Objectives: To compare the physical growth, current health status and utilization of health care resources by extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and control (C) adolescents. Design: Cohort study. Growth measures obtained by standard techniques were plotted on Nellhaus and Tanner growth charts. Information regarding current health status/health care utilization was obtained by parent interviews using a validated questionnaire.Setting: Geographically-defined region. Participants: 154/169 (91%) ELBW survivors aged between 12 and 16 years and 125/145 (86%) sociodemographically matched term C. Neurosensory impairments were present in 28% ELBW and 2% C. Results: Growth: Significantly higher proportion of ELBW than C were ≤ 10th centile for weight (31.5% vs 7.4%, p< 0.00001) and height (28% vs 9.8%, p = 0.0004) and < 3rd centile for head circumference (15.6% vs 1.7%, p = 0.0002). Current Health: There were no differences in the incidence of accidents, acute respiratory infections, asthma, renal, cardiac, or hearing problems. Although a higher proportion of ELBW had had surgery since birth (68% vs 36%, p < 0.00001), there was no difference in surgery rates in the last 2 years. There was also no difference in proportion currently taking prescription medications. By parent report, ELBW had a higher prevalence of visual problems (57% vs 21%, p< 0.00001), seizures (7% vs 1%, p = 0.03), developmental delay (26% vs 1%, p < 0.00001), learning disabilities (34% vs 10%, p < 0.00001), hyperactivity (9% vs 2%, p = 0.04), clumsiness (25% vs 1%, p < 0.00001) and emotional problems (16% vs 7%, p = 0.04). Health problems prevented normal participation at school/play in 31% of ELBW and 9% of C (p < 0.0001).Health Care Utilization: During the previous 2 years, there were no differences in rates of hospitalizations, visits to emergency/outpatient clinics or family physicians. However, more ELBW had visited pediatricians(34% vs 14%, p = 0.0002), ophthamalogists (62% vs 34%, p = 0.00001), occupational therapists (7% vs 1%, p = 0.02) and speech therapists (8% vs 0%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: While physical growth continues to be compromised and substantial morbidity remains, there seems to be an improvement in the incidence of acute health problems and utilization of hospital/emergency room resources by ELBW in adolescence. However, ELBW still tend to have higher utilization of specialists and community resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saigal, S., Stoskopf, B., Burrows, E. et al. PHYSICAL GROWTH AND CURRENT HEALTH STATUS OF EXTREMELY LOW BIRTHWEIGHT INFANTS AND CONTROLS IN ADOLESCENCE. • 1655. Pediatr Res 39 (Suppl 4), 278 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199604001-01679
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199604001-01679