Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Knowledge and attitudes on pharmacogenetics among pediatricians

Abstract

Increasing enthusiasm for clinical pharmacogenetic testing and the availability of pharmacogenetic-based guidelines indicate that pediatricians will increasingly be expected to interpret and apply pharmacogenetic test results into medical care. Previous studies have identified a lack of knowledge on pharmacogenetics across many physician specialties; however, this has not been systematically assessed among pediatricians. To evaluate pediatrician knowledge, attitude, and educational interest in pharmacogenetics, we surveyed physician cohorts from both the United States (U.S.) and Japan. A total of 282 pediatricians (210 from the U.S. and 72 from Japan) participated in an anonymous survey (online or hardcopy) on pharmacogenetics knowledge, perception, and education. Over 50% of all respondents had >10 years of clinical experience and >75% had some prior education in genetics. However, <10% felt they were familiar with pharmacogenetics, which was very consistent with <20% of the U.S. pediatricians correctly responding to a codeine/CYP2D6 pharmacogenetics knowledge question and <10% of U.S. pediatricians being aware of the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). Despite being generally unfamiliar with pharmacogenetics, >80% of all respondents indicated that implementation of clinical pharmacogenetic testing will improve efficacy and safety, and that pediatricians should be capable of applying this testing to their practice. Moreover, the majority (83.1%) were interested in educational opportunities on pharmacogenetics, particularly on result interpretation and therapeutic recommendations. Taken together, these data indicate that although practical knowledge of pharmacogenetics among pediatricians in the U.S. and Japan is currently very low, their interest in clinical pharmacogenetics and related education is high, which will likely facilitate future implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dunnenberger HM, Crews KR, Hoffman JM, Caudle KE, Broeckel U, Howard SC, et al. Preemptive clinical pharmacogenetics implementation: current programs in five US medical centers. Annu Rev Pharm Toxicol. 2015;55:89–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Stallings SC, Gordon AS, Almoguera B, Basford MA, Bielinski SJ, et al. Design and anticipated outcomes of the eMERGE-PGx project: a multicenter pilot for preemptive pharmacogenomics in electronic health record systems. Clin Pharm Ther. 2014;96:482–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Rose KO, Weidle NJ, Budnitz DS. US Emergency Department visits for outpatient adverse drug events, 2013-2014. J Am Med Assoc. 2016;316:2115–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chidambaran V, Sadhasivam S, Mahmoud M. Codeine and opioid metabolism: implications and alternatives for pediatric pain management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017;30:349–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hudak ML. Codeine pharmacogenetics as a proof of concept for pediatric precision medicine. Pediatrics. 2016;138. pii: e20161359.

  6. Ieiri I. What are barriers to pharmacogenomics (PGx) clinical uptake? Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2012;27:279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott SA. Personalizing medicine with clinical pharmacogenetics. Genet Med. 2011;13:987–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stanek EJ, Sanders CL, Taber KA, Khalid M, Patel A, Verbrugge RR, et al. Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clin Pharm Ther. 2012;91:450–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Relling MV, Klein TE. CPIC: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium of the pharmacogenomics research network. Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;89:464–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Relling MV, Klein TE, Gammal RS, Whirl-Carrillo M, Hoffman JM, Caudle KE. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium: 10 years later. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020;107:171–5.

  11. Berg JS, Agrawal PB, Bailey DB, Jr., Beggs AH, Brenner SE, Brower AM, et al. Newborn sequencing in genomic medicine and public health. Pediatrics. 2017;139. pii: e20162252.

  12. Holm IA, McGuire A, Pereira S, Rehm H, Green RC, Beggs AH, et al. Returning a genomic result for an adult-onset condition to the parents of a newborn: insights from the BabySeq project. Pediatrics. 2019;143:S37–S43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haga SB, Burke W, Ginsburg GS, Mills R, Agans R. Primary care physicians’ knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing. Clin Genet. 2012;82:388–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansen Taber KA, Dickinson BD. Pharmacogenomic knowledge gaps and educational resource needs among physicians in selected specialties. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2014;7:145–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu M, Lewis CM, Traylor M. Pharmacogenetic testing through the direct-to-consumer genetic testing company 23andMe. BMC Med Genomics. 2017;10:47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haga SB, O’Daniel JM, Tindall GM, Mills R, Lipkus IM, Agans R. Survey of genetic counselors and clinical geneticists’ use and attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing. Clin Genet. 2012;82:115–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mills R, Haga SB. Clinical delivery of pharmacogenetic testing services: a proposed partnership between genetic counselors and pharmacists. Pharmacogenomics. 2013;14:957–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McCullough KB, Formea CM, Berg KD, Burzynski JA, Cunningham JL, Ou NN, et al. Assessment of the pharmacogenomics educational needs of pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amstutz U, Carleton BC. Pharmacogenetic testing: time for clinical practice guidelines. Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;89:924–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Relling MV, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics in the clinic. Nature. 2015;526:343–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zineh I, Lesko LJ. Pharmacogenetics in medicine: barriers, critical factors and a framework for dialogue. Per Med. 2009;6:359–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Watanabe M, Ohata T, Muto K, Takada F. Problems in the regulation of genetic tests in Japan: what can we learn from direct-to-consumer genetic tests? Public Health Genomics. 2010;13:327–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Suematsu K. Japan Pharmacogenomics Data Science Consortium database and its application for drug safety analyses. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2016;5:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kamitsuji S, Matsuda T, Nishimura K, Endo S, Wada C, Watanabe K, et al. Japan PGx Data Science Consortium Database: SNPs and HLA genotype data from 2994 Japanese healthy individuals for pharmacogenomics studies. J Hum Genet. 2015;60:319–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kobayashi E, Sakurada T, Ueda S, Satoh N. Public involvement in pharmacogenomics research: a national survey on patients’ attitudes towards pharmacogenomics research and the willingness to donate DNA samples to a DNA bank in Japan. Cell Tissue Bank. 2011;12:71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Green JS, O’Brien TJ, Chiappinelli VA, Harralson AF. Pharmacogenomics instruction in US and Canadian medical schools: implications for personalized medicine. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11:1331–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffman JM, Haidar CE, Wilkinson MR, Crews KR, Baker DK, Kornegay NM, et al. PG4KDS: a model for the clinical implementation of pre-emptive pharmacogenetics. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014;166C:45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luzum JA, Pakyz RE, Elsey AR, Haidar CE, Peterson JF, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al. The pharmacogenomics research network translational pharmacogenetics program: outcomes and metrics of pharmacogenetic implementations across diverse healthcare systems. Clin Pharm Ther. 2017;102:502–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bell GC, Crews KR, Wilkinson MR, Haidar CE, Hicks JK, Baker DK, et al. Development and use of active clinical decision support for preemptive pharmacogenomics. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2014;21:e93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Stacey Gray, from the Nemours Biomedical Research Department, for coordinating the administration of the Nemours physician survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart A. Scott.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

SR, YS, and SAS are paid employees of Sema4.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rahawi, S., Naik, H., Blake, K.V. et al. Knowledge and attitudes on pharmacogenetics among pediatricians. J Hum Genet 65, 437–444 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-0723-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-0723-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links