Article | Published:

Detecting a long insertion variant in SAMD12 by SMRT sequencing: implications of long-read whole-genome sequencing for repeat expansion diseases

Journal of Human Genetics (2018) | Download Citation


Long-read sequencing technology is now capable of reading single-molecule DNA with an average read length of more than 10 kb, fully enabling the coverage of large structural variations (SVs). This advantage may pave the way for the detection of unprecedented SVs as well as repeat expansions. Pathogenic SVs of only known genes used to be selectively analyzed based on prior knowledge of target DNA sequence. The unbiased application of long-read whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for the detection of pathogenic SVs has just begun. Here, we apply PacBio SMRT sequencing in a Japanese family with benign adult familial myoclonus epilepsy (BAFME). Our SV selection of low-coverage WGS data (7×) narrowed down the candidates to only six SVs in a 7.16-Mb region of the BAFME1 locus and correctly determined an approximately 4.6-kb SAMD12 intronic repeat insertion, which is causal of BAFME1. These results indicate that long-read WGS is potentially useful for evaluating all of the known SVs in a genome and identifying new disease-causing SVs in combination with other genetic methods to resolve the genetic causes of currently unexplained diseases.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Huddleston J, Chaisson MJ, Meltz Steinberg K, Warren W, Hoekzema K, Gordon DS, et al. Discovery and genotyping of structural variation from long-read haploid genome sequence data. Genome Res. 2016;27:677–85.

  2. 2.

    Seo JS, Rhie A, Kim J, Lee S, Sohn MH, Kim CU, et al. De novo assembly and phasing of a Korean human genome. Nature. 2016;538:243–7.

  3. 3.

    Miyatake S, Koshimizu E, Fujita A, Fukai R, Imagawa E, Ohba C, et al. Detecting copy-number variations in whole-exome sequencing data using the eXome Hidden Markov Model: an 'exome-first' approach. J Hum Genet. 2015;60:175–82.

  4. 4.

    Pirooznia M, Goes FS, Zandi PP. Whole-genome CNV analysis: advances in computational approaches. Front Genet. 2015;6:138.

  5. 5.

    Merker JD, Wenger AM, Sneddon T, Grove M, Zappala Z, Fresard L, et al. Long-read genome sequencing identifies causal structural variation in a Mendelian disease. Genet Med. 2018;20:159–63.

  6. 6.

    Reiner J, Pisani L, Qiao W, Singh R, Yang Y, Shi L, et al. Cytogenomic identification and long-read single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing of a Bardet-Biedl Syndrome 9 (BBS9) deletion. NPJ Genom Med. 2018;3:3.

  7. 7.

    Ikeda A, Kakigi R, Funai N, Neshige R, Kuroda Y, Shibasaki H. Cortical tremor: a variant of cortical reflex myoclonus. Neurology. 1990;40:1561–5.

  8. 8.

    Inazuki G, Naito H, Ohama E, Kawase Y, Honma Y, Tokiguchi S, et al. [A clinical study and neuropathological findings of a familial disease with myoclonus and epilepsy—the nosological place of familial essential myoclonus and epilepsy (FEME)]. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi—Psychiatr Et Neurol Jpn. 1990;92:1–21.

  9. 9.

    Mikami M, Yasuda T, Terao A, Nakamura M, Ueno S, Tanabe H, et al. Localization of a gene for benign adult familial myoclonic epilepsy to chromosome 8q23.3-q24.1. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:745–51.

  10. 10.

    van Rootselaar AF, van Schaik IN, van den Maagdenberg AM, Koelman JH, Callenbach PM, Tijssen MA. Familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy: a single syndromic classification for a group of pedigrees bearing common features. Mov Disord. 2005;20:665–73.

  11. 11.

    Cen ZD, Xie F, Xiao JF, Luo W. Rational search for genes in familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy, clues from recent advances. Seizure. 2016;34:83–89.

  12. 12.

    Hitomi T, Kondo T, Kobayashi K, Matsumoto R, Takahashi R, Ikeda A. Clinical anticipation in Japanese families of benign adult familial myoclonus epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2012;53:e33–6.

  13. 13.

    Cen Z, Huang C, Yin H, Ding X, Xie F, Lu X, et al. Clinical and neurophysiological features of familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy. Mov Disord. 2016;31:1704–10.

  14. 14.

    Ishiura H, Doi K, Mitsui J, Yoshimura J, Matsukawa MK, Fujiyama A, et al. Expansions of intronic TTTCA and TTTTA repeats in benign adult familial myoclonic epilepsy. Nat Genet. 2018;50:581–90.

  15. 15.

    Cen Z, Jiang Z, Chen Y, Zheng X, Xie F, Yang X, et al. Intronic pentanucleotide TTTCA repeat insertion in the SAMD12 gene causes familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy type 1. Brain. 2018;141:2280–8.

  16. 16.

    Ardui S, Ameur A, Vermeesch JR, Hestand MS. Single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing comes of age: applications and utilities for medical diagnostics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:2159–68.

  17. 17.

    Krumsiek J, Arnold R, Rattei T. Gepard: a rapid and sensitive tool for creating dotplots on genome scale. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1026–8.

  18. 18.

    Carvalho CM, Lupski JR. Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:224–38.

  19. 19.

    Hannan AJ. Tandem repeats mediating genetic plasticity in health and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:286–98.

  20. 20.

    Doi K, Monjo T, Hoang PH, Yoshimura J, Yurino H, Mitsui J, et al. Rapid detection of expanded short tandem repeats in personal genomics using hybrid sequencing. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:815–22.

  21. 21.

    Dolzhenko E, van Vugt J, Shaw RJ, Bekritsky MA, van Blitterswijk M, Narzisi G, et al. Detection of long repeat expansions from PCR-free whole-genome sequence data. Genome Res. 2017;27:1895–903.

  22. 22.

    Tang H, Kirkness EF, Lippert C, Biggs WH, Fabani M, Guzman E, et al. Profiling of short-tandem-repeat disease alleles in 12,632 human whole genomes. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;101:700–15.

  23. 23.

    Dashnow H, Lek M, Phipson B, Halman A, Sadedin S, Lonsdale A, et al. STRetch: detecting and discovering pathogenic short tandem repeat expansions. Genome Biol. 2018;19:121.

  24. 24.

    McFarland KN, Liu J, Landrian I, Godiska R, Shanker S, Yu F, et al. SMRT sequencing of long tandem nucleotide repeats in SCA10 reveals unique insight of repeat expansion structure. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0135906.

  25. 25.

    Schule B, McFarland KN, Lee K, Tsai YC, Nguyen KD, Sun C, et al. Parkinson’s disease associated with pure ATXN10 repeat expansion. NPJ Park Dis. 2017;3:27.

  26. 26.

    Höijer I, Tsai YC, Clark TA, Kotturi P, Dahl N, Stattin EL, et al. Detailed analysis of HTT repeat elements in human blood using targeted amplification-free long-read sequencing. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:1262–72.

  27. 27.

    Mirkin SM. DNA structures, repeat expansions and human hereditary disorders. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006;16:351–8.

  28. 28.

    Landrian I, McFarland KN, Liu J, Mulligan CJ, Rasmussen A, Ashizawa T. Inheritance patterns of ATCCT repeat interruptions in spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (SCA10) expansions. PLoS ONE 2017;12:e0175958.

  29. 29.

    Usdin K, House NC, Freudenreich CH. Repeat instability during DNA repair: Insights from model systems. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;50:142–67.

  30. 30.

    Mori S, Nakamura M, Yasuda T, Ueno S, Kaneko S, Sano A. Remapping and mutation analysis of benign adult familial myoclonic epilepsy in a Japanese pedigree. J Hum Genet. 2011;56:742–7.

  31. 31.

    English AC, Salerno WJ, Reid JG. PBHoney: identifying genomic variants via long-read discordance and interrupted mapping. BMC Bioinform. 2014;15:180.

  32. 32.

    Fang L, Hu J, Wang D, Wang K. NextSV: a meta-caller for structural variants from low-coverage long-read sequencing data. BMC Bioinform. 2018;19:180.

  33. 33.

    Sedlazeck FJ, Rescheneder P, Smolka M, Fang H, Nattestad M, von Haeseler A, et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat Methods. 2018;15:461–8.

  34. 34.

    Zeng S, Zhang MY, Wang XJ, Hu ZM, Li JC, Li N, et al. Long-read sequencing identified intronic repeat expansions in SAMD12 from Chinese pedigrees affected with familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy. Journal of medical genetics 2018.

Download references


We would like to thank all of the subjects for participating in this study. We also thank N. Watanabe, T. Miyama, M. Sato, and K. Takabe for their technical assistance and A. Wenger (Pacific Biosciences) for helpful comments. We are also grateful to Edanz Group ( for editing a draft of this manuscript. This work was supported by AMED under grant numbers JP18ek0109280, JP18dm0107090, JP18ek0109301, JP18ek0109348, and JP18kk020500; by JSPS KAKENHI under grant numbers JP17K15630, JP17H01539, JP17K10080, and JP17K15630; by JST under the Creation of Innovation Centers for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research Areas Program in the Project for Developing Innovation Systems; the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare; and Takeda Science Foundation.

Author information


  1. Department of Human Genetics, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan

    • Takeshi Mizuguchi
    • , Noriko Miyake
    • , Naomichi Matsumoto
    •  & Satoko Miyatake
  2. Department of Neurology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health School of Medicine, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan

    • Tomoko Toyota
    •  & Hiroaki Adachi
  3. Clinical Genetics Department, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan

    • Satoko Miyatake


  1. Search for Takeshi Mizuguchi in:

  2. Search for Tomoko Toyota in:

  3. Search for Hiroaki Adachi in:

  4. Search for Noriko Miyake in:

  5. Search for Naomichi Matsumoto in:

  6. Search for Satoko Miyatake in:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Takeshi Mizuguchi or Satoko Miyatake.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history