Brief Communication | Published:

Epidemiology and Population Health

Relative proportion of vigorous physical activity, total volume of moderate to vigorous activity, and body mass index in youth: the Millennium Cohort Study

International Journal of Obesity (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Background

The present physical activity guidelines suggest that when the overall activity energy expenditure is held constant, moderate and vigorous intensity activities (MVPA) provide equivalent health benefits. We explored associations between vigorous physical activity on body mass index whilst controlling for volume of MVPA.

Methods

In a longitudinal study with 7 years follow-up (n = 4770; aged 7 years old at baseline), physical activity was measured objectively at baseline. Body mass index (BMI) was measured at baseline and follow-up. Vigorous activity was expressed as the percentage of total MVPA.

Results

Participants in the highest vigorous activity tertile at baseline were at lower odds (odds ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.88) of overweight /obesity at follow-up compared with those in the lowest vigorous activity tertile after adjustment for total volume of MVPA, BMI at baseline, sex, ethnicity and social status.

Conclusion

The results suggest vigorous activity, regardless of volume, is important in preventing excessive weight gain in young people.

  • Subscribe to International Journal of Obesity for full access:

    $652

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    Molnar D, Livingstone B. Physical activity in relation to overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr. 2000;159(suppl 1):S45–55.

  2. 2.

    Wareham N. Physical activity and obesity prevention. Obes Rev. 2007;8(suppl 1):109–14.

  3. 3.

    García-Hermoso A, Saavedra JM, Ramírez-Vélez R, Ekelund U, Del Pozo-Cruz B. Reallocating sedentary time to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity but not to light-intensity physical activity is effective to reduce adiposity among youths: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2017;18:1088–95.

  4. 4.

    Lee IM, Paffenbarger RS. Associations of light, moderate, and vigorous intensity physical activity with longevity—The Harvard Alumni Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:293–9.

  5. 5.

    Tanasescu N, Leitzmann MF, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB. Exercise type and intensity in relation to coronary heart disease in men. JAMA. 2002;288:1994–2000.

  6. 6.

    Shiroma EJ, Sesso HD, Moorthy MV, Buring JE, Lee IM. Do moderate-intensity and vigorous intensity physical activities reduce mortality rates to the same extent? J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000802.

  7. 7.

    Gebel K, Ding D, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown W, Bauman A. Effect of moderate to vigorous physical activity on all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older Australians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:970–7.

  8. 8.

    Braithwaite IE, Stewart AW, Hancox RJ, Murphy R, Wall CR, Beasley R, Mitchell EA. Body mass index and vigorous physical activity in children and adolescents: an international cross-sectional study. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106:1323–30.

  9. 9.

    Collings PJ, Westgate K, Väistö J, Wijndaele K, Atkin AJ, Haapala EA, Lintu N, Laitinen T, Ekelund U, Brage S, Lakka TA. Cross-sectional associations of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time with body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness in mid-childhood: The PANIC Study. Sports Med. 2017;47:769–80.

  10. 10.

    Plewis I. The Millennium Cohort Study. Technical report on sampling: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education. London: University of London; 2007.

  11. 11.

    Pulsford RM, Cortina-Borja M, Rich C. Actigraph accelerometer-defined boundaries for sedentary behaviour and physical activity intensities in 7 year old children. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21822.

  12. 12.

    Rich C, Cortina-Borja M, Dezateux C, et al. Predictors of non-response in a UK-wide cohort study of children’s accelerometer-determined physical activity using postal methods. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002290.

  13. 13.

    Aggio D, Smith L, Fisher A, Hamer M. Context-specific associations of physical activity and sedentary behavior with cognition in children. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183:1075–82.

  14. 14.

    Rich C, Geraci M, Griffiths L. Quality control methods in accelerometer data processing: defining minimum wear time. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e67206.

  15. 15.

    Griffiths LJ, Sera F, Cortina-Borja M, Law C, Ness A, Dezateux C. Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time: cross-sectional and prospective associations with adiposity in the Millennium Cohort Study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010366.

  16. 16.

    Riddoch CJ, Leary SD, Ness AR, Blair SN, Deere K, Mattocks C, Griffiths A, Davey Smith G, Tilling K. Prospective associations between objective measures of physical activity and fat mass in 12–14 year old children: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). BMJ. 2009;339:b4544.

  17. 17.

    Hidalgo-Santamaria M, Fernandez-Montero A, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, et al. Exercise intensity and incidence of metabolic syndrome: the SUN Project. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52:e95–e101.

  18. 18.

    Laursen AH, Kristiansen OP, Marott JL, Schnohr P, Prescott E. Intensity versus duration of physical activity: implications for the metabolic syndrome. A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001711.

  19. 19.

    Janssen I, Ross R. Vigorous intensity physical activity is related to the metabolic syndrome independent of the physical activity dose. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:1132–40.

  20. 20.

    Powell KE, Paluch AE, Blair SN. Physical activity for health: what kind? How much? How intense? On top of what? Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:349–65.

  21. 21.

    Collings PJ, Brage S, Bingham DD, Costa S, West J, McEachan RRC, Wright J, Barber SE. Physical activity, sedentary time, and fatness in a biethnic sample of young children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49:930–8.

Download references

Funding

Hamer acknowledges support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, which is a partnership between University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Loughborough University, and the University of Leicester. Stamatakis is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) through a Senior Research Fellowship.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

    • Mark Hamer
  2. Charles Perkins Centre Epidemiology Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    • Emmanuel Stamatakis
  3. Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    • Emmanuel Stamatakis

Authors

  1. Search for Mark Hamer in:

  2. Search for Emmanuel Stamatakis in:

Contributions

MH obtained funding, conceptualised and designed the study, performed analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. He is the manuscript’s guarantor. ES conceptualised and designed the study, provided statistical input and critical revision of the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Hamer.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0128-8

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.