Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor is a critical regulator for the survival and growth of oral squamous carcinoma cells

Abstract

Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR) is essential for adenovirus infection to target cells, and its constitutive expression in various cancerous and normal tissues has been reported. Recently, the biological role of CAR in human cancers of several different origins has been investigated with respect to tumor progression, metastasis and tumorigenesis. However, its biological function in tumor cells remains controversial. Here we report the critical role of CAR in growth regulation of oral squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) in vitro and in vivo via the specific interaction with Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK). Loss of endogenous CAR expression by knockdown using specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) against CAR facilitates growth suppression of SCC cells due to cell dissociation, followed by apoptosis. The consequent morphological reaction was reminiscent of anoikis, rather than epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and the dissociation of oral SCC cells was triggered not by lack of contact with extracellular matrix, but by loss of cell-to-cell contact caused by abnormal translocation of E-cadherin from surface membrane to cytoplasm. Immunoprecipitation assays of the CAR-transfected oral SCC cell line, HSC-2, with or without ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632) revealed that CAR directly associates with ROCKI and ROCKII, which results in inhibition of ROCK activity and contributes to maintenance of cell-to-cell adhesion for their growth and survival. Based on these findings, in vivo behavior of CAR-downregulated HSC-2 cells from siRNA knockdown was compared with that of normally CAR-expressing cells in intraperitoneally xenografted mouse models. The mice engrafted with CAR siRNA-pretreated HSC-2 cells showed poor formation of metastatic foci in contrast to those implanted with the control siRNA-pretreated cells. Thus, CAR substantially has an impact on growth and survival of oral SCC cells as a negative regulator of ROCK in vitro and in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergelson JM, Cunningham JA, Droguett G, Kurt-Jones EA, Krithivas A, Hong JS et al. Isolation of a common receptor for coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses 2 and 5. Science 1997; 275: 1320–1323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayr GA, Freimuth P . A single locus on human chromosome 21 directs the expression of a receptor for adenovirus type 2 in mouse A9 cells. J Virol 1997; 71: 412–418.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tomko RP, Xu R, Philipson L . HCAR and MCAR: the human and mouse cellular receptors for subgroup C adenoviruses and group B coxsackieviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 3352–3356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen CJ, Shieh CJT, Pickles RJ, Okegawa T, Hsieh J-T, Bergelson JM . The coxsackie and adenovirus receptor is a transmembrane component of the tight junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 15191–15196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fok PT, Huang KC, Holland PC, Nalbantoglu J . The coxsackie and adenovirus receptor binds microtubules and plays a role in cell migration. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 7512–7521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stecker K, Vieth M, Koschel A, Wiedenmann B, Rocken C, Anders M . Impact of the coxackievirus and adenovirus receptor on the adenoma-carcinoma sequence of colon cancer. Br J Cancer 2011; 104: 1426–1433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anders M, Vieth M, Rocken C, Ebert M, Pross M, Gretschel S et al. Loss of the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor contributes to gastric cancer progression. Br J Cancer 2009a; 100: 352–359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anders M, Rosch T, Kuster K, Becker I, Hofler H, Stein HJ et al. Expression and function of the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor in Barrett’s esophagus and associated neoplasia. Cancer Gene Ther 2009b; 16: 508–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto K, Shariat SF, Ayala GE, Rauen KA, Lemer SP . Loss of coxsackie and adenovirus receptor expression is associated with features of aggressive bladder cancer. Urology 2005; 66: 441–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamashita M, Ino A, Kawabata K, Sakurai F, Mizuguchi H . Expression of coxsackie and adenovirus receptor reduces the lung metastatic potential of murine tumor cells. Int J Cancer 2007; 121: 1690–1696.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Okegawa T, Pong RC, Li Y, Bergelson JM, Sagalowsky AI, Hsieh JT . The mechanism of the growth-inhibitory effect of coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR) on human bladder cancer: a functional analysis of car protein structure. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 6592–6600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okegawa T, Li Y, Pong RC, Bergelson JM, Zhou J, Hsieh JT . The dual impact of coxsackie and adenovirus receptor expression on human prostate cancer gene therapy. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 5031–5036.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giaginis C, Zarros A, Alexandrou P, Klijanienko J, Delladetsima I, Theocharis S . Evaluation of coxsakievirus and adenovirus receptor expression in human benign and malignant thyroid lesions. APMIS 2010; 118: 210–221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruning A, Stickeler E, Diederich D, Walz L, Rohleder H, Friese K et al. Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor promotes adenocarcinoma cell survival and is expressionally activated after transition from preneoplastic precursor lesions to invasive adenocarcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 4316–4320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qin M, Escuadro B, Dohadwala M, Sharma S, Batra RK . A novel role for the coxsakie adenovirus receptor in mediating tumor formation by lung cancer cells. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 6377–6380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Verdino P, Witherden DA, Havran WL, Wilson IA . The molecular interaction of CAR and JAML recruits the central cell signal transducer PI3K. Science 2010; 329: 1210–1214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Street CA, Bryan BA . Rho kinase proteins-pleiotropic modulators of cell survival and apoptosis. Anticancer Res 2011; 31: 3645–3657.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Frisch SM, Screaton RA . Anoikis mechanisms. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001; 13: 555–562.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stoff A, Rivera AA, Banerjee NS, Mathis JM, Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A, Le LP et al. Strategies to enhance transductional efficiency of adenoviral-based gene transfer to primary human fibroblasts and keratinocytes as a platform in dermal wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14: 608–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sakaguchi M, Miyazaki M, Takaishi M, Sakaguchi Y, Makino E, Kataoka N et al. S100C/A11 is a key mediator of Ca(2+)-induced growth inhibition of human epidermal keratinocytes. J Cell Biol 2003; 163: 825–835.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shi J, Wei L . Rho kinase in the regulation of cell death and survival. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2007; 55: 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lai JM, Hsieh CL, Chang ZF . Caspase activation during phorbol ester-induced apoptosis requires ROCK-dependent myosin-mediated contraction. J Cell Sci 2003; 116: 3491–3501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marconi A, Atzei P, Panza C, Fila C, Tiberio R, Truzzi F et al. FLICE/caspase-8 activation triggers anoikis induced by β1-integrin blockade in human keratinocytes. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 5815–5823.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Valentijn AJ, Gilmore AP . Translocation of full-length Bid to mitochondria during anoikis. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 32848–32857.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dorner AA, Wegmann F, Butz S, Wolburg-Buchholz K, Wolburg H, Mack A et al. Coxsackievirus-adenovirus receptor (CAR) is essential for early embryonic cardiac development. J Cell Sci 2005; 118: 3509–3521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Walters RW, Freimuth P, Moninger TO, Ganske I, Zabner J, Welsh MJ . Adenovirus fiber disrupts CAR-mediated intercellular adhesion allowing virus escape. Cell 2002; 110: 789–799.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang KC, Altinoz M, Wosik K, Larochelle N, Koty Z, Zhu L et al. Impact of the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR) on glioma cell growth and invasion: requirement for the C-terminal domain. Int J Cancer 2005; 113: 738–745.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mege RM, Gavard J, Lambert M . Regulation of cell-cell junctions by the cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006; 18: 541–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yonemura S . Cadherin-actin interactions at adherens junctions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011; 23: 515–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hermiston ML, Gordon JI . In vivo analysis of cadherin function in the mouse intestinal epithelium: essential roles in adhesion, maintenance of differentiation, and regulation of programmed cell death. J Cell Biol 1995; 129: 489–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fouquet S, Lugo-Martinez VH, Faussat AM, Renaud F, Cardot P, Chambaz J et al. Early loss of E-cadherin from cell-cell contacts is involved in the onset of Anoikis in enterocytes. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 43061–43069.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Excoffon KJ, Hruska-Hageman A, Klotz M, Traver GL, Zabner J . A role for the PDZ-binding domain of the coxsackie B virus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) in cell adhesion and growth. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 4401–4409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Coyne CB, Voelker T, Pichla SL, Bergelson JM . The coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor interacts with the multi-PDZ domain protein-1 (MUPP-1) within the tight junction. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 48079–48084.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sollerbrant K, Raschperger E, Mirza M, Engstrom U, Philipson L, Ljungdahl PO et al. The Coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) forms a complex with the PDZ domain-containing protein ligand-of-numb protein-X (LNX). J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 7439–7444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Maekawa M, Ishizaki T, Boku S, Watanabe N, Fujita A, Iwamatsu A et al. Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science 1999; 285: 895–898.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shewan AM, Maddugoda M, Kraemer A, Stehbens SJ, Verma S, Kovacs EM et al. Myosin 2 is a key Rho kinase target necessary for the local concentration of E-cadherin at cell–cell contacts. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16: 4531–4542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schackmann RC, van Amersfoort M, Haarhuis JH, Vlug EJ, Halim VA, Roodhart JM et al. Cytosolic p120-catenin regulates growth of metastatic lobular carcinoma through Rock1-mediated anoikis resistance. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 3176–3188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Maseki S, Ijichi K, Tanaka H, Fujii M, Hasegawa Y, Ogawa T et al. Acquisition of EMT phenotype in the gefitinib-resistant cells of a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line through Akt/GSK-3β/snail signalling pathway. Br J Cancer 2012; 106: 1196–1204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cheng HL, Su SJ, Huang LW, Hsieh BS, Hu YC, Hung TC et al. Arecoline induces HA22T/VGH hepatoma cells to undergo anoikis-involvement of STAT3 and RhoA activation. Mol Cancer 2010; 9: 126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vigl B, Zgraggen C, Rehman N, Banziger-Tobler NE, Detmar M, Halin C . Coxsackie- and adenovirus receptor (CAR) is expressed in lymphatic vessels in human skin and affects lymphatic endothelial cell function in vitro. Exp Cell Res 2009; 315: 336–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sakaguchi M, Murata H, Yamamoto K, Ono T, Sakaguchi Y, Motoyama A et al. TIRAP, an adaptor protein for TLR2/4, transduces a signal from RAGE phosphorylated upon ligand binding. PLoS One 2011; 6: e23132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Xiao L, Eto M, Kazanietz MG . ROCK mediates phorbol ester-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells via p21Cip1 up-regulation and JNK. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 29365–29375.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Hitoshi Ohno (Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan), Professor Hirohisa Yano (Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Japan) and Dr Atsushi Natsume (Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan) for kindly providing us lymphoma cell line, hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines and glioma cell lines, respectively, and Dr Yasushi Yatabe (Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) for advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E Kondo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Oncogene website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saito, K., Sakaguchi, M., Iioka, H. et al. Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor is a critical regulator for the survival and growth of oral squamous carcinoma cells. Oncogene 33, 1274–1286 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.66

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.66

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links