Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Functional insight into a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by missense variants in an RNA-binding protein, RBM10

Abstract

The RNA-binding motif protein 10, RBM10, is an RNA splicing regulator essential for development. Loss-of-function RBM10 variants are associated with TARP syndrome, a severe X-linked recessive condition in males. We report a 3-year-old male with a mild phenotype, consisting of cleft palate, hypotonia, developmental delay, and minor dysmorphisms, associated with a missense RBM10 variant, c.943T>C, p.Ser315Pro, affecting the RRM2 RNA-binding domain. His clinical features were similar to a previously reported case associated with a missense variant. The p.Ser315Pro mutant protein was expressed normally in the nucleus, but its expression level and protein stability were slightly reduced. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy showed that the structure and the RNA-binding ability of the RRM2 domain with the p.Ser315Pro were unaffected. However, it affects the alternative splicing regulations of downstream genes, NUMB and TNRC6A, and its splicing alteration patterns were variable depending on target transcripts. In summary, a novel germline missense RBM10 p.Ser315Pro variant that causes functional changes in the expression of its downstream genes results in a non-lethal phenotype associated with developmental delays. The functional alteration effects depend on the residues affected by missense variants. Our findings are expected to bring broader insights into the RBM10-associated genotype-phenotype relationships by delineating the molecular mechanism of RBM10 functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Inoue A. RBM10: Structure, functions, and associated diseases. Gene. 2021;783:145463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang K, Bacon ML, Tessier JJ, Rintala-Maki ND, Tang V, Sutherland LC. RBM10 modulates apoptosis and influences TNF-alpha gene expression. J Cell Death. 2012;5:1–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hernandez J, Bechara E, Schlesinger D, Delgado J, Serrano L, Valcarcel J. Tumor suppressor properties of the splicing regulatory factor RBM10. RNA Biol. 2016;13:466–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Guan G, Li R, Tang W, Liu T, Su Z, Wang Y, et al. Expression of RNA-binding motif 10 is associated with advanced tumor stage and malignant behaviors of lung adenocarcinoma cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317691740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohan N, Kumar V, Kandala DT, Kartha CC, Laishram RS. A splicing-independent function of RBM10 controls specific 3’ UTR processing to regulate cardiac hypertrophy. Cell Rep. 2018;24:3539–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Y, Gogol-Doring A, Hu H, Frohler S, Ma Y, Jens M, et al. Integrative analysis revealed the molecular mechanism underlying RBM10-mediated splicing regulation. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5:1431–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodor J, FitzPatrick DR, Eyras E, Caceres JF. The RNA-binding landscape of RBM10 and its role in alternative splicing regulation in models of mouse early development. RNA Biol. 2017;14:45–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S, Khrebtukova I, Zhang L, Mayr C, et al. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 2008;456:470–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang X, Coulombe-Huntington J, Kang S, Sheynkman GM, Hao T, Richardson A, et al. Widespread expansion of protein interaction capabilities by alternative splicing. Cell 2016;164:805–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnston JJ, Teer JK, Cherukuri PF, Hansen NF, Loftus SK, Center NIHIS. et al. Massively parallel sequencing of exons on the X chromosome identifies RBM10 as the gene that causes a syndromic form of cleft palate. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:743–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Imagawa E, Konuma T, Cork EE, Diaz GA, Oishi K. A novel missense variant in RBM10 can cause a mild form of TARP syndrome with developmental delay and dysmorphic features. Clin Genet. 2020;98:606–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumps C, D’Haenens E, Vergult S, Leus J, van Coster R, Jansen A, et al. Phenotypic spectrum of the RBM10-mediated intellectual disability and congenital malformation syndrome beyond classic TARP syndrome features. Clin Genet. 2021;99:449–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Retterer K, Juusola J, Cho MT, Vitazka P, Millan F, Gibellini F, et al. Clinical application of whole-exome sequencing across clinical indications. Genet Med. 2016;18:696–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Collins KM, Kainov YA, Christodolou E, Ray D, Morris Q, Hughes T, et al. An RRM-ZnF RNA recognition module targets RBM10 to exonic sequences to promote exon exclusion. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:6761–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bechara EG, Sebestyen E, Bernardis I, Eyras E, Valcarcel J. RBM5, 6, and 10 differentially regulate NUMB alternative splicing to control cancer cell proliferation. Mol Cell. 2013;52:720–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gripp KW, Hopkins E, Johnston JJ, Krause C, Dobyns WB, Biesecker LG. Long-term survival in TARP syndrome and confirmation of RBM10 as the disease-causing gene. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2011;155A:2516–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston JJ, Sapp JC, Curry C, Horton M, Leon E, Cusmano-Ozog K, et al. Expansion of the TARP syndrome phenotype associated with de novo mutations and mosaicism. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2014;164A:120–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Powis Z, Hart A, Cherny S, Petrik I, Palmaer E, Tang S, et al. Clinical diagnostic exome evaluation for an infant with a lethal disorder: genetic diagnosis of TARP syndrome and expansion of the phenotype in a patient with a newly reported RBM10 alteration. BMC Med Genet. 2017;18:60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hojland AT, Lolas I, Okkels H, Lautrup CK, Diness BR, Petersen MB, et al. First reported adult patient with TARP syndrome: a case report. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2018;176:2915–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaeppler KE, Stetson RC, Lanpher BC, Collura CA. Infant male with TARP syndrome: review of clinical features, prognosis, and commonalities with previously reported patients. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2018;176:2911–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Niceta M, Barresi S, Pantaleoni F, Capolino R, Dentici ML, Ciolfi A, et al. TARP syndrome: long-term survival, anatomic patterns of congenital heart defects, differential diagnosis and pathogenetic considerations. Eur J Med Genet. 2019;62:103534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Manotas H, Payan-Gomez C, Roa MF, Pineros JG. TARP syndrome associated with renal malformation and optic nerve atrophy. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14:e240601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Daicheng H, Shiwen X, Jingxuan Z, Junbo H, Bo W. A frameshift RBM10 variant associated with TARP syndrome. Front Genet. 2022;13:922048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Poulton C, Baynam G, Pugh K, Mason M, Kiraly-Borri C, Gration D, et al. Further evidence for distinct traits associated with RBM10 missense variants. Clin Genet. 2022;102:161–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Potter AB, O’Brien TD, Kulkarni A, McCabe S, Matthews K, Kovak K, et al. Missense variant in RBM10 associated with mild and non-lethal form of TARP syndrome. Clin Genet. 2023. In press.

  26. Zhao J, Sun Y, Huang Y, Song F, Huang Z, Bao Y, et al. Functional analysis reveals that RBM10 mutations contribute to lung adenocarcinoma pathogenesis by deregulating splicing. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang LY, Xiao SJ, Kunimoto H, Tokunaga K, Kojima H, Kimura M, et al. Sequestration of RBM10 in nuclear bodies: targeting sequences and biological significance. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10526.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Goto Y, Kimura H. Inactive X chromosome-specific histone H3 modifications and CpG hypomethylation flank a chromatin boundary between an X-inactivated and an escape gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:7416–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin HC, Gardner EJ, Samocha KE, Kaplanis J, Akawi N, Sifrim A, et al. The contribution of X-linked coding variation to severe developmental disorders. Nat Commun. 2021;12:627.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patient and his family for contributing to this study and the personnel of Microscopy Core Facility at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: EI, KO. Investigation: EI, LM, TK. Supervision: KO. Patient recruitment and consent acquisition: VKM, CN. Writing - original draft: EI, TK, KO. Writing - review and editing: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimihiko Oishi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

It was a non-interventional single case report describing clinical data that was collected as part of routine clinical care. No research or non-clinical testing or evaluations were done on the patient or patient-derived samples. IRB approval was not required according to the institution’s policy (Central Michigan University School of Medicine), while written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents for the publication as stated above. The original study regarding the functional assays of the p.Pro322Leu variant was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (GCO# 05-1150, HS# 10-00584).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents for the publication of the patient’s clinical information and photographs.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imagawa, E., Moreta, L., Misra, V.K. et al. Functional insight into a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by missense variants in an RNA-binding protein, RBM10. J Hum Genet 68, 643–648 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-023-01162-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-023-01162-0

Search

Quick links