Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Primary Care Respiratory Journal
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. primary care respiratory journal
  3. articles
  4. article
Observational study comparing intranasal mometasone furoate with oral antihistamines for rhinitis and asthma
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Intranasal fluticasone furoate in pediatric allergic rhinitis: randomized controlled study

02 October 2020

Yamei Zhang, Ping Wei, … Hongbing Yao

Asthma exacerbations and worsenings in patients aged 1–75 years with add-on tiotropium treatment

31 August 2020

J. Mark FitzGerald, Eckard Hamelmann, … Roland Buhl

The role of oral magnesium supplements for the management of stable bronchial asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

18 February 2019

Faisal Abuabat, Abdulaziz AlAlwan, … Mazen Saleh Ferwana

Comparative efficacy of inhalers in mild-to-moderate asthma: systematic review and network meta-analysis

08 April 2022

Hyung Jun Park, Jin-Young Huh, … Sei Won Lee

Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) triple therapy versus tiotropium monotherapy in patients with COPD

25 May 2021

Sandeep Bansal, Martin Anderson, … Alberto Papi

Allergic rhinitis

03 December 2020

Jean Bousquet, Josep M. Anto, … Sanna Toppila-Salmi

Key recommendations for primary care from the 2022 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) update

08 February 2023

Mark L. Levy, Leonard B. Bacharier, … Helen K. Reddel

Clinical and economic consequences of switching from omalizumab to mepolizumab in uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma

09 March 2021

Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano, Emanuela Resta, … Maria Pia Foschino Barbaro

Comparison of adverse events associated with different spacers used with non-extrafine beclometasone dipropionate for asthma

08 February 2019

Simon Wan Yau Ming, John Haughney, … David Price

  • Published: 22 June 2010

Observational study comparing intranasal mometasone furoate with oral antihistamines for rhinitis and asthma

  • David Price1,
  • Linda Kemp2,
  • Erika Sims2,
  • Julie von Ziegenweidt2,
  • Prakash Navaratnam3,
  • Amanda J Lee4,
  • Alison Chisholm2,
  • Elizabeth V Hillyer2 &
  • …
  • Gokul Gopalan5 

Primary Care Respiratory Journal volume 19, pages 266–273 (2010)Cite this article

  • 1012 Accesses

  • 13 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Aims:

Retrospective database study comparing upper and lower airway-related outcomes for patients with rhinitis and co-morbid asthma receiving mometasone furoate — an intranasal corticosteroid with low systemic bioavailability — or an oral antihistamine.

Methods:

395 patients prescribed intranasal mometasone were matched on 10 demographic and respiratory-related criteria in a 1:2 ratio to 790 patients prescribed oral antihistamine. Asthma and rhinitis control were assessed over one year using predefined composite proxy measures.

Results:

Asthma control was achieved by 309/395 (78.2%) versus 580/790 (73.4%; p=0.071) patients in the mometasone and antihistamine cohorts, respectively. Rhinitis control was achieved by 293 (74.2%) versus 539 (68.2%; p=0.035), respectively. The adjusted odds ratios for antihistamines, relative to mometasone, were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.52–0.98) for achieving asthma control and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.56–0.97) for achieving rhinitis control.

Conclusions:

Patients with rhinitis and co-morbid asthma initiating rhinitis therapy achieved significantly better upper as well as lower airway outcomes with intranasal mometasone than with oral antihistamine.

Download PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Academic Centre of Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

    David Price

  2. Research in Real Life Ltd, Norwich, UK

    Linda Kemp, Erika Sims, Julie von Ziegenweidt, Alison Chisholm & Elizabeth V Hillyer

  3. Global Outcomes Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, US

    Prakash Navaratnam

  4. Medical Statistics Team, Section of Population Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

    Amanda J Lee

  5. Global Medical Affairs Department, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, US

    Gokul Gopalan

Authors
  1. David Price
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda Kemp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erika Sims
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julie von Ziegenweidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Prakash Navaratnam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Amanda J Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alison Chisholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Elizabeth V Hillyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gokul Gopalan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Price.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

David Price has consultant arrangements with Aerocrine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dey Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, Novartis, Schering-Plough, and Teva. He or his team have received grants and research support for research in respiratory disease from the following organisations: UK National Health Service, Aerocrine, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Schering Plough, and Teva. He has spoken for Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, Pfizer, and Teva. Linda Kemp has no conflict of interest to declare.

Erika Sims has worked on projects funded by Schering Plough, Merck & Co., Inc., and Teva, and has received funding to attend conferences. Julie von Ziegenweidt has no conflict of interest to declare.

Prakash Navaratnam has a consultant arrangement with Merck & Co., Inc. He is the CEO of Eympres Research LLC, Hilliard, Ohio, USA.

Amanda J. Lee receives payment for statistical consultancy through the independent research company, Thorpe Respiratory Research. Alison Chisholm has no conflict of interest to declare.

Elizabeth V. Hillyer has done freelance writing work for Merck & Co., Inc., Aerocrine, and Teva Santé and received reimbursement for work-related travel expenses from Thorpe Respiratory Research and Merck. Gokul Gopalan is an employee of Merck & Co., Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, D., Kemp, L., Sims, E. et al. Observational study comparing intranasal mometasone furoate with oral antihistamines for rhinitis and asthma. Prim Care Respir J 19, 266–273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2010.00040

Download citation

  • Received: 16 February 2010

  • Revised: 29 April 2010

  • Accepted: 17 May 2010

  • Published: 22 June 2010

  • Issue Date: September 2010

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2010.00040

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Allergic rhinitis and asthma symptoms in a real-life study of MP-AzeFlu to treat multimorbid allergic rhinitis and asthma

    • David Price
    • Ludger Klimek
    • Joaquim Mullol

    Clinical and Molecular Allergy (2020)

  • Establishing the relationship of inhaler satisfaction, treatment adherence, and patient outcomes: a prospective, real-world, cross-sectional survey of US adult asthma patients and physicians

    • David Price
    • Brooke Harrow
    • Victoria Higgins

    World Allergy Organization Journal (2015)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Publish with us

  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Primary Care Respiratory Journal (Prim Care Respir J) ISSN 1475-1534 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • Nano
  • Protocol Exchange
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Live Expert Trainer-led workshops
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Career development

  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences
  • Nature events

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Italy
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Korea
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing