Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Modeling Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Human Disease Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract

As an experimental system, Caenorhabditis elegans offers a unique opportunity to interrogate in vivo the genetic and molecular functions of human disease-related genes. For example, C. elegans has provided crucial insights into fundamental biologic processes, such as cell death and cell fate determinations, as well as pathologic processes such as neurodegeneration and microbial susceptibility. The C. elegans model has several distinct advantages, including a completely sequenced genome that shares extensive homology with that of mammals, ease of cultivation and storage, a relatively short lifespan and techniques for generating null and transgenic animals. However, the ability to conduct unbiased forward and reverse genetic screens in C. elegans remains one of the most powerful experimental paradigms for discovering the biochemical pathways underlying human disease phenotypes. The identification of these pathways leads to a better understanding of the molecular interactions that perturb cellular physiology, and forms the foundation for designing mechanism-based therapies. To this end, the ability to process large numbers of isogenic animals through automated work stations suggests that C. elegans, manifesting different aspects of human disease phenotypes, will become the platform of choice for in vivo drug discovery and target validation using high-throughput/content screening technologies.

Main

The discovery of disease-related genes for simple Mendelian disorders and polygenic traits by positional cloning, linkage analysis or genome-wide association studies has increased at a frenetic pace (1). Although these strategies may identify genes encoding domains with recognizable functions (e.g., kinase domain) or folds belonging to a well-characterized protein family (e.g., G protein-coupled receptor), the relationship between mutations and disease phenotypes frequently are inapparent until genetic functions are placed within the context of molecular systems. Because cellular metabolism is comprised of an integrated network of biochemical pathways that fluctuate in response to environmental and constitutional cues, the precise positioning of disease-related genes within those pathways most proximal to their site of action is not a straightforward task. Identifying disease-related genes and their interacting partners is more than an academic exercise, as mechanism-based therapeutic strategies are based frequently on modulating the activities of different components of molecular pathways rather than those of the mutant genes themselves. Thus, a better understanding of genes and their interacting partners forms the foundation for more meaningful translational research.

Fortunately, a mutant gene, even if its function is unknown, can be used to gain an entrée into its biologic system. In vitro, biochemical approaches including affinity chromatography, coimmunoprecipitation, and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry are used to isolate interacting proteins (2,3). In vivo, genetic techniques using yeast two-hybrid analysis, crosses between different mutants, transgene insertion, and forward and reverse genetic screens have been instrumental in defining the components of biochemical systems associated with disease-related genes and their phenotypes. Humans, however, are poor subjects for these types of genetic studies as we lack inbred populations with homogeneous genetic backgrounds, reproduce inefficiently with small brood sizes, require generation times that far exceed the average National Institutes of Health grant cycle, demonstrate wide variations in gene penetrance and expressivity and are unable to control consistently for confounding environmental variables. Moreover, manipulating human germline DNA is deemed unethical and arranging nuptials to study genetic interactions in our progeny is generally frowned upon in most societies. To circumvent these issues, an expanding group of model organisms is being exploited to make inferences about human biology that are based partially upon the extent of evolutionary relatedness at the genomic level. These organisms, initially dubbed the “Security Council of Genetic Organisms” by Gerald Fink, have grown to include additional members and collectively have provided crucial insights into most aspects of modern cellular and molecular biology (Table 1) (4). Although each model genetic organism possesses distinct advantages, they share three common features: 1) the ability to conduct sexual crosses for determining modes of inheritance, complementation groups, and recombination frequencies; 2) a sequenced genome that is linked to a molecular toolbox containing genomic and cDNA clones and reagents to manipulate these sequences, and 3) techniques for generating germline DNA transformations and mutations (4).

Table 1 An expanded security council of genetic organisms

Convinced that the “classical problems of molecular biology had been solved and that the future lay in tackling more complex biologic problems,” Sydney Brenner in the mid 1960s sought to establish an experimental platform that would facilitate the study of the “new, mysterious and exciting” fields of development and the nervous system (5). Buoyed by the success of discovering the mechanisms of DNA replication and gene regulation by using genetics and biochemistry to interrogate a simple a prokaryotic model system (bacteria and their phage), Brenner reasoned that similar technologies applied to a microbiological-like multicellular organism (i.e., an organism of modest complexity) would help determine the molecular mechanisms for tissue organization and function underlying metazoan life. “Having once been discovered, their applicability to the higher forms of life could be tested afterward.” In 1974, Brenner published his landmark paper describing methods for isolating and mapping disease-related genes in the mutagenized free-living nematode, C. elegans (6).

C. elegans resources.

For C. elegans, becoming a charter member of the Council was no accident. Sydney Brenner identified several experimental traits that have made C. elegans the organism of choice for studying molecular aspects of cell biology in vivo. These and additional advantages include 1) small size (adults are 1 mm in length) that facilitates ease of propagation, manipulation (animals are reared on agar plates or liquid media seeded with bacteria, usually E. coli), and long-term storage (stocks can be frozen in glycerol), 2) transparency at all stages of development, which allows for visualization of all cells by differential interference contrast (DIC) and various forms of fluorescence microscopy, 3) a short generation cycle (3 d) and lifespan (3 wk), 4) sexual dimorphism with self-fertilizing hermaphrodites and cross-fertilizing males leading to large brood sizes of 300 and 1000 F1s, respectively, 5) a complete and invariant cell lineage map (from zygote to adult) for the 959 and 1031 somatic cells of the adult hermaphrodite and male, respectively, 6) organ-based physiology with developmental specification of a nerve ring and nerve cords, intestine, muscle, hypoderm, secretory-excretory system, gonads, and uterus, 7) complete connectivity maps for the 302 and 391 neurons comprising the adult hermaphrodite and male nervous systems, respectively, 8) complex behavioral traits such as mechano- and chemosensation, avoidance of noxious stimuli and thermotaxis, 9) experimental techniques for generating transgenic animals; ablating single cells by laser photolysis; conducting forward and reverse genetic screens by chemical mutagenesis and RNAi, respectively; flow sorting animals by both size and fluorescence; SNP mapping of phenotypic traits and drug screening using small molecule libraries, 10) a completely sequenced genome harboring 19,700 coding sequences and 1300 noncoding RNAs, 11) repositories of genomic and cDNA clones, 12) a stock center for mutant animals including ongoing efforts to include null mutants for every gene and, 13) a wealth of free on-line resources (e.g., WormBook) and databases (e.g., WormBase) (Table S1, online at www.pedresearch.org).

HUMAN-DISEASE RELATED GENES ARE WELL-CONSERVED IN C. Elegans

The number of human disease-related genes that share at least modest homology (E < 10−10 on BLASTP searches) with C. elegans genes ranges from 40 to 75% (712). However, this degree of relatedness may still be an underestimate as the rapid divergence of nonessential domains and exon shuffling may impair the ability of the BLASTP algorithm to detect high-scoring segment pairs between orthologous genes (13). For example, the C. elegans orthologue of vertebrate P53, cep-1, which also contains the five signature domains and residues commonly mutated in human malignancies, was detected only after using a combination of the squid P53 as the query, PSI-BLAST and the Block Maker tool (14). Moreover, even if a human disease-related gene does not have an orthologue in C. elegans, there is still a high-likelihood that a homologous gene, a protein domain or the constituents of an associated biochemical pathway (especially, if it encompasses a core cellular function like signal transduction, synaptic transmission, or membrane trafficking) are conserved to the extent that this model system can be exploited to lend insight into human pathobiology (15,16).

A compendium of the C. elegans genes that are orthologous to human disease-related genes is found in several excellent reviews (79) and partially summarized in Table S2 (online at www.pedreserach.org). Because a comprehensive update is beyond the scope of this review, we will focus on several experimental systems that underscore the importance of using this simple metazoan model, in combination with powerful genetic technologies, to enhance our understanding of fundamental human disease processes and to lead to new mechanism-based therapies.

THE REGULATION OF CELL DEATH PATHWAYS

Apoptosis.

The apoptosis form of programmed cell death has been recognized as a normal developmental and tissue homeostatic process for over a century (17). More recently, apoptosis has been recognized as a cellular response associated with different pathologic conditions including, infection, tissue degeneration, malignancy, and immunity [reviewed in Ref. (18)]. In an extraordinary series of morphologic studies, Sulston and colleagues showed that C. elegans development follows a stereotypical pattern. The adult hermaphrodite is comprised of 959 somatic nuclei after the loss of 113 and 18 cells in the embryonic and early larval (L2) stages of development, respectively (19,20). These programmed cell deaths are invariant in terms of morphology, cell type, and timing. Dying cells complete the process 1–2 h after mitosis and are eliminated by phagocytosis. Cells die autonomously and not secondary to engulfment, as a forward genetic screen using ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) as the mutagen showed the persistence of embryonic cell corpses in two different phagocytosis mutants, designated ced-1 and ced-2 for cell death abnormal (21). To isolate genetic mutants in which the programmed cell deaths would be disrupted (suppressed), ced-1 hermaphrodites were mutagenized also with EMS and their F2 progeny screened for the persistence of cells destined to die (22). Mapping of these suppressor mutants led to the isolation of loss-of-function mutations (lf) in two genes, ced-3 and ced-4 (Fig. 1A). Subsequently, these genes were found to be homologous to human caspases and apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (APAF-1), respectively (23,24).

Figure 1
figure1

C. elegans cell death pathways. A. The now classical core apoptosis pathway occurs in development and the germ line, but rarely in the adult soma. Upstream regulators block activation of the caspase, CED-3. B. The neurodegenerin pathway was first described in mechanosensory neurons and stimulated by mutations that elicit excitotoxic injury. A rise in [Ca2+]i triggers peptidase activity that kills the cells over several hours. Although not pictured, lysosomal injury and acidification of the cytoplasm may contribute to injury. The necrosis pathway is triggered after different types of stress (hypotonic, thermal, oxidative, and hypoxic) and is most evident within the intestinal cytoplasm. C. An intracellular serpin (SRP-6) protects the lysosome from stress-induced injury and also protects the cell itself from lysosome-induced damage. There is strong genetic, biochemical, and morphologic evidence for the conservation of these pathways in higher eukaryotes, including humans.

Egg laying in adult hermaphrodites is under neuronal control. Two hermaphrodite specific neurons (HSNs) innervate the vulval muscles and laser ablation of the HSNs leads to an egg-laying defect (25). During male development, the HSNs die suggesting that their cell fate is under genetic control associated with sex determination. In a mutagenesis screen for hermaphrodites with egg-laying defects (Egl), the inappropriate loss of HSNs was detected in some animals and was associated with a gain-of-function (gf) mutation in what is now known as a proapoptotic BH3-only (BCL2 homology domain-3) gene, egl-1 (25). Transcription of egl-1 is active in males and suppressed in hermaphrodites. The egl-1(gf) is due to the loss of a DNA binding site for a negative transcriptional regulator, TRA-1, thereby allowing for EGL-1 expression in the hermaphrodite.

In another mutagenesis screen for genes that altered programmed cell death, a gf mutant, ced-9(gf), was found to block nearly all developmental cell deaths (26). After ced-9(gf) was crossed with the egl-1(gf) mutant, HSN cell death was blocked. This data suggested that CED-9 functions downstream of EGL-1. In contrast, an lf mutation of ced-9(lf) resulted in ectopic cell deaths and embryonic lethality. Through a series of genetic crosses, ced-4(lf) and ced-3(lf) mutations blocked the ectopic cell deaths associated with the ced-9(lf) mutation, suggesting that these proteins function downstream of CED-9 (Fig. 1A). Biochemical and structural studies confirmed these findings and show that CED-9 localizes to the outer mitochondrial membrane, where it binds a CED-4 dimer [reviewed in (27,28)]. Binding of EGL-1 results in a conformational change in CED-9 and the release of CED-4. The released CED-4 dimers associate and bind four pro-CED-3 molecules, which are processed into the active catalytic form of the peptidase.

Conservation of the core apoptotic machinery in C. elegans was extended to mammals by showing that human BCL2 blocks ectopic cell deaths in ced-9(lf) mutants (29). The conservation of the apoptotic pathway(s) among metazoans was extended to at least 28 genes involving the initiation, execution, and elimination (engulfment) phases of the process (28). Taken together, these findings were the first to show how a precise knowledge of cell fates combined with a series of mutagenesis studies and genetic crosses between different types of mutants led to a seminal finding: apoptosis is a carefully regulated genetic process. These studies in C. elegans programmed cell death led to the awarding of the 2002 Nobel Prize in Medicine to Sydney Brenner, John E. Sulston, and H. Robert Horvtitz (27).

Necrosis.

Necrosis has been defined as an accidental, catastrophic, and uncontrolled form of cell death that occurs after overt energy failure, extreme metabolic embarrassment, or after the failure of counter-regulatory systems (30). Moreover, once activated, necrosis was characterized as an irreversible process. Studies in C. elegans suggest this is not the case. Insight into the molecular pathogenesis of necrosis was first described in a model of mechanosensory neuronal degeneration involving gf mutations for genes encoding a subunit of the degenerin/epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) family (deg-1, mec-4, mec-10, unc-8, and unc-105), a GTP binding protein subunit (gsa-1, a Gαs), and a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (deg-3) [reviewed in Ref. (31)]. Most of these mutations lead to hyperactivation of Na+ or Ca2+ channels and contribute to cellular demise by perturbed ion flow, osmotic shifts or Ca2+ mediated excitotoxic injury (Fig. 1B) (3234). Death follows a stereotypical pattern characterized by the formation of membranous whorls, vacuole formation, cytoplasmic and mitochondrial swelling, chromatin clumping, nuclear condensation, and the occasional loss of plasma membrane integrity (32). Although features of the late-degenerative phases are reminiscent of apoptosis, cell death is independent of ced-3 and ced-4 (35). However, both apoptotic and necrotic corpses are eventually engulfed and both death pathways use the same parallel sets of engulfment genes (ced-1, -6, -7, and ced-2, -5, -10, and -12) (35). Necrotic cell death of mechanosensory neurons requires a rise in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i), as death is blocked, in part, by lf mutations of the calreticulin (crt-1), inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3R/itr-1) or ryanodine receptor (RyR/unc-68) genes (36). The rise in [Ca2+]i is thought to activate two members (clp-1 and tra-3) of the calpain family (Ca2+ dependent, papain-like cysteine peptidases), which may activate the downstream aspartic peptidases, asp-3 and -4 (37). It is not known whether these peptidases kill cells directly or activate other downstream effectors.

The terminal phases of cellular death are triggered by peptidase-inhibitor imbalance within the cytoplasm. Because a subset of the serpin superfamily of peptidase inhibitors (e.g., α1-antitrypsin (AT) and antithrombin) lack signal peptides, which are highly expressed within the cytoplasm of metazoan cells, and neutralize lysosomal cysteine and serine peptidases; we hypothesized that some of these intracellular serpins regulate intracellular proteolytic pathways leading to cell death. This notion was confirmed using a reverse genetic approach in C. elegans (38). The intracellular serpin, SRP-6, exhibits a prosurvival function by blocking intestinal cell lysosomal disruption, cytoplasmic proteolysis and whole animal death induced by hypotonic shock, thermal stress, oxidative stress, hypoxia, and cation channel hyperactivity (Fig. 2). This necrotic death phenotype was dependent upon calpains and lysosomal cysteine peptidases, two in vitro targets of SRP-6. Taken together, these findings suggest that multiple noxious stimuli converge upon a peptidase-driven, core stress response pathway that, in the absence of intracellular serpin regulation, triggers lysosomal-dependent necrotic cell death (Fig. 1C).

Figure 2
figure2

Intestinal cell necrosis in C. elegans. (Center) Three dimensional image showing hypotonic shock-induced intestinal cell necrosis in srp-6 null C. elegans stained with Lysotracker Red and the cysteine peptidase substrate, (Z-FR)2-R110. Animals undergo extensive lysosome disintegration (red) and propagate a wave of cysteine peptidase activity (blue) across the cytoplasm. As an agonal event, adult worms often extrude their uteri and necrotic intestine through the vulva. Images were collected using an Olympus Fluoview1000 confocal microscope with 488 and 568 lasers. The micrograph is an overlay of fluorescent images taken over a z-series and merged. Volocity (Improvision) was used to psuedocolor and render the images. Background subtraction was performed using Canvas (Deneba). Scale bar = 50 μm. (Perimeter) Four-dimensional, time-lapsed images of intestinal cell necrosis occurring in live srp-6 null C. elegans stained with Lysotracker Red. Merged DIC and fluorescent images start at upper left-hand corner and progress clockwise. Images were captured at 20-s intervals (total time approximately 10 min) after the initiation of hypotonic shock. Intestinal cells undergo lysosomal rupture (red) and large vacuoles appear (purple) as intestinal cell necrosis progresses over time. Images were collected using a Zeiss Axioskop II Mot microscope using DIC optics at ×250 magnification. Fluorescent images were captured using excitation and emission wavelengths of 572 and 630 nm, respectively. Volocity and Canvas was used to pseudocolor and render the images. Scale bar (first frame) = 5 μm.

SRP-6 also protected animals from cell death after direct lysosomal rupture induced by the lysosomotropic and photo-sensitizing agent, acridine orange (38). Minutes after blue-light irradiation, nearly all of the intestinal cell lysosomes from both wild-type and srp-6 null animals disintegrate. Not surprisingly, all of the srp-6 null animals died. However, the majority of wild-type animals survived and reconstituted their lysosomal compartment. These findings show that even after massive lysosomal disruption, intestinal cells can survive providing that sufficient amounts of intracellular serpin are available to block collateral damage.

Based on these findings, necrosis appears to be evolutionarily conserved, orderly and a highly regulated peptidase-driven cell death pathway that is amenable to therapeutic intervention even after complete dissolution of the lysosomal compartment. Because intestinal epithelial cell necrosis is a common pathologic feature in many gastrointestinal disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease, ischemic bowel disease, graft versus host disease, infectious gastroenteritis, and necrotizing enterocolitis; the development of mechanism-based therapeutics that target different steps of the necrosis pathway could be used to treat a wide-array of disorders.

HUMANIZED WORMS: MODELING OF HUMAN DISEASE BY TRANSGENESIS

A practicing clinician might view the modeling of a human disease in a simple invertebrate by transgene insertion as experimental esoterica. If nematodes do not possess the complex organ-based physiology of mammals, how can we be confident that heterologous transgene expression in C. elegans will provide any meaningful insight into the pathogenesis of a human disease phenotype? The answer will depend, in part, on how the question is framed and by recognizing that complex disease phenotypes in humans can be studied successfully by reducing complex molecular and cellular events into their component parts. For example, classical AT deficiency is a common autosomal recessive disorder (39). A single missense mutation renders the mutant protein, Z-mutant of AT (ATZ) prone to self-polymerization and aggregation (40). ATZ polymers/aggregates are poorly secreted and accumulate within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of liver cells (39). Because AT is the predominant serine peptidase inhibitor in extracellular fluids, decreased AT secretion results in a lf phenotype manifest by peptidase-inhibitor imbalance, connective tissue matrix destruction and susceptibility to chronic obstructive lung disease (41). In contrast, the accumulation of aggregation-prone ATZ in liver cells leads to a toxic gf phenotype characterized by liver failure and carcinogenesis (42). Clearly, modeling the lf phenotype in C. elegans is a difficult proposition. However, the toxic gf phenotype (i.e., the ER translocation defect observed in hepatocytes) could be modeled in C. elegans by driving ATZ transgene expression in different tissues (Pak et al., unpublished).

Sveger followed the clinical course of 127 Swedish infants homozygous for the classical form of AT deficiency (43). Over a 40-y period, only 8% of the population at risk developed clinically significant liver disease. This epidemiologic study demonstrates that there is wide variability in the liver disease phenotype associated with AT deficiency, and other genetic factors are likely to modulate liver disease susceptibility in this cohort of patients. Thus, enhancer and suppressor screens using the C. elegans model of AT deficiency could yield novel insights into disease susceptibility by identifying, for example, genes that regulate the cellular response to proteotoxic species and the overall disposition of ATZ.

Neurodegenerative diseases.

Brain tissue from Alzheimer's disease patients harbor extracellular senile plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles partially composed of β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) and TAU/MAPT (a microtubule-associated protein), respectively (44,45). Both human proteins have been expressed in C. elegans and used to model different aspects of the disease. The Link laboratory has generated transgenes that drive Aβ1–42 peptide expression in body wall muscles or neurons (45). Young adults develop cytoplasmic Aβ inclusions in both cell types but only body wall muscle expression leads to progressive paralysis. Although Aβ-expressing animals do not appear to form extracellular plaques, the Aβ-containing intracellular inclusions are similar to those observed in patients with sporadic forms of Inclusion Body Myositis. Interestingly, transgenes expressing different Aβ1–42 variants show that cellular toxicity, like those of the murine models, does not correlate with the intracellular accumulation of the dye-reactive fibrillar Aβ1–42 species, but is related to the presence of soluble Aβ1–42 oligomers (46,47). These studies show that the transgenic techniques for C. elegans are facile enough to probe for structure-function relationships in vivo. Transgenic animals can also be used to identify interacting proteins. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of co-immunoprecipitates shows that several different types of chaperones, including two heat-shock proteins (HSP) of the HSP-70 family and three of the HSP-16 family associate with the Aβ1–42 peptide (48). RNAi of an HSP-70 inhibitor or over-expression of the HSPs help ameliorate the disease phenotype and identified a potential therapeutic strategy for treating disorders associated with protein misfolding.

Aggregates of Aβ1–42 have been considered a marker and possibly the initiator of cellular injury in patients with Alzheimer's disease. However, studies in C. elegans show that cellular dysfunction can precede the accumulation of intracellular Aβ inclusion bodies. To help resolve this issue, Dillin and colleagues (49) took advantage of long-lived, insulin signaling pathway mutants that show attenuated Aβ1–42 toxicity. Animals with lf mutations of daf-2 (an insulin-like receptor) demonstrate delayed ageing, which is due, in part, to the de-repression of the transcription factors, DAF-16 (a forkhead family member) and HSF-1 (a heat-shock transcription factor). Subsequent loss of either of these factors reverses the protective effects observed in daf-2(lf) animals, but for different reasons. By combining biochemical techniques to investigate the nature of the Aβ1–42 species in the genetic mutants, these investigators showed that soluble oligomers were the toxic intermediate, and that DAF-16 and HSF-1 had different but complementary functions in their detoxification. Animals with an intact HSF-1 pathway targeted their soluble oligomers for degradation. However, if the HSF-1 pathway was blocked, the DAF-16 pathway reduced Aβ1–42 toxicity by facilitating the assembly of less toxic high-molecular mass Aβ1–42 aggregates. These studies suggest that the presence of Aβ1–42 aggregates in patients of Alzheimer's disease may be more indicative of an adaptive cellular response to detoxify misfolded proteins rather than a marker of a toxic species per se. Thus, future therapies might be directed toward the elimination of toxic oligomers or the generation of high-molecular mass Aβ1–42 aggregates.

Pan-neuronal expression of mutant (P301L or V337M) and, to a lesser extent, the wild-type form of human TAU in C. elegans leads to neuronal cell loss and progressive uncoordinated movement that simulates aspects of the pathology associated with Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia with Parkinsonism chromosome 17 type (FTDP-17) (44). One of the most advantageous aspects of modeling human diseases in C. elegans is that unbiased genetic screens can be used to identify components of the molecular pathway(s) associated with the disease phenotype. For example, an RNAi screen involving 16,757 genes identified 75 genes that enhanced the disease phenotype and uncovered several candidate genes (e.g., peptidases, unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling components, and chaperones) that block TAU toxicity (50).

Huntington's disease, spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy, dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy, and the spinal-cerebellar ataxias including types 1, 2, 3 (Machado-Joseph disease), 6, 7, and 17 are all autosomal dominant neurodegenerative diseases hallmarked by the genomic amplification of CAG trinucleotide repeats. These repeats are translated into polyglutamine (polyQ) expansions within these different proteins (51). The expression of polyQ repeats above certain thresholds leads to toxic gf phenotypes marked by intranuclear or cytoplasmic inclusions, neuronal dysfunction, and cell death. Although the mechanism of toxicity has not been firmly established, a combination of native protein dysfunction because of polyQ-induced protein misfolding, sequestration of associated proteins by the polyQ motif, and the accumulation of cleaved polyQ aggregates appear to play a role (51). To help elucidate the mechanism of cell injury, transgenic lines expressing different numbers of polyQ repeats (n ranges from 2 to 150) in different cell types have been established in C. elegans (5256). Taken together, these studies show an age and threshold-dependent accumulation of intracellular inclusions that are associated with neuronal or body wall muscle dysfunction and, in certain cases, cell death. As in mammalian systems, a threshold of 35–40 polyQ repeats in muscle, and possibly a slightly higher number in neurons, leads to cellular dysfunction. The threshold goes down with age and can be exacerbated by the presence of other metastable proteins encoded by the host genome. For example, the presence of unrelated temperature-sensitive mutants enhances the aggregation of polyQ proteins (57). Similarly, the presence of polyQ proteins leads to the destabilization of temperature-sensitive mutant proteins even at their permissive temperatures. These studies suggest that polyQ proteins can lead to cellular dysfunction by perturbing the global balance of protein folding quality control systems (57).

One of the values of these C. elegans models resides in the ability to generate multiple transgenic lines with subtle variations in the transgenes. Similar approaches are being used to study different forms of superoxide dismutase in a model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (58), and α-synuclein mutants in a model of Parkinson's disease (59). The cost in terms of manpower and resource utilization makes this strategy impractical in mice. Moreover, the ability to use these animals as a platform to search for disease modifiers by transcriptional profiling and both forward and reverse genetics and to screen for new drugs (vide infra) makes humanized C. elegans animals unique tools for human disease research.

C. elegans AS A MODEL SYSTEM TO STUDY HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS

Although C. elegans is a bacteriophagus organism, these animals are killed by a variety of human pathogens, including gram-negative (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, Serratia marcescens, Burkholderia cepacia), gram-positive organisms (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis), and fungi (Candida species) [reviewed in Ref. (6063)]. Seminal studies conducted in the laboratories of Ausubel, Ewbank and others show unequivocally that many of the host resistance (e.g., antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), MAPK signaling cascades) and bacterial (and fungal) virulence factors (e.g., Pseudomonas exotoxin A, Staphylococcus V8 protease) that operate in C. elegans infection models are conserved in those of plants, arthropods, and mammals. Thus, C. elegans infection models serve as a useful system for dissecting apart the molecular components of host-pathogen interactions.

P. aeruginosa is a virulent opportunistic Gram-negative organism that causes severe sepsis, pneumonia, and skin and soft tissue infections in patients with compromised immunity or barrier function (64). Chronic infections with mucoid strains of P. aeruginosa occur in patients with cystic fibrosis, which is intimately associated with an inexorable decline of pulmonary function (64,65). P. aeruginosa relies on a range of virulence factors, including adhesins, secreted peptidases (LasA, LasB, alkaline protease, and protease IV), exotoxin A, and type III secretion system toxins (ExoU, ExoS, ExoT and ExoY) to infect its host (64,65). Although there are significant anatomical, cellular, and biochemical differences between the human lung and the nematode intestine (e.g., that the absence of an adaptive immune system), this latter system does provide the opportunity to identify 1) primordial virulence factors that P. aeruginosa employs to breech the most salient metazoan defense, the epithelial surface, 2) elemental host resistance factors used to repel potential pathogens and, 3) new antimicrobial compounds active in vivo (vide infra).

Depending on the culture conditions and the bacterial strain, C. elegans fed on lawns of P. aeruginosa are killed by fast (phenazine toxin or cyanide-induced paralysis) or slow (intestinal infection) mechanisms. To identify new virulence factors, a library of 2400 P. aeruginosa PA14 TnphoA insertion mutants were screened in a slow-killing assay by feeding the organisms to C. elegans. Eight mutants with attenuated killing were isolated. Five of these mutants (lasR, lemA, and mtrR were known virulence factors whereas ptsP and open reading frame 338 were novel) also showed decreased virulence in a mouse full-thickness burn model (66). Thus, the use of high-throughput genetic systems provides a means to identify additional P. aeruginosa virulence factors that can be targeted for a therapeutic advantage.

Significant portions of the C. elegans pathogen sensing and stress-signaling pathways are conserved in flies and mammals. Because there are no Rel/NFκB family members and a single Toll-like receptor gene (tol-1) appears to participate in a pathogen avoidance pathway, but not in pathogen recognition per se (67,68), the induction of innate immunity in C. elegans differs somewhat from that of Drosophila and higher vertebrates. For example, humans use a repertoire of toll-like receptors (TLRs) and a core-signaling cassette using Rel/NFκB family members to activate the transcription of host defense molecules [reviewed in Refs. (6971)]. Using a forward genetics screen for genes that enhanced susceptibility to pathogens, C. elegans was shown to possess several well-defined MAPK signaling cassettes [including those associated with PMK-1 (P38), KGB-1 (JNK), and MPK-1 (ERK)] that are crucial for mounting an innate immune defense [reviewed in Ref. (61)]. These MAPK pathways also participate in the innate defenses of arthropods and mammals and are activated most likely by the MAPKKK, TAK-1. TAK-1 is activated in response to TGF-β and Toll/TLR signaling. C. elegans also use TGF-β and insulin growth factor (Daf) signaling pathways to activate host resistance to pathogens (61). Although C. elegans does not harbor a Rel/NFκB signaling cassette, it does encode for several components of the cascade, including TRF-1 (TRAF-1), PIK-1 (IRAK), IKB-1 (IKB), and Toll-IL-1 receptor (TIR-1) (68,72). TOL-1 and TIR-1 are the only C. elegans proteins that contain a TIR domain (73,74). TIR domains are well-conserved in eukaryotic cells including plants and serve as binding sites for adapter proteins (e.g., MyD88, Mal) involved in host defense signaling (6971,74). In response to bacterial challenge, C. elegans TIR-1 serves as an upstream activator of an MAPK signaling pathway (7375). Interestingly, TIR-1 has its greatest homology in humans to SARM (7375). Although SARM contains a TIR domain, it does not function in TLR signaling cascades either. It has not been determined whether SARM activates MAPK cascades in mammals. These findings suggest that the MAPK and TLR signaling pathways are linked biochemically and share several orthologous signaling proteins and transcriptional targets (e.g., AMP genes). Taken together, genetic mutant analysis, transcriptional profiling, and biochemical studies in C. elegans show that MAPK signaling is one of the primordial, yet still essential, stress response pathways in eukaryotes and, in part, formed the basis of TLR signaling in metazoans (74). A better delineation of these signaling pathways should enhance our understanding of innate host resistance to a range of human pathogens.

C. eLEGANS AS A MODEL OF PARASITIC NEMATODES

The phylum, Nematoda, harbors the largest number of metazoans on earth. Although many of the species are free-living, some cause significant human suffering by damaging crops and livestock. In addition, human parasitic nematodes infect 2/5 of the world's population and cause debilitating diseases such as lymphatic filariasis/elephantiasis (Brugia malayi and timori, Wuchereria bancrofti), onchocerciasis/river blindness (Onchocerca volvulus), pinworm (Enterobius vermicularis), hookworm (Necator americanus, Ancyclostoma duodenle), trichinosis (Trichinella spiralis), ascariasis (Ascaris lumbricoides), strongyloidiasis (Strongyloides stercoralis and fuelleborni), and Guinea worm (Dracunculus medinensis) (76). Although a mass drug administration effort by the Global Programme and Alliance to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis has met with some success (77), concerns of evolving drug resistance may jeopardize these efforts (78).

Because human parasitic nematodes are not free-living, they may require intermediate hosts (e.g., sandflies or mosquitoes) to complete their life cycles and frequently lack surrogate laboratory hosts or in vitro culture systems that allow long-term propagation; current laboratory-based approaches are limited in their ability to deliver new therapeutic modalities (e.g., RNAi), vaccine candidates, or anthelmintics. Fortunately, similarities between genomes, anatomy, development, pharmacology, and physiology have allowed certain aspects of the parasitic lifestyle to be modeled in C. elegans (79,80). Many of the drugs used to treat parasitic nematodes target the neuromuscular unit and are toxic to C. elegans (78). For example, benzimidazoles, which are a mainstay of current anthelmintic therapy by inhibiting β-tubulin, also lead to paralysis of C. elegans. A genetic screen for drug resistant C. elegans, using EMS or γ-irradiation as the mutagen, identified 28 different lines with mutations that mapped to one of three β-tubulin genes, ben-1 (81). Subsequently, molecular analysis of drug resistance in Hemonchus contortus revealed amino acid variants at three different positions, 76, 200, and 368, in the β-tubulin isotype 1 allele, tub-1 (82). The Phe200Tyr variant was most suspicious as this allele always segregated with the drug resistant strains, and this exact codon position distinguishes ben-1 as the only benzimidazole-sensitive β-tubulin in C. elegans. To confirm that the Phe200Tyr mutation was the cause of drug resistance in H. contortus, ben-1 null C. elegans transformed with the wild-type, but not the mutant, allele of tub-1 restored drug responsiveness. These studies show how a combination of forward genetic screens and transgenic rescue in C. elegans was used to identify drug targets and study mechanisms of drug resistance in parasitic nematodes.

C. ELEGANS AS MODEL FOR DRUG DISCOVERY

With the advent of the National Institutes of Health Molecular Library Screening Network, which encompasses compound collections totaling hundreds-of-thousands of molecules and high-throughput screening (HTS) technologies, small molecule drug discovery campaigns are a realistic goal for a wide range of human diseases (83). Typically, these screening campaigns involve monitoring the effects of different compounds on cellular or molecular activities within individual wells of a 98-, 384-, or 1536-well microplates. HTS has become more informative by the development of high-content screens that use 1) fluorescent probes with different excitation and emission spectra, 2) automated fluorescent microscopy screening devices, and 3) complex image capture and analysis algorithms to qualitatively, quantitatively, temporally, and spatially assess drug effects on individual living cells within a single well of a microplate (84). More recently, HTS drug discovery screens have been adapted to using whole animals such as C. elegans and zebrafish embryos. Drug discovery screens with whole animals have the advantage of identifying compounds that modulate more complex phenotypes and for eliminating compounds with systemic toxicity early in the discovery process. The genetic tractability of C. elegans has the added advantage of alleviating one of the major bottlenecks of drug development, target validation (85). Kwok et al., exposed larval forms of C. elegans to 14,000 different compounds, and identified 300 compounds that induced a variety of defects. One compound, nemadipine-A, caused growth and Egl (85). This compound belongs to the 1,4-dyhydropyridine (DHP) class of anti-hypertensives, which block the α1 subunit of l-type calcium channels. To help identify the drug target, a suppressor screen was conducted by exposing 180,000 genome equivalents to EMS and isolating several dominant genetic suppressor mutants that were no longer sensitive to the drug. The mutant genes mapped to egl-19, the only C. elegans l-type calcium channel α1 subunit. DNA sequence analysis showed that one of the missense mutations altered a conserved residue required for mammalian channels to bind DHPs. These studies confirmed that live whole animal screens using C. elegans could be used as a biologic platform for both drug discovery and target validation. Moreover, the abilities to: 1) create transgenic animals with different types of fluorescent fusion proteins, 2) partition staged animals with similar degrees of transgene expression into microplate wells using the COPAS BIOSORT (worm sorter), 3) automate reagent delivery by liquid handling robots, and 4) monitor changes in overall animal size and internal florescence intensity/distribution in response to drug treatment using automated wide-field or confocal microscopes coupled to image capture and analysis software (Fig. 3), suggest that C. elegans will become the organism of choice for conducting HTS and high-content screening campaigns for gene (e.g., RNAi) and drug discovery for a wide range of human disease phenotypes.

Figure 3
figure3

Global strategy for high-throughput/high-content screening of lead compounds using C. elegans. A, compounds, culture media, and E. coli are dispensed into multi-well (96- or 384-well) plates using a high-throughput liquid handler (Evolution-P3©2001–2008 Perkin Elmer Inc., all rights reserved, printed with permission). B, Animals of the desired size and/or fluorescence profiles are sorted into multi-well plates using a COPAS BIOSORT (Union Biometrica Inc., image used with permission). C, An automated high-throughput imaging system, ArrayScan R VTi HCS Reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, images used with permission) captures images and identifies changes in phenotype of interest. D, Lead compounds are identified and further scrutinized to confirm positives and eliminate nuisance compounds. E, New compounds are synthesized to develop potential therapeutics.

Abbreviations

Aβ:

β-amyloid peptide

AMPs:

antimicrobial peptides

AT:

α1-antitrypsin

ATZ:

Z-mutant of AT

[Ca2+]i:

intracellular calcium concentration

EMS:

ethyl methane sulfonate

gf:

gain-of-function

HTS:

high-throughput screening

HSNs:

hermaphrodite specific neurons

HSP:

heat-shock proteins

lf:

loss-of-function

polyQ:

polyglutamine

TLRs:

toll-like receptors

References

  1. 1

    Manolio TA, Brooks LD, Collins FS 2008 A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. J Clin Invest 118: 1590–1605

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Gingras AC, Aebersold R, Raught B 2005 Advances in protein complex analysis using mass spectrometry. J Physiol 563: 11–21

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Fields S, Song O 1989 A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 340: 245–246

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Fink GR 1998 Anatomy of a revolution. Genetics 149: 473–477

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Brenner S 1988 Foreward. In: Wood WB (ed) The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp 9–13.

  6. 6

    Brenner S 1974 The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71–94

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Aboobaker AA, Blaxter ML 2000 Medical significance of Caenorhabditis elegans. Ann Med 32: 23–30

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Ahringer J 1997 Turn to the worm!. Curr Opin Genet Dev 7: 410–415

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Culetto E, Sattelle DB 2000 A role for Caenorhabditis elegans in understanding the function and interactions of human disease genes. Hum Mol Genet 9: 869–877

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    O'Kane CJ 2003 Modelling human diseases in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 14: 3–10

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Sonnhammer EL, Durbin R 1997 Analysis of protein domain families in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genomics 46: 200–216

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Wheelan SJ, Boguski MS, Duret L, Makalowski W 1999 Human and nematode orthologs–lessons from the analysis of 1800 human genes and the proteome of Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene 238: 163–170

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Schmidt EE, Davies CJ 2007 The origins of polypeptide domains. Bioessays 29: 262–270

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Derry WB, Putzke AP, Rothman JH 2001 Caenorhabditis elegans p53: role in apoptosis, meiosis, and stress resistance. Science 294: 591–595

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Mushegian AR, Bassett DE Jr, Boguski MS, Bork P, Koonin EV 1997 Positionally cloned human disease genes: patterns of evolutionary conservation and functional motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 5831–5836

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Rubin GM, Yandell MD, Wortman JR, Gabor Miklos GL, Nelson CR, Hariharan IK, Fortini ME, Li PW, Apweiler R, Fleischmann W, Cherry JM, Henikoff S, Skupski MP, Misra S, Ashburner M, Birney E, Boguski MS, Brody T, Brokstein P, Celniker SE, Chervitz SA, Coates D, Cravchik A, Gabrielian A, Galle RF, Gelbart WM, George RA, Goldstein LS, Gong F, Guan P, Harris NL, Hay BA, Hoskins RA, Li J, Li Z, Hynes RO, Jones SJ, Kuehl PM, Lemaitre B, Littleton JT, Morrison DK, Mungall C, O'Farrell PH, Pickeral OK, Shue C, Vosshall LB, Zhang J, Zhao Q, Zheng XH, Lewis S 2000 Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science 287: 2204–2215

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Vaux DL 2002 Apoptosis timeline. Cell Death Differ 9: 349–354

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Lockshin RA, Zakeri Z 2007 Cell death in health and disease. J Cell Mol Med 11: 1214–1224

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Sulston JE, Horvitz HR 1977 Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 56: 110–156

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN 1983 The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 100: 64–119

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Hedgecock EM, Sulston JE, Thomson JN 1983 Mutations affecting programmed cell deaths in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 220: 1277–1279

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Ellis HM, Horvitz HR 1986 Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans. Cell 44: 817–829

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Yuan J, Horvitz HR 1992 The Caenorhabditis elegans cell death gene ced-4 encodes a novel protein and is expressed during the period of extensive programmed cell death. Development 116: 309–320

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Yuan J, Shaham S, Ledoux S, Ellis HM, Horvitz HR 1993 The C. elegans cell death gene ced-3 encodes a protein similar to mammalian interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme. Cell 75: 641–652

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Trent C, Tsuing N, Horvitz HR 1983 Egg-laying defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 104: 619–647

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Hengartner MO, Ellis RE, Horvitz HR 1992 Caenorhabditis elegans gene ced-9 protects cells from programmed cell death. Nature 356: 494–499

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Conradt B, Xue D 2005 Programmed cell death. WormBook 6: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Lettre G, Hengartner MO 2006 Developmental apoptosis in C. elegans: a complex CEDnario. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 97–108

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Hengartner MO, Horvitz HR 1994 C. elegans cell survival gene ced-9 encodes a functional homolog of the mammalian proto-oncogene bcl-2. Cell 76: 665–676

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Golstein P, Kroemer G 2007 Cell death by necrosis: towards a molecular definition. Trends Biochem Sci 32: 37–43

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Syntichaki P, Tavernarakis N 2002 Death by necrosis. Uncontrollable catastrophe, or is there order behind the chaos? EMBO Rep 3: 604–609

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Hall DH, Gu G, Garcia-Anoveros J, Gong L, Chalfie M, Driscoll M 1997 Neuropathology of degenerative cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci 17: 1033–1045

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Bianchi L, Gerstbrein B, Frokjaer-Jensen C, Royal DC, Mukherjee G, Royal MA, Xue J, Schafer WR, Driscoll M 2004 The neurotoxic MEC-4(d) DEG/ENaC sodium channel conducts calcium: implications for necrosis initiation. Nat Neurosci 7: 1337–1344

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Yamashima T 2000 Implication of cysteine proteases calpain, cathepsin and caspase in ischemic neuronal death of primates. Prog Neurobiol 62: 273–295

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Chung S, Gumienny TL, Hengartner MO, Driscoll M 2000 A common set of engulfment genes mediates removal of both apoptotic and necrotic cell corpses in C. elegans. Nat Cell Biol 2: 931–937

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Xu K, Tavernarakis N, Driscoll M 2001 Necrotic cell death in C. elegans requires the function of calreticulin and regulators of Ca(2+) release from the endoplasmic reticulum. Neuron 31: 957–971

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Syntichaki P, Xu K, Driscoll M, Tavernarakis N 2002 Specific aspartyl and calpain proteases are required for neurodegeneration in C. elegans. Nature 419: 939–944

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Luke CJ, Pak SC, Askew YS, Naviglia TL, Askew DJ, Nobar SM, Vetica AC, Long OS, Watkins SC, Stolz DB, Barstead RJ, Moulder GL, Bromme D, Silverman GA 2007 An intracellular serpin regulates necrosis by inhibiting the induction and sequelae of lysosomal injury. Cell 130: 1108–1119

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Perlmutter DH 2002 Liver injury in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency: an aggregated protein induces mitochondrial injury. J Clin Invest 110: 1579–1583

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Lomas DA, Evans DL, Finch JT, Carrell RW 1992 The mechanism of Z alpha 1-antitrypsin accumulation in the liver. Nature 357: 605–607

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Lomas DA, Carrell RW 2002 Serpinopathies and the conformational dementias. Nat Rev Genet 3: 759–768

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Perlmutter DH 2006 Pathogenesis of chronic liver injury and hepatocellular carcinoma in alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. Pediatr Res 60: 233–238

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Sveger T 1988 The natural history of liver disease in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency children. Acta Paediatr Scand 77: 847–851

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Kraemer BC, Zhang B, Leverenz JB, Thomas JH, Trojanowski JQ, Schellenberg GD 2003 Neurodegeneration and defective neurotransmission in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of tauopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 9980–9985

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Link CD 1995 Expression of human beta-amyloid peptide in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 9368–9372

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Fay DS, Fluet A, Johnson CJ, Link CD 1998 In vivo aggregation of beta-amyloid peptide variants. J Neurochem 71: 1616–1625

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Link CD 2006 C. elegans models of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases: lessons from transgenic worm models of Alzheimer's disease. Exp Gerontol 41: 1007–1013

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Fonte V, Kapulkin V, Taft A, Fluet A, Friedman D, Link CD 2002 Interaction of intracellular beta amyloid peptide with chaperone proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 9439–9444

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Cohen E, Bieschke J, Perciavalle RM, Kelly JW, Dillin A 2006 Opposing activities protect against age-onset proteotoxicity. Science 313: 1604–1610

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Kraemer BC, Burgess JK, Chen JH, Thomas JH, Schellenberg GD 2006 Molecular pathways that influence human tau-induced pathology in Caenorhabditis elegans. Hum Mol Genet 15: 1483–1496

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Shao J, Diamond MI 2007 Polyglutamine diseases: emerging concepts in pathogenesis and therapy. Hum Mol Genet 16: R115–R123

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Brignull HR, Moore FE, Tang SJ, Morimoto RI 2006 Polyglutamine proteins at the pathogenic threshold display neuron-specific aggregation in a pan-neuronal Caenorhabditis elegans model. J Neurosci 26: 7597–7606

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Faber PW, Alter JR, MacDonald ME, Hart AC 1999 Polyglutamine-mediated dysfunction and apoptotic death of a Caenorhabditis elegans sensory neuron. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 179–184

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Morley JF, Brignull HR, Weyers JJ, Morimoto RI 2002 The threshold for polyglutamine-expansion protein aggregation and cellular toxicity is dynamic and influenced by aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 10417–10422

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Parker JA, Connolly JB, Wellington C, Hayden M, Dausset J, Neri C 2001 Expanded polyglutamines in Caenorhabditis elegans cause axonal abnormalities and severe dysfunction of PLM mechanosensory neurons without cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 13318–13323

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Satyal SH, Schmidt E, Kitagawa K, Sondheimer N, Lindquist S, Kramer JM, Morimoto RI 2000 Polyglutamine aggregates alter protein folding homeostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 5750–5755

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Gidalevitz T, Ben-Zvi A, Ho KH, Brignull HR, Morimoto RI 2006 Progressive disruption of cellular protein folding in models of polyglutamine diseases. Science 311: 1471–1474

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Oeda T, Shimohama S, Kitagawa N, Kohno R, Imura T, Shibasaki H, Ishii N 2001 Oxidative stress causes abnormal accumulation of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-related mutant SOD1 in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. Hum Mol Genet 10: 2013–2023

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Lakso M, Vartiainen S, Moilanen AM, Sirvio J, Thomas JH, Nass R, Blakely RD, Wong G 2003 Dopaminergic neuronal loss and motor deficits in Caenorhabditis elegans overexpressing human alpha-synuclein. J Neurochem 86: 165–172

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Alegado RA, Campbell MC, Chen WC, Slutz SS, Tan MW 2003 Characterization of mediators of microbial virulence and innate immunity using the Caenorhabditis elegans host-pathogen model. Cell Microbiol 5: 435–444

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Ausubel FM 2005 Are innate immune signaling pathways in plants and animals conserved?. Nat Immunol 6: 973–979

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Breger J, Fuchs BB, Aperis G, Moy TI, Ausubel FM, Mylonakis E 2007 Antifungal chemical compounds identified using a C. elegans pathogenicity assay. PLoS Pathog 3: e18

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Schulenburg H, Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ 2004 Evolution of the innate immune system: the worm perspective. Immunol Rev 198: 36–58

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Sadikot RT, Blackwell TS, Christman JW, Prince AS 2005 Pathogen-host interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171: 1209–1223

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Lyczak JB, Cannon CL, Pier GB 2002 Lung infections associated with cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 15: 194–222

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Tan MW, Rahme LG, Sternberg JA, Tompkins RG, Ausubel FM 1999 Pseudomonas aeruginosa killing of Caenorhabditis elegans used to identify P. aeruginosa virulence factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 2408–2413

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Graef IA, Gastier JM, Francke U, Crabtree GR 2001 Evolutionary relationships among Rel domains indicate functional diversification by recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 5740–5745

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Pujol N, Link EM, Liu LX, Kurz CL, Alloing G, Tan MW, Ray KP, Solari R, Johnson CD, Ewbank JJ 2001 A reverse genetic analysis of components of the Toll signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 11: 809–821

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    Akira S, Sato S 2003 Toll-like receptors and their signaling mechanisms. Scand J Infect Dis 35: 555–562

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Cook DN, Pisetsky DS, Schwartz DA 2004 Toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis of human disease. Nat Immunol 5: 975–979

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71

    Nurnberger T, Brunner F, Kemmerling B, Piater L 2004 Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunol Rev 198: 249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72

    Wajant H, Muhlenbeck F, Scheurich P 1998 Identification of a TRAF (TNF receptor-associated factor) gene in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Evol 47: 656–662

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73

    Couillault C, Pujol N, Reboul J, Sabatier L, Guichou JF, Kohara Y, Ewbank JJ 2004 TLR-independent control of innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans by the TIR domain adaptor protein TIR-1, an ortholog of human SARM. Nat Immunol 5: 488–494

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74

    Kim DH, Ausubel FM 2005 Evolutionary perspectives on innate immunity from the study of Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Opin Immunol 17: 4–10

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75

    Liberati NT, Fitzgerald KA, Kim DH, Feinbaum R, Golenbock DT, Ausubel FM 2004 Requirement for a conserved Toll/interleukin-1 resistance domain protein in the Caenorhabditis elegans immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 6593–6598

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76

    Crompton DW 1999 How much human helminthiasis is there in the world?. J Parasitol 85: 397–403

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77

    Ottesen EA 2002 Major progress toward eliminating lymphatic filariasis. N Engl J Med 347: 1885–1886

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78

    Holden-Dye L, Walker RJ 2007 Anthelmintic drugs. WormBook 2: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79

    Burglin TR, Lobos E, Blaxter ML 1998 Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for parasitic nematodes. Int J Parasitol 28: 395–411

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80

    Mitreva M, Blaxter ML, Bird DM, McCarter JP 2005 Comparative genomics of nematodes. Trends Genet 21: 573–581

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81

    Driscoll M, Dean E, Reilly E, Bergholz E, Chalfie M 1989 Genetic and molecular analysis of a Caenorhabditis elegans beta-tubulin that conveys benzimidazole sensitivity. J Cell Biol 109: 2993–3003

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82

    Kwa MS, Veenstra JG, Van Dijk M, Roos MH 1995 Beta-tubulin genes from the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus modulate drug resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol 246: 500–510

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83

    Lazo JS, Brady LS, Dingledine R 2007 Building a pharmacological lexicon: small molecule discovery in academia. Mol Pharmacol 72: 1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84

    Rausch O 2006 High content cellular screening. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10: 316–320

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85

    Kwok TC, Ricker N, Fraser R, Chan AW, Burns A, Stanley EF, McCourt P, Cutler SR, Roy PJ 2006 A small-molecule screen in C. elegans yields a new calcium channel antagonist. Nature 441: 91–95

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary A Silverman.

Additional information

Supported by grants from The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, The Hartwell Foundation, The Twenty-five Club of Magee-Womens Hospital, and The National Institutes of Health (DK079806).

This article contains supplementary materials, which can be found online at www.pedresearch.org.

Developmental Biology: Model Systems - A Series of Reviews

This is the fourth of five review articles focusing on model organisms currently being studied to understand developmental mechanisms. In this review, Dr. Gary Silverman examines the Caenorhabditis elegans model, which manifests different aspects of human disease phenotypes, making it ideally suited for in vivo drug discovery and target validation.

Sherin U. Devaskar, M.D.

Editor-in-Chief

ArticlePlus

Click on the links below to access all the ArticlePlus for this article.

Please note that ArticlePlus files may launch a viewer application outside of your web browser.

http://links.lww.com/PDR/A39

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silverman, G., Luke, C., Bhatia, S. et al. Modeling Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Human Disease Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Pediatr Res 65, 10–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819009b0

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links