerous tissues of OSCC patients and gingival tissues of healthy people found that the content of P. gingivalis in OSCC patients was remarkably higher.84,85,86 The staining density of P. gingivalis in cancerous tissues was more than 2 times of Streptococcus gordonii, and the content of P. gingivalis in the tissues is positively correlated with the metastasis of malignant tumors.87,88 Microbiome sequencing was used to evaluate the bacterial communities associated with OSCC, and it was found that the diversity and relative abundance of bacteria in the saliva of OSCC patients changed significantly.74,89 When used as a diagnostic marker, oral bacteria were found to have 80% sensitivity and 83% specificity between the case group and the control group.74

There are many ways in the antiapoptotic mechanism of P. gingivalis.90,91 It can activate serine/threonine protein kinase (PKB) to phosphorylate the pro-apoptotic protein Bad to form an inactive state. Due to the decrease in the content of the pro-apoptotic protein Bad, the ratio of the antiapoptotic factor B lymphocyte/leukemia-2 protein (Bax) on the mitochondrial surface increases, thereby inhibiting the release of cytochrome oxidase C to inhibiting cell apoptosis.92 P. gingivalis inhibits activation of caspase-3 by activating Akt and Jak/Stat dual signaling pathways, blocking the increase of mitochondrial membrane permeability caused by caspase-3, and triggering inherent mitochondrial apoptosis.93,94 At the same time, P. gingivalis can also activate the Jak/Akt/Stat3 signaling pathway to upregulate the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, the tumor formation-related gene c-Myc, and the apoptosis-inhibiting gene Survivin, inhibiting the inherent apoptosis of mitochondria and cell apoptosis.95 P. gingivalis can also activate the classical signaling pathway-phosphatidylinositol 3-hydroxy kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway, and activate the expression of NF-κB, participate in a series of processes such as anti-apoptosis, promote angiogenesis and tumor cell invasion, and can further promote anti-apoptosis factor expression.96 In addition, P. gingivalis up-regulates the expression level of miRNA-203, inhibiting the negative regulatory molecule-cytokine signal transfer to suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS3) function, thereby inhibiting cell apoptosis.96 P. gingivalis invades into the cell and secrets adenosine triphosphate (ATP) enzyme-like nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK) to act on extracellular ATP and block its binding to purinergic receptor-7 to inhibit ATP-dependent cell apoptosis and change the normal cycle of cells to make them cancerous.97,98

Another mechanism of P. gingivalis to promote tumors is to change the local inflammatory microenvironment. The LPS of P. gingivalis binds to TLR-2 and TLR-4 on the host cell membrane and then activates NF-κB through the intracellular signal transduction pathway to induce the production of IL-1α, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-8 promotes the inflammatory microenvironment for tumor growth.85 And when NF-κB is improperly activated in the nucleus and cannot return to the cytoplasm, its function can be abnormally increased to change the normal signal transduction of cells and promote cell cancelation.99 The up-regulated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) can induce tumor angiogenesis and promote the synthesis of uPA (Urokinase plasminogen activator), involved in the invasion and metastasis of OSCC.100 B7-H1 can increase the production of regulatory T cells, which can inhibit killer T cells and help tumor cells to achieve immune escape and promote lymph node metastasis of tumor cells.101 P. gingivalis induces the expression of B7-H1 and B7-DC receptors on the surface of gingival epithelial cells and squamous cell carcinoma cells.102 And also, P. gingivalis can interact with PAR-2 and PAR-4 to promote their gene expression.97 PAR-2 can activate NF-κB and PAR-4 can promote the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, p38, NF-κB, and thus promote the increase of inactive proMMP9 expression.103 P. gingivalis further secretes gingipains to promote the activation of proMMP9 and form active MMP9, which participates in the destruction of the surrounding matrix of the cell, promotes the inflammation and the invasion and metastasis of OSCC cells.104 Gingipains can exert cytotoxic effects, stimulate host endothelial cells to secrete IL-8, promote tumor angiogenesis and tumor growth, and change T cell functions by degrading T cell surface receptors and enhance OSCC immune escape.105

Co-infection of P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum has a stronger promoting effect on OSCC. Binder et al. established a mouse model with periodontal disease and OSCC and proved that P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum can directly interact with oral epithelial cells to stimulate tumorigenesis through Toll-like receptors. P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum trigger TLR signals, leading to IL-6 production, activating STAT3, and STAT3 induces important effect factors to drive the growth and invasiveness of OSCC.106 In addition, similar to P. gingivalis, infection of F. nucleatum alone has also been shown to promote OSCC. In order to study the mechanism of Fusobacterium promoting OSCC, Amani et al. used bacteria treated in different ways to infect oral cancer cells. It was found that in addition to increasing the secretion of IL-8 and MMP, oral cancer cells infected with live F. nucleatum significantly induced higher expression of STAT3, MYC, and ZEB1.107 This indicates that in addition to promoting tumor proliferation through Toll-like receptors, F. nucleatum can also promote tumor invasion and epithelial–mesenchymal transition.

T. denticola is also known to be associated with the development and progression of oral cancer.108 In vitro studies have found that Td-CTLP, a virulence factor of T. denticola, is detected in tongue squamous cell carcinoma and may regulate tumor-associated immunomodulatory proteins, such as upregulation of MMP-8 and MMP-9, promote the occurrence and development of tumors.109 Listyarifah et al. also found that Td-CTLP is significantly present in early tongue squamous cell carcinoma (MTSCC), and its expression is related to tumor invasion depth, tumor diameter, TLR-7, TLR-9 expression. This may suggest that Td-CTLP can be used as a marker for T. denticola to promote OSCC.110 Based on the above studies, the authors have studied the mechanism of T. denticola promoting tumors. It was found that T. denticola regulates the cell cycle by activating the TGF-β pathway, inhibiting cell apoptosis, and promoting the proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Oral microbes and esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. In China, the mortality rate of esophageal cancer is as high as 7.75 per 100,000 persons.111,112 Poor oral hygiene is considered a risk factor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal squamous epithelial dysplasia. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is closely related to oral conditions such as tooth loss and tooth brushing frequency. The incidence of metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in periodontitis patients is significantly higher than that in non-periodontal patients.113 However, the specific mechanism of this correlation is not yet clear.

The microecological imbalance caused by poor oral hygiene may be one of the reasons that cause the accumulation of carcinogens, and the body is in a state of continuous inflammation. Research by Narikiyo et al. found that periodontal disease-causing bacteria T. denticola can be detected in tumors and normal tissues of patients with esophageal cancer, and further promote tumor formation through inflammation.82,114 Chen et al. sequenced the microbial 16s rRNA gene of saliva samples from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and healthy people and found that the overall species diversity of salivary microorganisms in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma decreased, the abundance of Corynebacterium, Peptococcus, and Cardiobacterium was also significantly reduced.115 The results of these studies show that salivary microorganisms can reflect the changes in the microbial community of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and that salivary microorganisms may assist in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer.

Further research found that in the lesion area of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the detection rate of P. gingivalis was higher, 61%, only 12% in adjacent parts, and no normal parts were detected.116 At the same time, it was found that the detection of the lysine-specific gingival protease secreted by P. gingivalis at the above sites also has similar characteristics. Most patients with severe esophageal cancer are positive for P. gingivalis.117 Therefore, the colonization of P. gingivalis in the esophagus is not only related to the occurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma but also closely related to the severity of squamous cell carcinoma. At the same time, Neisseria is also believed to affect the occurrence of upper respiratory and digestive tract cancers due to its strong activity in metabolizing alcohol to acetaldehyde.

Oral microbes and pancreatic cancer

A retrospective study compared the prevalence of pancreatic cancer in 139,805 patients with periodontal disease and 75,085 patients without periodontal disease and reached similar conclusions.118 Fan et al. compared the oral microbiota of 361 pancreatic cancer patients and 371 non-pancreatic cancer patients and found that the detection rate of P. gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans was higher in the pancreatic cancer patients.69 Another study used high-throughput sequencing technology to analyze the composition of the salivary flora of 108 individuals (8 patients with pancreatic cancer, 78 patients with other diseases, and 22 healthy people).119 It also found that the abundance of P. gingivalis is relatively high in the saliva of patients with pancreatic cancer. Salivary bacterial DNA detection studies have found that Bacteroides and Granulicatella are more common in patients with pancreatic cancer, but Neisseria, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and Bacillus are less numerous.120 In patients with pancreatic cancer, more Leptotrichia and fewer Porphyromonas can be detected, which can be converted into a ratio with marker significance (Leptotrichia: Porphyromonas/L:P), a high ratio of L:P has a potential diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer.

Oral microbes and colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most malignant tumors in the world.121 Numerous clinical studies have found that Clostridium and F. nucleatum is enriched in colorectal cancer, suggesting that F. nucleatum is closely related to the occurrence of colorectal cancer.50,122,123,124 It was confirmed that F. nucleatum can bind to E-cadherin on the surface of colorectal cancer cells through the Adhesin FadA on its surface, thereby invading cancer cells and promoting the proliferation of cancer cells.125 Fap2 expressed by F. nucleatum interacts with TIGHT on the surface of human immune cells to inhibit the activity of immune cells such as T cells and natural killer cells, thereby inhibiting the killing of colorectal cancer cells by immune cells.126 It can also affect cell autophagy and promote the development of tumors. Animal experiments have found that continuous oral vaccination or tail vein injection can colonize and accumulate F. nucleatum in colorectal cancer, thereby promoting the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer.120

Oral microbes and cardiovascular diseases

Cardiovascular disease refers to diseases that occur in the heart and vascular circulatory system, including coronary heart disease, endocarditis, and myocardial infarction.127 Atherosclerosis (AS) is an important pathological process of coronary heart disease. It is closely related to the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells and the functional changes of vascular intimal cells. The main pathological manifestation of AS is lipid deposition in the vascular endothelium of the large and middle arteries, forming scattered or flakes of atherosclerotic plaques, resulting in narrowing of the arterial lumen.128 Many cross-sectional studies, case analyses, and epidemiological investigations have found that periodontitis is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease.129,130,131 The gingival epithelium in the periodontal pockets of patients with periodontitis is prone to breakage, which helps bacteria to enter the systemic circulatory system, leading to bacteremia, or ectopic colonization in other organs in the body. Periodontal disease-related bacteria can destroy the body’s immunity, stimulate cells to produce inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and enter the blood circulation from the damaged periodontal tissue, resulting in inflammation and vascular endothelial damage, and the formation of atherosclerotic plaques.132,133 Animal experiments have found that P. gingivalis inoculated into the mouth of mice can cause an increase in the number of Bacteroides and a decrease of Firmicutes, which are closely related to endotoxemia and systemic inflammatory reactions.134 Many clinical studies have found that after the periodontitis of the patient is controlled, the development of AS can be suppressed accordingly.135 It has been reported that the increase in the level of C-reactive protein in the body caused by oral bacterial infection has an important correlation with the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease.136 Lactobacillus and Streptococcus in the oral cavity are related to the occurrence of infective endocarditis. Streptococcus sanguis is an early colonizer of dental plaque, with the highest detection rate in the endocardium of patients, and is closely related to the inflammatory process of endocarditis.137 The pathogenesis may be that the thrombus-like protrusions formed on the surface of the vascular endothelium promote the adhesion of bacteria, which in turn leads to the occurrence of infection. In the animal model study of endocarditis, the virulence factor of S. gordonii is significantly increased, indicating that the virulence factor of oral bacteria may relate to the process of endocardial infection.138

After the treatment of periodontitis, C-reactive protein, which is an indicator of the improvement of the systemic inflammatory state, was significantly reduced in the patient’s serum, and some other serum inflammatory factors were also significantly reduced.139,140 Therefore, the state of periodontal inflammation is directly related to the inflammatory factors in the serum. The gingival epithelium in the periodontal pockets of patients with periodontitis is prone to breakage, which helps bacteria to enter the systemic circulatory system, leading to bacteremia, or ectopic colonization in other organs in the body. P. gingivalis can invade and colonize the patient’s atherosclerotic plaque.141 Chiu et al. analyzed the microorganisms in carotid endarterectomy specimens of 76 cardiovascular patients and found that the positive detection rate of P. gingivalis was 42%.142 And it was also detected other periodontal pathogens in atherosclerotic plaques, such as A. actinomycetemcomitans and T. forsythia.143 Periodontal disease-related bacteria can stimulate cells to produce inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and enter the blood circulation from the damaged periodontal tissue, causing related inflammation and promoting the formation of atherosclerotic plaques.144 Animal experiments found that after infection of P. gingivalis in ApoE gene-deficient mouse models, the onset of AS near the aorta and the aortic trunk was earlier and the damage was more serious.145 P. gingivalis inoculated into the mouth of mice can cause an increase in the number of Bacteroides and a decrease in the number of Firmicutes, which can cause severe immune inflammation in a short period, leading to a sharp increase in the level of serum inflammatory factors.146 Many clinical studies have found that after the periodontitis of the patient is controlled, the development of AS can be suppressed accordingly.147,148 Since Galectin-3 is expressed on the surface of cells and is readily secreted by damaged and inflammatory cells, it is considered to be a biomarker of heart inflammation and fibrosis. Gaetano et al. analyzed the association and influence of periodontitis and coronary heart disease (CHD) on saliva and serum Galectin-3 and suPAR, a soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, in patients with periodontitis and CHD. The results showed that patients with periodontitis and periodontitis + CHD showed significant serum Galectin-3 and suPAR levels.149,150 Therefore, periodontitis is an important predictor of serum Galectin-3 and suPAR levels associated with CHD. Based on the above-mentioned large number of research results, the American Periodontology Association and the European Periodontology Association agree that periodontal inflammation is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and periodontal pathogens or bacterial metabolites entering the blood circulation may directly induce AS.136

Oral microbes and Alzheimer’s disease

The relationship between oral microbes and Alzheimer’s disease has attracted people’s long-term attention. Clinical investigations and studies have provided some evidence for the causal relationship between periodontitis and Alzheimer’s disease. In a longitudinal cohort study, 152 subjects in the age range of 50–70 years were followed up for 20 years. The results found that the severity of periodontitis and the cognition level is in an inverse relationship in subjects with fewer than 10 teeth missing.151 Another longitudinal aging cohort study of 144 subjects showed that people with the APOE-ε4 gene and fewer teeth have a faster cognitive decline than people without these two risks.152 In addition, a longitudinal cohort study conducted a 32-year survey of 597 male individuals. The results showed that tooth loss, the depth of periodontal pockets, and the degree of alveolar bone loss are related to cognitive impairment, especially when they are older than 45 years old.153 A prospective follow-up survey of 5468 subjects found that irregular tooth brushing habits are also related to Alzheimer’s disease.154 A survey in the United States found that there is an association between periodontitis and cognitive impairment in 2355 60-years and older people.155 After adjusting for the level of education and other confounding factors, Poole et al. found that among 5138 subjects aged between 20 and 59, gum bleeding and periodontal attachment loss have a strong correlation with cognitive impairment.151 Because chronic periodontitis and Alzheimer’s disease are both multifactorial diseases, they are affected by a variety of factors, and they have many common risk factors, such as smoking and education level. Therefore, the causal relationship between tooth loss or periodontal disease and cognitive impairment has not been fully confirmed.

Studies found that periodontitis induced by P. gingivalis increased the deposition of Aβ in the brain, and the levels of IL-1β and TNF-α, which affected the cognitive ability of mice.156 Another study induced experimental chronic periodontitis by orally feeding 10 C57BL/6 mice with P. gingivalis or gingipains for 22 weeks. It was found that mice showed neurodegenerative diseases similar to Alzheimer’s disease and formed extracellular Aβ1-42.157 Stephen et al. found that P. gingivalis can colonize the brain of mice and increase the accumulation of Aβ1-42.158 It was also found that gingipains, the virulence component of P. gingivalis, is neurotoxic in vivo and in vitro, and harms Tau protein (a protein required for normal neuronal function). Inhibiting gingipains by using small molecule inhibitors can reduce the bacterial burden of P. gingivalis in brain tissue, prevent the production of Aβ1–42, reduce neuroinflammation, and reduce hippocampal neuronal damage.

We speculate that oral microbes can affect brain tissue in two ways. One is that pro-inflammatory cytokines caused by periodontal bacteria enter the brain tissue through the systemic circulation. The permeability of the blood-brain barrier is believed to increase with age and predates Alzheimer’s disease. This has been confirmed in animal models. The amyloid precursor protein gene mutations in genetically modified mice (5XFAD mice) have increased blood-brain barrier permeability and increased senile plaque accumulation.159 As the mice age with growth, this effect becomes more obvious.

The other is that periodontal microorganisms or their products enter the central nervous system through peripheral nerves, such as the glossopharyngeal and/or trigeminal nerve.160 The detection of oral spirochetes in the trigeminal ganglion also supports this. In addition, the ventricular tissues are not protected by the blood–brain barrier, so they may also become the entrance for bacteria to enter the brain.

There is a two-way relationship between chronic periodontitis and Alzheimer’s disease. Due to limited mobility and poor oral hygiene in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, it promotes the accumulation of periodontal tissue inflammation and eventually leads to tooth loss. Because the loss of teeth affects the patient’s eating and nutritional status, it may worsen the patient’s memory and other nervous system functions. These have been confirmed in animal experiments. Therefore, the relationship and mechanism of the interaction between periodontitis and Alzheimer’s disease need to be further studied.

Oral microbes and diabetes

Diabetes is a common endocrine and metabolic disease caused by insulin deficiency, impaired pancreatic islet function, or impaired insulin biological action.161 Diabetes with poor blood sugar control is a risk factor for periodontal diseases, and periodontitis is the sixth major complication of diabetes.162 Compared with non-diabetic patients, the risk of chronic periodontitis in diabetic patients is increased by 2–3 times.163 The pathological changes of diabetes can aggravate and accelerate the occurrence and development of periodontal inflammation, and the effective control of periodontitis has a pivotal effect on the control of blood sugar. The oral microbes in the periodontal pockets of patients with periodontitis have complex interactions with the human immune system, resulting in continuous chronic inflammation. Compared with non-diabetic periodontitis patients, the community structure of the subgingival microbiome of diabetic and periodontitis patients has undergone significant changes, and a variety of bacteria between the two are differentially enriched.164 Oral microorganisms may trigger insulin resistance by influencing the body’s immune inflammation and oxidative stress, thereby affecting the process of diabetes.

Oral microbes can affect the occurrence and development of diabetes by regulating systemic immune homeostasis.165 Microbial infection can stimulate the immune response of local periodontal tissues and produce large amounts of inflammatory cytokines. For example, the excessive response of mononuclear macrophages to periodontal bacteria can lead to the local production of high concentrations of IL-1 β, IL-6, and TNF-α in periodontitis.140,166 These cytokines can enter the circulatory system and affect multiple system tissues and blood vessels throughout the body. The endotoxin of P. gingivalis binds to the CD14 molecules on the surface of macrophages to activate the TLR2/4 signaling pathway.167 Activated TLR2/4 can bind to the TIR homology domain and the N-terminal death domain of MyD88 to activate IRAK. The activated IRAK then binds to TNF receptor-related factors to activate JNK, MAPK, and NF-κB signal transduction pathway eventually leading to a chronic inflammatory state. NF-κB can inhibit the expression of some important proteins in the insulin signaling pathway, such as glucose transporter 4 protein (GLUT4).168 TNFs stimulate fat cells to break down lipids, thereby increasing the level of free fatty acids in the blood and reducing insulin sensitivity. Persistent inflammation will lead to insulin resistance, which can further aggravate the systemic inflammatory response and cause a long-term imbalance of the inflammatory axis, affecting blood glucose metabolism. In addition, Bhat et al. found that endotoxin stimulation by P. gingivalis up-regulates the expression of immune-inflammatory response-related genes (Cd8a, Cd14, and Icam1) and insulin signaling pathway-related genes (G6pc and Insl3) of the pancreatic β-cell line MIN6.169 Animal experiments have also confirmed that the dysbacteriosis caused by periodontitis can promote the occurrence of insulin resistance in mice on a high-fat diet through an adaptive immune response.

Oxidative stress is an important way for host immune defense and microbial killing. However, in the absence of a compensatory endogenous antioxidant response, a large amount of ROS produced by oxidative stress can cause body damage and affect the occurrence and development of diabetes.170 Gram-negative bacteria and their metabolites in the subgingival microenvironment of patients with periodontitis can enter the periodontal tissue through the broken and loose gingival sulcus epithelium and spread to the surroundings, leading to the production of large amounts of ROS in inflammatory cells and vascular endothelial cells. ROS can interfere with the insulin signal transduction pathway, causing insulin resistance. Insulin resistance will increase the level of ROS, which will further damage the metabolic and vascular factors in the insulin signal transduction pathway. Oxidative stress interferes with the insulin signaling pathway by inhibiting tyrosine phosphorylation and activates a variety of serine/threonine kinase cascades through NF-κB activating enzymes, p38MAPK, JNK/SAPK, and protein kinase C (PKC) isoenzymes.171 These cascade reactions phosphorylate the free serine/threonine sites of related enzymes in the insulin signaling pathway, thereby disrupting the insulin signaling pathway.

In the state of periodontitis, periodontal pathogens enter the blood circulation directly or indirectly, which can cause bacteremia, and may colonize the distal end of the body, thereby inducing systemic inflammation. The systemic inflammatory state caused by periodontitis is different from the direct invasion of bacteria. The oral inflammatory and periodontitis-related pathogens are more likely to be the initiators of the systemic inflammatory. Patients with periodontitis have elevated levels of systemic inflammatory mediators, such as c-reactive protein, pentaxin-3, and fibrinogen.172 Under active periodontal treatment intervention, these systemic inflammation biomarkers can be significantly down-regulated.173 Therefore, the disordered oral flora of patients with periodontitis can not only mediate the periodontal inflammatory state but also affect the systemic inflammatory state of the distal body.

Oral microbes and rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid Arthritis is an autoimmune inflammatory disease with chronic, symmetric, polysynovial arthritis and extra-articular lesions as the main clinical manifestations.174 Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have a higher incidence of periodontitis and are usually accompanied by more serious periodontal inflammation. Effective treatment of periodontal disease has a positive effect on the control of rheumatoid arthritis. It is worth noting that rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis have similar risk factors, such as human leukocyte antigen HLA-DRB1 allele polymorphism and smoking.175 Both have similar pathological manifestations, such as chronic inflammation and bone resorption mediated by IL-1, TNF-α, and matrix metalloproteinases. Therefore, we believe that rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis may have similar immune-inflammatory causes. Since periodontitis is an immune-inflammatory response induced by oral microbial infection, it is speculated that oral microbial infection may be involved in the pathological process of rheumatoid arthritis as an environmental factor. In recent years, with the continuous deepening of research, the related mechanism of the relationship between oral microbes and rheumatoid arthritis has also been continuously gained new understanding.

Anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are highly specific immunoglobulins in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.176 This antibody is considered to be an important factor linking rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis. Citrullination is a post-translational repair mechanism in the body. It is catalyzed by peptidyl arginine deiminase (PAD), which can change the biochemical properties and immunity of the host protein, resulting in the generation of new antigenic determinants and inducing the body to produce autoantibodies against these epitopes. P. gingivalis gingipains and peptidyl arginine deiminase (pPAD) can lead to citrullination of the host protein, which in turn induces autoantibody reactions.177 Gingipain is a cysteine-like protease that can catalyze the cleavage of arginine at the C-terminus of polypeptides, and the resulting free arginine can be further citrullinated by pPAD. pPAD has a unique domain, does not have homology with mammalian PAD, and has different functions from mammalian PAD.178 Therefore, the citrullination catalyzed by pPAD may generate new epitopes and antigenic determinants. Although pPAD homologs can be detected in a variety of microorganisms in the oral cavity, intestines, and environment, P. gingivalis is the only bacteria that have been found to carry functional PAD at present. In addition, after collagen-induced arthritis mice were infected with P. gingivalis, the production of anti-collagen type II antibodies and the increase in inflammation of arthritis in mice could be detected.179 This kind of phenomenon does not appear in the same animal model of infection with the pPAD gene knocked out strain of P. gingivalis. Significantly, because pPAD can be automatically citrullinated, specific IgG antibodies against citrullinated pPAD can be found in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. And this antibody cannot be detected in healthy people or patients with chronic periodontitis. This suggests that pPAD itself may be one of the antigenic substances that cause RA immune inflammation. However, the titer of anti-pPAD antibodies in humans is extremely low and hard to be detected. However, the biomarkers of cascade amplification induced by pPAD may become very potential clinical markers for RA.

There is also a certain correlation between A. actinomycetemcomitans induces the imbalance of the PAD activity of neutrophils by secreting LtxA, which leads to high citrullination of proteins in neutrophils and the formation of self-antigens.179 Ltx A can also change the morphology of neutrophils, mimic the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps and cause neutrophil lysis, and finally release a large amount of citrullinated antigen. Different from P. gingivalis self-synthesis of bacterial PAD, A. actinomycetemcomitans mainly induces endogenous PAD activity, leading to the formation of autoantigens, and ultimately the formation of ACPA and rheumatoid factor and the occurrence of RA.

The oral microbial composition and community function of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are different from those of healthy people, and these differences are related to the clinical index. The researchers used 6 plaque MLG and 2 salivary flora information to fit the diagnosis model, and the specificity and accuracy of disease diagnosis were higher than 80%.180 The diagnostic model constructed by integrating community information of the intestine, plaque, and saliva has better accuracy and specificity. This indicates that the oral microbial composition of patients with rheumatoid arthritis is finely regulated by the disease. The oral microbiome affects the development and prognosis of RA and has extremely high sensitivity, which can be used as a fingerprint for disease progression and prognosis assessment.

Oral microbes and preterm birth

Preterm birth is the delivery of a fetus under 37 full weeks of pregnancy or 259 days of gestation.181 In China, the birth of a fetus at 28 full weeks of gestation or with a newborn weight of ≥1000 g but less than 37 weeks is regarded as preterm delivery.182 Newborns born during this period with a weight of 1000–2499 g and immature body organs are considered preterm babies.182 Approximately, 35% of neonatal deaths worldwide are related to preterm birth.183 Even if preterm babies survive, there may be complications such as mental retardation, abnormal vision, and hearing, which seriously increases the burden on the family and society. However, the reasons for preterm birth are unknown and there are many inducements, making it difficult for its prevention and treatment. Some oral common microorganisms were detected in the placenta, which indicates that the mechanism of preterm delivery can be explored from the oral conditions of pregnant women.184

The results of metagenomic sequencing of the placental microbial samples showed that the composition of the placental microbiome is most similar to the oral microbiome when compared with the vagina, intestine, and respiratory tract.184 Based on this, it is speculated that the bacteria in the oral microecology may colonize the placenta, and its virulence factors may produce pathological effects in the local placenta and induce preterm delivery. Researchers injected saliva and subgingival plaque obtained from the population into the tail vein of the mice, and then tested the bacterial composition in the placenta, and found that the bacteria colonized in the placenta are mostly oral symbiotic bacteria, and their colonization has a certain specificity, rather than physical diffusion.184 The difference in the composition of the oral microbiota at the placental site between preterm delivery and full-term delivery may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm delivery.

To study the effects of P. gingivalis on adverse pregnancy outcomes, Collins et al. injected the lipopolysaccharide of P. gingivalis into golden hamsters and found that both pre-pregnancy injections and injections during pregnancy had harmful effects on fetal mice with a dose-dependent effect.185 They also used the Chamber research model to repeat the above experiment and found a rising rate of adverse pregnancy outcomes and an increase of PGE2 and TNF-α in the LPS treatment mice.186 This indicates that P. gingivalis may induce premature delivery in mice by triggering acute and chronic inflammatory reactions. Lin et al. found that P. gingivalis can be detected in the liver, uterus, and placenta of the mothers of growth-restricted mice with increasing serum TNF-α, IFN-γ and P. gingivalis specific antibodies IgG.187 This indicates that P. gingivalis can stimulate the mother to produce an inflammatory response, leading to intrauterine growth restriction.

It has also been reported that in a case of a pregnant woman with gingivitis and upper respiratory tract infection who gave birth to a stillbirth, the 16S rRNA coding sequence analysis method was used to detect F. nucleatum from the placenta and the fetus, and its sequence was similar to that of the maternal gingival F. nucleatum.188 This case shows for the first time that F. nucleatum may be transferred from the human oral cavity to the placenta. In the experiment of injecting F. nucleatum into the veins of mice, it was also observed that F. nucleatum infects the mouse placenta in the form of biofilm and causes premature delivery and even stillbirth.189 Experiments using F. nucleatum and TLR-4 or TLR-2 deficient mice found that TLR-4 deficient mice had lower fetal mortality and less placental inflammation, while TLR-2 deficient mice did not. At the same time, the treatment of wild-type mice with TLR-4 antagonists can reduce fetal mortality and reduce the occurrence of decidual necrosis without affecting the colonization of placental bacteria. This indicates that the inflammation caused by oral microorganisms may be more important than the role of bacteria itself for adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth.

In addition, Bergerella was also detected in the amniotic fluid analysis of the parturient, and its 16S rRNA coding sequence was consistent with that in the subgingival plaque of the parturient but was not detected in the vagina.190 This finding confirmed that the bacteria in the oral cavity entered the amniotic fluid and suggested that Bergerella may be related to preterm birth. Other oral bacteria detected in the placenta and amniotic fluid include Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Listeria monocytogenes, Tannerella forsythia, T. denticola, Peptostreptococcus micros, S. sanguis, and A. actinomycetemcomitans. Whether these bacteria have the effect of causing preterm birth and the specific mechanism remains to be further studied. The proliferation of these oral microorganisms at the placenta may break the ecological balance of local sites cause pathological alterations and induce preterm birth. However, the abnormal proliferation of these oral microorganisms at the placenta may induce the host’s inflammatory response. Compared with the bacteria themselves, the release of inflammatory cytokines may play a more important role in causing adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusions and perspectives

The relationship between the structure and function of oral microbes and the balance of human health and disease is becoming clearer. The rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technology and bioinformatics technology has made it possible to comprehensively study the composition of oral microbes. Since the human body is a “super complex” composed of human cells and microorganisms, microorganisms, as the second genome that affects human health, can settle inside and on the human body. As an important part of the human microbiome, the oral microbiome is systemic and community-specific. However, compared with the gut microbiome, the study of the oral microbiome is still in its infancy. Many studies have focused on the discovery of microbial diversity, and few have dealt with the impact of community function, host genetic background, lifestyle, and biological function events on the oral microbiota. The lack of these data has greatly affected people’s comprehensive understanding of the oral microbial community. In addition, under the promotion of HMP and other microbial metagenomics research projects, the use of high-throughput sequencing technology to understand the oral microbial community has continued to deepen, and massive amounts of big data information have been obtained. How to effectively transform biological big data into clinical diagnosis and treatment methods with practical application value, and then provide patients with effective individualized medical services, there are still many problems to be solved urgently. The continuous development of metagenomics technology and high-throughput sequencing technology has greatly expanded human understanding of the relationship between the oral microbiome and systemic diseases. Oral microbiology has changed from studying the pathogenicity of individual bacteria to the relationship between oral microecological balance and systemic diseases. Understanding the specific mechanisms that maintain and regulate oral microecological balance is of great significance to the prevention and treatment of oral diseases and even human systemic diseases.

References

  1. Miller, W. D. The human mouth as a focus of infection. Lancet 138, 340–342 (1891).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Billings, F. Chronic focal infections and their etiologic relations to arthritis and nephritis. Arch. Intern. Med. IX, 484–498 (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Read, E., Curtis, M. A. & Neves, J. F. The role of oral bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 731–742 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tuominen, H. & Rautava, J. Oral microbiota and cancer development. Pathobiology 88, 116–126 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Y. et al. Oral, tongue-coating microbiota, and metabolic disorders: a novel area of interactive research. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8, 730203 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamer, A. R. et al. Periodontal dysbiosis associates with reduced CSF Abeta42 in cognitively normal elderly. Alzheimers Dement. (Amst.) 13, e12172 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Matsha, T. E. et al. Oral microbiome signatures in diabetes mellitus and periodontal disease. J. Dent. Res. 99, 658–665 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, Z. et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation from metabolically compromised human donors accelerates osteoarthritis in mice. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 79, 646–656 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gomez, L. A. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis placental atopobiosis and inflammatory responses in women with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Front. Microbiol. 11, 591626 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Xian, P. et al. The oral microbiome bank of China. Int J. Oral. Sci. 10, 16 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. The human microbiome project. Nature 449, 804–810 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hathaway-Schrader, J. D. & Novince, C. M. Maintaining homeostatic control of periodontal bone tissue. Periodontology 86, 157–187 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hajishengallis, G., Hasturk, H., Lambris, J. D. & Contributing authors C3-targeted therapy in periodontal disease: moving closer to the clinic. Trends Immunol. 42, 856–864 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zuza, E. C. et al. Evaluation of recurrence of periodontal disease after treatment in obese and normal weight patients: two-year follow-up. J. Periodontol. 91, 1123–1131 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nejman, D. et al. The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type-specific intracellular bacteria. Science 368, 973–980 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yete, S., D’Souza, W. & Saranath, D. High-risk human papillomavirus in oral cancer: clinical implications. Oncology 94, 133–141 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Diaz, P., Valenzuela Valderrama, M., Bravo, J. & Quest, A. F. G. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: adaptive cellular mechanisms involved in disease progression. Front. Microbiol. 9, 5 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Alshamsan, A., Khan, S., Imran, A., Aljuffali, I. A. & Alsaleh, K. Prediction of Chlamydia pneumoniae protein localization in host mitochondria and cytoplasm and possible involvements in lung cancer etiology: a computational approach. Saudi Pharm. J. 25, 1151–1157 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shukla, S. K., Singh, G., Shahi, K. S., Bhuvan & Pant, P. Staging, treatment, and future approaches of gallbladder carcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 49, 9–15 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jans, C. & Boleij, A. The road to infection: host-microbe interactions defining the pathogenicity of Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex members. Front. Microbiol. 9, 603 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Haghi, F., Goli, E., Mirzaei, B. & Zeighami, H. The association between fecal enterotoxigenic B. fragilis with colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 19, 879 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, T. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes chemoresistance to colorectal cancer by modulating autophagy. Cell 170, 548–563 e516 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, S., Gravekamp, C., Bermudes, D. & Liu, K. Tumour-targeting bacteria engineered to fight cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 727–743 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Graves, D. T., Correa, J. D. & Silva, T. A. The oral microbiota is modified by systemic diseases. J. Dent. Res. 98, 148–156 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao, L. et al. Oral microbiomes: more and more importance in oral cavity and whole body. Protein Cell 9, 488–500 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jia, X. et al. Berberine ameliorates periodontal bone loss by regulating gut microbiota. J. Dent. Res. 98, 107–116 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bourgeois, D., Inquimbert, C., Ottolenghi, L. & Carrouel, F. Periodontal pathogens as risk factors of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-is there cause for consideration? Microorganisms 7, 424 (2019).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Engevik, M. A. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum secretes outer membrane vesicles and promotes intestinal inflammation. mBio 12, e02706–e02720 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hashioka, S. et al. Implications of systemic inflammation and periodontitis for major depression. Front. Neurosci. 12, 483 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Dawes, C. & Wong, D. T. W. Role of saliva and salivary diagnostics in the advancement of oral health. J. Dent. Res. 98, 133–141 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, B. et al. Oral bacteria colonize and compete with gut microbiota in gnotobiotic mice. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 11, 10 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Qiao, Y. & Ran, Z. Potential influential factors on incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in mainland China. JGH Open 4, 11–15 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen, L. J., Cho, J. H., Gevers, D. & Chu, H. Genetic factors and the intestinal microbiome guide development of microbe-based therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 156, 2174–2189 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Glassner, K. L., Abraham, B. P. & Quigley, E. M. M. The microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 16–27 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Falcao, A. & Bullon, P. A review of the influence of periodontal treatment in systemic diseases. Periodontology 79, 117–128 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, Z. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles inhibit the invasion of Fusobacterium nucleatum into oral epithelial cells by downregulating FadA and FomA. J. Periodontol. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0144 (2021).

  37. Kato, T. et al. Oral administration of Porphyromonas gingivalis alters the gut microbiome and serum metabolome. mSphere 3, e00460–00418 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, H. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum exacerbates colitis by damaging epithelial barriers and inducing aberrant inflammation. J. Dig. Dis. 21, 385–398 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, Y., Shao, F., Zheng, S., Tan, Z. & He, Y. Alteration of Streptococcus salivarius in buccal mucosa of oral lichen planus and controlled clinical trial in OLP treatment. Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins 12, 1340–1348 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yin, W. et al. Inverse association between poor oral health and inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 525–531 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ito, S. et al. Specific strains of Streptococcus mutans, a pathogen of dental caries, in the tonsils, are associated with IgA nephropathy. Sci. Rep. 9, 20130 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Qi, Y. et al. New insights into the role of oral microbiota dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Digest. Dis. Sci. 67, 42–55 (2022).

  43. Xiao, J., Fiscella, K. A. & Gill, S. R. Oral microbiome: possible harbinger for children’s health. Int. J. Oral Sci. 12, 12 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Xun, Z., Zhang, Q., Xu, T., Chen, N. & Chen, F. Dysbiosis and ecotypes of the salivary microbiome associated with inflammatory bowel diseases and the assistance in diagnosis of diseases using oral bacterial profiles. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1136 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Goel, R. M. et al. Streptococcus salivarius: a potential salivary biomarker for orofacial granulomatosis and Crohn’s disease? Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 25, 1367–1374 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Purcell, R. V., Kaakoush, N. O., Mitchell, H. M., Pearson, J. F. & Keenan, J. I. Gastrointestinal pathobionts in pediatric Crohn’s disease patients. Int. J. Microbiol. 2018, 9203908 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Castano-Rodriguez, N., Kaakoush, N. O., Lee, W. S. & Mitchell, H. M. Dual role of Helicobacter and Campylobacter species in IBD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 66, 235–249 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brennan, C. A. et al. Aspirin modulation of the colorectal cancer-associated microbe Fusobacterium nucleatum. mBio 12, e00547–00521 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Yamashita, T., Tai, S., Tsukahara, T. & Inoue, R. Fusobacterium nucleatum impedes remission of colitis in a mouse model. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 85, 1235–1242 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Brennan, C. A. & Garrett, W. S. Fusobacterium nucleatum—symbiont, opportunist and oncobacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 156–166 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Kitamoto, S. et al. The intermucosal connection between the mouth and gut in commensal pathobiont-driven colitis. Cell 182, 447–462 e414 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Inohara, N. Route connection: mouth to intestine in colitis. Cell Host Microbe 22, 730–731 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kitamoto, S., Nagao-Kitamoto, H., Hein, R., Schmidt, T. M. & Kamada, N. The bacterial connection between the oral cavity and the gut diseases. J. Dent. Res. 99, 1021–1029 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Moutsopoulos, N. M. & Konkel, J. E. Tissue-specific immunity at the oral mucosal barrier. Trends Immunol. 39, 276–287 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lu, H. et al. Deep sequencing reveals microbiota dysbiosis of tongue coat in patients with liver carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 6, 33142 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Lu, H. et al. Deep sequencing reveals microbiota dysbiosis tongue coat. Patients Liver Carcinoma 6, 1–11 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Iwasaki, T. et al. Correlation between ultrasound-diagnosed non-alcoholic fatty liver and periodontal condition in a cross-sectional study in Japan. Sci. Rep. 8, 7496 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Sasaki, N. et al. Endotoxemia by Porphyromonas gingivalis injection aggravates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, disrupts glucose/lipid metabolism, and alters gut microbiota in mice. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2470 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Alakhali, M. S., Al-Maweri, S. A., Al-Shamiri, H. M., Al-Haddad, K. & Halboub, E. The potential association between periodontitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Investig. 22, 2965–2974 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Qin, N. et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 513, 59–64 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Blasco-Baque, V. et al. Periodontitis induced by Porphyromonas gingivalis drives periodontal microbiota dysbiosis and insulin resistance via an impaired adaptive immune response. Gut 66, 872–885 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhong, X. et al. Oral microbiota alteration associated with oral cancer and areca chewing. Oral. Dis. 27, 226–239 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang, X., Li, C., Cao, W. & Zhang, Z. Alterations of gastric microbiota in gastric cancer and precancerous stages. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 11, 559148 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Zanetta, P. et al. Oral microbiota and vitamin D impact on oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinogenesis: a narrative literature review. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 47, 224–239 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sarkar, P. et al. Dysbiosis of oral microbiota during oral squamous cell carcinoma development. Front. Oncol. 11, 614448 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang, J., Jia, Z., Zhang, B., Peng, L. & Zhao, F. Tracing the accumulation of in vivo human oral microbiota elucidates microbial community dynamics at the gateway to the GI tract. Gut 69, 1355–1356 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Teles, F. R. F., Alawi, F., Castilho, R. M. & Wang, Y. Association or causation? Exploring the oral microbiome and cancer links. J. Dent. Res. 99, 1411–1424 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Kakabadze, M. Z., Paresishvili, T., Karalashvili, L., Chakhunashvili, D. & Kakabadze, Z. Oral microbiota and oral cancer: review. Oncol. Rev. 14, 476 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Fan, X. et al. Human oral microbiome and prospective risk for pancreatic cancer: a population-based nested case-control study. Gut 67, 120–127 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Peters, B. A. et al. Oral microbiome composition reflects prospective risk for esophageal cancers. Cancer Res. 77, 6777–6787 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Han, Y. W. Commentary: oral bacteria as drivers for colorectal cancer. J. Periodontol. 85, 1155–1157 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Gur, C. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum supresses anti-tumor immunity by activating CEACAM1. Oncoimmunology 8, e1581531 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Zheng, H. J. & Zhang, C. P. The oral microbiota may have influence on oral cancer. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 9, 476 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhou, X. et al. The clinical potential of oral microbiota as a screening tool for oral squamous cell carcinomas. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 11, 728933 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Lim, Y., Totsika, M., Morrison, M. & Punyadeera, C. Oral microbiome: a new biomarker reservoir for oral and oropharyngeal cancers. Theranostics 7, 4313–4321 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Hussein, A. A. et al. Global incidence of oral and oropharynx cancer in patients younger than 45 years versus older patients: a systematic review. Eur. J. Cancer 82, 115–127 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Islami, F. et al. Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 31–54 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Irani, S. New insights into oral cancer-risk factors and prevention: a review of literature. Int. J. Prev. Med. 11, 202 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Wen, L. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes oral squamous cell carcinoma progression in an immune microenvironment. J. Dent. Res. 99, 666–675 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Zhang, S. et al. Analysis of differentially expressed genes in oral epithelial cells infected with Fusobacterium nucleatum for revealing genes associated with oral cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 25, 892–904 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Kamarajan, P. et al. Periodontal pathogens promote cancer aggressivity via TLR/MyD88 triggered activation of Integrin/FAK signaling that is therapeutically reversible by a probiotic bacteriocin. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008881 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Fitzsimonds, Z. R., Rodriguez-Hernandez, C. J., Bagaitkar, J. & Lamont, R. J. From beyond the pale to the pale riders: the emerging association of bacteria with oral cancer. J. Dent. Res. 99, 604–612 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Sankari, S. L., Mahalakshmi, K. & Kumar, V. N. A comparative study of Candida species diversity among patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders. BMC Res. Notes 13, 488 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Lafuente Ibanez de Mendoza, I., Maritxalar Mendia, X., Garcia de la Fuente, A. M., Quindos Andres, G. & Aguirre Urizar, J. M. Role of Porphyromonas gingivalis in oral squamous cell carcinoma development: a systematic review. J. Periodontal Res. 55, 13–22 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Liu, S. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes immunoevasion of oral cancer by protecting cancer from macrophage attack. J. Immunol. 205, 282–289 (2020).

  86. Chen, Q. et al. Salivary Porphyromonas gingivalis predicts outcome in oral squamous cell carcinomas: a cohort study. BMC Oral Health 21, 228 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Torralba, M. G. et al. Oral microbial species and virulence factors associated with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Microb. Ecol. 82, 1030–1046 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Li, Q. et al. Role of oral bacteria in the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers 12, 2797 (2020).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Chen, M. Y. et al. Carcinogenesis of male oral submucous fibrosis alters salivary microbiomes. J. Dent. Res. 100, 397–405 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Alizadehgharib, S., Ostberg, A. K., Dahlstrand Rudin, A., Dahlgren, U. & Christenson, K. Immunological response of human leucocytes after exposure to lipopolysaccharides from Porphyromonas gingivalis. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 7, 531–538 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Elsayed, R. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis provokes exosome secretion and paracrine immune senescence in bystander dendritic cells. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 11, 669989 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Ren, L., Yang, J., Wang, J., Zhou, X. & Liu, C. The roles of FOXO1 in periodontal homeostasis and disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 5557095 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Aral, K., Milward, M. R. & Cooper, P. R. Gene expression profiles of mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum tethering in human gingival fibroblasts in response to periodontal pathogens. Arch. Oral Biol. 128, 105173 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Vyhnalova, T., Danek, Z., Gachova, D. & Linhartova, P. B. The role of the oral microbiota in the etiopathogenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Microorganisms 9, 1549 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Moura, M. F. et al. Nonsurgical periodontal therapy decreases the severity of rheumatoid arthritis and the plasmatic and salivary levels of RANKL and Survivin: a short-term clinical study. Clin. Oral Investig. 25, 6643–6652 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Elazazy, O., Amr, K., Abd El Fattah, A. & Abouzaid, M. Evaluation of serum and gingival crevicular fluid microRNA-223, microRNA-203 and microRNA-200b expression in chronic periodontitis patients with and without diabetes type 2. Arch. Oral Biol. 121, 104949 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Chopra, A., Bhat, S. G. & Sivaraman, K. Porphyromonas gingivalis adopts intricate and unique molecular mechanisms to survive and persist within the host: a critical update. J. Oral Microbiol. 12, 1801090 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Zheng, S. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis survival skills: immune evasion. J. Periodontal Res. 56, 1007–1018 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Meng, F. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes the motility of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by activating NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Microbes Infect. 21, 296–304 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Guo, W. et al. Pyruvate kinase M2 promotes prostate cancer metastasis through regulating ERK1/2-COX-2 signaling. Front. Oncol. 10, 544288 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. de Vicente, J. C. et al. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 28, 546–554 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Groeger, S., Denter, F., Lochnit, G., Schmitz, M. L. & Meyle, J. Porphyromonas gingivalis cell wall components induce programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on human oral carcinoma cells by a receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIP2)-dependent mechanism. Infect. Immun. 88, e00051–00020 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Pontarollo, G. et al. Protease-activated receptor signaling in intestinal permeability regulation. FEBS J. 287, 645–658 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Zhang, L. et al. The virulence factor GroEL promotes gelatinase secretion from cells in the osteoblast lineage: Implication for direct crosstalk between bacteria and adult cells. Arch. Oral Biol. 122, 104991 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Mu, W. et al. Intracellular Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells via the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 10, 584798 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Binder Gallimidi, A. et al. Periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum promote tumor progression in an oral-specific chemical carcinogenesis model. Oncotarget 6, 22613–22623 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Harrandah, A. M., Chukkapalli, S. S., Bhattacharyya, I., Progulske-Fox, A. & Chan, E. K. L. Fusobacteria modulate oral carcinogenesis and promote cancer progression. J. Oral. Microbiol. 13, 1849493 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Stasiewicz, M. & Karpinski, T. M. The oral microbiota and its role in carcinogenesis. Semin. Cancer Biol. (2021).

  109. Nieminen, M. T. et al. Treponema denticola chymotrypsin-like proteinase may contribute to orodigestive carcinogenesis through immunomodulation. Br. J. Cancer 118, 428–434 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Listyarifah, D. et al. Treponema denticola chymotrypsin-like proteinase is present in early-stage mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma and related to the clinicopathological features. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 47, 764–772 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Asgarian, F. S., Mahdian, M. & Amori, N. Epidemiology and trends of gastrointestinal cancer in Iran (2004-2008). J. Cancer Res. Ther. 17, 963–968 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. He, F. et al. Esophageal cancer: trends in incidence and mortality in China from 2005 to 2015. Cancer Med. 10, 1839–1847 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Nwizu, N., Wactawski-Wende, J. & Genco, R. J. Periodontal disease and cancer: epidemiologic studies and possible mechanisms. Periodontol 2000 83, 213–233 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Narikiyo, M. et al. Frequent and preferential infection of Treponema denticola, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus anginosus in esophageal cancers. Cancer Sci. 95, 569–574 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Chen, X. et al. Oral microbiota and risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a high-risk area of China. PLoS ONE 10, e0143603 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Gao, S. G. et al. Preoperative serum immunoglobulin G and A antibodies to Porphyromonas gingivalis are potential serum biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 18, 17 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Gao, S. et al. Presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis in esophagus and its association with the clinicopathological characteristics and survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Infect. Agent Cancer 11, 3 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Chang, J. S., Tsai, C. R., Chen, L. T. & Shan, Y. S. Investigating the association between periodontal disease and risk of pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 45, 134–141 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Torres, P. J. et al. Characterization of the salivary microbiome in patients with pancreatic cancer. PeerJ 3, e1373 (2015).

  120. Wang, S. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum acts as a pro-carcinogenic bacterium in colorectal cancer: from association to causality. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 710165 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Keum, N. & Giovannucci, E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 713–732 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Pignatelli, P. et al. The potential of colonic tumor tissue Fusobacterium nucleatum to predict staging and its interplay with oral abundance in colon cancer patients. Cancers 13, 1032 (2021).

  123. Todd, S. M., Settlage, R. E., Lahmers, K. K. & Slade, D. J. Fusobacterium genomics using MinION and illumina sequencing enables genome completion and correction. mSphere 3, e00269–18 (2018).

  124. Yusuf, E., Wybo, I. & Pierard, D. Case series of patients with Fusobacterium nucleatum bacteremia with emphasis on the presence of cancer. Anaerobe 39, 1–3 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Shin, J. et al. Antibody and T cell responses to Fusobacterium nucleatum and Treponema denticola in health and chronic periodontitis. PLoS ONE 8, e53703 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Hashemi Goradel, N. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum and colorectal cancer: a mechanistic overview. J. Cell. Physiol. 234, 2337–2344 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Nabel, E. G. Cardiovascular disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 60–72 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Wolf, D. & Ley, K. Immunity and inflammation in atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 124, 315–327 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Beck, J. D. & Offenbacher, S. Systemic effects of periodontitis: epidemiology of periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease. J. Periodontol. 76, 2089–2100 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Tonetti, M. S. & Van Dyke, T. E., working group 1 of the joint, E.F.P.A.A.P.w. Periodontitis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: consensus report of the Joint EFP/AAPWorkshop on Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases. J. Periodontol. 84, S24–S29 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Persson, G. R. & Persson, R. E. Cardiovascular disease and periodontitis: an update on the associations and risk. J. Clin. Periodontol. 35, 362–379 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Forner, L., Nielsen, C. H., Bendtzen, K., Larsen, T. & Holmstrup, P. Increased plasma levels of IL-6 in bacteremic periodontis patients after scaling. J. Clin. Periodontol. 33, 724–729 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Zheng, X. Y. et al. Plumbagin suppresses chronic periodontitis in rats via down-regulation of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and IL-6 expression. Acta Pharm. Sin. 38, 1150–1160 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Marietta, E., Horwath, I., Balakrishnan, B. & Taneja, V. Role of the intestinal microbiome in autoimmune diseases and its use in treatments. Cell Immunol. 339, 50–58 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Zardawi, F., Gul, S., Abdulkareem, A., Sha, A. & Yates, J. Association between periodontal disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: revisited. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 7, 625579 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Herrera, D., Molina, A., Buhlin, K. & Klinge, B. Periodontal diseases and association with atherosclerotic disease. Periodontology 83, 66–89 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  137. Martini, A. M. et al. Association of novel Streptococcus sanguinis virulence factors with pathogenesis in a native valve infective endocarditis model. Front. Microbiol. 11, 10 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Chamat-Hedemand, S. et al. Prevalence of infective endocarditis in Streptococcal bloodstream infections is dependent on streptococcal species. Circulation 142, 720–730 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Schoffer, C., Oliveira, L. M., Santi, S. S., Antoniazzi, R. P. & Zanatta, F. B. C-reactive protein levels are associated with periodontitis and periodontal inflamed surface area in adults with end-stage renal disease. J. Periodontol. 92, 793–802 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Liu, Y. et al. The combined use of salivary biomarkers and clinical parameters to predict the outcome of scaling and root planing: a cohort study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 47, 1379–1390 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Brun, A. et al. Innovative application of nested PCR for detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis in human highly calcified atherothrombotic plaques. J. Oral. Microbiol. 12, 1742523 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Chiu, C. J., Chang, M. L., Kantarci, A., Van Dyke, T. E. & Shi, W. Exposure to Porphyromonas gingivalis and modifiable risk factors modulate risk for early diabetic retinopathy. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 10, 23 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Cairo, F. et al. Periodontal pathogens in atheromatous plaques. A controlled clinical and laboratory trial. J. Periodontal Res. 39, 442–446 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Khumaedi, A. I., Purnamasari, D., Wijaya, I. P. & Soeroso, Y. The relationship of diabetes, periodontitis and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 13, 1675–1678 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Xuan, Y. et al. Tanshinone IIA attenuates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice infected with Porphyromonas gingivalis. Inflammation 40, 1631–1642 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Li, L., Messas, E., Batista, E. L. Jr, Levine, R. A. & Amar, S. Porphyromonas gingivalis infection accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis in a heterozygous apolipoprotein E-deficient murine model. Circulation 105, 861–867 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Genco, R., Offenbacher, S. & Beck, J. Periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease: epidemiology and possible mechanisms. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 133, 14S–22S (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Bartova, J. et al. Periodontitis as a risk factor of atherosclerosis. J. Immunol. Res. 2014, 636893 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Isola, G., Polizzi, A., Alibrandi, A., Williams, R. C. & Lo Giudice, A. Analysis of galectin-3 levels as a source of coronary heart disease risk during periodontitis. J. Periodontal Res. 56, 597–605 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Isola, G., Polizzi, A., Alibrandi, A., Williams, R. C. & Leonardi, R. Independent impact of periodontitis and cardiovascular disease on elevated soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels. J. Periodontol. 92, 896–906 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Kamer, A. R., Craig, R. G., Niederman, R., Fortea, J. & de Leon, M. J. Periodontal disease as a possible cause for Alzheimer’s disease. Periodontology 83, 242–271 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  152. Lin, L. et al. Resilience to Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-beta in Cognitively Normal Individuals: Findings From Two Cohort Studies. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13, 610755 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Werber, T. et al. The association of periodontitis and Alzheimer’s disease: how to hit two birds with one stone. J. Alzheimers Dis. 84, 1–21 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Paganini-Hill, A., White, S. C. & Atchison, K. A. Dentition, dental health habits, and dementia: the Leisure World Cohort Study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 60, 1556–1563 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Noble, J. M. et al. Periodontitis is associated with cognitive impairment among older adults: analysis of NHANES-III. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80, 1206–1211 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Dominy, S. S. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer’s disease brains: evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau3333 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Zeng, F. et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end products up-regulation in cerebral endothelial cells mediates cerebrovascular-related amyloid beta accumulation after Porphyromonas gingivalis infection. J. Neurochem. 158, 724–736 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Stephan, A. & Phillips, A. G. A case for a non-transgenic animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Genes Brain Behav. 4, 157–172 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Kook, S. Y. et al. High-dose of vitamin C supplementation reduces amyloid plaque burden and ameliorates pathological changes in the brain of 5XFAD mice. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1083 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Horowitz, M., Horowitz, M., Ochs, M., Carrau, R. & Kassam, A. Trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: two orofacial pain syndromes encountered by dentists. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 135, 1427–1433 (2004). quiz 1468.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Association, A. D., Vol. Suppl 1, 1–2 (American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care; 2019).

  162. Genco, R. J., Graziani, F. & Hasturk, H. Effects of periodontal disease on glycemic control, complications, and incidence of diabetes mellitus. Periodontology 83, 59–65 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  163. Nguyen, A. T. M. et al. The association of periodontal disease with the complications of diabetes mellitus. A systematic review. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 165, 108244 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Matsha, T. et al. Oral microbiome signatures in diabetes mellitus and periodontal disease. J. Dent. Res. 99, 658–665 (2020).

  165. Ruff, W. E., Greiling, T. M. & Kriegel, M. A. Host-microbiota interactions in immune-mediated diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 521–538 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Isola, G. et al. Identification of the different salivary Interleukin-6 profiles in patients with periodontitis: a cross-sectional study. Arch. Oral. Biol. 122, 104997 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Jia, L. et al. Pathogenesis of important virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis via toll-like receptors. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 9, 262 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Mattera, M. et al. Effect of maternal periodontitis on GLUT4 and inflammatory pathway in adult offspring. J. Periodontol. 90, 884–893 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Bhat, U. G., Ilievski, V., Unterman, T. G. & Watanabe, K. Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide upregulates insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cell line MIN6. J. Periodontol. 85, 1629–1636 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Maritim, A. C., Sanders, R. A. & Watkins, J. B. 3rd Diabetes, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: a review. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 17, 24–38 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Yaribeygi, H., Sathyapalan, T., Atkin, S. L. & Sahebkar, A. Molecular mechanisms linking oxidative stress and diabetes mellitus. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 8609213 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Torrungruang, K., Katudat, D., Mahanonda, R., Sritara, P. & Udomsak, A. Periodontitis is associated with elevated serum levels of cardiac biomarkers-Soluble ST2 and C-reactive protein. J. Clin. Periodontol. 46, 809–818 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Wang, Y. et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of non-surgical periodontal therapy on cardiac function assessed by echocardiography in type 2 diabetic patients. J. Clin. Periodontol. 47, 726–736 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Aletaha, D. & Smolen, J. S. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis: a review. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 320, 1360–1372 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  175. Hollenbach, J. A. et al. A specific amino acid motif of HLA-DRB1 mediates risk and interacts with smoking history in Parkinson’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7419–7424 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Sakkas, L. I., Daoussis, D., Liossis, S. N. & Bogdanos, D. P. The infectious basis of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1853 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Munoz-Atienza, E. et al. The P. gingivalis autocitrullinome is not a target for ACPA in early rheumatoid arthritis. J. Dent. Res. 99, 456–462 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Potempa, J., Mydel, P. & Koziel, J. The case for periodontitis in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 13, 606–620 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Gomez-Banuelos, E., Mukherjee, A., Darrah, E. & Andrade, F. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. J. Clin. Med. 8, 1309 (2019).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Zhang, X. et al. The oral and gut microbiomes are perturbed in rheumatoid arthritis and partly normalized after treatment. Nat. Med. 21, 895–905 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Vogel, J. P. et al. The global epidemiology of preterm birth. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 52, 3–12 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Chen, C. et al. Preterm birth in China between 2015 and 2016. Am. J. Public Health 109, 1597–1604 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. Walani, S. R. Global burden of preterm birth. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 150, 31–33 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Fardini, Y., Chung, P., Dumm, R., Joshi, N. & Han, Y. W. Transmission of diverse oral bacteria to murine placenta: evidence for the oral microbiome as a potential source of intrauterine infection. Infect. Immun. 78, 1789–1796 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  185. Chopra, A., Radhakrishnan, R. & Sharma, M. Porphyromonas gingivalis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a review on its intricate pathogenic mechanisms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 46, 213–236 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Latorre Uriza, C. et al. Periodontal disease, inflammatory cytokines, and PGE2 in pregnant patients at risk of preterm delivery: a pilot study. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 7027683 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. Lin, D., Moss, K., Beck, J. D., Hefti, A. & Offenbacher, S. Persistently high levels of periodontal pathogens associated with preterm pregnancy outcome. J. Periodontol. 78, 833–841 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Barak, S., Oettinger-Barak, O., Machtei, E. E., Sprecher, H. & Ohel, G. Evidence of periopathogenic microorganisms in placentas of women with preeclampsia. J. Periodontol. 78, 670–676 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Liu, H., Redline, R. W. & Han, Y. W. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces fetal death in mice via stimulation of TLR4-mediated placental inflammatory response. J. Immunol. 179, 2501–2508 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Fox, C. & Eichelberger, K. Maternal microbiome and pregnancy outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 104, 1358–1363 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin Xu or Xuedong Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, X., Cheng, L., You, Y. et al. Oral microbiota in human systematic diseases. Int J Oral Sci 14, 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-022-00163-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-022-00163-7

Search

Quick links