Reconstitution of the 26S proteasome reveals functional asymmetries in its AAA+ unfoldase

Abstract

The 26S proteasome is the major eukaryotic ATP-dependent protease, yet the detailed mechanisms used by the proteasomal heterohexameric AAA+ unfoldase to drive substrate degradation remain poorly understood. To perform systematic mutational analyses of individual ATPase subunits, we heterologously expressed the unfoldase subcomplex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Escherichia coli and reconstituted the proteasome in vitro. Our studies demonstrate that the six ATPases have distinct roles in degradation, corresponding to their positions in the spiral staircases adopted by the AAA+ domains in the absence or presence of substrate. ATP hydrolysis in subunits at the top of the staircases is critical for substrate engagement and translocation. Whereas the unfoldase relies on this vertical asymmetry for substrate processing, interaction with the peptidase exhibits three-fold symmetry with contributions from alternate subunits. These diverse functional asymmetries highlight how the 26S proteasome deviates from simpler, homomeric AAA+ proteases.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Expression of yeast base subcomplexes in E. coli and reconstitution of the 26S proteasome.
Figure 2: Proteasomes reconstituted with endogenous or heterologously expressed base exhibit similar degradation activities for a polyubiquitinated substrate.
Figure 3: Degradation activities for base variants with a Walker-B E→Q mutation in individual Rpt subunits correlate with the subunit's position in the spiral staircase arrangement of the base.
Figure 4: Degradation activities for base variants containing single-subunit pore-loop mutations.
Figure 5: Rpt C-terminal tails contribute to gate opening differentially and in a nucleotide-independent manner.
Figure 6: Affinities of core-peptidase binding for base variants lacking individual C-terminal tails.
Figure 7: Model for the contribution of individual ATPase subunits to substrate processing and core particle interaction.

References

  1. 1

    Finley, D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 477–513 (2009).

  2. 2

    Hochstrasser, M. Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30, 405–439 (1996).

  3. 3

    Groll, M. et al. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 1062–1067 (2000).

  4. 4

    Liu, C.W. et al. ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis play distinct roles in the function of 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell 24, 39–50 (2006).

  5. 5

    Thrower, J.S., Hoffman, L., Rechsteiner, M. & Pickart, C.M. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J. 19, 94–102 (2000).

  6. 6

    Glickman, M.H. et al. A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell 94, 615–623 (1998).

  7. 7

    Smith, D.M. et al. Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's α ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol. Cell 27, 731–744 (2007).

  8. 8

    Tomko, R.J. Jr. & Hochstrasser, M. Order of the proteasomal ATPases and eukaryotic proteasome assembly. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 60, 13–20 (2011).

  9. 9

    Lander, G.C. et al. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482, 186–191 (2012).

  10. 10

    Beck, F. et al. Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14870–14875 (2012).

  11. 11

    Hamazaki, J. et al. A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes. EMBO J. 25, 4524–4536 (2006).

  12. 12

    Yao, T. & Cohen, R.E. A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature 419, 403–407 (2002).

  13. 13

    Verma, R. et al. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298, 611–615 (2002).

  14. 14

    Sakata, E. et al. Localization of the proteasomal ubiquitin receptors Rpn10 and Rpn13 by electron cryomicroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1479–1484 (2012).

  15. 15

    Martin, A., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Rebuilt AAA+ motors reveal operating principles for ATP-fuelled machines. Nature 437, 1115–1120 (2005).

  16. 16

    Rabl, J. et al. Mechanism of gate opening in the 20S proteasome by the proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell 30, 360–368 (2008).

  17. 17

    Kim, Y.C. & DeMartino, G.N. C termini of proteasomal ATPases play nonequivalent roles in cellular assembly of mammalian 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 26652–26666 (2011).

  18. 18

    Gillette, T.G., Kumar, B., Thompson, D., Slaughter, C.A. & DeMartino, G.N. Differential roles of the COOH termini of AAA subunits of PA700 (19 S regulator) in asymmetric assembly and activation of the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 31813–31822 (2008).

  19. 19

    Sledź, P. et al. Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7264–7269 (2013).

  20. 20

    Matyskiela, M.E., Lander, G.C. & Martin, A. Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 781–788 (2013).

  21. 21

    Rubin, D.M., Glickman, M.H., Larsen, C.N., Dhruvakumar, S. & Finley, D. Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome. EMBO J. 17, 4909–4919 (1998).

  22. 22

    Erales, J., Hoyt, M.A., Troll, F. & Coffino, P. Functional asymmetries of proteasome translocase pore. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 18535–18543 (2012).

  23. 23

    Kim, Y.C., Li, X., Thompson, D. & Demartino, G.N. ATP binding by proteasomal ATPases regulates cellular assembly and substrate-induced functions of the 26S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 3334–3345 (2013).

  24. 24

    Lee, S.H., Moon, J.H., Yoon, S.K. & Yoon, J.B. Stable incorporation of ATPase subunits into 19 S regulatory particle of human proteasome requires nucleotide binding and C-terminal tails. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 9269–9279 (2012).

  25. 25

    Köhler, A. et al. The axial channel of the proteasome core particle is gated by the Rpt2 ATPase and controls both substrate entry and product release. Mol. Cell 7, 1143–1152 (2001).

  26. 26

    Park, S. et al. Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C termini. Nature 459, 866–870 (2009).

  27. 27

    Kumar, B., Kim, Y.C. & DeMartino, G.N. The C terminus of Rpt3, an ATPase subunit of PA700 (19 S) regulatory complex, is essential for 26 S proteasome assembly but not for activation. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 39523–39535 (2010).

  28. 28

    Thompson, D., Hakala, K. & DeMartino, G.N. Subcomplexes of PA700, the 19 S regulator of the 26 S proteasome, reveal relative roles of AAA subunits in 26 S proteasome assembly and activation and ATPase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 24891–24903 (2009).

  29. 29

    Funakoshi, M., Tomko, R.J. Jr., Kobayashi, H. & Hochstrasser, M. Multiple assembly chaperones govern biogenesis of the proteasome regulatory particle base. Cell 137, 887–899 (2009).

  30. 30

    Roelofs, J. et al. Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly. Nature 459, 861–865 (2009).

  31. 31

    Saeki, Y., Toh, E.A., Kudo, T., Kawamura, H. & Tanaka, K. Multiple proteasome-interacting proteins assist the assembly of the yeast 19S regulatory particle. Cell 137, 900–913 (2009).

  32. 32

    Kaneko, T. et al. Assembly pathway of the mammalian proteasome base subcomplex is mediated by multiple specific chaperones. Cell 137, 914–925 (2009).

  33. 33

    Park, S. et al. Reconfiguration of the proteasome during chaperone-mediated assembly. Nature 497, 512–516 (2013).

  34. 34

    Smith, D.M. et al. ATP binding to PAN or the 26S ATPases causes association with the 20S proteasome, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded proteins. Mol. Cell 20, 687–698 (2005).

  35. 35

    Verma, R., Oania, R., Graumann, J. & Deshaies, R.J. Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell 118, 99–110 (2004).

  36. 36

    Hersch, G.L., Burton, R.E., Bolon, D.N., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Asymmetric interactions of ATP with the AAA+ ClpX6 unfoldase: allosteric control of a protein machine. Cell 121, 1017–1027 (2005).

  37. 37

    Weibezahn, J., Bukau, B. & Mogk, A. Unscrambling an egg: protein disaggregation by AAA+ proteins. Microb. Cell Fact. 3, 1 (2004).

  38. 38

    Gómez, E.B., Catlett, M.G. & Forsburg, S.L. Different phenotypes in vivo are associated with ATPase motif mutations in Schizosaccharomyces pombe minichromosome maintenance proteins. Genetics 160, 1305–1318 (2002).

  39. 39

    Wang, J. et al. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase–ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure 9, 177–184 (2001).

  40. 40

    Martin, A., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine grip substrates to drive translocation and unfolding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1147–1151 (2008).

  41. 41

    Martin, A., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Diverse pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine mediate unassisted and adaptor-dependent recognition of ssrA-tagged substrates. Mol. Cell 29, 441–450 (2008).

  42. 42

    Yamada-Inagawa, T., Okuno, T., Karata, K., Yamanaka, K. & Ogura, T. Conserved pore residues in the AAA protease FtsH are important for proteolysis and its coupling to ATP hydrolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 50182–50187 (2003).

  43. 43

    Aubin-Tam, M.E., Olivares, A.O., Sauer, R.T., Baker, T.A. & Lang, M.J. Single-molecule protein unfolding and translocation by an ATP-fueled proteolytic machine. Cell 145, 257–267 (2011).

  44. 44

    Maillard, R.A. et al. ClpX(P) generates mechanical force to unfold and translocate its protein substrates. Cell 145, 459–469 (2011).

  45. 45

    Park, E. et al. Role of the GYVG pore motif of HslU ATPase in protein unfolding and translocation for degradation by HslV peptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 22892–22898 (2005).

  46. 46

    Hinnerwisch, J., Fenton, W.A., Furtak, K.J., Farr, G.W. & Horwich, A.L. Loops in the central channel of ClpA chaperone mediate protein binding, unfolding, and translocation. Cell 121, 1029–1041 (2005).

  47. 47

    Glynn, S.E., Martin, A., Nager, A.R., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Structures of asymmetric ClpX hexamers reveal nucleotide-dependent motions in a AAA+ protein-unfolding machine. Cell 139, 744–756 (2009).

  48. 48

    Glynn, S.E., Nager, A.R., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Dynamic and static components power unfolding in topologically closed rings of a AAA+ proteolytic machine. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 616–622 (2012).

  49. 49

    Martin, A., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Distinct static and dynamic interactions control ATPase-peptidase communication in a AAA+ protease. Mol. Cell 27, 41–52 (2007).

  50. 50

    Barthelme, D. & Sauer, R.T. Bipartite determinants mediate an evolutionarily conserved interaction between Cdc48 and the 20S peptidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3327–3332 (2013).

  51. 51

    Tian, G. et al. An asymmetric interface between the regulatory and core particles of the proteasome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1259–1267 (2011).

  52. 52

    Smith, D.M., Fraga, H., Reis, C., Kafri, G. & Goldberg, A.L. ATP binds to proteasomal ATPases in pairs with distinct functional effects, implying an ordered reaction cycle. Cell 144, 526–538 (2011).

  53. 53

    Li, X. & Demartino, G.N. Variably modulated gating of the 26S proteasome by ATP and polyubiquitin. Biochem. J. 421, 397–404 (2009).

  54. 54

    Seong, I.S. et al. The C-terminal tails of HslU ATPase act as a molecular switch for activation of HslV peptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 25976–25982 (2002).

  55. 55

    Kim, D.Y. & Kim, K.K. Crystal structure of ClpX molecular chaperone from Helicobacter pylori. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 50664–50670 (2003).

  56. 56

    Guo, F., Maurizi, M.R., Esser, L. & Xia, D. Crystal structure of ClpA, an Hsp100 chaperone and regulator of ClpAP protease. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 46743–46752 (2002).

  57. 57

    Singleton, M.R., Sawaya, M.R., Ellenberger, T. & Wigley, D.B. Crystal structure of T7 gene 4 ring helicase indicates a mechanism for sequential hydrolysis of nucleotides. Cell 101, 589–600 (2000).

  58. 58

    Thomsen, N.D. & Berger, J.M. Running in reverse: the structural basis for translocation polarity in hexameric helicases. Cell 139, 523–534 (2009).

  59. 59

    Enemark, E.J. & Joshua-Tor, L. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature 442, 270–275 (2006).

  60. 60

    Costa, A. et al. The structural basis for MCM2–7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 471–477 (2011).

  61. 61

    Leggett, D.S., Glickman, M.H. & Finley, D. Purification of proteasomes, proteasome subcomplexes, and proteasome-associated proteins from budding yeast. Methods Mol. Biol. 301, 57–70 (2005).

  62. 62

    Saeki, Y., Isono, E. & Toh-E, A. Preparation of ubiquitinated substrates by the PY motif-insertion method for monitoring 26S proteasome activity. Methods Enzymol. 399, 215–227 (2005).

  63. 63

    Verma, R. et al. Proteasomal proteomics: identification of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affinity-purified proteasomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3425–3439 (2000).

  64. 64

    Glickman, M.H., Rubin, D.M., Fried, V.A. & Finley, D. The regulatory particle of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 3149–3162 (1998).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the Martin lab for helpful discussions. E.J.W. acknowledges support from a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. This research was funded in part by the Searle Scholars Program (A.M.), US National Institutes of Health grant R01-GM094497-01A1 (A.M.) and start-up funds from the Molecular and Cell Biology Department at University of California, Berkeley (A.M.).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.B., E.E., E.J.W. and A.M. designed experiments, expressed and purified proteasome constructs, performed biochemical experiments and analyzed data. R.B. and A.M. prepared the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Martin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Supplementary Note (PDF 4742 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Source data for Table 1 (XLSX 58 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckwith, R., Estrin, E., Worden, E. et al. Reconstitution of the 26S proteasome reveals functional asymmetries in its AAA+ unfoldase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20, 1164–1172 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2659

Download citation

Further reading