Background and objective
Bariatric surgery is a major event associated with psychological changes such as improvements in self-esteem, increased autonomy, and better self-value. Such changes could affect the patient’s interpersonal relationships; however, little is known about the impact of bariatric surgery on changes in relationship status. In this paper, we aim to test the hypothesis that bariatric surgery is associated with changes in interpersonal relationships such as becoming single for those who were in a relationship or entering a relationship among those who were single before surgery.
This register-based cohort study consisted of 12,493 patients undergoing bariatric surgery (95% gastric bypass) from 2005 to 2013 and a reference group of 15,101 individuals with obesity between the age of 18–63 with a body mass index between 32 and 60 kg/m2. Transitions between married, divorced, widowed, never-married single, and living with a partner without being married were analyzed by Poisson regression. Additionally, the outcome was dichotomized, and transitions between being single and being in a relationship were also analyzed. All analyses were weighted using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores.
The overall incidence rate ratio (IRR) of changing status from being single to in a relationship was 2.03 (95% CI: 1.18–2.28), and the overall IRR of changing status from being in a relationship to single was 1.66 (95% CI: 1.50–1.83).
Bariatric surgery is associated with a higher chance of finding a partner among single individuals, and a higher risk of separating from a partner among individuals in a relationship.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Sjostrom L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial - a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273:219–34.
Herring LY, Stevinson C, Davies MJ, Biddle SJ, Sutton C, Bowrey D, et al. Changes in physical activity behaviour and physical function after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obesity Rev. 2016;17:250–61.
Coulman KD, MacKichan F, Blazeby JM, Owen‐Smith A. Patient experiences of outcomes of bariatric surgery: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Obesity Rev. 2017;18:547–59.
Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD. Psychosocial concerns following bariatric surgery: current status. Current Obesity Rep. 2019;8:1–9.
Hult M, Bonn SE, Brandt L, Wirén M, Lagerros YT. Women’s satisfaction with and reasons to seek bariatric surgery—a prospective study in Sweden with 1-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2059–70.
Pearl RL, Wadden TA, Walton K, Allison KC, Tronieri JS, Williams NN. Health and appearance: factors motivating the decision to seek bariatric surgery. Surg Obesity Rel Dis. 2019;15:636–42.
Sharman MJ, Venn AJ, Hensher M, Wilkinson S, Palmer AJ, Williams D, et al. Motivations for seeking bariatric surgery: the importance of health professionals and social networks. Bariatric Surg Pract Patient Care. 2016;11:104–9.
Lier HØ, Aastrom S, Rørtveit K. Patients’ daily life experiences five years after gastric bypass surgery–a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25:322–31.
Bruze G, Holmin TE, Peltonen M, Ottosson J, Sjöholm K, Näslund I, et al. Associations of bariatric surgery with changes in interpersonal relationship status: results from 2 Swedish cohort studies. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:654–61.
Carr D, Friedman MA. Body weight and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Soc Psychol Q. 2006;69:127–49.
Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity. 2006;14:1802–15.
Dush CMK, Amato PR. Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2005;22:607–27.
Sarwer DB, Wadden TA, Moore RH, Eisenberg MH, Raper SE, Williams NN. Changes in quality of life and body image after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:608–14.
Burgmer R, Legenbauer T, Müller A, de Zwaan M, Fischer C, Herpertz S. Psychological outcome 4 years after restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1670–8.
Wallwork A, Tremblay L, Chi M, Sockalingam S. Exploring partners’ experiences in living with patients who undergo bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1973–81.
Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:30–3.
Christensen AI, Ekholm O, Glumer C, Andreasen AH, Hvidberg MF, Kristensen PL, et al. The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40:391–7.
Ekholm O, Hesse U, Davidsen M, Kjoller M. The study design and characteristics of the Danish national health interview surveys. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37:758–65.
Eriksen L, Gronbaek M, Helge JW, Tolstrup JS, Curtis T. The Danish Health Examination Survey 2007–2008 (DANHES 2007–2008). Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:203–11.
Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:22–5.
Jensen VM, Rasmussen AW. Danish Education Registers. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:91–4.
Baadsgaard M, Quitzau J. Danish registers on personal income and transfer payments. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:103–5.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.
Sturmer T, Rothman KJ, Avorn J, Glynn RJ. Treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution–a simulation study. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:843–54.
Hachem A, Brennan L. Quality of life outcomes of bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26:395–409.
Sogg S, Gorman MJ. Interpersonal changes and challenges after weight-loss surgery. Primary Psychiatry. 2008;15:61–6.
Moore DD, Cooper CE. Life after bariatric surgery: perceptions of male patients and their intimate relationships. J Marital Family Therapy. 2016;42:495–508.
Szmulewicz A, Wanis KN, Gripper A, Angriman F, Hawel J, Elnahas A, et al. Mental health quality of life after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clin Obes. 2019;9:e12290.
Canetti L, Bachar E, Bonne O. Deterioration of mental health in bariatric surgery after 10 years despite successful weight loss. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70:17–22.
Bocchieri LE, Meana M, Fisher BL. Perceived psychosocial outcomes of gastric bypass surgery: a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2002;12:781–8.
Pories ML, Hodgson J, Rose MA, Pender J, Sira N, Swanson M. Following bariatric surgery: an exploration of the couples’ experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26:54–60.
Magro DO, Geloneze B, Delfini R, Pareja BC, Callejas F, Pareja JC. Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study. Obes Surg. 2008;18:648–51.
Lazzati A, Chatellier G, Katsahian S. Readmissions after bariatric surgery in France, 2013–2016: a Nationwide Study on Administrative Data. Obes Surg. 2019;29:3680–9.
Bramming M, Becker U, Jørgensen MB, Neermark S, Bisgaard T, Tolstrup JS. Bariatric surgery and risk of alcohol use disorder: a register-based cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49:1826–35.
Kitzinger HB, Abayev S, Pittermann A, Karle B, Bohdjalian A, Langer FB, et al. After massive weight loss: patients’ expectations of body contouring surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:544–8.
Müller A, Hase C, Pommnitz M, de Zwaan M. Depression and suicide after bariatric surgery. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:84.
Peterhänsel C, Petroff D, Klinitzke G, Kersting A, Wagner B. Risk of completed suicide after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2013;14:369–82.
Somers AR. Marital status, health, and use of health services: an old relationship revisited. JAMA. 1979;241:1818–22.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency reference number 2015-57-0008. Manual chart review with data collection was performed with the approval of Danish Patient Safety Authority (former National Board of Health) with reference number 3-3013-770/1.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bramming, M., Hviid, S.S., Becker, U. et al. Changes in relationship status following bariatric surgery. Int J Obes 45, 1599–1606 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00825-2