Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Pediatrics

Abnormalities in deep-brain morphology and orbitofrontal cortical thinning relate to reward processing and body mass in adolescent girls

Abstract

Background

Research examining the neural correlates of obesity has recently expanded. However, limited attention has focused on identifying unique brain signatures associated with obesity, particularly in adolescents. The aim of this study was to use surface-based approaches to examine the integrity of brain structures involved in processing the pleasurable effects of food with body mass and food reward sensitivity in adolescent girls.

Methods

Structural morphology of the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, pallidum, and orbitofrontal cortex was examined in 89 adolescent girls with body mass ranging from normal to obese. High-resolution T1-weighted MPRAGE images were used to characterize deep-brain nuclei with high-dimensional diffeomorphic mapping procedures, while cortical thickness was derived from the FreeSurfer toolkit.

Results

Results revealed that zBMI was significantly associated with the shape of the left amygdala (β = −1.1, p < 0.021, 95% CI = −2.02, −0.16), volume of the right and left pallidum (β = 49.66, p < 0.010, 95% CI = 11.74, 87.58; β = 47.87, p < 0.017, 95% CI = 8.48, 87.25), and cortical thickness of the lateral and right medial orbitofrontal cortex (β = −0.06, p < 0.001, 95% CI = −0.09, −0.04; β = −0.05, p = 0.004, 95% CI = −0.08, −0.02). Sensitivity to food reward significantly predicted volume of the right nucleus accumbens (β = 0.66, p = 0.047, 95% CI = 0.01, 1). Contrast mapping for surface shape of the amygdala revealed significant outward deformation of the posterior lateral left amygdala and an inward deformation of the basolateral left amygdala in the group with overweight/obesity.

Conclusions

Integrity of the left amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex varies as a function of body mass, with greater localized amygdalar volume loss, pallidum volume, and increased cortical thinning of the orbitofrontal cortex occurring as weight increases. Thus, overweight/obesity may be associated with surface-based abnormalities in brain structures associated with processing of reward value related to food. Overall, findings highlight the importance of understanding changes in reward-related brain regions and how they pertain to variability in body mass in adolescent girls.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link

Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Visualized relationships between zBMI and subcortical shape.
Fig. 2: Visualized relationships between zBMI and power of food scale and subcortical volume.
Fig. 3: Overweight/obese vs. normal weight in the left amygdala.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on GitHub via the following link: https://github.com/kzaugg/Abnormalities-in-Deep-Brain-Morphology-and-Orbitofrontal-Cortical-Thinning-Relate-to-Reward-Processi.git. Raw structural MRI data are not openly available in order to protect participant privacy. All data can be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Simmonds M, Llewellyn A, Owen CG, Woolacott N. Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17:95–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kansra AR, Lakkunarajah S, Jay MS. Childhood and adolescent obesity: a review. Front Pediatr. 2021. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2020.581461.

  3. Skinner AC, Ravanbakht SN, Skelton JA, Perrin EM, Armstrong SC. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity in US children, 1999–2016. Pediatrics. 2018;141:20173459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jensen CD, Duraccio KM, Carbine KA, Barnett KA, Kirwan CB. Motivational impact of palatable food correlates with functional brain responses to food images in adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2016;42:578–87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Varley-Campbell JL, Fulford J, Moore MS, Williams CA. Adolescent brain activation: dependence on sex, dietary satiation, and restraint. Nutr Neurosci. 2018;21:439–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Must A, Anderson SE. Body mass index in children and adolescents: considerations for population-based applications. Int J Obes. 2006;30:590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cespedes EM, Hu FB. Dietary patterns: from nutritional epidemiologic analysis to national guidelines. Am J Clinical Nutrition. 2015;101:899–900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lowe CJ, Reichelt AC, Hall PA. The prefrontal cortex and obesity: a health neuroscience perspective. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019;23:349–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell MK. Biological, environmental, and social influences on childhood obesity. Pediatr Res. 2016;79:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berthoud H-R, Münzberg H, Morrison CD. Blaming the brain for obesity: integration of hedonic and homeostatic mechanisms. Gastroenterology. 2017 ;152:1728–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yokum S, Ng J, Stice E. Attentional bias to food images associated with elevated weight and future weight gain: An fMRI study. Obesity. 2011;19:1775–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Duraccio KM, Zaugg K, Jensen CD. Effects of sleep restriction on food- related inhibitory control and reward in adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2019;44:692–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marqués-Iturria I, Pueyo R, Garolera M, Segura B, Junqué C, García-García I, et al. Frontal cortical thinning and subcortical volume reductions in early adulthood obesity. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2013;214:109–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ross N, Yau PL, Convit A. Obesity, fitness, and brain integrity in adolescence. Appetite. 2015;93:44–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharkey RJ, Karama S, Dagher A. Overweight is not associated with cortical thickness alterations in children. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Carnell S, Gibson C, Benson L, Ochner CN, Geliebter A. Neuroimaging and obesity: current knowledge and future directions. Obes Rev. 2012;13:43–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berridge KC. Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996;20:1–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Baler RD. Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: Implications for obesity. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:37–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang T, Soussignan R, Schaal B, Royet JP. Reward for food odors: an fMRI study of liking and wanting as a function of metabolic state and BMI. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015;10:561–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berridge KC, Kringelbach ML. Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals. Psychopharmacology. 2008;199:457–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhutani S, Christian IR, Palumbo D, Wiggins JL. Reward-related neural correlates in adolescents with excess body weight. Neuroimage Clin. 2021 ;30:102618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang J, Matheson BE, Kaye WH, Boutelle KN. Neurocognitive correlates of obesity and obesity-related behaviors in children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2014;38:494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lowe MR, Butryn ML, Didie ER, Annunziato RA, Thomas JG, Crerand CE, et al. The Power of Food Scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment. Appetite. 2009;53:114–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Perlaki G, Molnar D, Smeets PA, Ahrens W, Wolters M, Eiben G, et al. Volumetric gray matter measures of amygdala and accumbens in childhood overweight/obesity. PloS ONE. 2018;13:0205331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haghighi A, Melka MG, Bernard M, Abrahamowicz M, Leonard GT, Richer L, et al. Opioid receptor mu 1 gene, fat intake and obesity in adolescence. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;19:63–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanko V, Apple AC, Alpert KI, Warren KN, Schneider JA, Arfanakis K, et al. In vivo hippocampal subfield shape related to TDP-43, amyloid beta, and tau pathologies. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;74:171–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Child BMI, Teen. BMI percentile calculator for child and teen. Center for Disease Control and Prevention CDC. 2020.

  28. Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Gerber RA, Leidy NK, Sexton CC, Karlsson J, et al. Evaluating the Power of Food Scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: development and measurement properties. Int J Obes. 2009;33:913–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitchell TB, Cushing CC, Amaro CM. Psychometric properties of the power of food scale in a community sample of preadolescents and adolescents. J Child Family Stud. 2016;25:2733–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: Automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002;33:341–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31:968–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan AR, Wang L, Beg MF. FreeSurfer-initiated fully-automated subcortical brain segmentation in MRI using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping. Neuroimage. 2008;41:735–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Joshi S, Pizer S, Fletcher PT, Yushkevich P, Thall A, Marron JS. Multiscale deformable model segmentation and statistical shape analysis using medial descriptions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:538–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Beg MF, Miller MI, Trouvé A, Younes L. Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int J Comput Vis. 2005 ;61:139–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2017.

  36. Esteban-Cornejo I, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Contreras-Rodriguez O, Verdejo-Roman J, Mora-Gonzalez J, Migueles JH, et al. A whole brain volumetric approach in overweight/obese children: rxamining the association with different physical fitness components and academic performance. The ActiveBrains project. Neuroimage. 2017;159:346–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Toga AW. Brain mapping: An encyclopedic reference. Academic Press; 2015 Feb 14.

  38. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1996;28:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alosco ML, Stanek KM, Galioto R, Korgaonkar MS, Grieve SM, Brickman AM, et al. Body mass index and brain structure in healthy children and adolescents. Int J Neurosci. 2014;124:49–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang H, Wen B, Cheng J, Li H. Brain structural differences between normal and obese adults and their links with lack of perseverance, negative urgency, and sensation seeking. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ortega FB, Campos D, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Altmäe S, Martínez-Zaldívar C, Martín- Matillas M, et al. Physical fitness and shapes of subcortical brain structures in children. Br J Nutr. 2017;122:49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ronan L, Alexander-Bloch A, Fletcher PC. Childhood obesity, cortical structure, and executive function in healthy children. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30:2519–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wallace GL, Richard E, Peng CS, Knodt AR, Hariri AR. Subclinical eating disorder traits are correlated with cortical thickness in regions associated with food reward and perception. Brain Imaging Behav. 2020;14:346–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Russo SJ, Dietz DM, Dumitriu D, Morrison JH, Malenka RC, Nestler EJ. The addicted synapse: Mechanisms of synaptic and structural plasticity in nucleus accumbens. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:267–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kennedy JT, Collins PF, Luciana M. Higher adolescent body mass index is associated with lower regional gray and white matter volumes and lower levels of positive emotionality. Front Neurosc. 2016;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00413.

  46. Jauch-Chara K, Oltmanns KM. Obesity–a neuropsychological disease? Systematic review and neuropsychological model. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;114:84–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Monda V, La Marra M, Perrella R, Caviglia G, Iavarone A, Chieffi S, et al. Obesity and brain illness: from cognitive and psychological evidences to obesity paradox. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2017;10:473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Brigham Young University* for providing internal funding to support this research project. *Sponsor was not involved in study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KKZ: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; DJC: Methodology, software, formal analysis, data curation, writing—review and editing, supervision; CDJ: Conceptualization, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—review and editing, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chad D. Jensen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaugg, K.K., Cobia, D.J. & Jensen, C.D. Abnormalities in deep-brain morphology and orbitofrontal cortical thinning relate to reward processing and body mass in adolescent girls. Int J Obes 46, 1720–1727 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-022-01188-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-022-01188-y

Search

Quick links