Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The FEV1/FEV6 ratio is a good substitute for the FEV1/FVC ratio in the elderly

Abstract

Aims:

To determine the agreement between the FEV1/FEV6 ratio and the FEV1/FVC ratio in an elderly population.

Method:

The study sample consisted of 3874 participants in a cross-sectional population survey in Tromso¨, Norway, aged 60 years or more, in whom acceptable spirometry had been obtained. Mean differences between the FEV1/FEV6 ratio (%) and the FEV1/FVC ratio (%) were calculated according to age, sex, smoking habit, and the degree of airflow limitation. ROC-curve analysis and Kappa-statistics were used to estimate the utility of the FEV1/FEV6 ratio in predicting an FEV1/FVC ratio< 70%.

Results:

The mean difference between FEV1/FEV6% and FEV1/FVC% was 2.7% in both men and women. The difference between the two measures increased somewhat with increasing age, and was more pronounced with smoking and decreasing FEV1/FVC ratio. The value for the FEV1/FEV6 ratio which best predicted an FEV1/FVC ratio of 70%, was 73%, and a very good agreement was found between these two cutoff values (kappa = 0.86).

Conclusion:

The FEV1/FEV6 ratio appears to be a good substitute for the FEV1/FVC ratio in an elderly population.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasse Melbye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melbye, H., Medbø, A. & Crockett, A. The FEV1/FEV6 ratio is a good substitute for the FEV1/FVC ratio in the elderly. Prim Care Respir J 15, 294–298 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrj.2006.07.002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrj.2006.07.002

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing