Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Uranium-Lead Chronology of Chrondritic Meteorites

Abstract

MODERN radiometric estimates of the age of the Earth are at present inseparably bound up with the classic works of Patterson and his colleagues1–3 on the isotopic composition of lead in the triolite phase of iron meteorites and in bulk samples of chondritic meteorites. But it is not widely appreciated, outside the ranks of those who work directly in geochronology or meteoritics, that, judged by modern standards, the meteorite lead-lead isochron is very poorly established. Anders, has pointed out many times (see for example ref. 4) that the available evidence on uranium, thorium and lead abundances in meteorites5–8 shows that for the majority of measured chondrites there is insufficient uranium and thorium to explain the observed development of radiogenic lead. This fact was recognized by Murthy and Patterson9 who, in constructing the meteoritic lead-lead isochron, rejected most of the available data on this ground. Only for three meteorites (Beardsley, Nuevo Laredo and Richardton) are the lead and uranium data known to be in tolerable agreement.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Patterson, C. C., Proc. Conf. Nuclear Processes in Geol. Settings (Williams Bay, 1953).

  2. 2

    Patterson, C. C., Tilton, G. R., and Inghram, M. G., Science, 121, 69 (1955).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Patterson, C. C., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 10, 230 (1956).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Anders, E., in The Moon, Meteorites and Comets (edit. by Middlehurst, B. M., and Kuiper, G. P.) (Chicago, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Morgan, J. W., and Lovering, J. F., Talanta, 15, 1079 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Hess, D. C., and Marshall, R. R., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 20, 284 (1960).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Reed, G. W., Kigoshi, K., and Turkevich, A., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 20, 122 (1960).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Cobb, J. C., J. Geophys. Res., 69, 1895 (1964).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Murthy, V. R., and Patterson, C. C., J. Geophys. Res., 67, 1161 (1962).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Fleischer, R. L., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 32, 989 (1968).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Fisher, D. E., in Radioactive Dating, 309 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Marshall, R. R., and Hess, D. C., J. Chem. Phys., 28, 1258 (1958).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Cumming, G. L., Can. J. Earth Sci., 6, 719 (1969).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GALE, N., ARDEN, J. & HUTCHISON, R. Uranium-Lead Chronology of Chrondritic Meteorites. Nature Physical Science 240, 56–57 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/physci240056a0

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing