Main

Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute febrile vasculitis of infants and children and is accompanied by the coronary artery lesions (CALs) that occur in 5–16% of patients (1,2). Even after the introduction of high-dose i.v. immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy, CAL occurs in a small proportion of KD patients and leads to life-threatening complications, including myocardial infarction, as well as acquired heart diseases such as myocardial dysfunction, valvular diseases, and arrhythmias (3,4). Therefore, it is important to identify as early as possible KD patients who are at risk for the development of CAL.

During the acute stage of KD, activation of the immune system with increased serum cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ, IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8 may play important roles in the occurrence of endothelial cell injury (57). The pathologic findings of vascular tissues in KD patients include subendothelial edema, vascular damage, gap formation, and fenestration of endothelial cells (8,9). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a molecule that promotes microvascular hyperpermeability and two major receptors for VEGF, known as VEGF-R1 [fms-related tyrosine kinase-1 (FLT-1)] and VEGF-R2 [kinase insert domain receptor (KDR)], are expressed exclusively in vascular endothelial cells. Because systemic overproduction of VEGF has been demonstrated in acute KD, VEGF is considered to be involved in the pathophysiology of KD, especially in the development of CALs (1014). In contrast to the other cytokines described above, which are largely produced by immune cells, VEGF in KD seems to be produced mainly by vascular smooth muscle cells (14). If stimulation or destruction of smooth muscle cells by inflammation of surrounding vascular tissues induces VEGF release from the cells, then it is suggested that serum VEGF levels reflect the severity of vasculitis. From a clinical point of view, serum VEGF level at diagnosis was found to be an independent major risk factor for the occurrence of CALs (12).

In previous reports, several genetic polymorphisms, such as tumor necrosis factor-α gene and CD14 gene, were associated with KD occurrence and/or the development of CALs (15,16). However, these studies did not include functional assays or multivariate analysis with clinical data. With respect to the VEGF gene, recent studies have shown that two genetic polymorphisms regulate the production of VEGF protein (1719). On the assumption that these genetic variations of VEGF and its receptor genes influence the systemic production of VEGF and its effects on vascular endothelial cells in KD patients and consequently contribute to the development of CALs, we analyzed the genetic polymorphisms of VEGF and its receptor genes in KD patients and investigated whether these genes would contribute to the KD occurrence or the development of CALs.

METHODS

Patients and control subjects.

The diagnosis of KD was made by the clinical criteria of the Japan Kawasaki Disease Research Committee (20), and the CAL was defined as the lumen diameter being at least 3 mm (>5 y of age, 4 mm) or the internal diameter of a segment at least 1.5 times as large as that of an adjacent segment (21). The clinical courses, initial laboratory data on admission, and echocardiograms or cardiac catheterization findings were examined retrospectively from their medical records. Informed consent was obtained from patients or their parents before study, and the Ethical Committees of Kyushu University and Fukuoka Children's Hospital approved the study. The study population consisted of 41 KD patients with CAL (28 boys and 13 girls) and 62 without CAL (37 boys and 25 girls) and 144 healthy control subjects. The age at diagnosis was 25.1 ± 23.6 mo (mean ± SD). All patients received acetylsalicylic acid, and 87 (84.5%) patients received IVIG and their initial administration was on day 5.2 ± 2.0 (mean ± SD) of illness. Other clinical and laboratory data are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical and laboratory data of KD patients

DNA extraction.

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole-blood leukocytes with QIAamp blood kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan).

Nomenclature for polymorphisms.

The description of polymorphisms in this article is based on the nomenclature recommendations by den Dunnen et al. (22). Nucleotide +1 is the A of the ATG-translation initiation codon, and the nucleotide 5′ to +1 is numbered −1. A letter preceding the description indicates the type of reference sequence as follows: g. for genomic sequence and c. for cDNA sequence.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of VEGF gene polymorphisms.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of VEGF g.−634 G>C and g.+13553 C>T single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was carried out as described previously (17,18).

Genotyping of KDR gene polymorphisms for association study.

Eight SNPs and one AC repeat polymorphism were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (accession no. NT_0022853) and are as follows: two (g.+11903 G>A and g.+18487 A>T) in that coding region that causes amino acid changes; five (g.−907 T>C, g.−680 G>A, g.−608 T>C, g.−566 C>T, g.−273 G>A) in the promoter region; one (g.+1786 T>A) in intron 1; and one AC repeat polymorphism [g.+4422(AC)11–14] in the intron 2, which was previously reported as a deletion/insertion polymorphism (National Center for Biotechnology Information SNP cluster ID: rs3034659).

All PCRs for genotyping were carried out under the same condition (35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s) with various annealing temperatures for respective amplifications. Table 2 shows all primer sequences for determination of KDR gene polymorphisms and their melting temperatures.

Table 2 Primers for genotyping of KDR gene polymorphisms

The g.+11903 G>A SNP in exon 7 was amplified by PCR and determined by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis with Gene Gel Excel 12.5/24 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotec, Uppsala, Sweden), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Single-strand DNA fragments in gel were visualized by subsequent silver staining. The g.+18487 A>T SNP in exon 11 was amplified by PCR, and the PCR products were digested with Nla III (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was carried out by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel and visualization with ethidium bromide staining. The 188-bp PCR product with g.+18487 T was digested into 124- and 64-bp fragments, whereas that with g.+18487 A was not. The five SNPs (g.−273 G>A, g.−566 C>T, g.−608 T>C, g.−680 G>A, and g.−907 T>C) in the promoter region were genotyped by PCR-mediated direct sequencing. The g.+1786 T>A SNP in intron 1 was amplified by PCR and determined by single-strand conformation polymorphism as described above. The DNA with g.+4422(AC)11–14 dinucleotide repeat polymorphism site was amplified by PCR. The 5′ end of the forward primer was labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein dye. Genotyping was performed using a fluorescence-based technique by an ABI prism 310 genetic analyzer and GeneScan analysis software (Perkin-Elmer).

Genotyping of FLT-1 gene microsatellite polymorphisms using PCR and a fluorescence-based technique.

The FLT1 c.+6724(TG)13–23 polymorphism site was amplified by PCR as described previously (23). Genotyping with a fluorescence-based technique was performed as described above.

Functional analysis of KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphism by dual luciferase assay.

The constructs used in the analysis are shown in Fig. 1. The pKDR-LUC plasmid was pGL3-Basic vector (Promega) with the KDR promoter region from −417 to −6 (24) incorporated into the KpnI-SacI site. A 937-bp KDR DNA fragment from +4111 to +5047 containing the polymorphism site was obtained from homozygous individuals and subcloned into the SacI-MluI site of pKDR-LUC plasmid. All PCRs for KDR DNA fragments were used with Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and the constructs were verified by sequencing analysis.

Figure 1
figure 1

pKDR-LUC plasmid: A 412-bp KDR promoter region was incorporated upstream of the luciferase gene (LUC) into pGL3-Basic Vector. pKDR-(AC)n-LUC plasmid: A 937-bp fragment containing a polymorphism site was incorporated downstream of the KDR promoter region in pKDR-LUC plasmid.

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and HeLa cells were cultured in HuMedia-EG2 medium (Kurabo, Osaka, Japan) and in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% FCS and 50 μg/mL streptomycin, respectively, at 37°C, under 95% humidified air, with 5% CO2.

HUVECs and HeLa cells were suspended and seeded into six-well plates (3 × 105 cells/well). One day later, 0.1 μg of each vector and 0.1 μg of Renilla luciferase vector (pRL-TK Renilla), as internal control, were introduced into HUVECs and HeLa cells by the lipofection method using Lipofectamine plus (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD). Twenty-four hours later, firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). Luciferase activity was calculated as the ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase activity. Transfections were performed in duplicate for each vector and repeated three times.

Statistics.

For the evaluation of clinical and laboratory data, a Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare parameters between groups with and without CAL. As for genotyping, the fit to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested by calculating the χ2 for goodness of fit. Differences of allele or genotype frequencies between groups were evaluated by χ2 analysis. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. When frequencies of three genotypes were compared, corrected p values (pc) were obtained by multiplying the uncorrected p values by 3 using Bonferroni inequality method. A value of pc < 0.05 was considered significant. Haplotype frequencies for pairs of alleles in the KD population (n = 103) were estimated using the estimating haplotype frequencies software program (http://linkage.rockefeller.edu/ott/eh.htm). Linkage disequilibrium coefficients D′ = D/Dmax and χ2 values were calculated using the method described by Lewontin (25). The clinical and laboratory data shown in Table 1 and other nominal variables such as gender, IVIG treatment (yes or no), and timing of IVIG (early: 7 days; late: 8 days) and genotypes of two polymorphisms [VEGF g.-634 G>C and KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14] were nominated for the evaluation of independent risk factors for CAL by stepwise logistic regression analysis. To analyze the data of dual luciferase assay, we used unpaired t test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Association study of two VEGF gene polymorphisms.

As shown in Table 3, the frequency of G allele of the g.−634 G>C polymorphism was significantly higher in KD patients with CAL than that in those without CAL [p = 0.012; odds ratio (OR) 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–3.84] or control subjects (p = 0.021; OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.09–3.15). This was mainly because the frequency of the GG genotype was significantly higher in KD patients with CAL compared with that in KD patients without CAL (p = 0.007; OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.34–7.03; pc = 0.021). Regarding the g.+13553 C>T polymorphism, there were no significant differences in the allele or genotype frequencies between any subject groups (data not shown).

Table 3 Allele and genotype frequencies of VEGF g.−634 G>C polymorphisms

Association study of KDR gene polymorphisms.

Table 4 shows allele and genotype frequencies of KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphism. Four types of alleles named A1 (11 AC repeats) to A4 (14 AC repeats) were identified in the Japanese population. The frequency of the A1 allele was significantly higher in the KD patients with CAL than in KD patients without CAL (p = 0.013; OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.21–5.65). In addition, the A1 allele frequency was significantly higher in KD patients with CAL than in control subjects (p = 0.040; OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.02–4.29). This was because the A1A1 genotype frequency was significantly higher in KD patients with CAL than in KD patients without CAL (p = 0.011; OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.28–7.62; pc = 0.033). A3 and A4 alleles were very rare (each one allele in only control population). The other eight SNPs showed no association with development of CAL or occurrence of KD (data not shown).

Table 4 Allele and genotype frequencies of KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphisms

Linkage disequilibriums of KDR gene polymorphisms.

Table 5 shows that there were remarkable linkage disequilibriums between the g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphism and five SNPs in the promoter region or the g.+1786 T>A in intron 1. In addition, these seven polymorphisms showed linkage disequilibrium from each other. In contrast, there was no linkage disequilibrium noted with the remaining two polymorphisms, g.+11903 G>A and g.+18487 A>T.

Table 5 KDR gene polymorphisms and their linkage disequilibriums with g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphism

Allele frequencies of FLT-1 gene microsatellite polymorphism.

Nine discrete alleles were identified in the Japanese population. No significant differences were observed in the allele and genotype frequencies of this polymorphism in the subject groups. Allele distribution was similar to that previously reported in the Japanese population (data not shown) (26).

Multivariate analysis of clinical and laboratory data, VEGF g.−634 G>C SNP, and KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphism.

Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the A1A1 genotype of KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14, long duration of fever, and high platelet count on admission were independent parameters to predict the development of CAL in KD patients (Table 6).

Table 6 Independent risk factors for CAL development by stepwise logistic regression analysis

Function of the KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphic site.

The KDR promoter activities with the polymorphic region (A1 and A2) were divided by that without the region and are shown as relative values in Fig. 2. The KDR promoter activity with the A1 allele was significantly higher than that with the A2 allele in HUVECs (p = 0.042), and there was a similar tendency in HeLa cells, as shown in Fig. 2. The SV40 promoter activities with the polymorphic region were diminished in both cells, and there were no significant differences between promoter activities with the A1 and the A2 alleles (data not shown).

Figure 2
figure 2

Relative KDR promoter activities were expressed as the ratio of the KDR promoter activities with the A1 or the A2 allele to that without the region. *p = 0.042; **p = 0.050. NS, not significant.

DISCUSSION

Among the pathologic findings of KD vasculitis, increased vascular permeability, which induces perivascular edema, is most vigorous on the fourth day of illness (8). The serum/plasma VEGF levels in KD patients seem to increase in the acute or subacute stages, and they promptly decrease in convalescent stages (11,12). VEGF induces the synthesis of interstitial collagenase, metalloproteinase (27), and plasminogen activators (28) and the development of fenestration in the endothelium of small venules and capillaries (29). VEGF is also a potent chemoattractant for monocytes (30) and induces expression of adhesion molecules on the endothelial cells (31). Thus, VEGF may exert its damaging effects by increasing microvascular permeability and perivascular edema through various mechanisms and may enhance vascular wall destruction in the acute KD phase and consequently be involved in the development of CAL. VEGF also enhances proliferation and migration of endothelial cells in collaboration with nitric oxide and may contribute to later vascular remodeling after the acute phase of KD (10,32).

Consistent with the finding that VEGF is involved in the pathophysiology of KD, especially in the development of CAL (1113), we showed that the frequencies of the G allele of VEGF g.−634 G>C SNP (previously described as +405 G/C) and the A1 allele of KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14 dinucleotide repeat polymorphism in KD patients with CAL were significantly higher than those in KD patients without CAL or control subjects.

In fact, VEGF production by LPS-stimulated mononuclear cells from individuals with the VEGF g.−634GG genotype was reported to be higher than that from those with other genotypes (18). In a study with a cell line, haplotypes that contained the +405G (newly described as g.−634) allele were associated with increased basal and stimulated VEGF promoter activity and responsiveness (19). Therefore, it is presumable that the VEGF g.−634GG genotype may affect serum/plasma VEGF levels in the acute stage of KD, although the influences of this SNP on VEGF production by vascular endothelial cells remain unknown. As for VEGF g.+13553 C>T SNP, it was not significantly associated with the development of CAL. In a previous study, plasma VEGF levels of healthy individuals in the physiologic state were significantly lower in individuals with the VEGF g.+13553T allele than in those without it (17). A possible reason for the negative result with the VEGF g.+13553 polymorphism may be because it does not affect the transcriptional induction in a pathologic state like KD. Because it was difficult to recruit a large number of patients with CAL, most DNA samples from CAL-positive patients were supplied by those with a history of KD, and little acute-phase plasma or serum was available. Further prospective study with a large number of patients will help us understand the effects of this SNP on the plasma/serum VEGF levels and the development of CAL.

Two major receptors for VEGF, known as VEGF-R1 (FLT-1) and VEGF-R2 (KDR), are expressed on vascular endothelial cells. The present study has shown that KDR g.+4422 (AC) repeat polymorphism but not FLT-1 polymorphism was significantly associated with the development of CAL. KDR is the main signaling molecule of VEGF receptor, whereas FLT-1 plays a regulatory role (33). Because there were no reports on the functional significance or disease associations of the FLT-1 c.+6724(TG)13–23 polymorphism, FLT-1 polymorphism might have less functional importance. As for six KDR SNPs in the promoter region and in intron 1 showing linkage disequilibriums with KDR g.+4422(AC) repeat polymorphism, there was no significant association between these SNPs and the development of CAL. Therefore, it is possible that this dinucleotide repeat polymorphism contributed by itself to the development of CAL. By means of the public database on the potential transcription factor binding motifs (TRANSFAC: http://transfac.gbf.de/TRANSFAC/), it was suggested that this g.+4422(AC) polymorphism locates within the possible binding site of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT), whereas other linked SNPs were not within possible transcription factor binding sites, as shown in Fig. 3. A recent study showed that ARNT-knockout conceptus had less KDR expression in the placental labyrinth of mice (34). In addition, it is known that introns regulate gene expression as enhancer/silencer in certain cases (3537). Therefore, it is possible that this polymorphism might influence the ARNT or ARNT-like molecule-mediated regulation of transcription, RNA elongation, or splicing of the KDR gene and consequently contribute to the development of CAL.

Figure 3
figure 3

KDR genomic DNA and polymorphisms that showed linkage disequilibrium. The numbers and arrows show polymorphism sites, and the transcription factor binding sites are displayed as boxes. The translation start site is in exon 1 (shown as +1).

Multivariate analysis has first demonstrated that KDR but not VEGF polymorphism served as an independent risk factor with the highest OR among clinical, laboratory, and genetic ones for the development of CAL in KD. One possible explanation for the KDR polymorphism as the strongest independent risk factor is that KDR expression is restricted to vascular endothelial cells, which play a central role in the pathophysiology of CAL (8,33).

We evaluated the functional differences of the KDR g.+4422 (AC)11–14 polymorphism between the A1 and A2 alleles by luciferase assay. The 937-bp region containing the g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphism has a silencer function in HUVECs as well as HeLa cells. In addition, the A1 allele showed a significantly weaker silencer function than the A2 allele in HUVECs. Because KDR expression is limited to endothelium at the early phase in acute KD patients, it is likely that individuals with the A1A1 genotype of this polymorphism might show a higher KDR expression in the acute KD phase, increase microvascular hyperpermeability and lead to vascular injuries, which might result in the formation of CAL through the remodeling process after the acute phase.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, Japanese KD patients with CAL showed significantly higher frequencies of the G allele in VEGF g.−634 G>C and of the A1 allele in KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphisms. Particularly, the A1A1 genotype of KDR g.+4422(AC)11–14 polymorphism was an independent risk factor for the development of CAL with the highest OR by multivariate analysis. By dual luciferase assay, this KDR polymorphism might influence the VEGF effect on the endothelium through the regulation of KDR gene expression and consequently play a role in the development of CAL in KD patients. With genetic and clinical risk factors for CAL development, the more accurate and earlier prediction of CAL would be possible in KD.