Article | Open | Published:

Scientific assessments to facilitate deliberative policy learning

Palgrave Communicationsvolume 2, Article number: 16092 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Putting the recently adopted global Sustainable Development Goals or the Paris Agreement on international climate policy into action will require careful policy choices. Appropriately informing decision-makers about longer-term, wicked policy issues remains a considerable challenge for the scientific community. Typically, these vital policy issues are highly uncertain, value-laden and disputed and affect multiple temporal and spatial scales, governance levels, policy fields and socioeconomic contexts simultaneously. In light of this, science-policy interfaces should help facilitate learning processes and open deliberation among all actors involved about potentially acceptable policy pathways. For this purpose, science-policy interfaces must strive to foster some enabling conditions: (1) “representation” in terms of engaging with diverse stakeholders (including experts) and acknowledging divergent viewpoints; (2) “empowerment” of underrepresented societal groups by co-developing and integrating policy scenarios that reflect their specific knowledge systems and worldviews; (3) “capacity building” regarding methods and skills for integration and synthesis, as well as through the provision of knowledge synthesis about the policy solution space; and (4) “spaces for deliberation”, facilitating direct interaction between different stakeholders, including governments and scientists. We argue that integrated, multi-stakeholder, scientific assessment processes—particularly the collaborative assessments of policy alternatives and their various implications—offer potential advantages in this regard, compared with alternatives for bridging scientific expertise and public policy. This article is part of a collection on scientific advice to governments.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Garard Jennifer, Lenzi Dominic, Dorsch Marcel J., Knopf Brigitte and Harrs Jan-Albrecht contributed equally to this work.

  2. Riousset Pauline and Edenhofer Ottmar is a These authors jointly supervised this work.

Affiliations

  1. Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Berlin, Germany

    • Martin Kowarsch
    • , Jennifer Garard
    • , Dominic Lenzi
    • , Marcel J. Dorsch
    • , Brigitte Knopf
    • , Jan-Albrecht Harrs
    •  & Ottmar Edenhofer
  2. Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    • Jennifer Garard
    • , Marcel J. Dorsch
    •  & Ottmar Edenhofer
  3. Institute for Ecological Economy Research, Berlin, Germany

    • Pauline Riousset
  4. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany

    • Ottmar Edenhofer

Authors

  1. Search for Martin Kowarsch in:

  2. Search for Jennifer Garard in:

  3. Search for Pauline Riousset in:

  4. Search for Dominic Lenzi in:

  5. Search for Marcel J. Dorsch in:

  6. Search for Brigitte Knopf in:

  7. Search for Jan-Albrecht Harrs in:

  8. Search for Ottmar Edenhofer in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kowarsch.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.92

Further reading

  • A road map for global environmental assessments

    • Martin Kowarsch
    • , Jason Jabbour
    • , Christian Flachsland
    • , Marcel T. J. Kok
    • , Robert Watson
    • , Peter M. Haas
    • , Jan C. Minx
    • , Joseph Alcamo
    • , Jennifer Garard
    • , Pauline Riousset
    • , László Pintér
    • , Cameron Langford
    • , Yulia Yamineva
    • , Christoph von Stechow
    • , Jessica O'Reilly
    •  & Ottmar Edenhofer

    Nature Climate Change (2017)