The secreted protein sonic hedgehog (Shh) is essential for normal development of many organs. Targeted disruption of Shh in mouse leads to near complete absence of craniofacial skeletal elements at birth, and mutation of SHH in human causes holoprosencephaly (HPE), frequently associated with defects of derivatives of pharyngeal arches. To investigate the role of Shh signaling in early pharyngeal arch development, we analyzed Shh mutant embryos using molecular markers and found that the first pharyngeal arch (PA1) was specifically hypoplastic and fused in the midline, and remaining arches were well formed at embryonic day (E) 9.5. Molecular analyses using specific markers suggested that the growth of the maxillary arch and proximal mandibular arch was severely defective in Shh-null PA1, whereas the distal mandibular arch was less affected. TUNEL assay revealed an increase in the number of apoptotic signals in PA1 of Shh mutant embryos. Ectodermal expression of fibroblast growth factor (Fgf)-8, a cell survival factor for pharyngeal arch mesenchyme, was down-regulated in the PA1 of Shh mutants. Consistent with this observation, downstream transcriptional targets of Fgf8 signaling in neural crest–derived mesenchyme, including Barx1, goosecoid, and Dlx2, were also down-regulated in Shh-null PA1. These results demonstrate that epithelial-mesenchymal signaling and transcriptional events coordinated by Shh, partly via Fgf8, is essential for cell survival and tissue outgrowth of the developing PA1.
Pharyngeal arches are bilaterally symmetric ventral structures that develop in a segmental fashion along the anteroposterior axis during embryogenesis (1). The first pharyngeal arch (PA1), which in mammals develops into jaws, lateral skull wall, teeth, middle ear, and part of the tongue and other soft tissue derivatives, is formed as the most rostral and earliest pharyngeal arch beginning at E8.25 in the mouse embryo. This arch rapidly increases in size as it is populated by mesenchyme derived from cranial NCC and develops into the mandibular and maxillary arches at E9.5.
Appropriate epithelial-mesenchymal signaling is essential for proper development of the pharyngeal arches. Genetic analyses in mice provide evidence that numerous homeobox genes, including Msx, Dlx, goosecoid (Gsc), and Prx, and other transcription factors, such as Hand2, are expressed in pharyngeal arch mesenchyme and play essential roles in development of PA1 (1,2).
Members of the Fgf family, particularly Fgf8, are epithelial signals that regulate gene expression during PA1 development (3,4). Inactivation of mouse Fgf8 specifically in PA1 epithelium revealed that Fgf8 promotes mesenchymal cell survival and induces a developmental program required for PA1 morphogenesis (5). Members of the Bmp family also have important roles in outgrowth of PA1 (4). PA1 development appears very sensitive to the level of Bmp signaling during the initial outgrowth phase, and the level of Bmp signaling is tightly regulated by various factors (6).
The secreted protein Shh, a vertebrate ortholog of the Drosophila segment polarity gene, Hedgehog, is essential for normal development of many organs and is implicated as a cause of HPE. Shh is expressed in the pharyngeal arch epithelium and targeted disruption of Shh in mouse leads to near complete absence of craniofacial skeletal elements along with multiple organ defects (7). Recent studies using chick and mouse embryos have suggested that Shh may play a role in NCC development and pharyngeal pouch patterning (8–10).
Here, we analyzed the developing pharyngeal arches in Shh mutant embryos and found that Shh may be required for outgrowth of PA1 by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal interactions partly via Fgf signaling pathways that ultimately promote cell survival of mesenchymal cells in PA1.
Mouse genetic studies.
Mice heterozygous for the Shh mutation or the Pax3-Cre transgene were previously described (7,11). Pax3-Cre transgenic mice were crossed with lacZ reporter mice (Rosa26 reporter: R26R) (12). These mice were crossed and pregnant mothers were killed at E8.5–9.5 to obtain Shh−/−/Pax3-Cre:R26R and Shh−/− embryos. This study has been approved by University of Texas Animal Care and Use Committee.
Embryos were dissected, fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde/PBS with phenol red, and stained in Xgal solution as described previously (13).
Whole-mount and section RNA in situ hybridization.
Whole-mount RNA in situ hybridizations were performed using digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobes as described previously (13). Section RNA in situ hybridizations were performed on paraffin-embedded sections of mouse embryos as described previously (14).
TUNEL analysis and cell proliferation assay.
TUNEL analysis was performed on paraffin sections using apoptosis detection kit (ApopTag, Intergen, Purchase, NY) following manufacturer's protocol with the blue fluorescent DAPI nucleic acid stain (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Cell proliferation assay was performed on paraffin section by immunohistochemistry with purified mouse anti-human Ki-67 antibody (2.5 μg/mL) (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) using VECTASTAIN ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) following manufacturer's protocol.
Bead experiments on cultured first pharyngeal arch explants.
The first pharyngeal arches were dissected in DMEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) from E9.5 embryos and cultured on membrane filter (Transwell, Corning, Palo Alto, CA). Bead experiments were performed as described previously (15). Explants were washed in PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C, and then subjected to whole-mount in situ hybridization for Fgf8 expression.
Hypoplasia and midline fusion of the first pharyngeal arches in Shh mutant mice.
To examine how Shh signaling might regulate early pharyngeal arch development, we analyzed the developing pharyngeal arches in Shh mutant embryos. At E9.5, Shh mutant embryos were grossly thinner and smaller in the head with hypoplasia of PA1 compared with wild-type littermates, but were similar in length (cranial to caudal) (Fig. 1). Morphometrics of PA1 in wild-type versus Shh mutant embryos demonstrated sizes of 0.405 ± 0.033 mm versus 0.281 ± 0.039 mm along the dorsal-ventral axis, respectively, and 0.313 ± 0.019 mm versus 0.142 ± 0.015 mm along the anteroposterior axis, respectively (p < 0.05 along both axes). In addition to morphologic and histologic indications, hypoplasia of PA1 was demonstrated using a unique property of the Pax3-Cre/R26R transgenic mouse line. In this mouse line, a population of NCC and their progeny can be marked with lacZ by Cre-mediated recombination under control of the Pax3 promoter, which drives transcription specifically in the early migratory NCC that populate the second to fourth pharyngeal arches, but not PA1 (Fig. 1, B and C). We crossed these transgenic mice into the Shh-null background, and stained the obtained embryos with X-gal. The hypoplastic arch in Shh mutants was PA1 as marked by exclusion of lacZ expression (Fig. 1G). In frontal view, PA1 of Shh mutants appeared as a single hypoplastic arch structure with the bilateral PA1s being fused in the midline anterior to the second pharyngeal arches (Fig. 1H). This analysis also demonstrated relatively normal size and patterning of second to fourth pharyngeal arches at E9.5, indicating that NCC migration into second to fourth arches was grossly normal in Shh mutants (Fig. 1, G and H). Histologic analyses suggested a small and fused single arch structure in the midline, absence of the maxillary component and hypoplasia of the mandibular component of PA1 in Shh mutants (Fig. 1I) compared with wild-type embryos (Fig. 1D), although bilaterally symmetric PA1 were initially developed at E8.5 in Shh mutant embryos (Fig. 1J).
To elucidate a mechanism for the PA1 defect in Shh mutant embryos, we performed in situ hybridization using markers specific for PA1 development. Bmp4 is normally expressed in numerous embryonic domains, including the distal epithelium of the mandibular, maxillary, and frontonasal region, as well as the cardiac outflow tract at E9.5 (Fig. 2, A and M) (16,17). In Shh mutant embryos, the expression of Bmp4 was specifically absent in the maxillary epithelium, whereas its expression in the mandibular and frontonasal epithelium, and the cardiac outflow tract was intact (Fig. 2, D and P). Mhox and Dlx3 are expressed in maxillary and mandibular mesenchyme derived from NCC in wild-type embryos at E9.5 (Fig. 2, B and C). Their expressions were undetectable in the maxillary component, but detectable in the mandibular component of Shh mutant embryos (Fig. 2, E and F). Consistent with these results, the expression of Dlx6 and Hand2, detectable only in the distal mandibular mesenchyme of wild-type embryos at E9.5 (Fig. 2, G and H), were unaltered in Shh mutant embryos (Fig. 2, J and K). In transverse sections of the mandibular arch at E9.5, expression of Bmp4 was detectable only in the distal epithelium of wild-type embryos (Fig. 2M), however, it was detected throughout the PA1 epithelium of Shh mutants (Fig. 2P), suggesting that the proximal mandibular component might be hypoplastic in the Shh mutant PA1. The Bmp4 expression domain in the medial epithelium of PA1 was absent in mutants and the ectodermal epithelium of right and left PA1 appeared to be continuous in Shh mutant embryos (Fig. 2P), probably reflecting a midline defect of the Shh mutant PA1. A defective proximal mandibular component and midline structure of PA1 in Shh mutants was further demonstrated by the expression pattern of Hand genes in transverse sections at E9.5. Hand2 is normally expressed in mesenchyme of the distal, but not proximal, region of the mandibular arch (Fig. 2, H and N). In Shh mutant embryos, the expression of Hand2 was homogenously detectable in PA1 (Fig. 2Q), further suggesting that the proximal region of mandibular arch was severely hypoplastic in these mutants. Hand 1 is normally expressed in the medial mesenchyme of PA1 (Fig. 2O). However, no expression of Hand1 was detectable in Shh mutants (Fig. 2R), consistent with a loss of midline structure in PA1.
In spite of the PA1 defect, expression of the endodermal marker, Pax9, was normally detected in the pharyngeal endoderm (pharyngeal pouches) of Shh mutants at E9.5 (Fig. 2L) compared with wild type embryos (Fig. 2I), suggesting that initial endodermal development and pharyngeal patterning were unaffected in mouse embryos lacking Shh by E9.5. Significant expressions of the NCC-derived mesenchymal cell markers, Mhox (Fig. 2E), Dlx3 (Fig. 2F), Dlx6 (Fig. 2J) and Hand2 (Fig. 2K) were observed in PA1 as well as other arches of Shh mutant embryos at E9.5, indicating that NCC could, at least in part, migrate and differentiate in PA1. Taken together, Shh signaling may be critical for proper outgrowth of PA1, especially the maxillary arch and the proximal region of mandibular arch, in addition to establishment of the midline structure during PA1 development.
Shh is required for survival of mesenchymal cells in the first pharyngeal arch.
To test whether the failure of PA1 outgrowth in Shh mutant embryos might be the result of a cell survival defect, we performed TUNEL assays on tissue sections to mark apoptotic cells. Little apoptosis was detected in PA1 of wild type at E9.0–9.5 (Fig. 3, A–D). In contrast, a progressive increase in apoptosis was detected in Shh mutants, mainly in the proximal region at E9.0 (Fig. 3, F and G), and throughout PA1 mesenchyme at E9.5 (Fig. 3, H and I). Enhanced apoptotic signals were detectable only in PA1, but not in the second and third arches at E9.5 (Fig. 3, H and I). In contrast, cell proliferation assayed by immunohistochemistry using anti-Ki-67 antibody appeared relatively normal in PA1 of Shh mutants at E9.5 (Fig. 3J) compared with wild-type embryos (Fig. 3E). These results suggest that hypoplasia of PA1 in Shh mutants at E9.5 is mainly due to apoptosis of a substantial proportion of the cells that normally give rise to PA1.
Shh is required for epithelial-mesenchymal signaling in the first pharyngeal arch.
In addition to Bmp4, Fgf8 is a critical signaling molecule that transmits survival signals from the epithelial cells to the adjacent mesenchyme (4–6). In contrast to Bmp4, which is expressed in the epithelia, albeit in an abnormal pattern (Fig. 2, D and P), Fgf8 was specifically down-regulated in the ectodermal epithelium of PA1 in Shh mutants at E9.5 (Fig. 4, F and G), coinciding with the extensive apoptosis observed. The expression of Fgf8 in the second and third pharyngeal regions was normal at this stage.
Because Fgf8 was down-regulated in Shh mutants, we examined expression of several transcription factors that are downstream of Fgf8 signaling in the pharyngeal arch mesenchyme (2,5). Genes encoding the homeobox transcription factors Barx1, Gsc, and Dlx2 are expressed in NCC-derived mesenchymal cells in the PA1 and other pharyngeal arches (Fig. 4, C–E), and their expression is dependent upon Fgf8 signaling. Consistent with down-regulation of Fgf8, expression of Barx1, Gsc, and Dlx2 were decreased in the PA1 of Shh mutants at E9.5, whereas expressions in other arches were normal (Fig. 4, H–J). These results indicate that the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions mediated by Fgf8 signaling were affected in PA1 of Shh mutant embryos.
To determine whether Shh can activate Fgf8 expression, we attempted to induce Fgf8 mRNA with Shh-soaked beads in cultured PA1. Compared with the control PA1 cultured with BSA-soaked beads, the expression level of Fgf8 was elevated in PA1 cultured with Shh-soaked beads (Fig. 5A). Despite the limitations of this experiment using cultured tissues, it supports the observation in Shh mutants that Fgf8 may function downstream of Shh signaling during PA1 development.
Shh signaling plays a primary role for early PA1 development.
In this report, we analyzed pharyngeal arch development in Shh mutant embryos, focusing on PA1, and demonstrated that bilateral PA1 initially form, but they become hypoplastic, resulting in a single fused structure in the midline by E9.5. Exposure to the Shh inhibitor, jervine, at E7.5 frequently leads to only forebrain defects, but no mandibular defects, whereas susceptibility for mandibular defects is highest when pregnant mice are treated around E9.5 (18). A recent study demonstrated that mice lacking Hh-responsiveness specifically in cranial NCC showed a hypoplastic PA1 without mid- or forebrain defects at E11.5 (9). Taken together, the PA1 defect in Shh mutants at E9.5 presented in this study is likely to be a primary defect resulting from lack of Shh signaling.
Our analyses did not address whether NCC migration into PA1 was altered in Shh mutant embryos. Significant expression of the NCC-derived mesenchymal cell markers, Mhox, Dlx3, Dlx6, and Hand2, was observed in PA1 as well as other arches of Shh mutant embryos at E9.5, indicating that NCC could, at least in part, migrate and differentiate in PA1. However, it remains to be elucidated whether appropriate amounts of NCC migrate into PA1 in absence of Shh signaling, inasmuch as Smoak et al. (19) suggested that NCC were migrating along abnormal pathways in Shh mutant embryos based on the expression of NCC markers, CrabP1 and AP2α.
Our analyses revealed the severe hypoplasia of the maxillary component and the proximal mandibular component, and defective midline development of PA1 in Shh mutants (Fig. 5C). The distal mandibular component where Hand2, Mhox, Dlx3, and Dlx6 are highly expressed was less affected. In the current concept of PA1 or jaw development, it has been proposed that “maxillary” and “mandibular” precursors are from distinct origins (20,21), and that identities of “maxillary,” “proximal mandibular,” and “distal mandibular” components are controlled by specific sets of transcription factors and signaling molecules (4). Shh signaling appears to be, directly or indirectly (see discussion below), more critical for development of maxillary and proximal mandibular region, and establishment of midline structure than identities of the distal mandibular region.
Enhanced apoptosis and altered epithelial-mesenchymal interactions lead to severe hypoplasia of PA1 in Shh mutants.
Our data suggest that the hypoplastic PA1 in Shh mutant embryos is mainly as a result of enhanced apoptosis in PA1 mesenchyme, indicating that Shh signaling functions in survival of PA1 mesenchymal cells. This is consistent with the observation that blocking Shh signaling in chick embryos by anti-Shh antibody results in significant increase in apoptosis in NCC-derived mesenchyme in pharyngeal arches (8), and recent experiments using lysotracker red (molecular probes) (10,19). Enhanced apoptosis of mesenchymal cells was also documented in PA1 of Wnt1-Cre; Smon/c mouse embryos that were created by crossing mice harboring the Wnt1-Cre transgene with those that contain loxP sites around the Shh receptor Smoothened (Smo) to remove Hh-signaling specifically in the cranial NCC lineage (9).
Whether Shh directly acts as a survival factor for mesenchymal cells in PA1 remains to be studied. Mesenchymal cells in PA1 can directly respond to Shh signaling, as they express the Shh receptors, Smo and Patced (Ptc), and the Gli family of transcription factors that transduce Shh signaling (4,22). Jeong et al. (17) have proposed a model in which Shh signaling directly regulates growth of pharyngeal arches via combinatorial expression of several forkhead (Fox) transcription factors, and we have previously reported that Foxc2 can mediate Shh signaling in craniofacial and cardiovascular development (23). These observations suggest that Shh signaling may directly play a role in survival of mesenchymal cells and growth of PA1 through epithelial-mesenchymal interaction.
Alternatively, it is also possible that Shh signaling may promote mesenchymal cell survival in PA1 by regulating the expression of other growth factors. Our molecular analysis revealed that Fgf8 expression was down-regulated in PA1 ectoderm of Shh mutants at E9.5. Tissue-specific inactivation of Fgf8 by Cre-mediated recombination in the ectoderm of the PA1 leads to mesenchymal cell death around E9.5 and impairs development of PA1 (5), suggesting that Fgf8 is required, directly or indirectly, for survival of neural crest–derived mesenchyme in PA1. We also observed down-regulation of pharyngeal mesenchyme markers, Barx1, Gsc, and Dlx2, that are putative targets of Fgf8 signaling in PA1 of Shh mutant embryos. Fgf8 is normally able to induce expression of these genes, whereas Shh alone is not sufficient (3–5). In addition, other mesenchymal markers, including Hand2, Mhox, and Dlx3 were not down-regulated in Shh mutants, suggesting that there was not a generalized defect of the pharyngeal arch mesenchyme. Consistent with the idea that Shh signaling functions upstream of Fgf8 in PA1 development, Shh mutants have more severe PA1 defects than those that result from tissue-specific loss of Fgf8 function in PA1, where only the proximal region of PA1 is most severely affected (5). Our result that Fgf8 is activated by Shh-soaked beads in PA culture supports this idea. We therefore favor the interpretation that the PA1 phenotype of Shh mutants, at least in part, reflects a lack of Fgf8 signaling during critical epithelial-mesenchymal interactions (Fig. 5B), although we still cannot rule out the possibility that Fgf8 expression is decreased secondary to the morphologic defect.
Implication in human diseases.
Mild midline defects of PA1 may lead to SMMCI. Interestingly, SMMCI is suggested as a characteristic finding in HPE patients with SHH mutations (24). In addition, SHH mutations have been identified not only in SMMCI with HPE, but also SMMCI without HPE (24,25). These findings are consistent with a primary role of Shh in PA1 as suggested in our study.
Severe hypoplasia of PA1 in humans, on the other hand, leads to agnathia or micrognathia. Agnathia alone occurs very rarely, and is often associated with HPE and sometimes with situs inversus totalis (25,26), all of which occur in the setting of SHH disruption in mouse and human. Moreover, Shh lies upstream of Tbx1, a major genetic determinant of DiGeorge/22q11.2 deletion syndrome that is often associated with micrognathia (15,23). It is intriguing to speculate that Shh is not only a disease gene for HPE but also a genetic modifier of other human syndromes associated with agnathia/micrognathia.
bone morphogenic protein
fibroblast growth factor
neural crest cells
first pharyngeal arch
solitary median maxillary central incisor
Graham A 2003 Development of the pharyngeal arches. Am J Med Genet A 119: 251–256
Richman JM, Lee SH 2003 About face: signals and genes controlling jaw patterning and identity in vertebrates. Bioessays 25: 554–568
Tucker AS, Yamada G, Grigoriou M, Pachnis V, Sharpe PT 1999 Fgf-8 determines rostral-caudal polarity in the first branchial arch. Development 126: 51–61
Tucker AS, Al Khamis A, Ferguson CA, Bach I, Rosenfeld MG, Sharpe PT 1999 Conserved regulation of mesenchymal gene expression by Fgf-8 in face and limb development. Development 126: 221–228
Trumpp A, Depew MJ, Rubenstein JL, Bishop JM, Martin GR 1999 Cre-mediated gene inactivation demonstrates that FGF8 is required for cell survival and patterning of the first branchial arch. Genes Dev 13: 3136–3148
Massague J, Chen YG 2000 Controlling TGF-beta signaling. Genes Dev 14: 627–644
Chiang C, Litingtung Y, Lee E, Young KE, Corden JL, Westphal H, Beachy PA 1996 Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature 383: 407–413
Ahlgren SC, Bronner-Fraser M 1999 Inhibition of sonic hedgehog signaling in vivo results in craniofacial neural crest cell death. Curr Biol 9: 1304–1314
Jeong J, Mao J, Tenzen T, Kottmann AH, McMahon AP 2004 Hedgehog signaling in the neural crest cells regulates the patterning and growth of facial primordia. Genes Dev 18: 937–51
Moore-Scott BA, Manley NR 2005 Differential expression of Sonic hedgehog along the anterior-posterior axis regulates patterning of pharyngeal pouch endoderm and pharyngeal endoderm-derived organs. Dev Biol 278: 323–335
Epstein JA, Li J, Lang D, Chen F, Brown CB, Jin F, Lu, Thomas M, Liu E, Wessels A, Lo CW 2000 Migration of cardiac neural crest cells in Splotch embryos. Development 127: 1869–1878
Soriano P 1999 Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 21: 70–71
Yamagishi H, Olson EN, Srivastava D 2000 The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, dHAND, is required for vascular development. J Clin Invest 105: 261–270
Yamagishi H, Yamagishi C, Nakagawa O, Harvey RP, Olson EN, Srivastava D 2001 The combinatorial activities of Nkx2.5 and dHAND are essential for cardiac ventricle formation. Dev Biol 239: 190–203
Garg V, Yamagishi C, Hu T, Kathiriya IS, Yamagishi H, Srivastava D 2001 Tbx1, a DiGeorge syndrome candidate gene, is regulated by sonic hedgehog during pharyngeal arch development. Dev Biol 235: 62–73
Zakin L, DeRobertis EM 2004 Inactivation of mouse Twisted gastrulation reveals its role in promoting Bmp4 activity during forebrain development. Development 131: 413–424
Liu W, Selever J, Wang D, Lu MF, Moses KA, Schwartz RJ, Martin JF 2004 Bmp4 signaling is required for outflow-tract septation and branchial-arch artery remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 4489–4494
ten Berge D, Brouwer A, Korving J, Reijnen MJ, van Raaij EJ, Verbeek F, Gaffield W, Meijlink F 2001 Prx1 and Prx2 are upstream regulators of sonic hedgehog and control cell proliferation during mandibular arch morphogenesis. Development 128: 2929–2938
Washington Smoak I, Byrd NA, Abu-Issa R, Goddeeris MM, Anderson R, Morris J, Yamamura K, Klingensmith J, Meyers EN 2005 Sonic hedgehog is required for cardiac outflow tract and neural crest cell development. Dev Biol 283: 357–372
Lee SH, Bedard O, Buchtova M, Fu K, Richman JM 2004 A new origin for the maxillary jaw. Dev Biol 276: 207–224
Cerny R, Lwigale P, Ericsson R, Meulemans D, Epperlein HH, Bronner-Fraser M 2004 Developmental origins and evolution of jaws: new interpretation of “maxillary” and “mandibular”. Dev Biol 276: 225–236
McMahon AP, Ingham PW, Tabin CJ 2003 Developmental roles and clinical significance of hedgehog signaling. Curr Top Dev Biol 53: 1–114
Yamagishi H, Maeda J, Hu T, McAnally J, Conway SJ, Kume T, Meyers EN, Yamagishi C, Srivastava D 2003 Tbx1 is regulated by tissue-specific forkhead proteins through a common Sonic hedgehog-responsive enhancer. Genes Dev 17: 269–281
Nanni L, Ming JE, Du Y, Hall RK, Aldred M, Bankier A, Muenke M 2001 SHH mutation is associated with solitary median maxillary central incisor: a study of 13 patients and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 102: 1–10
Garavelli L, Zanacca C, Caselli G, Banchini G, Dubourg C, David V, Odent S, Gurrieri F, Neri G 2004 Solitary median maxillary central incisor syndrome: clinical case with a novel mutation of sonic hedgehog. Am J Med Genet A 127: 93–95
Leech RW, Bowlby LS, Brumback RA, Schaefer GB Jr 1988 Agnathia, holoprosencephaly, and situs inversus: report of a case. Am J Med Genet 29: 483–490
The authors thank J.A. Richardson and members of the Molecular Pathology Core for assistance with histologic analysis and section in situ hybridization, S. Johnson for preparation of figures, and K. Uchida for helpful comments. We also thank C. Chiang for Shh mice; J.A. Epstein for Pax3-Cre mice; H. Yanagisawa (Dlx6, Mhox), D.E. Clouthier (Barx1), Richard Behringer (GSC), B.L.M. Hogan (Bmp4), and E.N. Meyers (Fgf8) for probes; and E.N. Meyers for mouse embryos.
About this article
Cite this article
Yamagishi, C., Yamagishi, H., Maeda, J. et al. Sonic Hedgehog Is Essential for First Pharyngeal Arch Development. Pediatr Res 59, 349–354 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1203/01.pdr.0000199911.17287.3e
This article is cited by
Embryonic tongue morphogenesis in an organ culture model of mouse mandibular arches: blocking Sonic hedgehog signaling leads to microglossia
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal (2016)
Essential roles of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, Capsulin and Musculin, during craniofacial myogenesis of zebrafish
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2011)
Zebrafish con/disp1 reveals multiple spatiotemporal requirements for Hedgehog-signaling in craniofacial development
BMC Developmental Biology (2009)