Molecular and functional characteristics of ovarian surface epithelial cells transformed by KrasG12D and loss of Pten in a mouse model in vivo

Article metrics

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is a complex and deadly disease that remains difficult to detect at an early curable stage. Furthermore, although some oncogenic (Kras, Pten/PI3K and Trp53) pathways that are frequently mutated, deleted or amplified in ovarian cancer are known, how these pathways initiate and drive specific morphological phenotypes and tumor outcomes remain unclear. We recently generated Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D; Amhr2-Cre mice to disrupt the Pten gene and express a stable mutant form of KrasG12D in ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells. On the basis of histopathologic criteria, the mutant mice developed low-grade ovarian serous papillary adenocarcinomas at an early age and with 100% penetrance. This highly reproducible phenotype provides the first mouse model in which to study this ovarian cancer subtype. OSE cells isolated from ovaries of mutant mice at 5 and 10 weeks of age exhibit temporal changes in the expression of specific Mullerian epithelial marker genes, grow in soft agar and develop ectopic invasive tumors in recipient mice, indicating that the cells are transformed. Gene profiling identified specific mRNAs and microRNAs differentially expressed in purified OSE cells derived from tumors of the mutant mice compared with wild-type OSE cells. Mapping of transcripts or genes between the mouse OSE mutant data sets, the Kras signature from human cancer cell lines and the human ovarian tumor array data sets, documented significant overlap, indicating that KRAS is a key driver of OSE transformation in this context. Two key hallmarks of the mutant OSE cells in these mice are the elevated expression of the tumor-suppressor Trp53 (p53) and its microRNA target, miR-34a-c. We propose that elevated TRP53 and miR-34a-c may exert negatively regulatory effects that reduce the proliferative potential of OSE cells leading to the low-grade serous adenocarcinoma phenotype.

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is a complex disease that remains difficult to diagnose at early stages and hence is difficult to treat (Bast et al., 2009; Cho, 2009; Cho and Shih, 2009). Epithelial ovarian cancers are subdivided into four major categories based on histological criteria and resemblance to epithelial components of the normal female reproductive tract (Cho and Shih, 2009). Approximately 70% of ovarian carcinomas are categorized as serous tumors because their histoarchitecture recapitulates the epithelium lining the human fallopian tube. Other categories include endometrioid, mucinous and clear cell subtypes (Bast et al., 2009; Cho and Shih, 2009). Ovarian carcinomas are also classified as either low-grade or high-grade tumors. Clinically, low- and high-grade ovarian cancer behaves very differently, with low-grade cancers being more resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy (Cho and Shih, 2009). Whereas low-grade tumors frequently exhibit alterations (mutations, deletions or amplifications) of genes in the Kras and Pten/PI3K pathways, high-grade tumors are associated frequently with mutations (or deletions) in the tumor repressor protein (Trp53; p53) gene (Cho and Shih, 2009) and may be derived from fimbrial epithelial cells of the distal fallopian tube (Kindelberger et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2007) as well as from ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells (Auersperg et al., 2008). High-grade tumors may also exhibit amplification of PIK3CA (Astanehe et al., 2008; Roh et al., 2010) suggesting a link between PTEN and p53. Recent gene profiling and sequencing databases have identified mRNAs and microRNAs relatively overexpressed or underexpressed in various ovarian cancer subtypes (Page et al., 2006; Kobel et al., 2008; Konstantinopoulos et al., 2008; Bast et al., 2009; Creighton et al., 2010; Despierre et al., 2010). However, our understanding this complex disease remains limited and continues to evolve as new information on the potential sites of origin and molecular pathways involved is obtained (Crum et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2007; Auersperg et al., 2008; Karst and Drapkin, 2010).

To help understand the etiology of human ovarian cancer, several mouse models of this disease have been devised in recent years using novel, pioneering strategies. Oncogenes introduced into dispersed Trp53 null ovarian cells using in vitro and in vivo approaches and avian retroviral receptors generated epithelial cell tumors (Orsulic et al., 2002). Other investigators have injected adenoviral vectors expressing Cre recombinase under the ovarian bursa to generate Trp53fl/fl;Rbfl/fl (Flesken-Nikitin et al., 2003), Ptenfl/fl; LSL-KrasG12D (Dinulescu et al., 2005) and Ptenfl/fl;Apcfl/fl (Wu et al., 2007) mutations, characterized as poorly differentiated carcinomas, endometrioid-like adenocarcinomas, endometrioid adenocarcinomas, respectively. Although the adenoviral injection approach has been a major breakthrough, it depends on a highly technical intervention that can deliver the vectors to bursal and/or oviductal cells in addition to the OSE, thereby obscuring the identity of the actual transformed cell type(s) (Clark-Knowles et al., 2009). The anti-Mullerian hormone receptor (AMHR2) is expressed in multiple cells types, including Mullerian-derived OSE cells, stromal cells of the oviduct and uterus as well as ovarian granulosa cells (Jamin et al., 2002; Fan et al., 2008; Xing et al., 2009). When the Amhr2 promoter was used to drive expression of the SV40T antigen, ovarian carcinomas developed with 50% penetrance (Connolly et al., 2003) verifying expression of Amhr2-Cre in OSE cells. More recently, when the Amhr2-Cre mice were used to disrupt the Brca1 and p53 genes (Xing et al., 2009), uterine leiomyosarcomas developed rapidly indicating that uterine Amhr2-Cre expressing smooth muscle cells are acutely sensitive to these particular mutations. Importantly, activation of the PI3K pathway by loss of Pten (Ptenfl/fl;Amhr2Cre mice) (Lague et al., 2008; Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b) or overexpression of PI3K (Pik3ca;Amhr2Cre mice) (Liang et al., 2009) or activation of the KRAS pathway by expression of stable mutant KRASG12D (KrasG12D;Amhr2Cre mice) (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b) alone does not lead to ovarian cancer but can enhance OSE cell proliferation and metaplasia (Liang et al., 2009).

Recent studies from our laboratory have shown that activation of the rat sarcoma GTPase (RAS), dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 pathway directs specific cell fate decisions of ovarian granulosa cells in growing and preovulatory follicles as well as in cells that comprise the ovarian surface epithelium (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b). In preovulatory follicles activation of RAS and ERK1/2 by the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge is essential for ovulation and terminal differentiation of granulosa cells (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b). Conversely, premature expression of a mutant stable KRAS (KRASG12D) in granulosa cells of the KrasG12D;Amhr2Cre mice completely derailed early follicle development (Fan et al., 2008). Granulosa cells ceased dividing, failed to undergo apoptosis and did not differentiate. As KrasG12D mutant granulosa cells expressed high levels of the tumor-suppressor PTEN, we further disrupted the Pten gene in the KrasG12D;Amhr2Cre mouse strain. Surprisingly, the fate of granulosa cells in the abnormal follicles was not markedly altered in the KrasG12D; Pten;Amhr2Cre double mutant mice. However, the OSE cells developed into low-grade serous papillary adenocarcinomas (as classified by expert mouse and human pathologists) with 100% penetrance and died within 4–6 months of age because of tumor volume (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b). Therefore, the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice provide the first evidence that granulosa cells are highly resistant to many oncogenic insults that profoundly impact OSE cells (Fan et al., 2008; Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b), thereby explaining why granulosa cell tumors have not been observed in the previous studies (Orsulic et al., 2002; Connolly et al., 2003; Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b).

Importantly, the low-grade serous adenocarcinomas of the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mutant mice represent the first mouse model of this specific ovarian cancer subtype (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b). The spontaneous and reproducible development of serous adenocarcinomas in these mice have lead us to determine what molecular pathways are altered in these cells and if this model can be used to understand the molecular events controlling the transformation of OSE cells and thereby provide some insights into this cancer subtype in women. In particular, this model, unlike other models, affords the opportunity to track the initiation of transformation of OSE cells at early stages in vivo by determining when the mutant OSE cells first exhibit altered morphology and functions and what signaling pathways are required to maintain transformation in the OSE cells in this context. The striking increases Mullerian cell markers in the OSE tumors indicate that these cells can differentiation into a fallopian-like epithelium. In addition, the consistent increases in Trp53 expression and its target microRNA, miR-34a-c indicate that altered activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) and RAS pathways is tightly linked to regulation of TRP53 levels and presumably function in these cells.

Results

OSE cell tumors are evident in the Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D;Amhr2-cre mice as early as 5 weeks of age and express markers of human serous adenocarcinomas

Histological sections prepared from ovaries of control mice at 5 and 10 weeks of age show that the OSE cell layer is comprised on a single layer of meso-epithelial cells as reported by others (Auersperg et al., 2001; Orsulic et al., 2002). These cells stain for the epithelial cell markers cytokeratin 8 (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b) and for E-cadherin (CDH1) but not for vimentin (Figure 1a). In contrast, the OSE layer present in ovaries of the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice exhibits visible changes in morphology with obvious epithelial cell hyperplasia evident as early as 3 weeks of age in some ovaries and at 5 weeks in all ovaries. By 10 weeks of age, all mice exhibited low-grade serous, papillary-like adenocarcinomas as classified by expert pathologists (Figure 1a). Of note, the OSE tumor cells stain for cytokeratin 8 (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b) and vimentin but not for E-cadherin (Figure 1a) suggesting that the cells have undergone an epithelial to mesenchymal type of transformation (Lee et al., 2006). Furthermore, the OSE tumor cells do not stain for calretinin, a marker of mesotheliomas and do not exhibit atypic nuclear morphology observed in high-grade adenocarcinomas (Supplementary Figure 1). However, the tumor OSE cells do stain positive for estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1), providing additional evidence that these tumors represent low-grade adenocarcinomas (Supplementary Figure 1) (Wong et al., 2007).

Figure 1
figure1

Temporal changes in OSE cell morphology and expression of specific genes associated with the serous adenocarcinoma phenotype in the Pten;KrasG12D;Amhr2-cre mice. (a) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immuno-labeling of ovarian sections from WT and mutant mice at 5 and 10 weeks of age. (b) Gene expression patterns in whole ovaries of WT or tumor-bearing (T) Pten;KrasG12D;Amhr2-cre mice at 5 and 10 weeks of age.

To identify specific genes expressed in the tumor-bearing ovaries at 3 months of age, total RNA was extracted from ovaries of control (wild-type (WT)) and Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice and submitted for Microarray Analyses. Table 1 lists the top 25 most highly upregulated genes in the Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre tumor-bearing ovaries (Supplementary Table S1). These include potential regulators of stem cells (Angtpl7) (Zhang et al., 2006), markers of cancer cells (Nov, also known as Ccn3 (Bohlig et al., 2008), Mela and Ptgs2) (Wang and DuBois, 2010), specific cytokines (Gkn1, Gnk2 ) and the acute phase factor (Hp) (Abdullah et al., 2009).

Table 1 Microarray data representing the top 25 genes that are upregulated in the tumor-bearing ovaries isolated from the Pten;Kras;Amhr2-Cre mutant mice compared with ovaries from wild-type mice

When we compared our microarray data derived from normal ovaries and tumor-bearing ovaries of Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice with data sets derived from human cancer cell lines expressing mutant or WT KRAS, 213 genes exhibited significantly over-lapping mutant Kras-related expression patterns (Figures 2a and b) (Supplementary Table S2). Genes highly expressed in the human mutant Kras expressing cancer cells and the mouse ovary tumor samples include: Ptgs2, Mpzl2 (Eva1), Cldn3, Lcn2, Ccnd1, Adam8, Egfr, Btc, Podxl, Msln, Igfbp4 and Dusp6. These results indicate that the transformed mouse cells exhibit a mutant Kras signature similar to that observed in human cancer cell lines (GlaxoSmithKline GSK, 2008).

Figure 2
figure2

Genes overlapping between the Pten;Kras;Amhr2-cre gene signature and relevant signatures from human cancers. (a) Overlaps between the set of human orthologs high (fold#2) in Pten;Kras;Amhr2-cre mice (compared with WT mice) and various sets of genes derived from human data sets: genes high/low (P<0.01, t-test) in k-ras mutant versus k-ras WT cell lines, and genes high/low (P<0.05) in serous, mucinous, or endometrioid ovarian cancers, as compared with normal ovary. Numbers of genes in each set indicated in parentheses. Numbers overlapping between sets were compared with chance expected. *P<1E–20, one-sided Fisher's exact; **P<1E–6, one-sided Fisher's exact. (b) Heat maps showing expression patterns for the Pten;Kras;Amhr2-cre gene signature, both in the Pten;Kras;Amhr2-cre mouse expression data set and in an expression data set of human cancer cell lines with or without mutations in k-ras (35). *Pattern of enrichment (213 genes, P<1E–20). (c) Heat maps for the Pten;Kras;Amhr2-cre gene signature, both in the mouse data set and in a data set of human ovarian tumors (36). *Patterns of enrichment. For parts (b, c), genes represented in both heat maps are the same and have the same ordering, and genes not represented in the given human data set are not shown.

The data sets from our tumor-bearing ovaries also exhibit overlapping expression with data sets from human ovarian cancers (as compared with normal ovary): 330 genes in human serous tumors and 331 in the mucinous tumors (Figures 2a and c) (Malpica et al., 2004). Among the common genes are Cp, Lcn2, Dmkn, Msln, Cldn3, Podxl, Esr1 and Muc16 as well as specific Mullerian epithelial marker genes, Wt1, Pax8, Hoxa9 and Hoxa10. Genes encoding matrix components were also observed (Schwartz et al., 2002; Malpica et al., 2004; Santin et al., 2004; Cheng et al., 2005; Kobel et al., 2008; Konstantinopoulos et al., 2008; Cho and Shih, 2009; Gorringe and Campbell, 2009; Despierre et al., 2010; Gava et al., 2008) (Supplementary Table S3). That many of the genes in the mouse and human ovarian cancer samples are common to the cancer cell Kras signature indicates that activation of Kras pathway (by mutations or other mechanisms) may be an underlying common feature of transformed OSE and Mullerian cells. As a high percentage human ovarian cancer samples are likely to be high-grade serous adenocarcinomas, these tumors may harbor defects not only in the function of TP53 but also changes in the MET–RAS signaling pathway (Corney et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2010).

Real-time reverse transcriptase–PCR results using RNA prepared from control and the tumor-bearing ovaries confirmed the Microarray data, documented age-dependent changes in gene expression profiles and verified upregulation of specific genes known to be expressed in human ovarian cancers (Figure 1b). Cp, Podxl and Ptgs2 were expressed at elevated levels by 5 weeks of age whereas Cldn3, Dmkn, Krt8, Lcn2, Msln and Angptl were elevated at 10 weeks. Wt1, Pax8, Hoxa9 and Hoxa10 were also elevated in the mouse tumor tissue at 10 weeks of age indicating that these cells had acquired specific characteristics of Mullerian (fallopian tube/endometrial) epithelial cells. Expression of the Trp53 (p53) was also elevated in the tumor cells providing further evidence that there are distinct temporal changes in gene expression patterns in the mutant OSE cells.

Most genes expressed at reduced levels in the tumor-bearing ovaries from the Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D;Amhr2-cre mice compared with controls are oocyte (*) or granulosa cell specific (Supplementary Table S4) and reflect the loss of oocytes and altered granulosa cell differentiation in the abnormal follicle structures (Supplementary Table S2) present in these ovaries (Fan et al., 2008).

Tumor-related genes are selectively expressed in OSE cells

To determine which of the genes associated with the tumor-bearing ovary at 5 and 10 weeks of age were expressed specifically in purified OSE cells, we isolated OSE cells from ovaries of WT and Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice. The WT and mutant OSE cells (cytokerain 8 positive) were removed from the epithelium by mild-trypsin digestion (Figure 3a, upper panel). The highly purified OSE cells from WT ovaries appear morphologically homogeneous in culture as indicated by the characteristic cuboidal-cell shape (Figure 3a, middle panel) and uniform immunolabeling of cytokeratin 8 and E-cadherin (Figure 3a, lower panel) as would be predicted from their presence in vivo (Figures 1 and 3a).

Figure 3
figure3

Mutant OSE cells express genes associated with human serous adenocarcinomas in a time-dependent manner. (a) Cytokeratin 8 and E-cadherin-positive OSE cells removed from the ovarian surface exhibit a cobblestone appearance. (b) Expression of genes in RNA samples from whole ovaries and purified OSE cells isolated from ovaries of WT and Pten;KrasG12D;Amhr2-cre mice at 5 and 10 weeks of age.

Several genes (Cldn3, Dmkn, Msln and Lcn2) were higher in the purified WT OSE cells compared with WT whole ovaries (Figure 3b), suggesting that these genes are specific markers of OSE cells and function in the non-transformed epithelium. Furthermore, the expression of Wt1, Pax8, Hoxa9 and Hox10, specific markers of Mullerian-derived (fallopian and endometrial) epithelia (Cheng et al., 2005; Ko et al., 2010) were induced in the mutant mouse OSE cells (Figure 3b). These results document unequivocally that mouse OSE cells can acquire Mullerian duct markers during transformation by disrupting Pten and expressing mutant KrasG12D. Differential gene expression patterns in the mutant OSE cells were observed: some genes were elevated selectively in cells from 10 weeks (Hoxa9, Dmkn, Lcn2 and Podxl) whereas others were elevated at 5 and 10 weeks (Cp, Cldn3, Krt8, Msln, Ptgs2, Wt1 and Angptl7). A striking increase in Trp53 mRNA and protein were also observed in the mutant OSE cells compared with WT cells (Figure 3c).

OSE cells isolated from ovaries of the Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice are transformed

When OSE cells were isolated from WT or Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mouse ovaries at 5 and 10 weeks and cultured for 2 days, the growth rate of the mutant cells far exceeded that of the WT cells (Figure 4a). The mutant, but not WT, OSE cells also generated stable cell lines. To further confirm that the mutant OSE cells were transformed, purified WT and mutant OSE cells were prepared and plated in soft agar. Mutant cells isolated from the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice at 5 and 10 weeks formed colonies within 2 weeks whereas the WT cells did not (Figure 4b). Moreover, mutant OSE cells prepared at 10 weeks formed significantly more colonies than did cells collected at 5 weeks, providing additional evidence that temporal changes in the function of mutant OSE cells occur in vivo and are retained in culture (Figure 4c). Additionally, when the purified Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre OSE cells were injected into recipient mice in vivo, ectopic tumors positive for cytokeratin 8 developed rapidly (within 2 weeks) in the peritoneal cavity, at subcutaneous sites and under the kidney capsule where invasive activity into the kidney capsule was evident (Figure 4d). Thus, these transformed cells are highly proliferative and possess invasive activity.

Figure 4
figure4

OSE cells isolated from ovaries of Pten;Kras;Amhr2-cre mice are transformed. (a) Mutant OSE cells proliferate faster than WT cells at 24 and 48 h. (b) Mutant but not WT OSE cells grow in soft agar (c) and form ectopic tumors in the peritoneal cavity, subcutaneously and under the kidney capsule in vivo (d).

The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and ERK1/2 impact in the functions of the mutant OSE cells

The disruption of Pten and expression of mutant KRASG12D are expected to increase the activity of the PI3K/AKT and RAS/MEK1/ERK1/2 pathways, respectively. However, there is also important cross-talk between these pathways and increasing evidence indicates that activation of the PI3K pathway is essential to maintain the growth promoting and transformation effects of KRAS (Miller et al., 2009), in part, by blocking negative feedback regulatory loops (Wee et al., 2009). Therefore, we determined if pharmacological disruption of either PI3K or MEK1/ERK1/2 activity would prevent colony formation and/or the expression of selected genes. As shown in Figure 5a, AKT and ERK1/2 are phosphorylated and hence activated in OSE cells isolated from ovaries of tumor-bearing mice at 10 weeks of age and this was blocked by blocked by inhibitors of PI3K (LY294002) and MEK1 (U0126), respectively. PTEN was undetectable and Foxo1 mRNA was markedly reduced in the mutant OSE cell (data not shown). When U0126 and/or LY294002 were added to the soft agar, they inhibited colony formation by approximately 70–90% (Figure 5b).

Figure 5
figure5

The MEK1/ERK1/2 and PI3K/AKT pathways drive gene expression and transformation of the mutant OSE cells. (a) Western blot of lysates prepared from mutant OSE cells cultured in media alone or with either the MEK1 inhibitor UO126 (10 μM) or the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (10 μM) for 24 h. (b) Colony formation of mutant OSE cells grown in soft agar is inhibited by both UO126 and LY294002. (c) Gene expression is altered in cells cultured in media alone or with either UO126 or LY294002 for 24 h. (d) TRP53 immunolabeling decreases in mutant cells cultured for 24 h with or without 10 μM UO126 or LY294002 compared with media alone.

Loss of colony formation was associated with reduced expression of specific genes including Cp, Ptgs2, Dmnk, Lcn2 and Ptgs2 that were selectively down-regulated by inhibition of PI3K as well as Ccnd1,Cldn3, Krt8, Podxl and W1t that were reduced by either the PI3K/AKT or ERK1/2 signaling cascade inhibitors. Angptl7 was increased selectively by the PI3K inhibitor whereas Trp53 mRNA and protein were reduced equally by either LY294002 or UO126 (Figures 5c and d). Thus, the PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK1/2 pathways are required to drive and maintain transformation of the mutant OSE cells.

To further characterize the specific effects of disrupting the PI3K pathway or activating the RAS pathway, we isolated and cultured OSE cells obtained from ovaries of Ptenfl/fl;Amhr2-Cre and KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice as well as from the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice and WT mice at 10 week of age. Cells from each genotype exhibited slightly different morphology (Figure 6a) and only cells from the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice were transformed. Genes that were highly expressed in the OSE cells from the tumor (T)-bearing ovaries of the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice compared with WT were also elevated in OSE cells from the Ptenfl/fl;Amhr2-Cre mice. These include Podxl, markers of Mullerian epithelium (Wt1 and Hoxa9), Trp53 and one of its target genes Cdkn1a (p21) as well as a marker of serous adenocarcinomas, Cldn3. These genes were less dramatically increased in the KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice indicating that disrupting the PI3K pathway alone exerts the more potent response in this context (Figure 6b).

Figure 6
figure6

Mutations in either Pten or Kras alone alter gene expression in purified OSE cells. (a) OSE cells were isolated from Pten;Amhr2-cre, Kras;Amhr2-cre, Pten;Kras;Amhr2-cre (tumor-bearing, T) and WT mice. The transformed cells (T) grow rapidly and eventually form clusters whereas the WT and KRAS OSE cells exhibit slower growth and well-defined boarders. OSE cells from the Pten null cells, like the transformed (T) cells, lack distinct borders but are not transformed. (b) The transformed cells and the Pten null cells exhibit striking similarities in the expression of specific mRNAs, including Trp53 and its target p21 (Cdkna1).

Specific microRNAs are regulated in the mutant OSE cells compared with WT OSE cells

MicroRNAs comprise an extensive class of non-coding nucleic acids that govern broad gene regulatory pathways in development (Stafani and Slack, 2008). Specific microRNAs presumed to be linked to various cancers, including ovarian cancer, have been identified (Iorio et al., 2007; Dahlya et al., 2008; Nam et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2008; Krichevsky and Gabriety, 2009; Wyman et al., 2009; Creighton et al., 2010). Those highlighted most frequently are members of the Let-7 cluster that regulate (K/H)RAS and Hmga2, a potent regulator of proliferation (Roush and Slack, 2008), miR-21 that is transcriptionally controlled by STAT3, AP1 factors and/or TRP53 (Krichevsky and Gabriety, 2009) and regulates such diverse processes as cell proliferation, invasion and migration (Krichevsky and Gabriety, 2009), miR-34a/c that are targets of TRP53 and potent inhibitors of the cell growth regulators (Hermeking, 2007; Ji et al., 2009), miR-29a that is a target of WNT/CTNNB1 (Kaplinas et al., 2009) and regulates Trp53 (Park et al., 2009), miR-125b that may target RAS (Rybak et al., 2008) and miR-214 that impacts the level of mRNA encoding the tumor-suppressor Pten (Yang et al., 2008).

On the basis of these studies, we analyzed several microRNAs in our WT and mutant OSE cells in culture (Figure 7a). We show that primary transcripts of Let-7f and miR-21, miR-29a, miR-34a, miR-34c, miR-125b-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-720 and miR-1937 were increased dramatically in the mutant cells isolated from tumors of mice at 5 and 10 weeks of age compared with WT cells whereas miR-31 was dramatically reduced. These results indicate that transcription of these microRNAs is being regulated in the mutant mouse OSE cells. The expression of the mature forms of these microRNAs was verified for Let-7f and miR-34a (Figure 7b). With the exception of miR-31, the expression of these microRNAs is regulated by inhibitors of PI3K (LY294002) or MEK1/ERK1/2 (U0126). Of particular interest is the down-regulation of miR-21, miR-29a, miR-34c, miR125b-5p and miR-720 in response to U0126 indicating that ERK1/2 is a potent regulator of these microRNAs. Other microRNAs (miR-29a, miR-199a-5p and miR-1937) were potently downregulated by both inhibitors. Additionally, miR-34a, like Trp53, was increased in cells lacking Pten alone, whereas miR-31 was selectively suppressed in cells expressing KrasG12D but not those lacking Pten indicating that each pathway controls the expression of distinct miRNAs presumed involved in transformation.

Figure 7
figure7

Specific miRNAs are expressed in the mutant compared with WT OSE cells and are regulated by inhibitors of MEK1/ERK1/2 and PI3K as shown by real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)–PCR. (a, b) Primary miRNA and mature transcripts are transcriptionally regulated in mutant OSE cells at 5 and 10 weeks of age. (c) Transcription of primary miRNAs is altered by UO126 or LY294002. (d) miR-34a is elevated in OSE cells from Pten;Kras;Amhr2-cre (tumor-bearing, T) mice and from Pten;Kras;Amhr2-cre mice (Pten) but not from Kras;Amhr2-cre mice (Kras). Conversely, the potential tumor-suppressor miR-31 is downregulated in the tumor OSE cells and Kras cells but not the Pten null cells, indicating differential regulation of these two pathways.

Discussion

These studies document that the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice develop low-grade serous-type adenocarcinomas with 100% penetrance and at an early age. Detailed analyses of purified OSE cells obtained from the mutant mice provide unequivocal evidence that the cells are transformed, grow in soft agar and form ectopic invasive tumors when injected into recipient mice. That the tumors of Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice are the first to recapitulate diagnostic aspects of the human low-grade serous subtype (Schwartz et al., 2002; Malpica et al., 2004) is supported by several observations. Comparisons of microarray databases show highly significant overlap in genes expressed in the mouse and human tumor cells. Importantly, the Kras/Pten mutant cells but not WT OSE cells express Wt1, Hoxa9, Hox10 and Pax8 genes that are characteristic markers of fallopian/Mullerian epithelia (Kurman and Shih, 2010). The expression of Hoxa9 is of particular interest because it is not only important for normal tissue development but is highly expressed in other cancer cell types, including leukemias (Wang et al., 2010) and astrocytomas (Costa et al., 2010) where it is thought to maintain the survival of progenitor cells and to be regulated by PI3K (Costa et al., 2010). Other genes that are upregulated in the mutant mouse OSE cells are similar to ones that are enhanced in human ovarian serous adenocarcinomas (Schwartz et al., 2002; Malpica et al., 2004; Santin et al., 2004; Kobel et al., 2008; Konstantinopoulos et al., 2008; Cho and Shih, 2009; Gorringe and Campbell, 2009; Despierre et al., 2010; Gava et al., 2008). These include Cldn3 and Msln that are increased preferentially in serous adenocarcinomas expressing Hoxa9 (Cheng et al., 2005). Thus, although recent evidence suggests that some ovarian cancers, especially high-grade serous adenocarcinomas, may be derived from mutant fallopian tube or endometrial epithelial cells that migrate to the ovarian surface (Crum et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2007; Dubeau, 2008; Karst and Drapkin, 2010; Kurman and Shih, 2010; Roh et al., 2010), our results and those of others (Orsulic et al., 2002; Connolly et al., 2003; Flesken-Nikitin et al., 2003; Dinulescu et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2007) document that mouse OSE cells can transform if exposed to specific oncogenic insults and that they may have some characteristics of multi-potent cells (Auersperg et al., 2008; Bowen et al., 2009).

Many microRNAs expressed in the mutant mouse OSE tumor cells are also present in human ovarian cancer. Of particular relevance are members of the Let-7 cluster (Roush and Slack, 2008) that regulate Kras, miR-21 (Krichevsky and Gabriety, 2009) that is regulated by Kras, miR-34a/c that are transcriptional targets of TRP53 and potent inhibitors of the cell growth and therefore appear to act as tumor suppressors (Hermeking, 2007; Ji et al., 2009), miR-29a (Kaplinas et al., 2009) that regulates Trp53 (Park et al., 2009), miR-125b that may target RAS (Rybak et al., 2008) and miR-214 that impacts the level of mRNA encoding the tumor-suppressor Pten (Yang et al., 2008). That these miRNAs have been detected in various human ovarian cancer samples underscores their potential regulatory roles in the initiation and/or maintenance of the transformed phenotype. That many miRNAs were highest in mutant OSE cells isolated from ovaries of mice at 5 weeks indicates that the molecular activities as well as the growth rate of the mutant OSE cells change with time and tumor growth.

The molecular basis of the different histological phenotypes of ovarian cancer subtypes remains puzzling. For example, the serous adenocarcinomas of the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice described herein (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b) differ in their histological architecture from the endometrioid-like OSE tumors in the mice reported by (Dinulescu et al., 2005). Although the same mutant Pten and KrasG12D mouse strains were used, the tumors in each model were generated by different approaches and in OSE cells at different stages of differentiation. In our model, OSE cells are transformed by endogenous Amhr-2Cre expressed directly in these cells in vivo and in mice before puberty; hence before increases in ovarian steroid production. Conversely, the Kras and Pten mutations in the Dinulescu model were generated by adenoviral Cre injections into the ovarian bursa of mice primed with gonadotropin (Dinulescu et al., 2005) and therefore have been exposed to steroids. As phenotypic outcome in each model appears to be highly reproducible, one plausible explanation for the distinct histological features is that the stage of OSE cell differentiation when they are exposed to the oncogenes determines the response.

Impressively, many genes selectively expressed in the Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mouse tumor cells as well as in serous and mucinous human tumors share a common ‘Kras signature’ observed in other cancer cell types (Figure 2), suggesting that activation of Kras pathway, by mutation or other mechanisms provide a mechanism that yields a common transformed outcome. Although a ‘Pten signature’ was not significant, selective activation of the PI3K pathway by loss of Pten in OSE cell of the Ptenfl/fl;Amhr2-Cre mice leads to specific and marked changes in mRNA and miRNA profiles in the OSE cells. Of note, Trp53, Cdkna1, Cldn3 and miR-34a are increased suggesting that components of the Trp53 pathway are key targets of the PI3K pathway. Conversely, Trp53, miR-34a and miR-31 are expressed but at lower levels in the tumor cells of Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice and OSE cells of KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice indicating that activation of the KRAS pathway alters the effects of the PI3K pathway.

Moreover, when inhibitors of the PI3K and RAS pathways were added in culture to OSE cells already transformed, they blocked mutant OSE cell growth in soft agar and selectively altered the expression of key marker genes, indicating that both pathways are critical to maintain the transformed phenotype. As the inhibition of PI3K was more effective than inhibition of MEK1/ERK1/2 on cell growth indicates that the PI3K pathway may be a more potent driver of proliferation, perhaps involving the regulatory effects of Hoxa9 and Meis1 (Costa et al., 2010). However, the observed potency of PI3K may also be related to the ability of PI3K to activate the RAS/MEK1/ERK1/2 pathway, thereby, stimulating both signaling cascades. Conversely, the lesser effects of U0126 indicate that blocking MEK1 and ERK1/2 disrupts only one arm of the RAS signaling cascade but will not block the effects of KRAS on PI3K or other pathways in these cells (Wee et al., 2009). Thus, the critical role of KRAS is underscored most impressively by the extensive number of human mutant Kras target genes (213) that are also expressed in the murine and human OSE tumors cells (Figure 2). Collectively, these results provide strong evidence that the Ptenfl/fl; KrasG12D; Amhr2-Cre mouse model is relevant to a subset of the human ovarian cancers and for determining the molecular events by which these two oncogenic pathways intersect to initiate transformation and also control the TRP53 pathway.

More aggressive ovarian cancer is associated with frequent mutations or deletions of TRP53 (Cho and Shih, 2009). Strikingly, the mutant OSE cells from the Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mice as well as in the Ptenfl/fl;Amhr2-Cre mice express increased levels of Trp53 mRNA and protein. As a potent tumor suppressor (Orsulic et al., 2002; Connolly et al., 2003; Flesken-Nikitin et al., 2003), TRP53 may exert negative regulatory effects in the mutant Ptenfl/fl;Amhr2-Cre and Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre cells to prevent more aggressive proliferation and metastatic activity (Astanehe et al., 2008). TRP53 appears to be active in the mutant cells because known targets are elevated selectively in the mutant OSE cells, including microRNAs, miR34a and miR34c, which have also been shown to exhibit tumor-suppressor activity, genes encoding regulators of cell proliferation such as p21CIP (Corney et al., 2007, 2010; Hermeking, 2007) and CCN3 that regulates cell adhesion (Bohlig et al., 2008). Thus, TRP53 and miR-34a in mouse and human low-grade adenocarcinomas may serve as an underlying negative molecular regulatory network that controls the low-grade tumorgenicity and perhaps cytotoxic resistance of these cells.

In summary, murine OSE cells respond to known oncogenic insults, Pten deletion and Kras activation (KrasG12D), and undergo transformation, leading to the formation of low-grade serous adenocarcinomas spontaneously in vivo. The mutant mouse OSE cells acquire morphological and biochemical characteristics of Mullerian-derived epithelial cells. Moreover, these ‘differentiated’ transformed cells express specific mRNA and miRNAs known to be expressed in human ovarian cancers indicating that this mouse model has relevance for understanding the specific effects of these two oncogenic factors in this cellular context and their interactions alone and together on the TRP53 pathway.

Materials and methods

Animal procedures

LSL-KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre, Ptenfl/fl;Amhr2-Cre; LSL-KrasG12D;Ptenfl/fl;Amhr2-Cre, mice were derived and genotyped as previously described (Fan et al., 2008; Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b). Trp53fl/fl;Amhr2-cre mice were derived from previously described Amhr2-Cre and Trp53fl/fl mice (obtained from the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium, MMHCC, NCI-Frederick, MD, USA) (Raimondi et al., 2009). Animals were housed under a 16-h light/8-h dark schedule in the Center for Comparative Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine and provided food and water ad libitum. Animals were treated in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, as approved by the Animal care and Use Committee at the Baylor College of Medicine.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Ovaries were collected and fixed in 4% parformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and processed by routine procedures for immunohistochemisrty (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b) of cytokeratin 8 (ab59 400 Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA).

Immunofluorescence

Ovaries were fixed in 4% parformaldehyde, embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (Sakura Finetek Inc., Torrence, CA, USA) and stored at −70 °C. In all, 7 μM sections were immunostained (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b) with antibodies against: cytokeratin 8 (as above), E-cadherin (24E10), Vimentin (R28) from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA) and TRP53 (p53) (Sc-6243) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Western blots

Whole cell extracts were prepared by lysing ovaries in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing protease inhibitors (Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA). Western blot analyses were performed using 30 μg of lysate protein for each sample. Cell extracts were prepared from cultured OSE cells by lysis 1 × sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer at 100F for 5 min and 35 μl of each sample analyzed by western blot using antibodies, AKT and phospho-AKT (9272, 4058L), and ERK and phospho-ERK (9102, 9101S) from Cell Signaling and TRP53 (p53) (Sc-6243) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.

Isolation and culture of primary OSE cells

Ovaries were harvested from mice of indicated ages and gently washed once with serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-F12 media. The OSE cells were released by mild-trypsin digestion (Flesken-Nikitin et al., 2003) with modifications. The ovaries from one to five mice were then placed in a 15 ml conical tube containing 5 ml of room temperature (20–24 °C) buffer (0.25% w/v trypsin—EDTA) (Gibco/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 30 min in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. After 30 min, the tube was gently tipped back and forth 10 times and the supernatant containing the OSE cells was transferred to a new tube and the cells collected by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 10 min. The cells from each tube were resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-F12 growth media (10% fetal bovine serum, 5% insulin–transferrin–selenium-A (Gibco/Invitrogen)) and 5% penicillin–streptomycin (Gibco/Invitrogen)) and plated in separate wells of a 24-well tissue culture plate. Fresh media was added every 2–3 days and the cells harvested when 90–100% confluent (7–10 days).

Inoculation of cells into mice

In all, 100 000 cultured OSE cells isolated from a 10-week Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-Cre mouse were grafted along with collagen under the renal capsule of WT mice with the same genetic background. 100 000 cells were also injected subcutaneously along with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. In addition, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 100 000 cells. Tumors were harvested and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde after 20 days.

Real-time reverse transcriptase–PCR for mRNAs, primary(pri)-miRNAs and mature miRNAs

Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and treated with DNase I (DNA-free, Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Complementary DNA was synthesized with a Taqman reverse transcriptase reagent kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) primed with random hexamers. Real-time PCR was performed using the Light Cycler DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche Applied Sciences, Nutley, NJ, USA). Primers (Supplementary Table S5) were used at a concentration of 0.5 μM and MgCl2 at 2.4 mM. Samples were denatured for 10 min at 95 °C and then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 20 s as previously (Fan et al., 2009a, 2009b). Data were normalized to L19 using the comparative Ct method. Data are presented as the mean±s.e.m of a representative of at least three experiments performed in triplicate.

Small RNAs required for detecting and measuring mature miRNAs were extracted using the mirVANA miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion Inc.,) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription was performed as described above. For quantification of mature miRNAs, the TaqMan MicroRNA assay kit (Applied Biosystems) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Microarray

Total RNA was prepared using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen from ovaries of control and Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-cre mice at 3 months of age when ovaries of the mutant mice contained a substantial amount of tumor. The quality of the RNA was verified in the MicroArray Core Facility at Baylor College of Medicine and hybridized in duplicate to Mouse 420.3 Affymetrix Chips using routine procedures (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Gene expression analysis

After scanning and low-level quantification using Microarray Suite (Affymetrix), DNA Chip (dChip) analyzer (www.dchip.org) was used to estimate expression values. Fold changes between control and Ptenfl/fl;KrasG12D;Amhr2-cre mice were estimated, using the ratio of expression values. Expression profiles of human cell lines were obtained from Glaxo (GlaxoSmithKline GSK, 2008) and expression profiles of human ovarian tumors and normal ovary were obtained from GEO (GSE6008). Two-sided t-tests using log-transformed data determined significant differences in mean gene mRNA levels between sample groups. The mapping of transcripts or genes between the mouse signature and the human tumor array data sets was made on the Entrez Gene identifier (using the human orthologs from the mouse data set); where multiple human array probe sets referenced the same gene, the probe set with the highest variation was used to represent the gene. One-sided Fisher's exact tests determined the significance of overlap between the mouse and human gene sets (using the 15 092 unique human gene orthologs represented on the mouse array as the population). Expression patterns were visualized as color maps using the JavaTree Software (Saldanha, 2004).

References

  1. Abdullah M, Schultz H, Kähler D, Branscheid D, Dalhoff K, Zabel P et al. (2009). Expression of the acute phase protein haptoglobin in human lung cancer and tumor-free lung tissues. Pathol Res Pract 205: 639–647.

  2. Astanehe A, Arenillas D, Wasserman WW, Leung PC, Dunn SE, Davies BR et al. (2008). Mechanisms underlying p53 regulation of PIK3CA transcription in ovarian surface epithelium and in ovarian cancer. J Cell Sci 121: 664–674.

  3. Auersperg N, Wong AST, Choi K-C, Kang SK, Leung PCK . (2001). Ovarian surface epithelium: biology, endocrinology and pathology. Endocrine Rev 22: 255–288.

  4. Auersperg N, Woo MMM, Gilks CB . (2008). The origin of ovarian carcinomas: a developmental view. Gynecol Oncol 110: 452–454.

  5. Bast RC, Hennessy B, Mills GB . (2009). The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 415–428.

  6. Bohlig L, Metzger R, Rother K, Till H, Engeland K . (2008). The CCN3 gene coding an extracellular adhesion-related protein is transcriptionally activated by the p53 tumor suppressor. Cell Cycle 7: 1254–1261.

  7. Bowen NJ, Walker LD, Matyunina L, Logani S, Totten KA, Benigno BB et al. (2009). Gene expression profiling supports the hypothesis that human ovarian surface epithelia are multipotent and capable of serving as ovarian cancer initiating cells. BMC Med Genomics 2: 71.

  8. Cheng W, Liu J, Yoshida H, Rosen D, Naora H . (2005). Lineage infidelity of epithelial ovarian cancer is control by HOX genes that specify regional identity in the reproductive tract. Nat Med 11: 531–537.

  9. Cho KR . (2009). Ovarian cancer update: lessons from morphology, molecules and mice. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133: 1775–1781.

  10. Cho KR, Shih I-M . (2009). Ovarian Cancer. Ann Rev Path 4: 287–313.

  11. Clark-Knowles KV, Senterman MK, Collins O, Vanderhyden BC . (2009). Conditional inactivation of Brca1, p53 and Rb in mouse ovaries results in the development of leiomyosarcomas. PLoS One 4: e8534.

  12. Connolly DC, Bao R, Nikitin Y, Stephens KC, Poole TW, Hua X et al. (2003). Female mice chimeric for expression of the Simian virus 40T Ag under the control of the MISRIIR promoter develop epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 63: 1389–1397.

  13. Corney DC, Flesken-Nikitin A, Godwin AK, Wang W, Nikitin AY . (2007). MicroRNA-34b and microRNA-34c are targets of p53 and cooperate in control of cell proliferation and adhesion-independent growth. Cancer Res 67: 8433–8438.

  14. Corney DC, Hwang C, Matoso A, Vogt M, Fleskin-Nikitin A, Godwin AK et al. (2010). Frequent downregulation of miR-34 family in human ovarian cancers. Clin Cancer Res 16: 1119–1128.

  15. Costa BM, Smith JS, Chen Y, Chen J, Phillips HS, Aldape KD et al. (2010). Reversing HOXO9 oncogene activation by PI3K inhibition: epigenetic mechanism and prognostic significance in human glioblastoma. Cancer Res 70: 453–462.

  16. Creighton CJ, Fountain MD, Yu Z, Nagaraja AK, Zhu H, Khan M et al. (2010). Molecular-profiling uncovers a p53-associated role for microRNA-31 in inhibiting the proliferation of serous ovarian carcinomas and other cancers. Cancer Res 70: 1906–1915.

  17. Crum CP, Drapkin R, Kindelberger D, Medeiros F, Miran A, Lee Y . (2007). Lessons from BRCA: the tubal fimbria emerges as an origin for pelvic serous cancer. Clin Med Res 5: 35–44.

  18. Dahlya N, Sherman-Baust CA, Wang T-L, Davidson B, Shih I-M, Zhang Y et al. (2008). MicroRNA expression and identification of putative miRNA targets in ovarian cancer. PLoS One 3: 1–11.

  19. Despierre E, Lambrechts D, Neven P, Amant F, Lambrechts S, Vergote L . (2010). The molecular genetic basis of ovarian cancer and its roadmap towards a better treatment. Gynecol Oncol 117: 358–365.

  20. Dinulescu DM, Ince TA, Quade BJ, Shafer SA, Crowley D, Jacks T . (2005). Role of K-ras and Pten in the development of mouse models of endometriosis and endometrioid ovarian cancer. Nat Med 11: 63–70.

  21. Dubeau L . (2008). The cell origin of ovarian epithelial tumours. Lancet Oncol 9: 1191–1197.

  22. Fan HY, Liu Z, Paquet M, Wang J, Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ et al. (2009a). Cell type specific targeted mutation of Kras and Pten document proliferation arrest in granulosa cells versus oncogenic insult in ovarian surface epithelial cells. Cancer Res 69: 6463–6472.

  23. Fan HY, Liu Z, Shimada M, Sterneck E, Johnson PF, Hedrick SM et al. (2009b). MAPK3/1 (ERK1/2) in ovarian granulosa cells are essential for female fertility. Science 324: 938–941.

  24. Fan HY, Shimada M, Liu Z, Cahill N, Noma N, Wu Y et al. (2008). Selective expression of KrasG12D in granulosa cells of the mouse ovary causes defects in follicular development and ovulation. Development 135: 2127–2137.

  25. Flesken-Nikitin A, Choi K-C, Eng JP, Shmidt N, Nikitin AY . (2003). Induction of carcinogenesis by concurrent inactivation of p53 and Rb1 in the mouse ovarian surface epithelium. Cancer Res 63: 3459–3463.

  26. Gava N, Clarke CL, Bye C, Byth K, deFazio A . (2008). Global gene expression profiles of ovarian surface epithelial cells in vivo. J Mol Endocrinol 40: 281–296.

  27. GlaxoSmithKline GSK (2008). Cancer cell line genomic profiling data. https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/tools/caArray.

  28. Gorringe KL, Campbell IG . (2009). Large-scale genomic analysis of ovarian carcinomas. Mol Oncol 3: 157–164.

  29. Hermeking H . (2007). p53 Enters the microRNA world. Cancer Cell 12: 414–418.

  30. Iorio MV, Visone R, Di Leva G, Donati V, Petrocca F, Casalini P et al. (2007). MicroRNA signatures in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 67: 8699–8707.

  31. Jamin SP, Arango NA, Mishina Y, Hanks MC, Behringer RR . (2002). Requirement of Bmpr1a for Mullerian duct regression during male sexual development. Nat Genet 32: 408–410.

  32. Ji Q, Hao X, Zhang M, Tang W, Meng Y, Li L et al. (2009). MicroRNA miR-34 inhibits human pancreatic cancer tumor-initiating cells. PLos One 4: 1–13.

  33. Kaplinas K, Kessler CB, Delany AM . (2009). miR-29 suppression of osteonectin in osteoblasts: regulation during differentiation by canonical Wnt signaling. J Cell Biochem 108: 216–224.

  34. Karst AM, Drapkin R . (2010). Ovarian cancer pathogenesis: a model in evolution. J Oncol 2010: 932371.

  35. Kindelberger DW, Lee Y, Miron A, Hirsch MS, Feltmate C, Medeiros F et al. (2007). Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous adenocarcinoma: evidence for a causal relationship. Am J Surg Pathol 31: 161–169.

  36. Ko SY, Lengyel E, Naora H . (2010). The Mullerian HOXA10 gene promotes growth of ovarian surface epithelial cells by stimulating epithelial-stroma interactions. Mol Cell Endocrinol 317: 112–119.

  37. Kobel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, McKinney S, Mehl E, Palmer C et al. (2008). Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med 5: 1749–1760.

  38. Konstantinopoulos PA, Sppentzos D, Cannistra SA . (2008). Gene-expression profiling in epithelial ovarian cancer. Nat Clin Pract 5: 577–587.

  39. Krichevsky AM, Gabriety G . (2009). miRNA-21: a small multi-faceted RNA. J Cell Mol Med 13: 39–53.

  40. Kurman RJ, Shih I-M . (2010). The origin and pathogeneis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol 34: 433–443.

  41. Lague MN, Paquet M, Fan HY, Kaartinene MJ, Chu S, Jamin SP et al. (2008). Synergistic effects of Pten loss and WNT/CTNNB1 signaling pathway activation in granulosa cell tumor development and progression. Carcinogenesis 29: 2062 .

  42. Lee JM, Dedhar S, Kalluri R, Thompson EW . (2006). The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: new insights in signaling, development and disease. J Cell Biol 172: 973–981.

  43. Lee Y, Miron A, Drapkin R, Nucci MR, Medeiros F, Saleemuddin A et al. (2007). A candidate precursor to serous carcinoma that originates in the distal fallopian tube. J Pathol 211: 26–35.

  44. Liang S, Yang N, Pan Y, Deng S, Lin X, Yang X et al. (2009). Expression of activated PIK3CA in ovarian surface epithelium results in hyperplasia but not tumor formation. PLoS One 4: e4295.

  45. Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K, Bodurka DC, Atkinson EN, Gershenson DM et al. (2004). Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol 28: 496–504.

  46. Miller KA, Yeager N, Baker K, Liao X-H, Referoff S, De Cristofano A . (2009). Oncogenic Kras requires simultaneous PI3K signaling to induce ERK activation and transform thyroid epithelial cells in vivo. Cancer Res 69: 3689–3694.

  47. Nam EJ, Yoon H, Kim SW, Kim H, Kim YT, Kim JH et al. (2008). MicroRNA expression profiles in serous ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 14: 2690–2695.

  48. Orsulic S, Li Y, Soslow RA, Vitale-Cross LA, Gutkind JS, Varmus HE . (2002). Induction of ovarian cancer by defined multiple genetic changes in a mouse model system. Cancer Cell 1: 53–62.

  49. Page CL, Ouellet V, Madore J, Ren F, Hudson TJ, Tonin PN et al. (2006). Gene expression profiling of primary cultures of ovarian epithelial cell identifies novel molecular classifiers of ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 94: 436–445.

  50. Park SY, Lee JH, Nam JW, Kim VN . (2009). miR-29 miRNAs activate p53 by targeting p85 alpha and CDC42. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 23–29.

  51. Raimondi AR, Molinolo A, Gutkind JS . (2009). Rapamycin prevents early onset of tumorigenesis inan oral-specific K-ras and p53 two-hit carcinogenesis model. Cancer Res 69: 4159–4166.

  52. Roh MH, Yassin Y, Miron A, Mehra KK, Mehrad M, Monte NM et al. (2010). High-grade fimbrial-ovarian carcinomas are unified by altered p53, PTEN and PAX2 expression. Mod Pathol 23: 1316–1324.

  53. Roush S, Slack FJ . (2008). The let-7 family of microRNAs. Trends Cell Biol 18: 505–516.

  54. Rybak A, Fuchs H, Smirnova L, Brandt C, Pohl EE, Pohl EE et al. (2008). A feedback loop comprising lin-28 and let-7 controls pre-let-7 maturation during neural stem cell commitment. Nat Cell Biol 10: 987–993.

  55. Saldanha AJ . (2004). Janva Treeview --extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20: 3246–3248.

  56. Santin AD, Zhan F, Bellone S, Palmieri M, Cane S, Bignotti E et al. (2004). Gene expression profiles in primary ovarian serous papillary tumors and normal ovarian epithelium: identification of candidate molecular markers for ovarian cancer diagnosis and therapy. Int J Cancer 112: 14–25.

  57. Schwartz DR, Kardia SL, Shedden KA, Kuick R, Michailidis G, Taylor JM et al. (2002). Gene expression in ovarian cancer reflects both morphology and biological behavior, distinguishing clear cell from other poor-prognosis ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res 62: 4722–4729.

  58. Stafani G, Slack FJ . (2008). Small non-coding RNAs in animal development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 219–230.

  59. Wang D, DuBois RN . (2010). Eicosanoids and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 10: 181–193.

  60. Wang Y, Krivtsov AV, Sinha AU, North TE, Goessling W, Feng Z et al. (2010). The Wnt/b-catenin pathway is required for the development of leukemia stem cells in AML. Science 327: 1650–1653.

  61. Wee S, Jagani Z, Xiang XX, Loo A, Dorsch M, Yao Y-M et al. (2009). PI3K pathway activation mediates resistance to MEK inhibitors in KRAS mutant cancers. Cancer Res 69: 4286–4293.

  62. Wong KK, Lu KH, Malpica A, Bodurka DC, Shvartsman HS, Schmandt RE et al. (2007). Significantly greater expression of ER, PR, and ECAD in advanced-stage low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma as revealed by immunohistochemical analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol 26: 404–409.

  63. Wu R, Hendrix-Lucas N, Kiuck R, zhai Y, Schwartz DR, Akyol A et al. (2007). Mouse model of human ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on somatic defects in the Wnt/b-catenin and PI3K/Pten pathways. Cancer Cell 11: 321–333.

  64. Wyman SK, Parkin RK, Mitchell PS, Fritz BR, O'Briant K, Godwin AK et al. (2009). Repertoire of microRNAs in epithelial ovarian cancer as determined by next generation sequencing of small RNA cDNA libraries. PLoS One 4: e5311.

  65. Xing D, Scangas G, Nitta M, He L, Xu X, Ioffe YJM et al. (2009). A role for BRCA1 in uterine leiomyosarcoma. Cancer Res 69: 8231–8235.

  66. Yang H, Kong W, He L, Zhao J-J, O'Donnell JD, Wang J et al. (2008). MicroRNA expression profiling in human ovarian cancer: miR-214 induces cell survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting PTEN. Cancer Res 68: 425–433.

  67. Zhang CC, Kaba M, Ge G, Tong W, Hug C, Lodish HF . (2006). Angiopoietin-like proteins stimulate ex vivo expansion of hemapoitetic stem cells. Nat Med 12: 240–245.

  68. Zhao Z, Zuber J, Diaz-Flores E, Lintault L, Kogan SC, Shannon K et al. (2010). p53 loss promotes acute myeloid leukemia by enabling aberrant self-renewal. Genes Dev 24: 1389–1402.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We Alan J Herron DVM, Professor and Head of the Comparative Pathology Laboratory for his advice and insights into the mouse ovarian tumor phenotype, Yuet Lo and Azam Zariff for technical assistance and the Microscopy Core at Baylor College of Medicine for their expertise. We also thank the Immunohistochemistry Laboratory at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for performing the calretinin and ESR1 immunostaining. Supported in part by NIH-HD-16229 (JSR), NRSA (LM), a Program Project Development Grant from the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund (CJC, PG, MA) and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Ovarian Cancer (P50 CA08369) (KKW).

Author information

Correspondence to J S Richards.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Oncogene website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullany, L., Fan, H., Liu, Z. et al. Molecular and functional characteristics of ovarian surface epithelial cells transformed by KrasG12D and loss of Pten in a mouse model in vivo. Oncogene 30, 3522–3536 (2011) doi:10.1038/onc.2011.70

Download citation

Keywords

  • Kras
  • Pten
  • Trp53
  • ovarian cancer
  • serous

Further reading