Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Behavior, Psychology and Sociology

No impact of hunger on male perception of female physical attractiveness in relation to adiposity: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Female physical attractiveness is strongly related to body mass index (BMI). Females with lower BMI are on average more attractive down to at least BMI = 18. Previous correlational studies have indicated that this effect may be modulated by the hunger of the rater, with more hungry raters preferring images of subjects with greater adiposity. This prior work, however, was correlational and so we wished to explore this phenomenon further using a randomized controlled trial.

Methods and subjects

Two studies are presented. In the first, 52 male participants were recruited and after an overnight fast were randomly allocated to either fed or starved treatments. Starved individuals continued not to feed, while fed individuals were given ad libitum access to foods and were encouraged to eat to full satiation. Their hunger levels were monitored using visual analog scales (VAS) and levels of circulating glucose. Four hours later, they were asked to complete a previously used female attractiveness rating test, a standard IQ test, and a memory recall test. In the second study, which was a double-blind experiment, 32 individuals were recruited to evaluate if the original effect was due to a confounding impact of alcohol consumption when dining. Blinded individuals consumed drinks with or without alcohol. Their circulating alcohol levels were quantified by a breath test, and they repeated the tests matched with the first study excluding the IQ test.

Results

Hunger resulted in lower performance on the memory recall test, but had no effect on the IQ score, and contrasting previous results had no effect on the ratings of female physical attractiveness. Circulating alcohol levels had no effect on the memory recall test, but there was a significant negative relationship between circulating alcohol and the mean adiposity of the five individuals rated as least attractive.

Conclusions

This randomized controlled trial failed to replicate previous nonrandomized observational studies, which had suggested that ratings of female physical attractiveness by males are sensitive to the levels of hunger. The reason for the difference was possibly because in previous studies, levels of hunger were confounded by alcohol consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh D. Ideal female body shape: role of body weight and waist-to-hip ratio. Int J Eat Disord. 1994;16:283–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh D. Female mate value at a glance: relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2002;23(Suppl 4):81–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brase GL, Gary W. Male sexual strategies modify ratings of female models with specific waist-to-hip ratios. Hum Nat. 2004;15:209–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tovée MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL. Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet. 1998;352:548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Furnham A, Moutafi J, Baguma P. A cross-cultural study on the role of weight and waist-to-hip ratio on female attractiveness. Pers Individ Dif. 2002;32:729–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Streeter SA, Mcburney DH. Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness: new evidence and a critique of a “critical test”. Evol Hum Behav. 2003;24:88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Henss R. Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Pers Individ Dif. 2000;28:501–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swami V, Caprario C, Tovée MJ, Furnham A. Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: a cross‐cultural study. J Soc Psychol. 2007;147:15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Swami V, Tovee MJ. Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: a cross-cultural study. Body Image. 2005;2:115–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Swami V, Frederick DA, Aavik T, Alcalay L, Allik J, Anderson D, et al. The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: results of the international body project i. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010;36:309–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang G, Djafarian K, Egedigwe CA, El AH, Ojiambo R, Ramuth H, et al. The relationship of female physical attractiveness to body fatness. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Faries MD, Bartholomew JR. The role of body fat in female attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav. 2012;6:672–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Swami V, Tovée MJ. Differences in attractiveness preferences between observers in low-and high-resource environments in Thailand. J Evol Psychol. 2007;5:149–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Swami V, Tovée MJ. Does financial security influence judgements of female physical attractiveness? J Socio-Econ. 2008;37:1363–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nelson LD, Morrison EL. The symptoms of resource scarcity: judgments of food and finances influence preferences for potential partners. Psychol Sci. 2005;16:167–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Swami V, Tovée MJ. Does hunger influence judgments of female physical attractiveness? Br J Psychol. 2010;97:353–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gueguen N. Men’s hunger, food consumption and preferences for female body types. A replication and extension of Nelson and Morrison’s (2005) study. Soc Psychol. 2014;45:495–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van DAJ, Penton-Voak IS, Attwood AS, Stephen ID, Munafò MR. Increased facial attractiveness following moderate, but not high, alcohol consumption. Br Dent J. 2015;219:296.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen X, Wang X, Yang D, Chen Y. The moderating effect of stimulus attractiveness on the effect of alcohol consumption on attractiveness ratings. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014;49:515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bowdring MA, Sayette MA. Perception of physical attractiveness when consuming and not consuming alcohol: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2018;113:1585–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gladue BA, Delaney HJ. Gender differences in perception of attractiveness of men and women in bars. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1990;16:378–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Souto A, Bezerra BM, Halsey LG. Alcohol intoxication reduces detection of asymmetry: an explanation for increased perceptions of facial attractiveness after alcohol consumption? Perception. 2008;37:955–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitra A, Thakur G. Relationship of IQ with glucose and lipid levels. J Clin Diagn Res. 2007;5:347–51.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gallacher JEJ, Pickering J, Elwood PC, bayer AJ, Yarnell JW, Ben-Shlomo Y. Glucoregulaion has greater impact on cognitive performance than macro-vascular disease in men with type 2 diabetes: data from the caerphilly study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20:761–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Messier C. Glucose improvement of memory: a review. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;490:33.57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Riby LM. The impact of age and task domain on cognitive performance; a meta-analytic review of the glucose facilitation effect. Brain Impair. 2004;5:145–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith MA, Riby LM, van Eekelen JAM, Foster JK. Glucose enhancement of human memory: a comprehensive research review of the glucose memory facilitation effect. Neurosci. Biobeh Rev. 2011;35:770–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stollery B, Christian L. Glucose improve object-location binding in visual-spatial working memory. Psychopharmacology. 2016;233:529–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the people who participated in these two studies and the Chinese police who provided the breath alcohol test machine. Lewis Halsley provided useful advice on performing studies that involve dosing individuals with alcohol for which we are grateful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZGJ, JRS and GLW designed the studies. ZGJ and SMH executed them. JRS and ZGJ wrote the paper, and it was modified and approved by GLW and SMH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Speakman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, Z., Wang, G., Hu, S. et al. No impact of hunger on male perception of female physical attractiveness in relation to adiposity: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obes 44, 418–427 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0392-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0392-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links