Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Physiological and perceptual responses during walking at set and preferred pace in normal and overweight adults

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the influence of body weight, exercise modality, and pace on physiological and perceptual responses to determine the relation between perceptual and physiological responses.

Methods

Aerobically untrained, normal weight, and overweight males and females participated. Participants were randomly assigned to one exercise condition for a 1-mile walk.

Results

Prescribed pace resulted in a greater physiological stress than self-selected pace (all p < 0.001) through blood lactate (1.3 ± 0.4 vs 1.7 ± 0.5 mmol), systolic blood pressure (128.9 ± 10.3 vs 139.2 ± 13.2 mmHg), heart rate recovery (2.1 ± 1.7 vs 4.5 ± 2.6 min), oxygen consumption (15.1 ± 2.6 vs 18.1 ± 3.6 ml/kg/min), heart rate (111.7 ± 16.6 vs 134.4 ± 8.3 bpm), and energy expenditure (5.5 ± 1.4 vs 6.8 ± 1.7 kcal/min). Overweight individuals exhibited higher values than normal weight for heart rate (113 ± 8.8 vs 125.5 ± 13.2 bpm, p < 0.001), percentage of max heart rate (60.7 vs 69.0%, p < 0.001), percent of VO2peak (42.2 vs 55.6%, p < 0.001), and total energy expenditure (100.9 ± 27.4 vs 114.1 ± 33.5 kcal, p = 0.022). Greater perceived effort was seen on a treadmill (6.3 ± 0.5 vs 12.5 ± 2.0 RPE, p < 0.001) and at prescribed pace (6.5 ± 1.1 vs 8.9 ± 1.9 RPE, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A novel finding of this study was the increased physiological stress and perception of effort on a treadmill and at a prescribed pace, while total energy expenditure showed no significant differences. This could indicate an unfavorable perception and less affective response to the treadmill modality. These results indicate exercise at self-selected pace in preferred environments promotes enjoyable experiences with similar health benefits as those during prescribed higher intensity exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW 3rd, Blair SN. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281:327–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greene NP, Lambert BS, Greene ES, Carbuhn AF, Green JS, Crouse SF. Comparative efficacy of water and land treadmill training for overweight or obese adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:1808–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cox KL, Burke V, Gorely TJ, Beilin LJ, Puddey IB. Controlled comparison of retention and adherence in home- vs center-initiated exercise interventions in women ages 40-65 years: the S.W.E.A.T. Study (Sedentary Women Exercise Adherence Trial). Prev Med. 2003;36:17–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Freitas LAG, Ferreira SDS, Freitas RQ, Januario RSB, Alves RC, Silva AC, et al. Effect of self-selected and imposed-intensity walking programs on fat oxidation in obese women. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2015;18:62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report, 2008. Nutr Rev. 2009;67:114–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1423–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Browning RC, Baker EA, Herron JA, Kram R. Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:390–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morris C, Garner J, Owens S, Valliant M, Debusk H, Loftin M. A prospective study comparing distance-based vs. time-based exercise prescriptions of walking and running in previously sedentary overweight adults. Int J Exerc Sci. 2017;10:782–97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Peyrot N, Thivel D, Isacco L, Morin JB, Belli A, Duche P. Why does walking economy improve after weight loss in obese adolescents? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:659–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Donnelly JE, Blair SN, Jakicic JM, Manore MM, Rankin JW, Smith BK. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:459–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Loftin M, Waddell DE, Robinson JH, Owens SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Conditioning Res. 2010;24:2794–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manson JE, Greenland P, LaCroix AZ, Stefanick ML, Mouton CP, Oberman A, et al. Walking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:716–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Antoniewicz F, Brand R. Dropping out or keeping up? Early-dropouts, late-dropouts, and maintainers differ in their automatic evaluations of exercise already before a 14-week exercise course. Front Psychol. 2016;7:838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall CW, Holmstrup ME, Koloseus J, Anderson D, Kanaley JA. Do overweight and obese individuals select a “moderate intensity” workload when asked to do so? J Obes. 2012;2012:919051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Caserta MS, Gillett PA. Older women’s feelings about exercise and their adherence to an aerobic regimen over time. Gerontologist. 1998;38:602–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baldwin AS, Kangas JL, Denman DC, Smits JA, Yamada T, Otto MW. Cardiorespiratory fitness moderates the effect of an affect-guided physical activity prescription: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther. 2016;45:445–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung ME, Bourne JE, Little JP. Where does HIT fit? An examination of the affective response to high-intensity intervals in comparison to continuous moderate- and continuous vigorous-intensity exercise in the exercise intensity-affect continuum. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin B, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ekblom O, Ekblom-Bak E, Rosengren A, Hallsten M, Bergstrom G, Borjesson M. Cardiorespiratory fitness, sedentary behaviour and physical activity are independently associated with the metabolic syndrome, results from the SCAPIS Pilot Study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0131586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017.

  21. Abe D, Yoshida T, Ueoka H, Sugiyama K, Fukuoka Y. Relationship between perceived exertion and blood lactate concentrations during incremental running test in young females. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015;7:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buckley JD, Bourdon PC, Woolford SM. Effect of measuring blood lactate concentrations using different automated lactate analysers on blood lactate transition thresholds. J Sci Med Sport. 2003;6:408–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Coutts AJ, Rampinini E, Marcora SM, Castagna C, Impellizzeri FM. Heart rate and blood lactate correlates of perceived exertion during small-sided soccer games. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12:79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Medbo JI, Mamen A, Holt Olsen O, Evertsen F. Examination of four different instruments for measuring blood lactate concentration. Scand J Clin Lab Investig. 2000;60:367–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Browning RC, Kram R. Energetic cost and preferred speed of walking in obese vs. normal weight women. Obes Res. 2005;13:891–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ali S, Bhatti A, Khan H, Jan R. Correlation between pre and post exercise blood lactate and pH. Gomal. J Med Sci. 2008;6:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goodwin ML, Harris JE, Hernandez A, Gladden LB. Blood lactate measurements and analysis during exercise: a guide for clinicians. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1:558–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marcora S. Perception of effort during exercise is independent of afferent feedback from skeletal muscles, heart, and lungs. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:2060–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dasilva SG, Guidetti L, Buzzachera CF, Elsangedy HM, Krinski K, DeCampos W, et al. Psychophysiological responses to self-paced treadmill and overground exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1114–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lind E, Joens-Matre RR, Ekkekakis P. What intensity of physical activity do previously inactivity middle-aged women select? Evidence of a coherent pattern from physiological, perceptual, and affective markers. Prev Med. 2005;40:407–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Levinger I, Bronks R, Cody DV, Linton I, Davie A. Perceived exertion as an exercise intensity indicator in chronic heart failure patients on beta-blockers. J Sports Sci Med. 2004;3:23–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Perri MG, Anton SD, Durning PE, Ketterson TU, Sydeman SJ, Berlant NE, et al. Adherence to exercise prescriptions: effects of prescribing moderate versus higher levels of intensity and frequency. Health Psychol. 2002;21:452–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ekkekakis P, Lind E. Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of self-selected and imposed intensity on affect and exertion. Int J Obes. 2006;30:652–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Garcin M, Mille-Hamard L, Billat V. Influence of aerobic fitness level on measured and estimated perceived exertion during exhausting runs. Int J Sports Med. 2004;25:270–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lewis JE, Nash MS, Hamm LF, Martins SC, Groah SL. The relationship between perceived exertion and physiologic indicators of stress during graded arm exercise in persons with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1205–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Figard-Fabre H, Fabre N, Leonardi A, Schena F. Physiological and perceptual responses to Nordic walking in obese middle-aged women in comparison with the normal walk. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:1141–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ceci R, Hassmen P. Self-monitored exercise at three different RPE intensities in treadmill vs field running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:732–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have made significant contributions to research design, data collection and analysis, and development of the manuscript. RG: developed study design, conducted all data collection, and made significant contribution to manuscript development and revision. RB: made significant contribution to manuscript development and revision in all sections. ML: assisted in study design and data collection along with development of the “Methods” section of the manuscript. MEH: assisted in development of all sections and reviewing of manuscript. JG: conducted data filtering and statistical analysis and also contributed significantly to manuscript review and revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Galloway.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galloway, R., Booker, R., Loftin, M. et al. Physiological and perceptual responses during walking at set and preferred pace in normal and overweight adults. Int J Obes 46, 100–106 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00963-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00963-7

Search

Quick links