Sfeir, A. & Symington, L.S. Microhomology-mediated end joining: a back-up survival mechanism or dedicated pathway? Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 701–714 (2015).
Boulton, S.J. & Jackson, S.P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways. EMBO J. 15, 5093–5103 (1996).
Truong, L.N. et al. Microhomology-mediated end joining and homologous recombination share the initial end resection step to repair DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7720–7725 (2013).
Thyme, S.B. & Schier, A.F. Polq-mediated end joining is essential for surviving DNA double-strand breaks during early zebrafish development. Cell Rep. (2016).
Mateos-Gomez, P.A. et al. Mammalian polymerase θ promotes alternative NHEJ and suppresses recombination. Nature 518, 254–257 (2015).
Ceccaldi, R. et al. Homologous-recombination-deficient tumours are dependent on Polθ-mediated repair. Nature 518, 258–262 (2015).
Wyatt, D.W. et al. Essential roles for polymerase θ-mediated end joining in the repair of chromosome breaks. Mol. Cell 63, 662–673 (2016).
Wood, R.D. & Doublié, S. DNA polymerase θ (POLQ), double-strand break repair, and cancer. DNA Repair (Amst.) 44, 22–32 (2016).
Harris, P.V. et al. Molecular cloning of Drosophila mus308, a gene involved in DNA cross-link repair with homology to prokaryotic DNA polymerase I genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5764–5771 (1996).
Chan, S.H., Yu, A.M. & McVey, M. Dual roles for DNA polymerase theta in alternative end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001005 (2010).
van Kregten, M. et al. T-DNA integration in plants results from polymerase-θ-mediated DNA repair. Nat. Plants 2, 16164 (2016).
Koole, W. et al. A polymerase theta-dependent repair pathway suppresses extensive genomic instability at endogenous G4 DNA sites. Nat. Commun. 5, 3216 (2014).
Yousefzadeh, M.J. et al. Mechanism of suppression of chromosomal instability by DNA polymerase POLQ. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004654 (2014).
Kent, T. et al., Mechanism of microhomology-mediated end-joining promoted by human DNA polymerase θ. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 230–237 (2015).
Higgins, G.S. et al. A small interfering RNA screen of genes involved in DNA repair identifies tumor-specific radiosensitization by POLQ knockdown. Cancer Res. 70, 2984–2993 (2010).
Zelensky, A.N., Schimmel, J., Kool, H., Kanaar, R. & Tijsterman, M. Inactivation of Pol θ and C-NHEJ eliminates off-target integration of exogenous DNA. Nat. Commun. 8, 66 (2017).
Saito, S., Maeda, R. & Adachi, N. Dual loss of human POLQ and LIG4 abolishes random integration. Nat. Commun. 8, 16112 (2017).
Black, S.J., Kashkina, E., Kent, T. & Pomerantz, R.T. DNA polymerase θ: a unique multifunctional end-joining machine. Genes (Basel) 7, E67 (2016).
Kent, T. et al. DNA polymerase θ specializes in incorporating synthetic expanded-size (xDNA) nucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 9381–9392 (2016).
Zahn, K.E., Averill, A.M., Aller, P., Wood, R.D. & Doublié, S. Human DNA polymerase θ grasps the primer terminus to mediate DNA repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 304–311 (2015).
Hogg, M., Sauer-Eriksson, A.E. & Johansson, E. Promiscuous DNA synthesis by human DNA polymerase θ. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 2611–2622 (2012).
Seki, M., Marini, F. & Wood, R.D. POLQ (Pol theta), a DNA polymerase and DNA-dependent ATPase in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6117–6126 (2003).
Newman, J.A., Cooper, C.D., Aitkenhead, H. & Gileadi, O. Structure of the helicase domain of DNA polymerase theta reveals a possible role in the microhomology-mediated end-joining pathway. Structure 23, 2319–2330 (2015).
Beagan, K. et al. Drosophila DNA polymerase theta utilizes both helicase-like and polymerase domains during microhomology-mediated end joining and interstrand crosslink repair. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006813 (2017).
Xie, A., Kwok, A. & Scully, R. Role of mammalian Mre11 in classical and alternative nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 814–818 (2009).
Rass, E. et al. Role of Mre11 in chromosomal nonhomologous end joining in mammalian cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 819–824 (2009).
Villarreal, D.D. et al. Microhomology directs diverse DNA break repair pathways and chromosomal translocations. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003026 (2012).
Decottignies, A. Microhomology-mediated end joining in fission yeast is repressed by pku70 and relies on genes involved in homologous recombination. Genetics 176, 1403–1415 (2007).
Daley, J.M. & Wilson, T.E. Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks as a function of overhang length. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 896–906 (2005).
Deng, S.K., Gibb, B., de Almeida, M.J., Greene, E.C. & Symington, L.S. RPA antagonizes microhomology-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 405–412 (2014).
Simsek, D. & Jasin, M. Alternative end-joining is suppressed by the canonical NHEJ component Xrcc4-ligase IV during chromosomal translocation formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 410–416 (2010).
Shima, N., Munroe, R.J. & Schimenti, J.C. The mouse genomic instability mutation chaos1 is an allele of Polq that exhibits genetic interaction with Atm. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 10381–10389 (2004).
Lemée, F. et al. DNA polymerase theta up-regulation is associated with poor survival in breast cancer, perturbs DNA replication, and promotes genetic instability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 13390–13395 (2010).
Prasad, R. et al. Human DNA polymerase theta possesses 5′-dRP lyase activity and functions in single-nucleotide base excision repair in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1868–1877 (2009).
Simsek, D. et al. DNA ligase III promotes alternative nonhomologous end-joining during chromosomal translocation formation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002080 (2011).
Bothmer, A. et al. Characterization of the interplay between DNA repair and CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA lesions at an endogenous locus. Nat. Commun. 8, 13905 (2017).
Yusufzai, T. & Kadonaga, J.T. HARP is an ATP-driven annealing helicase. Science 322, 748–750 (2008).
Audry, J. et al. RPA prevents G-rich structure formation at lagging-strand telomeres to allow maintenance of chromosome ends. EMBO J. 34, 1942–1958 (2015).
Sugiyama, T., New, J.H. & Kowalczykowski, S.C. DNA annealing by RAD52 protein is stimulated by specific interaction with the complex of replication protein A and single-stranded DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6049–6054 (1998).
Bailey, S.M., Goodwin, E.H. & Cornforth, M.N. Strand-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization: the CO-FISH family. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 107, 14–17 (2004).
Sfeir, A. & de Lange, T. Removal of shelterin reveals the telomere end-protection problem. Science 336, 593–597 (2012).
Tang, J. et al. Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 317–325 (2013).
Doksani, Y. & de Lange, T. Telomere-internal double-strand breaks are repaired by homologous recombination and PARP1/Lig3-dependent end-joining. Cell Reports 17, 1646–1656 (2016).
Lee-Theilen, M., Matthews, A.J., Kelly, D., Zheng, S. & Chaudhuri, J. CtIP promotes microhomology-mediated alternative end joining during class-switch recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 75–79 (2011).
Symington, L.S. & Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 247–271 (2011).
Cejka, P. et al. DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 467, 112–116 (2010).
Niu, H. et al. Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467, 108–111 (2010).
Chen, H., Lisby, M. & Symington, L.S. RPA coordinates DNA end resection and prevents formation of DNA hairpins. Mol. Cell 50, 589–600 (2013).
Audebert, M., Salles, B. & Calsou, P. Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA ligase III in an alternative route for DNA double-strand breaks rejoining. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 55117–55126 (2004).
Adelman, C.A. et al. HELQ promotes RAD51 paralogue-dependent repair to avert germ cell loss and tumorigenesis. Nature 502, 381–384 (2013).
Richards, J.D. et al. Structure of the DNA repair helicase hel308 reveals DNA binding and autoinhibitory domains. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5118–5126 (2008).
Maga, G. et al. Human DNA polymerase lambda functionally and physically interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen in normal and translesion DNA synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 48434–48440 (2002).
Yusufzai, T., Kong, X., Yokomori, K. & Kadonaga, J.T. The annealing helicase HARP is recruited to DNA repair sites via an interaction with RPA. Genes Dev. 23, 2400–2404 (2009).
Driscoll, R. & Cimprich, K.A. HARPing on about the DNA damage response during replication. Genes Dev. 23, 2359–2365 (2009).
Goullet de Rugy, T. et al. Excess Polθ functions in response to replicative stress in homologous recombination-proficient cancer cells. Biol. Open 5, 1485–1492 (2016).
Kawamura, K. et al. DNA polymerase theta is preferentially expressed in lymphoid tissues and upregulated in human cancers. Int. J. Cancer 109, 9–16 (2004).
Robertson, E., Bradley, A., Kuehn, M. & Evans, M. Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector. Nature 323, 445–448 (1986).
Cho, N.W., Dilley, R.L., Lampson, M.A. & Greenberg, R.A. Interchromosomal homology searches drive directional ALT telomere movement and synapsis. Cell 159, 108–121 (2014).
Kent, T., Chandramouly, G., McDevitt, S.M., Ozdemir, A.Y. & Pomerantz, R.T. Mechanism of microhomology-mediated end-joining promoted by human DNA polymerase θ. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 230–237 (2015).