Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical Research

Prostate cancer diagnosis through electronic nose in the urine headspace setting: a pilot study

Abstract

Background:

To evaluate the efficacy of prostate cancer (PCa) detection by the electronic nose (EN) on human urine samples.

Methods:

Urine samples were obtained from candidates of prostate biopsy (PB). Exclusion criteria were a history of urothelial carcinoma or other malignant disease, urine infection, fasting for <12 h before PB or ingestion of alcohol or foods that might alter the urine smell in the last 24 h. The initial part of the voided urine and the midstream were collected separately in two sterile containers. Both samples were analyzed by the EN immediately after the collection. All patients underwent a standard transperineal, transrectal-ultrasound-guided PB. The pathological results were compared with the outcomes of the EN. Sensitivity and specificity of EN were assessed.

Results:

Forty-one men were included in the study. Fourteen out of the 41 patients were positive for PCa. Midstream urine did not correlate significantly neither with a positive nor with a negative PB. Instead, significantly different results on the initial part of the urine stream between positive and negative PBs were obtained. The EN correctly recognized 10 out of the 14 cases (that is, sensitivity 71.4% (confidence interval (CI) 42–92%)) of PCa while four were false negatives. Moreover, the device recognized as negative 25 out of the 27 (that is, specificity 92.6% (CI 76–99%)) samples of negative PBs, with only two false positives.

Conclusions:

We believe this is the first demonstration of an olfactory imprinting of the initial part of the urine stream in patients with PCa that was revealed by an EN, with high specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ . Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schröder FH . PSA screening—a review of recent studies. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45 (Suppl 1): 402–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stamey TA, Caldwell M, McNeal JE, Nolley R, Hemenez M, Downs J . The prostate specific antigen era in the United States is over for prostate cancer: what happened in the last 20 years? J Urol 2004; 172: 1297–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tuma RS . New tests for prostate cancer may be nearing the clinic. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 752–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsumura K, Opiekun M, Oka H, Vachani A, Albelda SM, Yamazaki K et al. Urinary volatile compounds as biomarkers for lung cancer: a proof of principle study using odor signatures in mouse models of lung cancer. PLoS One 2010; 5: e8819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cornu JN, Cancel-Tassin G, Ondet V, Girardet C, Cussenot O . Olfactory detection of prostate cancer by dogs sniffing urine: a step forward in early diagnosis. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lesniak A, Walczak M, Jezierski T, Sacharczuk M, Gawkowski M, Jaszczak K . Canine olfactory receptor gene polymorphism and its relation to odor detection performance by sniffer dogs. J Hered 2008; 99: 518–527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roine A, Tolvanen M, Sipiläinen M, Kumpulainen P, Helenius MA, Lehtimäki T et al. Detection of smell print differences between nonmalignant and malignant prostate cells with an electronic nose. Future Oncol 2012; 8: 1157–1165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Santonico M, Pennazza G, Capuano R, Falconi C, Vink TJ, Knobel HH et al. Electronic noses calibration procedure in the context of a multicentre medical study. Sens Actuators B Cheml 2012; 173: 555–561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sauerbrey G . Verwendung von Schwingquarzen zur Wägung dünner Schichten und zur Mikrowägung. Z Phys 1959; 155: 206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kneepkens CM, Lepage G, Roy CC . The potential of the hydrocarbon breath test as a measure of lipid peroxidation. Free Radic Biol Med 1994; 17: 127–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bajaj A, Miranda OR, Kim IB, Phillips RL, Jerry DJ, Bunz UH et al. Detection and differentiation of normal, cancerous, and metastatic cells using nanoparticle-polymer sensor arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 10912–10916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Filipiak W, Sponring A, Filipiak A, Ager C, Schubert J, Miekisch W et al. TD-GC-MS analysis of volatile metabolites of human lung cancer and normal cells in vitro. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19: 182–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams H, Pembroke A . Sniffer dogs in the melanoma clinic? Lancet 1989; 1: 734.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pickel D, Manucy GP, Walker DB, Hall SB, Walker JC . Evidence for canine olfactory detection of melanoma. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2004; 89: 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehmann R, Boedeker E, Friedrich U, Sagert J, Dippon J, Friedel G et al. Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 669–676.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Horvath G, Andersson H, Paulsson G . Characteristic odour in the blood reveals ovarian carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McCulloch M, Jezierski T, Broffman M, Hubbard A, Turner K, Janecki T . Diagnostic accuracy of canine scent detection in early- and late-stage lung and breast cancers. Integr Cancer Ther 2006; 5: 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sonoda H, Kohnoe S, Yamazato T, Satoh Y, Morizono G, Shikata K et al. Colorectal cancer screening with odour material by canine scent detection. Gut 2011; 60: 814–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Willis CM, Church SM, Guest CM, Cook WA, McCarthy N, Bransbury AJ et al. Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study. BMJ 2004; 329: 712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bijland LR, Bomers MK, Smulders YM . Smelling the diagnosis: a review on the use of scent in diagnosing disease. Neth J Med 2013; 71: 300–307.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gordon RT, Schatz CB, Myers LJ, Kosty M, Gonczy C, Kroener J et al. The use of canines in the detection of human cancers. J Altern Complement Med 2008; 14: 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leja MA, Liu H, Haick H . Breath testing: the future for digestive cancer detection. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 7: 389–391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. http://www.cnr.it/documenti/Istituzionali/Consuntivo/Report/Report2003_file/pdf/237-238Focus.pdf.

  25. Bajtarevic A, Ager C, Pienz M, Klieber M, Schwarz K, Ligor M et al. Noninvasive detection of lung cancer by analysis of exhaled breath. BMC Cancer 2009; 9: 348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D’Amico A, Pennazza G, Santonico M, Martinelli E, Roscioni C, Galluccio G et al. An investigation on electronic nose diagnosis of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2010; 68: 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Di Natale C, Macagnano A, Martinelli E, Paolesse R, D'Arcangelo G, Roscioni C et al. Lung cancer identification by the analysis of breath by means of an array of non-selective gas sensors. Biosens Bioelectron 2003; 18: 1209–1218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Machado RF, Laskowski D, Deffenderfer O, Burch T, Zheng S, Mazzone PJ et al. Detection of lung cancer by sensor array analyses of exhaled breath. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 1286–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Barash O, Peled N, Hirsch FR, Haick H . Sniffing the unique "odor print" of non-small-cell lung cancer with gold nanoparticles. Small 2009; 5: 2618–2624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Peled N, Hakim M, Bunn Jr PA, Miller YE, Kennedy TC, Mattei J et al. Non-invasive breath analysis of pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7: 1528–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu ZQ, Broza YY, Ionsecu R, Tisch U, Ding L, Liu H et al. A nanomaterial-based breath test for distinguishing gastric cancer from benign gastric conditions. Br J Cancer 2013; 108: 941–950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Horvath G, Chilo J, Lindblad T . Different volatile signals emitted by human ovarian carcinoma and healthy tissue. Future Oncol 2010; 6: 1043–1049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng G, Hakim M, Broza YY, Billan S, Abdah-Bortnyak R, Kuten A et al. Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors. Br J Cancer 2010; 103: 542–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Phillips M, Cataneo RN, Saunders C, Hope P, Schmitt P, Wai J . Volatile biomarkers in the breath of women with breast cancer. J Breath Res 2010; 4: 026003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. D’Amico A, Bono R, Pennazza G, Santonico M, Mantini G, Bernabei M et al. Identification of melanoma with a gas sensor array. Skin Res Technol 2008; 14: 226–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bernabei M, Pennazza G, Santonico M, Corsi C, Roscioni C, Paolesse R et al. A preliminary study on the possibility to diagnose urinary tract cancers by an electronic nose. Sens Actuators B Chem 2008; 131: 1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A D Asimakopoulos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asimakopoulos, A., Del Fabbro, D., Miano, R. et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis through electronic nose in the urine headspace setting: a pilot study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 17, 206–211 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2014.11

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2014.11

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links