Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Lethal mutations with fluctuating heterozygous effect: the lethal force of effective dominance

Abstract

The theory of population genetics leads to the expectation that in very large populations the frequencies of recessive lethal mutations are close to the square root of the mutation rate, corresponding to mutation-selection balance. There are numerous examples where the frequencies of such alleles are orders of magnitude larger than this result. In this work we theoretically investigate the role of temporal fluctuations in the heterozygous effect (h) for lethal mutations in very large populations. For fluctuations of h, around a mean value of \(\bar{h}\), we find a biased outcome that is described by an effective dominance coefficient, heff, that is generally less than the mean dominance coefficient, i.e., \({h}_{{\rm{eff}}}\, < \, \bar{h}\). In the case where the mean dominance coefficient is zero, the effective dominance coefficient is negative: heff < 0, corresponding to the lethal allele behaving as though overdominant and having an elevated mean frequency. This case plausibly explains mean allele frequencies that are an order of magnitude larger than the equilibrium frequency of a recessive allele with a constant dominance coefficient. Our analysis may be relevant to explaining lethal disorders with anomalously high frequencies, such as cystic fibrosis and Tay-Sachs, and may open the door to further investigations into the statistics of fluctuations of the heterozygous effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Temporal homogeneity means the correlation of h (t1) and h (t2) only depends on t1 and t2 in the combination t1t2.

  2. The approach we adopt, that the correlation time is non-zero but we treat as being negligible, plays an important role in the way the noise is treated (see Part D of the “Supplementary Material”).

  3. If h(t) is correlated over relatively long times, then it ceases to behave like random fluctuations and is more plausibly represented as a known function of time.

  4. The form of heff in Eq. (15) has a wider applicability than just fluctuating h. For the alternative selection scheme waa = 0, waA = 1 − ζ and wAA = 1 + η, where ζ and η are small, an approximation for the force is F(x) u − (η + ζ)x − x2 (see Eq. (B2) of Part B of the “Supplementary Material”). When there are fluctuations in the fitnesses of the non-lethal genotypes, i.e., in ζ and η, all results will be equivalent to just h fluctuating providing η(t) + ζ(t) has the same statistical properties as those we have adopted for h(t).

References

  1. Hedrick PW. Heterozygote advantage: the effect of artificial selection in livestock and pets. J Heredity. 2015;106:141–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kong A, et al. Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk. Nature. 2012;488:471–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hedrick PW. Lethals in finite populations. Evolution. 1984;56:654–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Myrianthopoulos NC, Aronson SM. Population dynamics of Tay-Sachs disease. I. Reproductive fitness and selection. Am J Hum Genet. 1966;18:313–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Farrell PM. The prevalence of cystic fibrosis in the European Union. J Cyst Fibros 2008;7:450–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization, Sickle-Cell Anaemia. Fifty-Ninth World Health Assembly, A59/9 (2006).

  7. Genton B, al-Yaman F, Mgone CS, Alexander N, Paniu MM, Alpers MP, et al. Ovalocytosis and cerebral malaria. Nature. 1995;378:564–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedrick PW. What is the evidence for heterozygote advantage selection? Trends Ecol Evolution. 2012;27:698–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arzuza-Ortega L, Polo A, Perez-Tatis G, Lopez-Garcia H, Parra E, Pardo-Herrera LC, et al. Fatal sickle cell disease and Zika virus infection in girl from Colombia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;22:925–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spyropoulos B. Tay-Sachs carriers and tuberculosis resistance. Nature. 1988;25:666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodman DM, Zamudio S. The cystic fibrosis heterozygote–advantage in surviving cholera? Med Hypotheses. 1991;36:253–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poolman EM, Galvani AP. Evaluating candidate agents of selective pressure for cystic fibrosis. J R Soc Interface. 2007;4:91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bell G. Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Glaziou P, Floyd K, Raviglione M. Trends in tuberculosis in the UK. Thorax. 2018;73:702–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Amorim CEG, Gao Z, Baker Z, Diesel JF, Simons YB, et al. The population genetics of human disease: The case of recessive, lethal mutations. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waxman D, Overall ADJ. Influence of dominance and drift on lethal mutations in human populations. Front Genet. 2020;11:267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nei M. Heterozygous effects and frequency changes of lethal genes in populations. Genetics. 1969;63:669–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gossmann TI, Waxman D, Eyre-Walker A. Fluctuating selection models and McDonald-Kreitman type analyses. PloS One. 2014;9:e84540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Waxman D. A unified treatment of the probability of fixation when population size and the strength of selection change over time. Genetics. 2011;188:907–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuckwell HC. Elementary applications of probability theory, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London (1995).

  21. Haigh J. Probability models. Springer, London (2002). https://www.amazon.co.uk/Handbook-Mathematical-Functions-Paperback-CD-ROM/dp/0521140633.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Olver FWJ, Lozier DW, Boisvert RF, Clark CW (eds.) NIST Handbook of mathematical functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).

  23. Dawson KP, Frossard PM. A hypothesis regarding the origin and spread of the cystic fibrosis mutation ΔF508. QJM: Int J Med. 2000;93:313–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Akihiro Fujimoto and two anonymous reviewers for comments which have helped us to significantly improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Waxman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Overall, A.D.J., Waxman, D. Lethal mutations with fluctuating heterozygous effect: the lethal force of effective dominance. J Hum Genet 65, 1105–1113 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-0801-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-0801-3

Search

Quick links