Introduction

Because π-conjugated polymers are capable of forming large area films and are compatible with various substrates such as flexible and conformable plastics, there has been much interest in their potential application in semiconductors, organic light emitting diodes, field-effect transistors and photovoltaic cells.1, 2 Among the π-conjugated polymers, polyfluorenes (PFs)3 and fluorene-based copolymers4, 5 have been extensively studied because of their exceptional optoelectronic properties. Although the self-assembly of π-conjugated polymers is known to remarkably influence device performance,6, 7 few discussions of the correlation between the optical properties and macrostructural order of fluorene-based homo- and copolymers in the film state has been reported.8, 9 Interpolymer excimer formation of π-conjugated polymer films is a particularly important factor in device fabrication.10, 11

To our knowledge, fluorene homopolymers such as poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene), POF, show only slight excimeric properties in the film state,12 although alternating copolymers such as poly(9,9-difluorofluorene-alt-9,9-dioctylfluorene), P(FF- alt -OF), previously prepared in our laboratory (Scheme 1), exhibit characteristic optoelectronic properties such as interpolymer excimer formation in highly concentrated solutions, intramolecular charge transfer and good n-type character.13, 14 Excimer formation in highly concentrated solutions implies that the alternating fluorene-based copolymers promote π–π stacking and crystallization more efficiently than fluorene homopolymers. In this paper, we report the relationships between macrostructural order and photoluminescent (PL) properties through powder X-ray diffraction and PL analysis. In addition, we also report the PL behavior of polymer blends composed of PFs and poly(methyl methacrylate), PMMA, in the film state.

Scheme 1
figure 1

Poly(fluorenes).

Experimental procedure

Poly(fluorene)s were prepared according to the previous work.13, 14, 15 PMMA was synthesized by radical polymerization of methylmethacrylate with azobis(isobutyronitrile) in toluene.

Ultraviolet-visible spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu UV-1600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Infrared spectra were taken on a JASCO FT/IR-410 infrared spectrometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) by casting the sample from a chloroform solution on a NaCl plate. Cyclic voltammetry measurements were recorded on an ALS 600A Electrochemical Analyzer (CH Instruments, Inc., Austin, TX, USA). X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded on a RIGAKU RINT2100 Ultima+/PC X-ray diffractometer (RIGAKU, Tokyo, Japan). For the electroluminescent (EL) experiment, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with poly(styrenesulfonate), as the hole-injection–transport layer, was introduced between emissive layer and indium tin oxide glass substrate cleaned by successive ultrasonic treatments. The solution of the poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(styrenesulfonate) in aqueous isopropyl alcohol was spin-coated on the surface-treated indium tin oxide substrate and dried on a hot plate for 30 min at 110 °C. On top of the poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(styrenesulfonate) layer, the emissive polymer film was obtained by spin casting toluene solution of the polymer. The emissive polymer thin film prepared had a uniform surface with a thickness of around 30 nm. The emissive film was dried in vacuum, and 1,3,5-tri(phenyl-2-benzimidazole)-benzene (10 nm), barium (3 nm), aluminum (100 nm) were deposited on the top of the polymer films through a mask by vacuum evaporation at pressures below 10−7 mm Hg, yielding active areas of 4 mm2. For the determination of the device characteristics, current density–voltage (JV) and luminance–voltage (LV) characteristics of the device was measured with a Minolta CS-1000 spectroradiometer (Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) and with a Minolta LS-110 luminance meter (Minolta). A Keithley 2400 source meter (Keithley, Cleveland, OH, USA) connected to a microcomputer (Epson Direct, Nagano, Japan) was used to operate the devices.

Results and Discussion

To explore the relationship between structural character and optical properties of PFs, POF (Mn=13400, Mw=21900, Mw/Mn=1.64), and poly(fluorene-alt-9,9-dioctylfluorene), P(HF- alt -OF) (Mn=2900, Mw=3800, Mw/Mn=1.30) were synthesized by the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling polymerization (100 °C, 48 h) of 9,9-dioctylfluorene-2,7-diboronic acid ester and 9,9-dioctyl-2,7-dibromofluorene or 2,7-dibromofluorene with tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium as a catalyst in a toluene/2 M potassium carbonate solution (Scheme 1).15 P(HF- alt -OF) (Mn=5800, Mw=18300, Mw/Mn=3.16) was synthesized using the procedure reported previously (Scheme 1).13, 14

The PL spectra of POF, P(HF- alt -OF) and P(FF- alt -OF) in chloroform solutions showed emission peaks at 416, 422 and 409 nm, respectively (Figure 1, solid line). The PL spectra in the film state were measured using a polymer thin film coated on a glass plate by spin casting. The slightly red shifted spectrum of POF in the film state compared with that in chloroform solution indicates minimal excimeric formation because of the steric hindrance of the dense dioctyl groups (Figure 1). The spectra of P(HF- alt -OF) and P(FF- alt -OF) in the film state showed emission peaks at 538 and 545 nm, respectively (Figure 1, dotted line), which are highly red shifted from those seen in chloroform solution. The large Stoke's shifts observed in the spectra of the alternating copolymers are derived from large structural differences in the polymers when in solution versus the film state. The single peaks for both alternating copolymers in the film state indicate the formation of perfect interpolymer excimers.10, 11

Figure 1
figure 2

PL spectra of POF, P(HF- alt -OF) and P(FF- alt -OF) in a dilute chloroform solution and in the film state, and EL spectrum of P(FF- alt -OF).

To exploit the perfect excimeric property of these polymers in the film state, an EL device was fabricated from P(FF- alt -OF) with the following structure: indium tin oxide anode, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(styrenesulfonate) hole-injection layer (30 nm), P(FF- alt -OF) (30 nm), 1,3,5-tris(N-phenylbenzimidazol-2-yl)benzene electron transporting layer (10 nm), barium (3 nm) and aluminum (100 nm) as a cathode. A unimodal electroluminescence was observed with a narrow emission band at 550 nm (7.1 cd m−2 at 8.5 V, 0.0048 cd A−1 at a brightness of 5.0 mA cm−2) as seen in Figure 1. The emission peak was in good agreement with the previous photoluminescence measurement. These results confirm that an excimer EL device can be easily prepared using simple PF alternating copolymers as the luminescence layer.

The macrostructural order of the fluorene-based homo- and alternating copolymer thin films were assayed by θ-2θ X-ray diffraction scans of drop-cast films.16 As shown in Figure 2, the alternating copolymers P(HF- alt -OF) and P(FF- alt -OF) exhibit crystalline patterns with distinct diffraction peaks, whereas homopolymer POF exhibits a non-crystalline (amorphous) profile. The strong peaks for the copolymers were observed at 2θ=6.94° and 6.12°, which correspond to d-spacings of 12.72 and 14.43 Å and are in good agreement with the length of the bulky dioctyl groups that are oriented perpendicular to the main chain of the polymer. These results suggest that the alternating PFs P(HF- alt -OF) and P(FF- alt -OF) have a lamellar patterned d-spacing (Figure 3). The strong broad peaks for the copolymers at ca. 2θ=20° correspond to π–π stacking distances of 4.2–4.4 Å and are similar to the distances measured previously in other fluorene-based polymeric and oligomeric semiconductors.17, 18 The existence of such peaks indicates an interdigitation packing mode as depicted in Figure 3. The formation of this characteristic packing mode, which produces perfect interpolymer excimeric fluorescence, is likely due to the presence of alternating small and large (bulky) side chains on the PFs.

Figure 2
figure 3

Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of POF, P(HF- alt -OF) and P(FF- alt -OF).

Figure 3
figure 4

Schematic diagram of the two-dimensional interdigitation packing structure for alternating fluorine copolymers with interchain d-spacing.

We proposed that with such a structure, by blending additives into the film, it could be possible to interrupt the lamellar packing of the copolymers and disrupt the π–π stacking, thus quenching the excimeric photoluminescence. The use of polymer blending to control the optical properties and morphologies of π-conjugated polymers has been reported.19, 20 To study the relationship between the macrostructural order (π–π stacking) and excimeric properties of P(HF- alt -OF) and P(FF- alt -OF) copolymers, PL measurements for films of various PF/PMMA blends were taken (Figure 4). At different ratios, P(HF- alt -OF) and P(FF- alt -OF) show two PL emission peaks at 408, 538 and 403, 545 nm, respectively (Figure 4). Quenching of the emissions at 538 and 545 nm was observed to increase with increasing PMMA content due to disruption of π–π stacking by the PMMA segments. At the same time, with increasing PMMA content the PL peaks for non-aggregated PFs at 408 and 403 nm increased. The film containing 1.0 wt% P(FF- alt -OF) showed a pale blue fluorescence similar to that observed for PF in a highly dilute solution.

Figure 4
figure 5

PL spectra of (a) POF, (b) P(HF- alt -OF) and (c) P(FF- alt -OF) in the film state at various PFs/PMMA blend ratio.

Conclusion

In conclusion, fluorene-based alternating copolymers are considered to assume an ordered macrostructure involving lamellar and π–π stacking in the film state. The ordered structure gives rise to perfect interpolymer excimeric luminescence, which can be used as a luminescence layer in an EL device. Furthermore, a gradual quenching of excimeric fluorescence and increase in the intensity of non-aggregated fluorescence for alternating copolymers in the film state occurs when blending PMMA into the polymer film. We successfully demonstrated to control the degree of macrostructural order and emission properties of π-conjugated polymer films.