Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Vacuum Breakdown between Superconducting Electrodes

Abstract

IN this communication I report the preliminary results of a study of prebreakdown current-voltage characteristics of superconducting electrodes in a high vacuum. The small prebreakdown electron current which flows from the cathode when a sufficiently high potential difference is applied between two electrodes in a vacuum is described quantitatively by the Fowler–Nordheim equation if it is assumed that the applied electric field is enhanced by a factor β due to small projections on the cathode surface1–3. Gomer and Hulm4 have measured currents from tantalum electrodes both in the normal and superconducting states. They could detect no difference in the current, I, at temperatures below and above the transition temperature when an electric field Ewas applied.The results expressed in the form of a Fowler–Nordheim graph of against yielded straight lines throughout the temperature range 2.2 K to 270 K. By contrast, Looms et al.5 used niobium at a pressure of 10−5 torr and showed that as the temperature of the electrodes decreased from 300 K to 4.2 K, the current, at constant applied field, decreased by several orders of magnitude although no discontinuity was observed at the onset of superconductivity. Straight Fowler–Nordheim graphs were not obtained and they concluded that the data were not consistent with the Fowler–Nordheim relationship in this temperature range.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Dyke, W. P., and Trolan, J. K., Phys. Rev., 89, 799 (1953).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan, C. Grey, Handbook of Vacuum Physics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alpert, D., Lee, D. A., Lyman, E. M., and Tomaschke, H. E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech., 1, 35 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomer, R., and Hulm, J. K., J. Chem. Phys., 20, 1500 (1952).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Looms, J. S. T., Meats, R. J., and Swift, D. A., J. Phys. D, 1, 377 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klein, R., and Leder, L. B., Phys. Rev., 124, 1050 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fowler, R. H., and Nordheim, L., Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 119, 173 (1928).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Good, R. H., and Müller, E. W., Hand, der Phys., 22 (Springer, Berlin, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams, D. W., and Williams, W. T., Proc. Ninth Intern. Conf. Ionization and Gas Discharges, 87 (Bucharest, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILLIAMS, W. Vacuum Breakdown between Superconducting Electrodes. Nature Physical Science 231, 42–44 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/physci231042a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/physci231042a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing